John Todd writes:
> To validate that the addresses were “ours” or at least under our
> control, there were still some hoops to jump through other than the
> standard validation of registry data. For example, we had to activate
> web servers and objects on our anycast network to answer specific
>
Curious, will that be with starlink ASN then ?
That throw geo detection via IP out right away.
On 3/1/2022 6:55 AM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/28/ukraine-updates-starlink-satellite-dishes.html
On 28 Feb 2022, at 7:11, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> On Feb 28, 2022, at 3:29 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> Any recommendations for a CA with a published policy allowing an IP
>> address SAN (Subject Alternative Name)?
>> Both Quad9 got their certificate from DigiCert:
>>
>>Issuer: C = US, O = Dig
As of right now >90% of the starlink satellites in orbit function in what
we would call a bent pipe topology, where a moving LEO satellite at any
given moment in time needs to be simultaneously in view of a starlink-run
earth station and the CPE.
They have been launching satellites with sat-to-sat
On 2/28/22 4:29 PM, Karl Auer wrote:
On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 16:17 -0800, Michael Thomas wrote:
As a practical matter how does this help? You need to have base
stations/dishes, right?
Anyone with a dish and power can connect to the Internet. That's it.
If a dish owner chooses to allow too many
On 2/28/22 16:17, Michael Thomas wrote:
As a practical matter how does this help? You need to have base
stations/dishes, right? Can they be beefy ones that can pump out
gigabytes that would be capable of backfilling the load? Or would it
need to be multiple in parallel? Wouldn't that bandwidth
On Mon, 2022-02-28 at 16:17 -0800, Michael Thomas wrote:
> As a practical matter how does this help? You need to have base
> stations/dishes, right?
Anyone with a dish and power can connect to the Internet. That's it.
If a dish owner chooses to allow too many people to share their uplink,
then t
On 2/28/22 2:55 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/28/ukraine-updates-starlink-satellite-dishes.html
As a practical matter how does this help? You need to have base
stations/dishes, right? Can they be beefy ones that can pump out
gigabytes that would be capable of backf
> On Feb 28, 2022, at 4:44 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> That is North Dakota, not population centers. Click the link.
>
> You're basing fiber availability everywhere on living? That's a poor excuse
> for data.
I did. The numbers are related to population, not area. If you move outside of
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/28/ukraine-updates-starlink-satellite-dishes.html
--
Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net
Network Engineering - CCIE #7880
503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
That is North Dakota, not population centers. Click the link.
You're basing fiber availability everywhere on living? That's a poor
excuse for data.
>These numbers are crap and nobody should believe them.
Lol ok but we should believe nearly 100% from you because you lived in a
couple places?
>
Airtel or Tata, both can provide this.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 17:15 Mark Robinson wrote:
> Hunting for E-Line;/EPL provider from Los Angeles to Bangalore India.
> Anyone have recommendations?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
--
Mehmet
+1-424-298-1903
Hunting for E-Line;/EPL provider from Los Angeles to Bangalore India.
Anyone have recommendations?
Thanks,
Mark
I said North Dakota, not population centers (they are where the legacy LECs
operate). I have lived and worked there for telecommunications Coops which
device the land mass of the state. They had no issues providing the most
cutting edge service to extremely rural areas. What is the excuse of the
According to the 477 data it's less than 50% (updated 11/1/2021 and I think
the public 477 is 2 years? behind) What makes you believe it's nearly 100%?
https://broadbandnow.com/North-Dakota
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 4:22 PM Brian Johnson
wrote:
> Given this premise (that it is too expensive to p
Given this premise (that it is too expensive to provide access to rural areas),
can you explain why nearly 100% of North Dakota is serviced by FTTH solutions.
The exceptions being the areas still run by the traditional LECs?
I’m not to sure this should be an urban/rural debate.
> On Feb 28, 20
Ryan,
This discussion was in regards to urban areas.
Regarding your example, though, I expect you're in a hard to reach rural
area based on your description. It looks like there are absolutely a
massive amount of trees, making it hard for fixed wireless. Since it
sounds like your only option, w
Bill Woodcock writes:
>> Does this mean that DigiCert is the only alternative?
>
> I assume not, but we’d already used them for other things, and they
> didn’t have a problem doing it, so we didn’t shop any further.
Makes sense. That's how I started as well. But we are using Buypass,
and for s
David Guo writes:
> You don't need a certificate for your IP address if your DoT and DoH
> use domains.
Sorry if I'm slow, but isn't that a chicken-and-egg problem?
We're going to provide this as an add-on to our standard ISP resolver
service. Most clients will pick up the addresses from DHCP/
They have the skills and the ability to stop it but the people who report the
traffic represent 0% of their revenue so they could care less.It’s the same
actors every single day. Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Phychz Networks, Digital
Ocean, etc. that spew garbage from their networks. For a
Hi Mork,
You don't need a certificate for your IP address if your DoT and DoH use
domains.
For certificates with IPv4 address, we use ZeroSSL / GoGetSSL, both are SubCA
with Sectigo, which works fine.
For IPv6 address, we used Digicert but it's too expensive, so we give up ☹
Our DoT/DoH servi
So the providers most likely to have the skills and capabilities to automate
abuse mitigation are the least likely to do anything about it, even when asked?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
*nods* Not only cleaning up the infections, but also implementing BCP 38 and 84
to keep things you miss from leaking.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Seth David Schoen"
To: "Joe Greco
There are a couple to a few that lurk here. Give it a few hours.
This list is a lot less volume than they have on the interim communications.
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Feb 28,
Hi
We have tried to get hold of cloudflare because we have migrated from one ASN
to another.
We have tried with the contact information that is public (peeringdb). We have
been waiting for several weeks without a response.
Would have appreciated if anyone here could have helped us with this.
> On Feb 28, 2022, at 3:29 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Any recommendations for a CA with a published policy allowing an IP
> address SAN (Subject Alternative Name)?
> Both Quad9 got their certificate from DigiCert:
>
>Issuer: C = US, O = DigiCert Inc, CN = DigiCert TLS Hybrid ECC SHA384
>
Any recommendations for a CA with a published policy allowing an IP
address SAN (Subject Alternative Name)?
Preferably someone using ACME with a simple RFC 8738 reference. Let's
Encrypt had this in their TODO list for a while, but it was removed and
the project was put on hold:
https://github.com/
AFAIK they don't do that just because they are not being droned.
When they were killed, just because cell towers was used by coordinators
and as a source of information.
Which once again reminds that if telecom doesnt stay neutral as much as
possible, or worse, they side with one of conflicting p
28 matches
Mail list logo
