Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

> On 20-Oct-2023, at 00:35, nanog@nanog.org wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 11:56, Owen DeLong > wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 11:46, Owen DeLong via NANOG >> > wrote: A question for network operators out there that implement ROV…

Re: ARIN election statistics, eligible-to-vote ASNs/Org IDs vs. number of votes cast

On Oct 19, 2023, at 5:25 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: Does anyone have general statistics on: a) Number of eligible voting org IDs b) Percentage of eligible voting org IDs which actually cast ballots in previous ARIN elections That’s an interesting question to ask over here on nanog’s mailing

ARIN election statistics, eligible-to-vote ASNs/Org IDs vs. number of votes cast

Does anyone have general statistics on: a) Number of eligible voting org IDs b) Percentage of eligible voting org IDs which actually cast ballots in previous ARIN elections

Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

>> has arin not made it easier, lowering the legal insanity, for legacy >> holders to obtain services? > Yes but they need to jump now if they want to take advantage of it, as > I understand it. arin has deep expertise in hurdles randy

Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

On 19 Oct 2023 at 17:16:21, Randy Bush wrote: > has arin not made it easier, lowering the legal insanity, for legacy > holders to obtain services? > Yes but they need to jump now if they want to take advantage of it, as I understand it. f

Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

> For legacy resource holders it is a problem but then it’s a > bureaucratic issue rather technical and technology has a solution > called SLURM. has arin not made it easier, lowering the legal insanity, for legacy holders to obtain services? randy

Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 1:37 pm, Owen DeLong wrote: > I ask because there was discussion at the ARIN meeting and Kevin Blumburg > made the suggestion that “in 2024, routes will not be accepted without > ROAs”. > As someone who was there, that’s misrepresentation of what Kevin said. Im sure he

Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

I ask because there was discussion at the ARIN meeting and Kevin Blumburg made the suggestion that “in 2024, routes will not be accepted without ROAs”. I didn’t think this was likely, but as someone with resources for which I cannot create ROAs, it is a concern. So far, I haven’t really seen a

Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 12:12, Aftab Siddiqui wrote: > A quick check to my routing table suggests that I have 206700 > preferred routes (v4/v6) to notfound (unknown) destinations. So yeah I > don't think anyone can afford to do this right now. > I don’t think anyone can afford to ever do this,

Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

A quick check to my routing table suggests that I have 206700 preferred routes (v4/v6) to notfound (unknown) destinations. So yeah I don't think anyone can afford to do this right now. Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 05:49, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > A question for

Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 11:56, Owen DeLong wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 11:46, Owen DeLong via NANOG > wrote: > >> A question for network operators out there that implement ROV… >> >> Is anyone rejecting RPKI unknown routes at this time? >> >> I know that it’s popular to reject RPKI invalid

Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 11:46, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > A question for network operators out there that implement ROV… > > Is anyone rejecting RPKI unknown routes at this time? > > I know that it’s popular to reject RPKI invalid (a ROA exists, but doesn’t > match the route), but I’m

Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

Assuming unknown encompasses no roa at all, im inclined to say most probably haven’t because that would break a lot of things because a lot of folks don’t have ROAs at all and some don’t seem to even have a plan around implementing them. J~ > On Oct 19, 2023, at 11:47, Owen DeLong via NANOG

Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV

A question for network operators out there that implement ROV… Is anyone rejecting RPKI unknown routes at this time? I know that it’s popular to reject RPKI invalid (a ROA exists, but doesn’t match the route), but I’m wondering if anyone is currently or has any plans to start rejecting routes

Re: Correcting Netflix ipv6 geolocation

> On 19 Oct 2023, at 02:09, Justin Kilpatrick wrote: > > Our ipv6 subnet 2602::FBAD::/40 is You likely mean 2602:FBAD::/40, as the one above is not a valid IPv6 address ;) BGP wise it seems only 2602:fbad:8::/45 and 2602:fbad:10::/45 are announced as per

Correcting Netflix ipv6 geolocation

Our ipv6 subnet 2602::FBAD::/40 is showing up as in Kiev Ukraine on Fast.com and Netflix.com which is causing all sorts of problems for our US based customers. Other services like Google and MaxMind don't seem to have any issue and report correct locations. Happy to follow up with more