Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

On May 16, 2018 at 18:18 o...@delong.com (Owen DeLong) wrote: > At this point if I were a registrar or registry doing business in such a way > as to be subject to gdpr, I’d seriously consider spinning up a subsidiary > only for that purpose and leave it with minimal revenues and nothing to

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

At this point if I were a registrar or registry doing business in such a way as to be subject to gdpr, I’d seriously consider spinning up a subsidiary only for that purpose and leave it with minimal revenues and nothing to collect in the event of a lawsuit. Either that or simply stop doing

Re: Email security: PGP/GPG & S/MIME vulnerability drop imminent

On 05/15/2018 04:34 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:47:50PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >> TL;DR = Don't use HTML email [snip] > > That's enough right there. HTML markup in email is used exclusively > by three kinds of people: (1) ignorant newbies who don't know

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

On May 16, 2018 at 16:10 muren...@gmail.com (Constantine A. Murenin) wrote: > I think this is the worst of both worlds. The data is basically still > public, but you cannot access it unless someone marks you as a > "friend". > > This policy is basically what Facebook is. And how well it

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

While we are on ECMP topic... In L3VPN, when I've learned say, 3 different routes all using different MPLS tags to the 3 remote PE's, is there a way to ECMP hash across all of the paths to load balance? Aaron > On May 16, 2018, at 6:32 PM, Thomas Bellman wrote: > >> On

Re: internet - sparkle

I assumed your AS number is 16527 and looked up who you currently are peering with. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Aaron Gould wrote: > Thanks. > > What's an eyeball network ? > > How do you know my "current mix is decent" ? > > Btw, I have onsite the cdn's aanp, ggc, oca,

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

On 2018-05-16 15:22, Adam Kajtar wrote: > I wasn't using per-packet load balancing. I believe juniper default is per > IP. The Juniper default is to not do ECMP at all. Only a single route is programmed into the FIB for each prefix in your RIB. If you e.g. have routes to 198.51.100.0/24

Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok

As others have noted, there can be implementation specific issues that you can't necessarily predict but most typically when I hear "odd vs even" discussions, usually the caveat is not a trunk but a redundant connection. Putting three links on router A and two links on router B obviously doesn't

Re: Curiosity about AS3356 L3/CenturyLink network resiliency (in general)

On 16/May/18 18:59, David Hubbard wrote: > I’m curious if anyone who’s used 3356 for transit has found shortcomings in > how their peering and redundancy is configured, or what a normal expectation > to have is. The Tampa Bay market has been completely down for 3356 IP > services twice so

Re: internet - sparkle

Agree with this  Traffic engineering is non existent making it a pain to move your traffic besides not advertising the prefix to them Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2018, at 12:33 PM, Ca By wrote: > >> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:14 AM Michael Crapse

Re: internet - sparkle

--- aar...@gvtc.com wrote: From: Aaron Gould What's an eyeball network ? --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyeball_network scott

Re: internet - sparkle

Thanks. What's an eyeball network ? How do you know my "current mix is decent" ? Btw, I have onsite the cdn's aanp, ggc, oca, fna, so only about ~60% of my customer traffic is from Internet uplinks... ~40% is served from local cdn's Aaron > On May 16, 2018, at 2:31 PM, Jared Geiger

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

I think this is the worst of both worlds. The data is basically still public, but you cannot access it unless someone marks you as a "friend". This policy is basically what Facebook is. And how well it played out once folks realised that their shared data wasn't actually private? C. On 16 May

Whois vs GDPR, latest news

A draft of the new ICANN Whois policy was published a few days ago. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-gtld-registration-data-temp-specs-14may18-en.pdf >From that document: "This Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data (Temporary Specification) establishes temporary

Re: internet - sparkle

Hello, Also Sparkle (AS6762) has a significant footprint in South America, I'd say even bigger than Level 3 because they have mobile telco and broadband ISP in Brazil. I wouldn't worry much with latency in NA because at least in South America they do hot potato (as everyone does) and all their

Re: internet - sparkle

If most of your traffic is for US based destinations, you might see worse performance since Sparkle doesn't seem to have many US POPs/Peering locations compared to Centurylink/Level3 or HE. You'd probably benefit more by pulling in some peering from Dallas than adding or replacing a transit

Re: internet - sparkle

On 16/May/18 16:54, Aaron Gould wrote: > .written in 12/2015 - do y'all think this is accurate, and, in 2018, is it > still accurate ? (asking since my next question is related to Sparkle, since > they are listed in that previous article as a significant Internet presence) I don't know about

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

I did exactly that when I called. One is looking into the other hasn't called yet. I will let you know what they say. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:59 PM Phil Lavin wrote: > Ask if they will configure BFD for you. I’ve not found many transit > providers that will, but

Re: USB Ethernet Adapters

> On May 16, 2018, at 5:55 AM, ~ wrote: > > AK-A7611011 The Anker USB-C to Ethernet adapter also uses the Realtek 0x8153 chip.

Re: ProofPoint

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:13 AM, ConsulTIC - Cyprien Laleau via NANOG < nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > Could a proofpoint e-mail blacklist contact, contact me? > We are trying to solve undelivered mails and can't get ahold of anyone. > > Thank you in advance, > Responded off list. Thanks, --Jaren

RE: is odd number of links in lag group ok

Many routers do not rehash everything when a link breaks. Doing so would disturb flows that were not broken, causing possible misordered packets or jitter. The flows on the broken link will get rehashed, of course. Note that even if a hash function can distribute the flows evenly, you may get

Curiosity about AS3356 L3/CenturyLink network resiliency (in general)

I’m curious if anyone who’s used 3356 for transit has found shortcomings in how their peering and redundancy is configured, or what a normal expectation to have is. The Tampa Bay market has been completely down for 3356 IP services twice so far this year, each for what I’d consider an

ProofPoint

Could a proofpoint e-mail blacklist contact, contact me? We are trying to solve undelivered mails and can't get ahold of anyone. Thank you in advance,

Re: USB Ethernet Adapters

To me then the Anker AK-A7611011 sounds perfect. It has indicator lights, good build quality and uses said Realtek chip. On Wed, 16 May 2018, 01:51 Colton Conor, wrote: > Mario, > > Thanks for the recommendation. I am leaning towards the devices with > a Realtek RTL8153

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

Erich, Good Idea. I can't believe I didn't think of that earlier. Simple and effective. I will go ahead and request the defaults from my ISP and update the thread of the findings. Thanks! On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:03 AM Kaiser, Erich wrote: > A last resort route (default

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

I could use static routes but I noticed since I moved to full routes I have had a lot fewer customer complaints about latency(especially when it comes to Voice and VPN traffic). I wasn't using per-packet load balancing. I believe juniper default is per IP. My timers are as follows Active

Re: internet - sparkle

On 16/05/2018 19:12, Michael Crapse wrote: HE listed currently in 7th place: http://as-rank.caida.org/ -Hank > Additionally, whilst not "technically" a tier 1 provider, Hurricane > electric should be high on that list. Especially as one of the best > providers of and proponents for IPv6. We'll

Re: ALTDB - Getting records removed

Are you referring to auto-dbm@ email, or the db-admin@ one?  I emailed db-admin@ about 15 hours ago, and haven't heard back (although it didn't bounce this time!)  Not sure what sort of response time to expect from a free service though. On 5/16/2018 12:17 PM, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: As

Re: internet - sparkle

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:14 AM Michael Crapse wrote: > Additionally, whilst not "technically" a tier 1 provider, Hurricane > electric should be high on that list. Especially as one of the best > providers of and proponents for IPv6. We'll see into the future, HE may > have

Re: ALTDB - Getting records removed

As stated yesterday, email was fixed on AltDB yesterday. Please try again. Thanks, Mike > On May 16, 2018, at 08:55, Delacruz, Anthony B > wrote: > > Ditto also interested have dozens of old entries from previous delegations > would like to see cleaned up

Re: internet - sparkle

Additionally, whilst not "technically" a tier 1 provider, Hurricane electric should be high on that list. Especially as one of the best providers of and proponents for IPv6. We'll see into the future, HE may have one of the most critical infrastructures, and should be a "part-owner" of the

RE: ALTDB - Getting records removed

Ditto also interested have dozens of old entries from previous delegations would like to see cleaned up but my google-foo tells me it's been a nonresponsive black hole several years now that probably should just go away if it's not going to be maintained properly. I think my favorite is the "Is

Re: internet - sparkle

Replace Level3 with CenturyLink as they're basically taking over AS33566. Would add Zayo (AS6461) to the list. I'm not familiar with Sparkle/Seabone to be honest as we're operating an eyeball network exclusively in the NA. On May 16 2018, at 10:54 am, Aaron Gould wrote: > >

internet - sparkle

http://icaruswept.com/2016/06/28/who-owns-the-internet/ .written in 12/2015 - do y'all think this is accurate, and, in 2018, is it still accurate ? (asking since my next question is related to Sparkle, since they are listed in that previous article as a significant Internet presence) Also,

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

A last resort route (default route) could still be good to take from your ISP(s) even if you still do full routes, as the propagation is happening on the internet side, you should at least have a path inbound through the other provider. The default route at least would send the traffic out if it

Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok

This is implementation specific. Consider hash result returning range 0-15. Then number of port count as divisor of 16/n must result in an integer value. To workaround this issue, you either have larger range of hash results, in which case unequal distribution has small bias, or you have

Re: Email security: PGP/GPG & S/MIME vulnerability drop imminent

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:42:31AM +0100, Brandon Butterworth wrote: > and phishers/exploiters. HTML markup in email is used exclusively > by four kinds of people I'll accept that as a friendly amendment. ;) It is -- to Brian Kantor's point elsewhere in the thread -- very unfortunate that many