Re: ABQNOG -- May 4, 2023

Thanks for sharing, John. I'm excited for this event, long overdue! See everyone there - find me wherever the green chile is being served. =) ~Chris On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 8:58 PM John Osmon wrote: > For folks that might be in the southwest US (and any that want to > visit!), we're going to

Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey

On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:12 AM Tom Beecher wrote: > Fair play, Tom. All I can say is that after 20 years of working on, in, >> and around the Internet, I'm sure as hell not going to ruin my reputation >> now. >> > > Apologies if I implied anything like that. Wasn't my intent to do so. > Thanks

Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey

much automation is actually out there in the real world. Cheers, ~Chris > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 2:37 AM Chris Grundemann > wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 2:30 PM Tom Beecher wrote: >> >>> Having the opt out is nice, but if I am being completely hones

Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey

e survey is exactly as I stated: To report network automation trends back to the community. And whether we engineers like it or not, one of the best ways to measure trends is in the relative amount of money organizations spend on them... HTH, ~Chris > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 4:12 PM Chris Gru

Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:57 AM Denis Fondras wrote: > Le Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:16:13AM -0700, Chris Grundemann a écrit : > > Update: The survey has received almost 4 dozen responses already! > > > > Of course, for the most meaningful results possible, I'd like to s

Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:15 PM Tom Beecher wrote: > > I was also off put by some of the financial questions in there. > The financial questions (2 of them) both allow opt-out if that is a sticking point. They are also both as vague as possible (large ranges, not exact figures) while still

Re: 2023 State of Network Automation Survey

be better off having the additional data point: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc5J_i2rkcpgkvI83Vj3DRVsau5jZ1u99M7p_ecWOgnW_9XHg/viewform?usp=sf_link Thanks so much! ~Chris On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:06 PM Chris Grundemann wrote: > Hail NANOGers! > > For those of you who we

2023 State of Network Automation Survey

Hail NANOGers! For those of you who were unable to attend my lightning talk las Wednesday (link below) I would like to ask that you all complete the 2023 State of Network Automation Survey:

Intro and Invitation to SANOG

Hail NANOGers! As I must assume you are all aware, NANOG is one of many NOGs & NOFs around the world these days. One of the oldest of those NOGs that many of you may not have heard of is SANOG - the South Asian Network Operators Group. SANOG has been running strong since 2003. And their

Call for Volunteers - 2021 IX-Denver Board Election

opens * 4 February 2021 - Call for Volunteers closes * 5 February 2021 - Slate of candidates announced * 18 February 2021 - Members meeting and election * 5 March 2021 - New Board announced This information is also posted here: https://ix-denver.org/governance/2021-election/ Thank you, Chris

CloudFlare Issues?

Looks like there may be something big up (read: down) at CloudFlare, but their status page is not reporting anything yet. Am I crazy? Or just time to give up on the internet for this week? -- @ChrisGrundemann http://chrisgrundemann.com

Re: Disney+ CDN

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jared Geiger wrote: > An article mentioned BAMTech's platform which is what NHL, MLB, and HBO GO > are built on. The bits from the first two come from Akamai and Level3 CDNs. > I haven't looked into where HBO Go comes from. > Yep, they decided to buy BAMTech and

FYI - IX-Denver Call for Volunteers (3 Board Seats up for Election)

>>> FYI <<< IX-Denver will be holding an election at our 2018 members meeting. The purpose of this election will be selecting three Board members for two year terms (2018-2020). To ensure that IX-Denver has the best possible leadership, we are now calling for volunteers who are willing and able

Re: Broadcom vs Mellanox based platforms

Mellanox commissioned a report along these lines from Tolly in 2016: https://www.mellanox.com/related-docs/tolly/tolly-report-performance-evaluation-2016-march.pdf Obviously a grain of salt is needed with any commissioned study - but it will at least point you to some tests and methodologies that

MANRS IXP Webinar: Tuesday, 13 March

Hail NANOGers! If you operate an IX in North America, this message is for you. (I'm passing it along on behalf of my former colleagues at the Internet Society.) Hope to "see" you on the webinar this Tuesday! ——— Hi, The MANRS IXP Partnership program is designed to invite and encourage

Re: Open-IX BCOP Committee Call for Volunteers

The call for volunteers ends one week from today - reach out to me today! On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundem...@gmail.com> wrote: > Pardon the interruption. > > There is a new effort underway to ensure that BCOP has a home in North > America and y

Open-IX BCOP Committee Call for Volunteers

Pardon the interruption. There is a new effort underway to ensure that BCOP has a home in North America and your help is needed. Following the publication of the Open-IX Document Development Policy (OIX DDP) and the formation of the Best Current Operational Practices committee (BCOP)

Re: Multi-CDN Strategies

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote: > I could keep going, but if so, I might as well stick them into a > powerpoint and submit a talk for Bellevue :) Not a bad idea! Maybe there's a BCOP here..? -- @ChrisGrundemann http://chrisgrundemann.com

Multi-CDN Strategies

Hail NANOG; Is anyone here leveraging multiple CDN providers for resiliency and have best practices or other advice they'd be willing to share? Thanks, ~Chris -- @ChrisGrundemann http://chrisgrundemann.com

Multi-vendor strategies [was: Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization]

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > I apparently wasn't very clear. In the layered approach to multiple > > vendors, you would (obviously) choose your layer definitions to avoid > > such delicate interdependence. > > can you describe in useful detail your

Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization

I apparently wasn't very clear. In the layered approach to multiple vendors, you would (obviously) choose your layer definitions to avoid such delicate interdependence. Regardless of my failure to fully explain, I'm curious as to how mixing vendors at the same layer is seen to be less problematic

Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote: > 2 Vendor > > Can be implemented multiple ways, for instance 1 vendor per site > alternating sites, or gear deployed in pairs with one from each vendor > up and down the stack. > An alternative multi-vendor approach is to

Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization

Hail NANOGers! A global hospitality organization with 100+ locations recently asked us how to weigh the importance of standardizing infrastructure across all their locations versus allowing each international location to select on their own kit. My first instinct was to jump on my favorite

Dyn DDoS this AM?

Does anyone have any additional details? Seems to be over now, but I'm very curious about the specifics of such a highly impactful attack (and it's timing following NANOG 68)... https://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/10/ddos-on-dyn-impacts-twitter-spotify-reddit/ -- @ChrisGrundemann

Re: Fwd: hotel

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > I tried booking earlier today, had the same issue and called in. I was > > told they were now full, and only non-block rooms were available (@ > > > $500/night). > > find a non-exhorbitant fall-back? The Sheraton Grand

Re: Best practices for sending network maintenance notifications

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Hal Ponton wrote: > I think there was a BCP being worked on. I seem to recall it was being > discussed as a Facebook group. True. https://www.facebook.com/groups/maintnote/ Currently under development, but fairly far along... Cheers, ~Chris

Re: Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Jay Ashworth <j...@baylink.com> wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Chris Grundemann" <cgrundem...@gmail.com> > > > After receiving several off-line inquiries about the status of BCOP in > > North Amer

Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts

Hail NANOGers! After receiving several off-line inquiries about the status of BCOP in North America I think it's appropriate to send a general announcement here. The biggest news here is that the current NANOG Board of Directors has disbanded the NANOG BCOP Committee. The stated rationale for

Re: Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts

PM, Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > > > If NANOG isn't developing and publishing BCOPs, what's the point of > NANOG other than a mailing list? > > > > > > > > > > - > > Mike Hammett > > Intelligent Computing Solut

Join us for the NANOG 63 BCOP Track!

Hello NANOG, This is a friendly notification of the BCOP Track to be held at NANOG 63 in San Antonio. We’d (the BCOP Committee) like to invite you to come participate at our track. Participation can take (at least) two forms: 1) Come present your idea for a BCOP! Do you have a question that

Seeking IPv6 Security Resources

Hail NANOG! I am looking for IPv6 security resources to add to: http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ipv6/security/ These could be best current practice documents, case-studies, lessons-learned/issues-found, research/evaluations, RFCs, or anything else focused on IPv6 security really. I'm

New BCOPs in Progress

Hail NANOGers! As most of you hopefully know, NANOG now has a BCOP Ad Hoc Committee and we are pushing forward with new BCOPs! http://nanog.org/governance/bcop We currently have three BCOPs in active development: eBGP configuration, shepherd Bill Armstrong Public Peering Exchange update,

Re: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Måns Nilsson mansa...@besserwisser.org wrote: The fact that you need v4 space to build a MPLS backbone is a very good reason to not waste a /10 on CGN crap. Ah, so you're in the camp that a /10 given to one organization for their private use would have been

Re: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: a good number of us use that kinky /10 behind home nats and encourage everyone to do so. it was a sick deal and should be treated as such, just more 1918. A good number of folks use other folks IP space in all kinds of strange

Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

Hi Mans, On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Måns Nilsson mansa...@besserwisser.orgwrote: This is a field where v4 next-hops are essential to make things work. rantIn that context, allocating 100.64.0.0/10 to CGN was especially un-clever... /rant Would you expound a bit on what you mean here? I

Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)

On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: On May 2, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Deepak Jain dee...@ai.net wrote: Between peering routers on a dual-stacked network, is it considered best practices to have two BGP sessions (one for v4 and one for v6) between them?

Call for Presenters: The Future of the Internet 2014: Defining Software Defined Networks

Hail NANOG, The Future of the Internet 2014: Defining Software Defined Networks call for presenters is now open! The Future of the Internet 2014 (TFI2014) will be held in Denver, Colorado on Friday, 22 August, 2014. At this year's event, the Colorado Chapter of the Internet Society (CO ISOC) is

Deadline Approaching [was: Ad Hoc BCOP Committee - Call for Volunteers]

someone who should) - please send an email with a brief bio to be...@nanog.org ASAP. We'll be kicking off committee calls in early March! =) Thanks! ~Chris On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Chris Grundemann cgrundem...@gmail.comwrote: Hail NANOGers! Per approval of the NANOG Board in February

Operators and the IETF

Hey all, As promised in my lightning talk just now, here is the Operators and the IETF info: Details: http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2014/01/new-project-operators-and-the-ietf/ Survey: https://internetsociety2.wufoo.com/forms/operators-and-the-ietf/ Please consider taking the

Re: BCP38 (was: Re: Why won't providers source-filter attacks? Simple.)

On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote: On Feb 8, 2014, at 3:37 AM, John Curran jcur...@arin.net wrote: It's also true that if a sizable group of network operators were to actually deploy source address validation (thus proving that it really is a

Ad Hoc BCOP Committee - Call for Volunteers

Hail NANOGers! Per approval of the NANOG Board in February 2013, a community effort to develop a NANOG sponsored regional BCOP effort was engaged. NANOG BCOP Tracks and updates were provided at RIPE, ARIN, NANOG 57, 58, and 59. In November of 2013, sufficient interest and momentum in the NANOG

Re: BCP38.info

Perhaps instead of trying to do this as a new independent activity (with all of the difficulties that entails), the community would be better served by documenting this information as a BCOP or two or three??? http://bcop.nanog.org/ $0.02 ~Chris On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Jay

Lavabit / Ladar Levison Info

Hail NANOG! I have received multiple off-line and in person requests for information on the Lavabit Legal Defense Fund, so I'm going to just take a shotgun approach here: The Lavabit website: http://lavabit.com/ PayPal link to donate to the Fund:

Looking for clue at Yourwebhoster.eu

I could use someone with some clue from Yourwebhoster.eu to contact me off list please. Thanks, ~Chris -- @ChrisGrundemann http://chrisgrundemann.com

Re: It's the end of the world as we know it -- REM

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Geoff Huston g...@apnic.net wrote: On 26/04/2013, at 4:27 PM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote: I also find it a bit strange that the runout in APNIC and RIPE was very different. APNIC address allocation rate accelerated at the end, whereas RIPE

Re: It's the end of the world as we know it -- REM

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: There is a lot of speculation what IPv4 addresses are worth, I've been hearing everything from a few USD to 20 EUR per address. There was some good information shared at the recent INET Denver on value vs. price and

Re: It's the end of the world as we know it -- REM

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Geoff Huston g...@apnic.net wrote: But then again APNIC and RIPE NCC both had last /8 policies in place, which has mitigated some of the impacts of address pool exhaustion. For smaller actors there is still a source of addresses in these regions, albeit a

Re: It's the end of the world as we know it -- REM

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Tore Anderson t...@fud.no wrote: * Chris Grundemann Nope, you are correct Geoff. There is a /10 reserved for transition technologies (e.g. outside addresses on a CGN) and there is a critical infrastructure reserve, but no general purpose reserve like in RIPE

Why use PeeringDB?

Peering Experts, I am currently working on a BCOP for IPv6 Peering and Transit and would very much appreciate some expert information on why using PeeringDB is a best practice (or why its not). All opinions are welcome, but be aware that I plan on using the responses to enhance the document,

Re: ipv6 book recommendations?

I believe that Silvia Hagan's book [1] is still the primary reference available, but there are others reviewed here: http://getipv6.info/index.php/Book_Reviews. Cheers, ~Chris PS - Shameless plug: If you're running Juniper, I wrote two books for them that you can get for free [2][3]. And I have

Re: ipv6 book recommendations?

On Jun 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, William Herrin wrote: 2. Subnetting in v6 in a nutshell: FWIW - There is a published BCOP on IPv6 subnetting: http://www.ipbcop.org/ratified-bcops/bcop-ipv6-subnetting/ Cheers, ~Chris -- @ChrisGrundemann http://chrisgrundemann.com

Re: ipv6 book recommendations?

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: On Jun 5, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Chris Grundemann wrote: On Jun 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, William Herrin wrote: 2. Subnetting in v6 in a nutshell: FWIW - There is a published BCOP on IPv6 subnetting: http://www.ipbcop.org/ratified

Re: bgp best practice question

Depends on a few things, but the main questions are probably: Are the data-centers connected on the backside (VPN, etc. - could the new dc failover through the main dc)? Yes - /22 Will that /24 ever be used in the main datacenter? Yes - /22 $0.02 ~Chris On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, jon

Re: AAAA on various websites, but they all forgot to enable them on their nameservers....

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:15, Schiller, Heather A heather.schil...@verizonbusiness.com wrote: ...yes, there is a serious lack of v6 enabled eyeballs.  But it's also not clear to me from Akamai's stats just how many of the sites they host are v6 enabled. 2? 12? 500? I remember it being stated

Re: IPv6 day non-participants

ISOC has a red/green dashboard of individual (non)participants: http://www.worldipv6day.org/participant-websites/index.html Cheers, ~Chris On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 09:59, James Harr james.h...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed that one of our vendors wasn't actually participating when they very

Re: IPv4 address exchange

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 18:59, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: At John Curran's advice, the ARIN Advisory Council abandoned my proposals.   Two of them are now in petition for further discussion, including ARIN-prop-134 which outlines how to identify a legitimate address holder and

Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6naysayer...)

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:07, Scott Helms khe...@ispalliance.net wrote: We don't have a situation where the existing infrastructure doesn't work, it does. It does today. IPv4 addresses are still freely available today though. As soon as we introduce LSN, the infrastructure starts to stop

Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...)

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 16:48, Benson Schliesser bens...@queuefull.net wrote: I agree that it's an imperfect analogy, so I won't bother defending it. :)   But my point remains:  NAT444 is a deployment scenario, which includes a CGN element.  Other deployment scenarios that also include a CGN

Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...)

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:17, Benson Schliesser bens...@queuefull.net wrote: If you have more experience (not including rumors) that suggests otherwise, I'd very much like to hear about it.  I'm open to the possibility that NAT444 breaks stuff - that feels right in my gut - but I haven't

Re: Comcast IPv6 Native Dual Stack Trials

Well done John! Here's to a rapid expansion of the native footprint! ~Chris On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:26, Brzozowski, John john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Comcast Activates First Users With IPv6 Native Dual Stack Over DOCSIS

Re: Tools for teaching users online safety

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 19:13, Alex Thurlow a...@blastro.com wrote: I'm trying to find out if there are currently any resources available for teaching people how to be safe online.  As in, how to not get a virus, how to pick out phishing emails, how to recognize scams.  I'm sure everyone on

Re: Recommendations for Metro-Ethernet Equipment

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:29, Curtis Maurand cmaur...@xyonet.com wrote:  I'd add Alcatel to that list. yep, and also (depending on specific needs/topologies): Ciena Cyan Fujitsu Corrigent Adva Rad Data Juniper (in no particular order) Good luck, ~Chris On 10/20/2010 11:24 AM, Eric Merkel

Re: Lightly used IP addresses

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 22:24, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: Psst.. Hey.. buddy. Over here... wanna score some gen-yoo-ine Rolex integers, cheap? Right, because there is no reason to care about the uniqueness of integers used on the Internet... :/ ~Chris

Re: Lightly used IP addresses

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 15:25, Ken Chase k...@sizone.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:00:04PM -0400, Jared Mauch said:  I know of several large providers that would stop routing such rogue space. Really? They'd take a seriously delinquent (and we're only talking about non payment after

Re: Lightly used IP addresses

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:32, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: when the 'community' is defined as those policy wannabes who do the flying, take the cruise junkets, ... this is a self-perpetuating steaming load that is not gonna change. Yes, those definitions create a steaming load. But why is

Re: any bring your own bandwidth IPv4 over IPv4 tunnel merchants?

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:12, Bill Bogstad bogs...@pobox.com wrote: Like many people, I can't justify the expense of commercial IP connectivity for my residence.  As a result, I deal with dynamic IP addresses; dns issues; and limitations on the services that I can host at my residence. snip

Re: Running out of IPv6 (Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space)

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:47, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote: [changing topics, so that it actually reflects the content] On 2010-04-08 20:33, William Herrin wrote: Yes, with suitably questionable delegations, it is possible to run out of IPv6 quickly. The bottom line (IMHO) is that

Re: FCC dealt major blow in net neutrality ruling favoring Comcast

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 08:21, Mark Smith na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org wrote: snip So, there's the problem. According to the above, I'm both for, and against, Network Neutrality. One thing which would significantly help this argument for or against Network

Re: legacy /8

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 15:01, Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote: I am curious. Once we're nearing exhausting all IPv4 space will there ever come a time to ask/demand/force returning all these legacy /8 allocations? snip Legacy vs RIR allocated/assigned space is not a proper distinction,

Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?

SixXS maintains a list here: http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=ipv6transit. The IPv6 BGP weather map is a good resource: http://bgpmon.net/weathermap.php?inet=6 You can also use Geoff Huston's IPv6 CIDR report: http://www.cidr-report.org/v6/as2.0/ plugI should also note that my employer,

Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:04, Dale W. Carder dwcar...@wisc.edu wrote: On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Gary Mackenzie wrote: Having slightly lost track of what everybody is using for peering routers these days, what is the consensus about the best alternative to Juniper M series routers? have

Re: Ready to get your federal computer license?

with suggestions and ideas in this vein - I have some vehicles in place to start making this happen quickly with a bit of help) /soapbox ~Chris -- Chris Grundemann weblog.chrisgrundemann.com www.burningwiththebush.com www.coisoc.org

Re: Ready to get your federal computer license?

that create real security by encouraging better computer hygiene. - http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/cybersecurity-act $0.02 ~Chris -- Chris Grundemann weblog.chrisgrundemann.com www.burningwiththebush.com www.coisoc.org

Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:43, Randy Bushra...@psg.com wrote: sure, we need a privacy policy that can be arbitrarily changed with no ... previous ... notice just as we have for ... ... everything !!! exactly.  so was the question a troll, a red herring, or just a rant? randy I guess it

Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:03, Randy Bushra...@psg.com wrote: sure, we need a privacy policy that can be arbitrarily changed with no ... previous ... notice just as we have for ... ... everything !!! exactly.  so was the question a troll, a red herring, or just a rant? If you are saying that

Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch

customers have gotten from it.  You can see a sample report at:        http://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/restore/id=example-session - Vern Why no privacy policy? Or am I just partially blind? Is an answer in a FAQ legally binding? ~Chris -- Chris Grundemann weblog.chrisgrundemann.com

Re: ground control to TWTelecom

    |  therefore you are  Atlantic Net                | _ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_ I assume you checked route-server.twtelecom.net for the route? -- Chris Grundemann weblog.chrisgrundemann.com

Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re impacting revenue]

-- Chris Grundemann weblog.chrisgrundemann.com

Re: google logo

-- Chris Grundemann www.chrisgrundemann.com

Re: Level 3 / Time Warner problem in Ohio

/ Time Warner problem in Columbus OH? Time Warner is reporting to me that their provider, Level 3 is having problems in Columbus OH that is affecting several large midwest cities. Anyone have more details? -- Chris Grundemann

Re: IOS Rookit: the sky isn't falling (yet)

site is indeed the IOS that you put there in the first place.. Like MD5 File Validation? - MD5 values are now made available on Cisco.com for all Cisco IOS software images for comparison against local system image values. ~Chris Adrian -- Chris Grundemann www.linkedin.com

Re: [NANOG] OSPF minutia, and, technote publication venues

? -- Paul Vixie ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog -- Chris Grundemann www.linkedin.com/in/cgrundemann ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http

Re: 10GE router resource

Greg has laid out a great bit of information and I would like to add just one possibility to the list of budget 10GE routers: Vyatta. According to a recent press release from that company ( http://www.vyatta.com/about/pressreleases.php?id=51) they offer a product that is 2 to 3X higher

Re: 10GE router resource

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:56 PM, William Herrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Chris Grundemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greg has laid out a great bit of information and I would like to add just one possibility to the list of budget 10GE routers: Vyatta