Re: Any technical-network issues? (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site)

On 4/18/2019 3:44 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Sean Donelan wrote: The Special Counsel's report is expected to be posted on its website sometime between 11 a.m. and noon on Thursday, April 18, 2019. Its been about 7 hours since the report was released on the SCO web site and

Any technical-network issues? (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site)

On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Sean Donelan wrote: The Special Counsel's report is expected to be posted on its website sometime between 11 a.m. and noon on Thursday, April 18, 2019. Its been about 7 hours since the report was released on the SCO web site and to the news media. Ignoring the content of

Re: We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site)

>> Oops..the link would be helpful, sorry! >> >> We have made the full report available here, including conclusions (full >> report both embedded by iframe, and linked to the actual report at DOJ). > > The DOJ web site is hosted on Akamai's CDN. I don't think anyone's > had trouble getting

Re: We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site)

In article you write: >Oops..the link would be helpful, sorry! > >We have made the full report available here, including conclusions (full >report both embedded by iframe, and linked to the actual report at DOJ). The DOJ web site is hosted on Akamai's CDN. I don't think anyone's had trouble

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

> If you want NANOG to devolve into a morass of political claptrap you mean it could improve?

Re: who attacks the weather channel?

I not only got it, my best friend in junior high's father was president of SDS. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consulting http://www.SuretyMail.com/

Re: who attacks the weather channel?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 2:18 PM Lee wrote: > > On 4/18/19, John Sage wrote: > > On 4/18/19 8:26 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 03:16:34PM +, > >> Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote > >> a message of 69 lines which said: > >> > >>>

Re: who attacks the weather channel?

On 4/18/19, John Sage wrote: > On 4/18/19 8:26 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 03:16:34PM +, >> Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote >> a message of 69 lines which said: >> >>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/media/weather-channel-hack/index.html >> >> May be these people? >>

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

Exactly. In other words, don't be a social retard. On 4/18/2019 7:23 AM, Mel Beckman wrote: Rich, If you want NANOG to devolve into a morass of political claptrap, keep posting comments like that. Personally, I want NANOG to remain a useful technical

Re: who attacks the weather channel?

On 4/18/19 8:26 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 03:16:34PM +, Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote a message of 69 lines which said: https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/media/weather-channel-hack/index.html May be these people? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground

We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site)

Oops..the link would be helpful, sorry! We have made the full report available here, including conclusions (full report both embedded by iframe, and linked to the actual report at DOJ). https://www.theinternetpatrol.com/the-mueller-report-online-text-of-the-mueller-report-and-analysis/ Anne P.

Re: who attacks the weather channel?

I mistyped. It's AmbientWeather.com. Here’s the Gibraltar Peak weather station link if anyone is interested: https://dashboard.ambientweather.net/devices/public/143d3d3f9aa00e499954061991374c7b Ignore the rain data. Something is not mapping correctly from our weather

Re: who attacks the weather channel?

When IBM purchased TWC, IBM summarily cancelled our heretofore free weather station monitoring through Wunderground.com. Instead IBM offered to “sell” us our own remote data center weather stations information back to us at an exorbitant price. No thank you. We switched

Re: who attacks the weather channel?

The Weather **Channel** is now a separate entity, which is the cable channel only. The Weather **Company** is the entity now owned by IBM, and it provides the web content and apps such as Weather Underground and Weather.com. I live near their corporate HDQ and interview there for a job, so they

Re: who attacks the weather channel?

According to this, Weather Underground was purchased by the Weather Channel and firmed “The Weather Company”, and that was in turn purchased by IBM last year. https://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/weather-underground-bought-by-ibm.html Sent using a machine that autocorrects in

Re: who attacks the weather channel?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:27 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 03:16:34PM +, > Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote > a message of 69 lines which said: > > > https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/media/weather-channel-hack/index.html > > May be these people? > >

Re: who attacks the weather channel?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 03:16:34PM +, Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote a message of 69 lines which said: > https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/media/weather-channel-hack/index.html May be these people? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground

who attacks the weather channel?

https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/media/weather-channel-hack/index.html

P2P [was: Special Counsel Office report web site]

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:56:03PM +, Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote: > I can???t believe p2p isn???t used more, even inside companies. It does have > legit uses It does, and some of the use cases for it are quite compelling. However, there is often deep mistrust associated with it: years of

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

B just announced that they are offering free downloads via their Nook reader. I noticed I couldn’t reach B via IPv6, and discovered the cause : nslookup > set type= > barnesandnoble.com Server: 4.2.2.1 Non-authoritative answer: *** Can't find barnesandnoble.com: No answer > set

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

Rich, If you want NANOG to devolve into a morass of political claptrap, keep posting comments like that. Personally, I want NANOG to remain a useful technical resource, and leave the partisan crap to Facebook and its ilk. -mel beckman > On Apr 18, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: >

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:02:52PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote: > The Special Counsel's report is expected to be posted [...] Not quite. A *version* of the report that has been redacted by the President's hand-picked obedient lackey will be posted. I suspect that the full report will find its way

RE: Special Counsel Office report web site

Agreed, I remember the biggest problem when the Starr Report was released was that our dial-up PoPs had all lines busy. It was a different Internet then. Steven Naslund Chicago IL > Hey Mike. > > Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? > Should be highly cached

RE: Special Counsel Office report web site

I can’t believe p2p isn’t used more, even inside companies. It does have legit uses From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mark Seiden Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:27 PM To: fwessl...@succinctsystems.com; Mark Tinka via NANOG Subject: Re: Special Counsel Office report web site of course p2p is the

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:25:32AM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote: > Hey Mike. > > Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? Should > be highly cached with a good ratio of served to pull bits. I'm willing to > bet you a beer its just another day on the Internet. However, I