Re: DPDK and energy efficiency

> Server PS maximum input wattage is 900W. Present draw of 2.0A @ 208V is ~420W, so 420/900 = 46.67% But in the real world an R640 would *never* draw 900W. Even if you were to load it up with the maximal CPU configuration (2 x 125W TDP CPU per socket), a full load of 2.5" 15K spinning drives,

Re: DPDK and energy efficiency

On 2021-03-05 15:40, Eric Kuhnke wrote: For comparison purposes, I'm curious about the difference in wattage results between: a) Your R640 at 420W running DPDK b) The same R640 hardware temporarily booted from a Ubuntu server live USB, in which some common CPU stress and memory disk/IO

RE: Microsoft Exchange zero day

Here is a blog covering some more in depth details. https://www.huntress.com/blog/rapid-response-mass-exploitation-of-on-prem-exchange-servers Thank you, Kevin McCormick From: NANOG On Behalf Of Scott Morizot Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 5:02 PM To: Eric Kuhnke Cc: nanog@nanog.org list

Re: Microsoft Exchange zero day

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 4:26 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote: > ISPs/NSPs with customers running self hosted or on-premises Exchange may > want to be aware of this. > > > > https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/03/at-least-3-u-s-organizations-newly-hacked-via-holes-in-microsofts-email-software/ > > >

Microsoft Exchange zero day

ISPs/NSPs with customers running self hosted or on-premises Exchange may want to be aware of this. https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/03/at-least-3-u-s-organizations-newly-hacked-via-holes-in-microsofts-email-software/

Re: DPDK and energy efficiency

For comparison purposes, I'm curious about the difference in wattage results between: a) Your R640 at 420W running DPDK b) The same R640 hardware temporarily booted from a Ubuntu server live USB, in which some common CPU stress and memory disk/IO benchmarks are being run to intentionally load

Re: DPDK and energy efficiency

That was an unfortunate typo on my part, I meant to write "isn't excessively difficult..." Some real world examples of specific models of CPU + motherboard + PCI-E NIC combinations with wattage figures at idle load, average load and maximal load would be useful for comparison purposes. On Fri,

Re: DPDK and energy efficiency

On 2021-03-05 12:22, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote: Sure, here goes: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-BJ9FCT6K9/ Thanks for sharing these results. We run DPDK workloads (Cisco nee Viptela vEdge Cloud) on ESXI. Fwiw, a quick survey of a few of our Dell R640s running mostly vEdge

Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?

I see from peering db: 2020-07-01T14:22:01Z According to the bg.he.net link AS18894 has not been visible in the global routing table since November 28, 2020 The information displayed is from that time. Are they causing you or someone issues Eric? Maybe they went out of business? Many

Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?

On 05/03/2021 01:14, Eric Kuhnke wrote: First, take a look at this: https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894 Now look at these (or use your own BGP table analysis tools): https://bgp.he.net/AS18894 https://stat.ripe.net/18894

Re: DPDK and energy efficiency

Sure, here goes: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-BJ9FCT6K9/ Cheers, Etienne On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 5:06 PM Tom Hill wrote: > On 04/03/2021 18:20, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote: > > *SECTION 2: Survey results* > > I don't see the embedded images, and there's no way to show them

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to

[NANOG-announce] Register now for our Tribal Communications Webinar

Working together, for the Internet of tomorrow. ** Join us for our Tribal Communications During the COVID Pandemic Webinar! NANOG U Webinars provide students across North America a way to virtually connect and engage with industry

Register now for our Tribal Communications Webinar

Working together, for the Internet of tomorrow. ** Join us for our Tribal Communications During the COVID Pandemic Webinar! NANOG U Webinars provide students across North America a way to virtually connect and engage with industry

Re: DPDK and energy efficiency

On 05/03/2021 00:26, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > A great deal of this discussion could be resolved by the use of a $20 > in-line 120VAC watt meter [1] plugged into something as simple as a $500 > 1U server with some of the DPDK-enabled network cards connected to its > PCI-E bus, running DANOS. I'm

Re: DPDK and energy efficiency

On 04/03/2021 18:20, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote: > *SECTION 2: Survey results* I don't see the embedded images, and there's no way to show them inline. For the sake of simplicity/sharing, are these results presented anywhere on a web page? :) Regards, -- Tom

Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?

supp...@peeringdb.com is fairly prominently displayed at the bottom of every page that peeringdb displays. On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:16 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote: > First, take a look at this: > > https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894 > > > Now look at these (or use your own BGP table analysis