Re: Stalled IX requests in Google peering

Will You can send me the ticket number(s) by email. Also, if anyone else has (have) similar issues feel free to email me. Regards as On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 15:17, Will OBrien via NANOG wrote: > Since google is abandoning RS routes, we worked on setting up IX peering > across the board. > >

Fwd: 2022 MANRS Ambassadors

I think that this message hasn't been shared here. Regards as -- Forwarded message - From: Israel Rosas Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 at 16:12 Subject: [lacnog] 2022 MANRS Ambassadors To: LACNOG Dear all, Happy Monday! I’m reaching out to you to announce that today we are opening

Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers

Mark Invalid according to RPKI or IRR? Or both? Regards as On Tue, 10 Dec 2019, 18:22 Randy Bush, wrote: > mark, > > > Just to let this group know that we've started the process of > > activating the dropping of Invalids for all our eBGP customers. > > cool. any stats and lessons

Re: someone is using my AS number

Proper filtering from the upstream providers. .as On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:25 PM Alejandro Acosta < alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unfortunately RPKI is not useful in this case. > > Question: What else could be done to prevent this? > > > Alejandro, > > > > On 6/12/19 12:05 PM,

Peering Forum LAC: Call for Presentations

The Latin American and Caribbean Peering Forum LACPF-2018 will be held in Panama City, Panama on the April 30th, 2018. The goal of the LACPF is to promote and provide collaboration spaces in topics related to interconnection and peering, IXPs, CDNs, transport capacity, and colo facilities among

Re: Puerto Rico Internet Exchange

What about the PRBI project for an IXP? I think that is working, possibly it just need a hand. If possible, I would like to put my effort in something that is working and improve it rather than start something else from scratch. Regards as On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 at 14:15 Mike Hammett

Re: Here we go again.

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 at 07:08 Dovid Bender wrote: > Consumers can always chose with their wallet. > > As long as you have options, which is the basic problem. There isn't real alternative options.

Re: Measuring the quality of Internet access

Would be M-lab (https://www.measurementlab.net/about/) what you are looking for? .as On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 at 13:20 Max Tulyev wrote: > Thank you! > > I got one more reply off-list - and again it is connected to SamKnows. > > But I can't figure out what SamKnows uses as the

Re: bad announcement taxonomy

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:15 PM, wrote: > > How about Origin Obfuscation > > Obfuscation implies intent. Most leaks and mis-announcements don't > have intent because they're whoopsies. > Well, if you take a route, change its origin as your own (or any other) and

Re: bad announcement taxonomy

Laundered route I like it. Or re-originated laundered route (it has more meaning but a bit too long) .as On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 at 09:33 Casey Russell wrote: > I think Tony's on the right track here. I vote we call this "Route > Laundering", the people who do it "Route

Re: EyeBall View

There are a plenty of services/research doing that. M-Lab RIPE Atlas Speedtest to name some. .as On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 at 10:35 Dovid Bender wrote: > All, > > I had an idea to create a product where we would have a host on every > EyeBall network. Customers could then

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://visa24.info/caught.php?o2hl> Arturo Servin

Re: Seeking IPv6 Security Resources

Chris Some that come to my mind: draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security and (not sure how up to date is this one) RFC 6092 Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service RFC 5157 IPv6 Implications for Network

Re: Oi Assistance

Try LACNOG or GTER (aka Brazilian NOG group) emailing list. May be somebody there could help. Regards as On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Brian Free brf...@adobe.com wrote: Humberto, I have been contacted by a couple of engineers inside of Oi or its subsidiaries. I'm pursuing those

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

No Happy Eyeballs? Perhaps also time to ditch XP and IE for something new as well. -as On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.atwrote: Random IPv6 complaint of the day: redirects from FCC.gov to pay.gov fail when clients have IPv6 enabled. Work fine if IPv6 is

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

HE should work then, perhaps another problem + IPv6. -as On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.atwrote: Windows 8 running Google Chrome as the browser. Matthew Kaufman On 3/17/2014 11:46 AM, Arturo Servin wrote: No Happy Eyeballs? Perhaps also time

Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.netwrote: Is there some technical reason that BGP is not an option? You could allow them to announce their ATT space via you as a secondary. unless it is a /26, /25 or something shorter. Even with a /24 things may get messy.

Re: BCP38.info

Not working in the Internet access business but as Internet citizen this sounds interesting. You would need some motivations to make ISPs register and perhaps some kind of validation in the future. But as initial step it sounds cool. .as On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Andrei Robachevsky

Re: Best practice on TCP replies for ANY queries

I think is better idea to rate-limit your responses rather than limiting the size of them. AFAIK, bind has a way to do it. .as On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote: Hi ML Yeah I can understand. Even DNSSEC will have issues with it which makes me

Re: [Paper] B4: Experience with a Globally-Deployed Software Defined

converge and act as independent network snippets. -Jay. On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote: On 8/17/2013 7:14 PM, Arturo Servin wrote: Hacker will love SDN ... Yes. Traditional SDN is big, flat layer-2 network with global mac-address resolution

Re: [Paper] B4: Experience with a Globally-Deployed Software Defined

Hacker will love SDN ... :) Bye, bye dumb and resilient network ... .as On 8/17/13 8:02 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote: A software defined network is one where the forwarding behavior can be completely defined in software running outside of the devices that perform the forwarding.

Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table?

And this presentation by Geoff Huston: http://iepg.org/2011-11-ietf82/2011-11-13-bgp2011.pdf Regards, as On 6/22/13 11:48 AM, John Curran wrote: On Jun 22, 2013, at 1:45 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: Yes… It will probably settle out somewhere around 100-125K routes. Owen -

Re: Bogons filtering

This draft is now RFC6441 and BCP 171 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6441 .as On 6/10/13 11:49 PM, Jayram A. Deshpande wrote: Hello, With IPv4 being almost exhausted[1] , I am curious to know how many net admins have the Bogon filtering ACLs still hanging around ? Google

Re: GMail IPv6 IMAP Issue, or is it Just Me?

It works to me, a different one by the way: telnet -6 imap.gmail.com 993 Trying 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::6c... Connected to gmail-imap.l.google.com. Escape character is '^]'. ] ^] telnet q Connection closed. The same one, works too: telnet 2607:f8b0:400d:c00::6c 993 Trying

Re: It's the end of the world as we know it -- REM

Yes. We figured this out and we are starting a program (or a set of activities) to promote the deployment of IPv6 in what we call End-users organizations (basically enterprises, universities). We are seeing much lower adoption numbers than our ISP's categories. One basic

Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN

On 4/8/13 9:41 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: On Apr 7, 2013, at 23:27 , Tore Anderson t...@fud.no wrote: * Owen DeLong The need for CGN is not divorced from the failure to deploy IPv6, it is caused by it. In a historical context, this is true enough. If we had accomplished ubiquitous

Re: BCP38 needs advertising

And do not forget http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp38 :) -as On 3/27/13 2:17 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote: Please reference: http://openresolverproject.org/ http://spoofer.csail.mit.edu/ http://blog.cloudflare.com/deep-inside-a-dns-amplification-ddos-attack ...and

Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty

I am afraid you are right. It is going to cost us money and time, but unfortunately I do not see another way out. /as On 3/27/13 6:19 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote: As I mentioned on another list earlier today, let's face it -- this is going to require a large-scale, very public,

Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification

Yes, BCP38 is the solution. Now, how widely is deployed? Someone said in the IEPG session during the IETF86 that 80% of the service providers had done it? This raises two questions for me. One, is it really 80%, how to measure it? Second, if it were

Re: What Should an Engineer Address when 'Selling' IPv6 to Executives?

On 7 Mar 2013, at 02:50, Dobbins, Roland wrote: On Mar 7, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: I would pitch it as follows: We need to at least have IPv6 access to troubleshoot/understand customers that have dual-stack technology. That's a great point, but my guess is that the suits

Re: What Should an Engineer Address when 'Selling' IPv6 to Executives?

Pretty much the same process that I have seen in many ISPs and enterprises. Regards. as On 07/03/2013 11:32, John Curran wrote: On Mar 7, 2013, at 5:42 AM, Arturo Servin aser...@lacnic.net wrote: Yes, but this is an argument to deploy the whole IPv6 thing, not against

Re: www.eftps.gov contact

It works for me (http) Cannot ping, so maybe they filtered the whole ICMPv6 and you have a MTU problem. But that is only a guessing. as On 18/12/2012 13:36, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue,

Re: Network Latency Measurements

It is in beta and in spanish, though: http://simon.labs.lacnic.net/simon/api http://simon.labs.lacnic.net/simon http://simon.labs.lacnic.net/simon/participate/ If you found it useful we could create an english version. Regards as On 04/12/2012 19:05, Tal Mizrahi wrote: Hi,

Re: /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

Perhaps because you are addressing to a bunch of Internet engineers that (we) are used to create standards in open forums where everybody have a say. For the new Internet world available to all participants in the ITU-T, on exactly the same terms as drafts of other

Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

What do you mean with deliberate migration? Users do not care and they will never have a deliberate migration. However ISPs do, if the user have IPv6 it is because the ISP deliberate migrate to v6 by enable it in their backbone, networks and user's CPEs. IMHO if

Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

It won't. Users do not care about IPv6 or IPv4. They want a fast and reliable Internet connection. If you think you can do that with IPv4, you don't need to do anything (well, just plan for some budget for your CGNs). If not, better start deploying IPv6. .as On

Re: 169.254.0.0/16

Wait! Are you suggesting to not use it as intended by RFC6598? to be used as Shared Address Space to accommodate the needs of Carrier- Grade NAT (CGN) devices. It is anticipated that Service Providers will use this Shared Address Space to number the interfaces that

Re: Regarding smaller prefix for hijack protection

Or better. Sign your prefixes and create ROAs to monitor any suspicious activity. There is an app for that: http://bgpmon.net Besides the normal service you can use also RPKI data to trigger alarms of possible hijacks

Re: IPv6 only streaming video

The licence expired. We will see if we can get another one. Cheers, as On 25 Jul 2012, at 15:58, Arturo Servin wrote: Oh! We had it as a test service. We didn't know that it was been used by more people, so probably somebody turn it off. I

Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS)

On 28 Jun 2012, at 08:05, Tei wrote: On 27 June 2012 09:50, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote: (trollspecially for a Web site written in PHP/troll)? We software makers have a problem, when a customer ask for a application, often theres a wen project that already do it ( for

Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS)

It was not DNS issue, but it was a clear case on how community-support helped. Some of us may even learn some new tricks. :) Regards, as Sent from mobile device. Excuse brevity and typos. On 27 Jun 2012, at 05:07, Daniel Rohan dro...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:50 AM,

Re: ZOMG: IPv6 a plot to stymie FBI !!!11!ONE!

On 17 Jun 2012, at 20:29, Owen DeLong wrote: Lather rinse repeat with a better choice of address... 2001:550:3ee3:f329:102a3:2aff:fe23:1f69 This is in the ARIN region... It's from within a particular ISP's /32. Has that ISP delegated some overlapping fraction to another ISP? If

Re: ZOMG: IPv6 a plot to stymie FBI !!!11!ONE!

On 18 Jun 2012, at 09:48, Owen DeLong wrote: On Jun 18, 2012, at 4:50 AM, Arturo Servin wrote: On 17 Jun 2012, at 20:29, Owen DeLong wrote: Lather rinse repeat with a better choice of address... 2001:550:3ee3:f329:102a3:2aff:fe23:1f69 This is in the ARIN region... It's from

Re: ZOMG: IPv6 a plot to stymie FBI !!!11!ONE!

Wouldn't BCP38 help? /as On 15 Jun 2012, at 11:59, Jay Ashworth wrote: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57453738-83/fbi-dea-warn-ipv6-could-shield-criminals-from-police/ sigh Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink

Re: ZOMG: IPv6 a plot to stymie FBI !!!11!ONE!

unnallocated IPv6 space (2F10:baba:ba30:e8cf:d06f:4881:973a:c68) to SPAM and then go invisible and use another one (2E10:baba:ba30:e8cf:d06f:4881:973a:c68) Regards, as On 17 Jun 2012, at 13:24, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:10:59 -0400, Arturo Servin said

Re: ZOMG: IPv6 a plot to stymie FBI !!!11!ONE!

If the ISP fails to filter my bogus space and leak that route to the Internet (which happens today everyday with IPv4, and will with IPv6) I would get my return path. Again, if every ISP followed BCP 38 that would not happen (IPv6 and IPv4). But they are not, and probably

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

On 26 May 2012, at 08:33, Matt Ryanczak wrote: On 5/25/12 2:35 PM, Arturo Servin wrote: I wouldn't be so picky to have an static IP address in my phone, bur for sure I want a global IPvx one. but would you want that dynamic IP address behind layers of NAT, ALG, etc. or open

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

I wouldn't be so picky to have an static IP address in my phone, bur for sure I want a global IPvx one. -as On 25 May 2012, at 15:00, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote: On 5/25/12 07:35 , valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:

Re: [routing-wg] RPKI performance metrics; your help requested

On 17 May 2012, at 00:47, Randy Bush wrote: Could someone make: 2) put the graphs at 'not rpki.net' on rpki.net (too) no. that is the exact point. the graph to which i pointed is on rob's site. these are data each relying party can collect and see for themselves and their point of

Re: Automatic IPv6 due to broadcast

Anurag, You have a rogue RA in your network. Now is just an annoying DoS, but it can easily be turned in a real security concern. I suggest to either deploy properly IPv6 or disable it. I am more on the former, but it is your choice. Regards -as On 16 Apr 2012, at 15:09,

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

Summary: Do not use NSI, if you are. Switch. /as On 29 Mar 2012, at 13:32, Matt Ryanczak wrote: On 3/28/12 11:00 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: once, years ago, Netsol -did- have a path for injecting records. It was prototype code with the engineering team. I had

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

Another reason to not use them. Seriusly, if they cannot expend some thousands of dollars (because it shouldn't be more than that) in touching code, (hopefully) testing that code, deploying it, training customer support staff to answer questions, updating documentation, etc. I

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

if the company exceeds 50,000 employees. Arturo Servin arturo.ser...@gmail.com wrote: Another reason to not use them. Seriusly, if they cannot expend some thousands of dollars (because it shouldn't be more than that) in touching code, (hopefully) testing that code, deploying

Re: SNMP monitoring of routing tables

Try RIS from RIPE NCC or routeviews. regards, as Sent from my mobile device (please excuse typoss and brevit.) On 13 Mar 2012, at 11:54, Walter Keen walter.k...@rainierconnect.net wrote: Trying to work on an interesting project, where it would be nice to monitor the routing table of a

Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

On 11 Mar 2012, at 09:48, Iljitsch van Beijnum iljit...@muada.com wrote: On 9 Mar 2012, at 10:02 , Jeff Wheeler wrote: The way we are headed right now, it is likely that the IPv6 address space being issued today will look like the swamp in a few short years, and we will regret repeating

Re: Thanks Let's Prevent this in the Future.

One option is to use RPKI and origin validation. But it won't help much unless prefix holders create their certificates and ROAs and networks operators use those to validate origins. It won't solve all the issues but at least some fat fingers/un-expierience errors. We are

Why not to use RPKI (Was Re: Argus: a hijacking alarm system)

You could use RPKI and origin validation as well. We have an application that does that. http://www.labs.lacnic.net/rpkitools/looking_glass/ For example you can periodically check if your prefix is valid:

Re: Why not to use RPKI (Was Re: Argus: a hijacking alarm system)

hijacks. Regards, as 2012/1/20 Arturo Servin aser...@lacnic.net You could use RPKI and origin validation as well. We have an application that does that. http://www.labs.lacnic.net/rpkitools/looking_glass/ For example you can periodically check

Re: ANNOUNCE: bgptables.merit.edu - understanding visibility of your prefix/AS

.? What would be an example of a query that uses time? Thanks. -manish On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Arturo Servin wrote: Manish, Nice tool. Is it possible to see the history of a prefix? Regards, .as On 13 Jan 2012, at 18:19, Manish Karir wrote

Re: shell access to BGP router, CALEA tips??

Not sure if this is what you are looking for: http://www.traceroute.org/#Route%20Servers /as On 8 Jan 2012, at 22:31, David Prall wrote: Both ATT and Hurricane Electric have access for this. A quick list of them. http://www.netdigix.com/servers.html Majority of these are

Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation

snip On 22 Nov 2011, at 13:38, Joel Maslak wrote: 1) Not having IPv6 at all. I expect to get it on my DSL in about 10 years or so when the equipment my line on is old enough to be replaced under a 15 or 20 year replacement cycle. 2) Bandwidth caps probably affect people a lot more than

Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US

I wonder if they are using private IP addresses. -as On 21 Nov 2011, at 13:32, Jay Ashworth wrote: On an Illinois water utility: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45359594/ns/technology_and_science-security Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink

Re: Minimum Allocation Size by RIRs (IPv4)

/24 as minimal allocation is only for end-users and critical infrastructure. For ISPs (LIRs) the minimal allocation is /22. /as On 16 Nov 2011, at 00:30, Rubens Kuhl wrote: LACNIC: /24 - http://lacnic.net/en/politicas/manual3.html

Re: IPV6 6to4 and 6In4 Lab

Why don't you use just a tunnelbroker? I would take just a few minutes to setup a tunnel. From there, you can do a lot of stuff inside your network. My 2 cents /as On 1 Nov 2011, at 18:36, Meftah Tayeb wrote: Hello folks, i'm posting this Message to both nanog and afnog

Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations

Same from LACNIC. This would have justify a /44 or separate /48s for each site. /as On 31 Oct 2011, at 12:45, Justin M. Streiner wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Owen DeLong wrote: Ideally, you should put a /48 at each location. Speaking from my experience with getting v6 space

Re: DPI deployment use case

I imagine that those proposals are not from users … I would add tyrannical telcos cracking down on their own customers. -as On 7 Oct 2011, at 14:20, Claudio Lapidus wrote: Hello, On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Martin Millnert milln...@gmail.com wrote: I've seen

Re: Botnets buying up IPv4 address space

, Arturo Servin arturo.ser...@gmail.com wrote: ARIN and APNIC allows it, LACNIC will when it reaches the last /12 (so now is not possible). RIPE NCC and Afrinic do not have a policy yet AFAIK. RIPE's LIR IPv4 listing service has 1x /20 listed, *right now*. https://www.ripe.net/lir

Re: Botnets buying up IPv4 address space

What do you mean with purchasing or renting IPv4. Last time that I check it was not possible in the RIR world. If you mean hijacking unused IPv4 space, that's another history. .as On 7 Oct 2011, at 15:11, Joly MacFie wrote: I'd welcome comments as to solutions to

Re: Botnets buying up IPv4 address space

Yes, I forgot that one. ARIN and APNIC allows it, LACNIC will when it reaches the last /12 (so now is not possible). RIPE NCC and Afrinic do not have a policy yet AFAIK. -as On 7 Oct 2011, at 15:35, David Conrad wrote: On Oct 7, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Arturo Servin wrote

Re: Botnets buying up IPv4 address space

I agree with Benson. In fact, for this problem I find irrelevant that IPv4 is running out. They are just looking for good reputation IP nodes. -as On 7 Oct 2011, at 16:03, Benson Schliesser wrote: I don't see anything new in the article, and would classify parts of it as

Re: NAT444 or ?

NAT444 alone is not enough. You will need to deploy it along with 6rd or DS-lite. Whilst you still have global v4, use it. The best is to deploy dual-stack, but that won't last for too long. Regards, as- On 1 Sep 2011, at 15:36, Serge Vautour wrote: Hello,

Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

, Arturo Servin wrote: If you are claiming right over these prefixes I suggest you to contact RIPE NCC. And that will do what exactly? Back when I worked at an RIR, a prefix was misplaced. When I contacted the (country monopoly PTT) ISP and told them the prefix had been removed from

Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

it on. No, I'm not a venture capitalist, but IT specialist. I am too sleepy, so replied to Adrian directly while wanted to post in the list. If you are claiming right over these prefixes I suggest you to contact RIPE NCC. /as 2011/8/21 Arturo Servin aser...@lacnic.net These prefix

Re: Errant Advertisement - 128.1/16

They also made Interface Message Processors, like the grandpas of routers. .as On 8 Aug 2011, at 12:29, Peter Stockli wrote: Wow, BBN, the reason we use the @ sign, second .com Domain, former AS1. Lots of history ;) On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Rick Altmann raltm...@bbn.com

Re: IPv6 and DNS

On 12 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Fabio Mendes wrote: 2011/6/11 Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org The router isn't assigning an address, it's merely telling everyone on the segment what the local prefix and default route is. As such, there's no reason why the router should try to register a

Re: v6 proof of life

Sometimes more than 25% of the traffic in our webserver is v6 http://lacnic.net/v6stat/hour_access_log_counter.png http://lacnic.net/v6stat/hour_access_log_counter.txt Haven't time to check the details about URLs, countries, user-agents but I am working on it. Regards, .as

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

On 15 May 2011, at 22:55, Matthew Kaufman wrote: On 5/15/2011 7:08 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: On May 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote: ...and we'll agree to disagree on this one (RTMFP)... and users will just be ok with BitTorrent and Skype not working on the v6-only + NAT64

Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?

On 29 Mar 2011, at 00:18, Wil Schultz wrote: I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of testing ipv6 out. A couple of concerns that come to mind are: 1) www.domain.com and ipv6.domain.com are serving the exact same content. Typical SEO standards are to only

Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future

On 9 Mar 2011, at 07:18, Joel Jaeggli wrote: one of these curves is steeper than the other. That's what we wanted for the first one.

Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=enas_sdt=0,5cluster=6058676534328717115 @article{cittadini2010evolution, title={{Evolution of Internet Address Space Deaggregation: Myths and Reality}}, author={Cittadini, L. and Muhlbauer, W. and Uhlig, S. and Bush, R. and Fran{\c{c}}ois, P.

Re: raw bgp traffic

here: http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/stats/ris/ris-raw-data -as On 22 Feb 2011, at 00:21, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:58 PM, Javier Godinez wrote: Does anyone know where I can get real/raw BGP traffic, maybe in pcap format? I just need maybe a few days of raw

Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

Iljitsch, In deed there were ERX unused space that were divided among RIRs, I think it is referred as various ERX (pointed out by Tore). http://bgp.potaroo.net/stats/nro/various.html There were also ERX space transferred from ARIN DB (used to be in InterNIC's) to RIRs because

Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

On 11 Feb 2011, at 04:51, Ricky Beam wrote: On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:31:21 -0500, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote: Amusingly enough, I personally (along with others) made arguments along these lines back in 1995 or so when the IAB was coming out with

Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

Lucky you. .as On 11 Feb 2011, at 11:42, Josh Smith wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Arturo Servin arturo.ser...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 Feb 2011, at 04:51, Ricky Beam wrote: On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:31:21 -0500, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote: Amusingly enough

Re: ipv4's last graph

We have been doing it for a few months. http://www.lacnic.net/en/registro/espacio-disponible-ipv4.html We are working in a new model to forecast the available space over time and in providing the data so anybody can do their own graphs. Also APNIC has some very useful

Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level 3's IRR Database)

Is it really a better alternative? Do we want to pay the cost of a fully distributed RPKI architecture? Or do we just abandon the idea of protecting the routing infrastructure? There is no free-lunch, we just need to select the price that we want to pay. -as

Re: Level 3's IRR Database

I think the issue is not between valid vs invalid, but that using route-maps and local preference a more specific not valid route would be used over another less specific valid because of the routing decision process, right? Perhaps this would help?

Re: [arin-announce] ARIN Resource Certification Update

I agree with Alex that without a hosted solution RIPE NCC wouldn't have so many ROAs today, for us, even with it, it has been more difficult to roll out RPKI among our ISPs. As many, I do not think that a hosted suits to everybody and it has some disadvantages but at leas it could help

Re: Network Simulators

GNS3 http://www.gns3.net/ This is another network simulator, mainly for academic research. NS-2 http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ And you can always setup some virtual machines with DNSs, hosts and routers with open-source software. regards, -as On 17 Jan 2011, at 11:58, James

Re: Are you ready for RPKI in your BGP?

There are some pieces in the RPKI puzzle. One is the definitions of protocols, that one is very advanced in the SIDR WG in the IETF. Not RFCs yet but I am sure we will se some soon. Another piece are repositories of CA's and ROAs and Trust Anchors. RIRs have

Re: Over a decade of DDOS--any progress yet?

...@arbor.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Dec 8, 2010, at 7:28 PM, Arturo Servin wrote: One big problem (IMHO) of DDoS is that sources (the host of botnets) may be completely unaware that they are part of a DDoS. I do not mean the bot machine, I mean the ISP connecting

Re: Over a decade of DDOS--any progress yet?

, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Arturo Servin arturo.ser...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 Dec 2010, at 13:12, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote: Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:53:51 + From: Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net Subject: Re: Over a decade of DDOS--any progress yet? To: North American Operators' Group nanog