you too, why are you emailing me?
I didn't ask anyone to contact me off list.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 8:53 PM Sam Silvester
wrote:
> Archives are browsable by anybody. How do you expect to keep political
> types out of the discussion?
>
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 11:36 am, Javier J
> wrote:
>
Why are you emailing me?
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:54 PM Jeff P wrote:
> SEE!?!
>
> With no evidence yet publicly acknowledged as to who added the AOC email
> to the list now they are just accusing some random "A woman!"
>
> Words (The Pen) are mightier than any brute force (The Sword).
>
> And
In 2016, U.N. Human Rights Council, resolution A/HRC/RES/32/13: "condemns
unequivocally measures to intentionally prevent or disrupt access to or
dissemination of information online in violation of international human
rights law and calls on all States to refrain from and cease such
measures".
I couldn't agree more.
If I want to talk politics, I will go to other places. I use this mailing
list to talk about things relevant to technology and operation of networks
in North American and other places.
- Javier
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:19 PM Mel Beckman wrote:
> javier,
>
> I concur.
On 1/18/21 6:24 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
This is not the longest internet shutdown. Ethiopia shutdown internet
access for nearly two months in 2020. Belerus had several full and
partial internet shutdowns over several months in 2020.
-
Just for fun...this
Hi Sean, Will, group,
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 03:01:22PM -0800, William Herrin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 1:37 PM Sean Donelan wrote:
> > Some people think its funny to ghost subscribe email addresses, and
> > the NANOG mailing list auomation doesn't catch them in the verification
> >
I find this comment insulting.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:40 PM Lorell Hathcock wrote:
> A-woman!
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Lorell Hathcock
>
> On Jan 18, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Javier J wrote:
>
>
> I agree 100%.
>
> I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't
> appreciate
javier,
I concur. What we don’t need on Nanog is outside parties deciding to “reign in”
our discussions on political grounds!
-mel beckman
On Jan 18, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Javier J wrote:
I agree 100%.
I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't
appreciate is
A-woman!
Sincerely,
Lorell Hathcock
> On Jan 18, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Javier J wrote:
>
>
> I agree 100%.
>
> I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't
> appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address list
> because of someone's
I agree 100%.
I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't
appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address list
because of someone's behavior.
- Javier
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis wrote:
> There's a world of difference between
There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be
private to list members" and "don't forward the list to autoresponders."
The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it,
should result in their removal from the list, at least until they explain
what
The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy.
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/
On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what is
the policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is
> On Jan 18, 2021, at 12:28 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:20 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
> wrote:
> And either way, what is the policy about forwarding list email to someone who
> is not on the list?
>
> If you are posting to NANOG under the impression that
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:20 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
wrote:
> And either way, what is the policy about forwarding list email to someone
> who is not on the list?
>
If you are posting to NANOG under the impression that your email will only
be seen by network engineers and that it will never
Dear all,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:17:06AM -0700, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
> Either Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' office is on the NANOG list or
> someone is forwarding NANOG email to AOC's press office (in which case
> either spoofed as the original sender or AOC's office sends an ack to
>
Googling "Rob Monster Epik" will tell you just about everything you need to
know about that organization.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 3:42 PM Matt Corallo wrote:
> In case anyone thought Amazon was being particularly *careful* around
> their enforcement of Parler's ban...this is from
> today on
Either Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' office is on the NANOG list or someone is
forwarding NANOG email to AOC's press office (in which case either spoofed as
the original sender or AOC's office sends an ack to every email address it can
find)..as I received this auto-ack in response to my email to
How much longer before this is declared a crime against humanity? I give it
10 yrs
Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon, ASCE
6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC
CEO
b...@6by7.net
"The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the
world.”
FCC License KJ6FJJ
Sent from my
About 5 days later, from January 13, 2021, through January 18,
2021, Uganda begins to restore some internet services in the
nation. Most social media sites appear to still be blocked.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-55705404
Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni claimed Saturday that he
Double check the features on the Cisco 8000. Either Cisco purposefully limited
features or they are still developing the software. I was initially excited
about the Cisco 8000 series until I started reading the configuration guides
and found the router does not several feature we use on the ASR
Hi folks,
I'd like to get other operator's views on the Cisco 8201 versus Juniper
PTX10001-35MR choice,
What made you (or what would make you) go for one or the other?
Speeds and feeds are identical between these two, Cisco seems much better
with regards to power consumption, but Juniper's
21 matches
Mail list logo
