Wasn't 44/8 the space for AMPRNet?
I looked it up and they sold part of it to Amazon. Ok. Got it.
Possible that a potential highjack could be a good faith radio ham who
hasn't somehow been updated on the sale of that space? Or more likely to
be a malicious highjack?
On 8/23/22 02:05, Siyuan
You should get a status response within 24 hours. I would call in to the
support hotline, (800) 829-0420, and ask for a status update.
-mel via cell
> On Aug 29, 2022, at 4:03 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
>
> We have a circuit on AS209 that was originally provisioned v4-only. I'm now
>
We have a circuit on AS209 that was originally provisioned v4-only. I'm now
trying to get Lumen to turn v6 up on it. How long does this typically take?
I've had a configuration ticket open for nearly 3 biz days now with no movement
(or even acknowledgement). For anybody who has gone through
* br...@2mbit.com (Brie) [Mon 29 Aug 2022, 19:38 CEST]:
On 8/29/22 10:59 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Uhm, this includes various versions of the intel pro 1000 card...
so that's a TON of gear, to include like lenovo laptops, for
instance. I'd wager that this is super common in the field.
The
On 8/29/22 10:59 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Uhm, this includes various versions of the intel pro 1000 card... so
that's a TON of gear,
to include like lenovo laptops, for instance. I'd wager that this is
super common in the field.
The PDF in the download says;
"Products Affected: All 1gbe
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 12:00 PM Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2022, Michael Thomas wrote:
> >> In some situations where a client machine is connected via some specific
> >> Optical Network Terminals (ONTs), and data is appended after the packet
> >> checksum, the network adapter can
On Sat, 27 Aug 2022, Michael Thomas wrote:
In some situations where a client machine is connected via some specific
Optical Network Terminals (ONTs), and data is appended after the packet
checksum, the network adapter can drop receive packets when using TCP-IPv6
Checksum Offload for receive
> especially as it's *known* that email is not a reliable method of
> communication
That's the problem - it is *not* known by most ordinary folks that
email is not reliable. They all think it *is* reliable.
Nick
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 17:34, Anne Mitchell wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 23, 2022,
8 matches
Mail list logo
