So I have to ask, why is it advantageous to put this in a container
rather than just run it directly
on the container's host?
Mike
On 06/14/2018 05:03 PM, Richard Hicks wrote:
I'm happy with GoBGP in a docker container for my BGP
Dashboard/LookingGlass project.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:41 PM Oliver O'Boyle
wrote:
> There's no reason why it shouldn't work well. It's just a minor paradigm
> shift that requires some solid testing and knowhow on the ops team.
>
>
and... XR or Junos are ... doing this under the covers for you anyway, so..
get used to the
There's no reason why it shouldn't work well. It's just a minor paradigm
shift that requires some solid testing and knowhow on the ops team.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 22:26 Eric Tykwinski, wrote:
> The funny part is I don’t like containers but love VMs, so kvm, vmware,
> citrix, hvm, et al.
> Not
The funny part is I don’t like containers but love VMs, so kvm, vmware, citrix,
hvm, et al.
Not much difference but I tend to like the separation of OS knowledge, with all
the bugs lately though I wonder if it’s worth it.
Sincerely,
Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-429-8300
> On Jun 14,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:46 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> I wonder which part of the proposal people find offensive.
I have no idea. All - You know no one is trying to make *you* run BGP
inside of a container, right?
I wonder which part of the proposal people find offensive.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "james jones"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 1:56:09 PM
Subject:
I'm happy with GoBGP in a docker container for my BGP
Dashboard/LookingGlass project.
https://github.com/rhicks/bgp-dashboard
Its just piping RIB updates, as JSON, to script to feed into MongoDB
container.
At work we also looked at GoBGP as a route-server for a small IXP type of
setup, but ran
On Thu 2018-Jun-14 23:28:50 +0200, na...@jack.fr.eu.org
wrote:
Bof
I currently use cumulus's software, I will then report my experience:
not production ready
You have a lot of features, with a fast development, but ..
I expect my network to be a rock solid part of my infrastructure,
Bof
I currently use cumulus's software, I will then report my experience:
not production ready
You have a lot of features, with a fast development, but ..
I expect my network to be a rock solid part of my infrastructure,
especially when I am using the classic part, not the fancy ones
When I
Hey,
Can someone reach out to me off list in regards to Google Scholar? Been
dealing with an issue in which a recently acquired IP block appears to have
been blacklisted in the past and is impacting end users.
Thanks!
--
Ryan Gard
Also, please stop putting quotes in your email signature... it's 2018.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On June 13, 2018 2:01 AM, wrote:
> Then perhaps that thread was killed by the moderators. Please heed
>
> the list charter.
>
> Also, please get a mail client that generates proper
>On 6/12/18 1:52 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Randy Bush said:
If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry,
so very sorry. Especially when it comes to v6.
>>>
>>> emacs!
>>
>> vim!
>>
>
>ed!
Butterflies!
Hi
Any thought leader on the list to shed some light to what is happening
in the world of open networking ? OVS vs OpenNSL vs Cumulus vs fd.io
vs Snabb vs a lot of stuff :)
Where is this going ? What are the obvious pros and cons of each when
it comes to scale and feature velocity ?
On 06/12/2018 01:10 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
Apologies for the noise. Please hit delete...
Once again I am not able to send email to the list and
have either been moderated off again (for some mistake
or some unknown reason why) or something else is going
on. Sent email to admins@, but no
I run BGP (bird) on containers in a high available production environment for
supporting multiple kubernetes clusters, among other very critical pieces of my
infrastructure.
As long as you know what you’re doing and have people that knows how to
troubleshoot, it's very reliable. the fact that
Not sure I've seen it mentioned, so will throw NetBox into the mix.
https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox
- jay
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:50 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> Either phpipam or nipap.
>
> Both use fairly standard database backends and db schema (usually something
> as simple as mariadb
Netbox. Open source IPAM and DCIM built by DigitalOcean
https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 5:50 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> Either phpipam or nipap.
>
> Both use fairly standard database backends and db schema (usually something
> as simple as mariadb listenong on
On 06/11/2018 05:16 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ca By
Meanwhile, FB reports that 75% of mobiles in the USA
reach them via ipv6
And Akaimai reports 80% of mobiles
And they both report ipv6 is faster / better.
Let me
Assuming IPv6+translation, yes, you need IPv4 addresses of Good Repute
for the outside; that might requiring constant monitoring, and notifying
various content that it's shared address space. It's the same
operational problem as CGNAT44, but reduced because half (or more) of
your traffic is
Can we please stop spamming the list with this crap now?
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 10:37 PM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2018 08:26 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>>> emacs!
>> vim!
> ed!
TECO!
>>> cat
>> IBM 029.
>
> Youngster. IBM 026.
Device42.
https://www.device42.com/
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:53 AM Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Randy Bush said:
> > > If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry,
> > > so very sorry. Especially when it comes to v6.
> >
> > emacs!
>
> vim!
> --
> Chris
sorry, but nano4lyfe!
On 6/12/18 2:52 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Randy Bush said:
If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry,
so very sorry. Especially when it comes to v6.
emacs!
vim!
Check out TIPP;
http://tipp.tobez.org
/Brian
søn. 10. jun. 2018 kl. 22.51 skrev Mike Lyon :
> Title says it all... Currently using IPPlan, but it is kinda antiquated..
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> --
> Mike Lyon
> mike.l...@gmail.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
>
re: Exa:
Our use case was both on exporting service IPs as well as receiving routes
from ToRs. Exa is more geared towards the former than the latter. Rather
then working on getting imports and route installation through Exa, we
found it simpler with BIRD exporting the service IP from it
2018-06-14 20:56 GMT+02:00 james jones :
> I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
> option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
> and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not over looking
> any other options before
there's actually a not insignificant part of the 'network device' world
which is in fact just really a container and "quagga" (or similar).
James, do you care about being close to a 'cisco like' config world?
(quagga)
more programmatic? (exa-bgp, gobgp .. a few others)
something else?
On Thu,
Have a peak at
https://osrg.github.io/gobgp/
and
https://github.com/osrg/dockerfiles
On 14 Jun 2018, at 20:56, james jones wrote:
> I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
> option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
> and docs
bird is better than quagga!
(runs away) ;)
14.06.18 21:56, james jones пише:
> I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
> option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
> and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not
This is generally in the context of routing-on-the-host setups. We're
using BIRD for that in a kubernetes deployment.
--
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
On Thu 2018-Jun-14 13:05:58 -0600, Michael Crapse wrote:
I agree, i hope
Yes, that's it.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:05 PM Michel 'ic' Luczak
wrote:
>
> > On 14 Jun 2018, at 20:56, james jones wrote:
> >
> > I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
> > option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot
> blogs
> >
On 6/14/18 11:56 AM, james jones wrote:
I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not over looking
any other options before I
I agree, i hope that this is for testing/testbench purposes only, or only
running iBGP, as no one in the world would like for you to be running a
public BGP through a docker instance.
On 14 June 2018 at 13:00, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> On 6/14/2018 12:56 PM, james jones wrote:
>
>> I am working on
> On 14 Jun 2018, at 20:56, james jones wrote:
>
> I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
> option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
> and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not over looking
> any other
I know of a telco that has been doing this it helps them be able to move
around containers and not have constantly configure IP's on servers.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> On 6/14/2018 12:56 PM, james jones wrote:
>
>> I am working on an personal experiment and was
On 6/14/2018 12:56 PM, james jones wrote:
I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not over looking
any other options before I
I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not over looking
any other options before I dive in. Any thoughts or suggestions?
-James
36 matches
Mail list logo
