on the subject
now that I look. Were these folks mistaken or am I missing something?
Any help would be appreciated.
--
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
And two seconds after I hit send I find an updated article
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp_fhrp/configuration/xe-3s/fhp-vrrp.html
facepalm
If you have more information I still welcome it. I'm going to go sit in
the corner now...
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
Correction. Still looking for something IPv6 specific.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 8/20/2012 9:39 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
And two seconds after I hit send I find an updated article
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp_fhrp/configuration/xe-3s/fhp
is parity such a difficult task?
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 8/20/2012 9:51 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 20/08/2012 15:41, -Hammer- wrote:
Correction. Still looking for something IPv6 specific.
Last time I looked, the support looked like this:
XR: v4: HSRPv1, VRRP
feet. I'll have to stick with HSRP and LL addressing. If
anyone knows different please let me know. Thanks
PS: Yes, I still have some ISL. :( On legacy environments only though. I
promise. Nothing new in years...
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 8/20/2012 3:31 PM, Owen
That's good to know. Seriously. I can point that out to the Cisco
guys... :)
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 8/20/2012 3:10 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Yeah I see the disconnect. I'm assuming that what I see is what I get.
Which means I'm going to stick with HSRP
I have almost one hundred FWs. Some physical. Some virtual. Various
vendors. Your point is spot on.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 7/16/2012 8:55 PM, Lee wrote:
On 7/16/12, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Why would you want NAT66? ICK!!! One of the best benefits
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 7/16/2012 11:18 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On 7/16/12, -Hammer- bhmc...@gmail.com wrote:
hurdles. Example? HSRP IPv6 global addressing on Cisco ASR platform. If
HSRP is a legacy proprietary protocol; try VRRP. Stateless
autoconfig
There's are routing and switching people and there are security people.
And they look at things different. That, IMHO, is the root of the
emotion on this thread. No one is actually wrong except me for stirring
the pot as the OP. :)
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 7/17
space with the WAN design team. What I'm trying to say is
that Roberts comments are spot on. It is a very different way of
thinking on a small scale and a large scale and you can't take your IPv4
logic and apply it. I've tried and it's just slowing me down.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
Inline -
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
1) (This one is currently a personal issue) I am still building up a true IPv6
skillset. Yes, I understand it for the most part but now is the time to apply
it.
Frankly, IMHO, the best way to build up a truly useful IPv6 skill set
I agree. Most are naive. Not all.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 7/16/2012 11:34 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:09:28 -0500, -Hammer- said:
---That is clearly a matter of opinion. NAT64 and NAT66 wouldn't be there
if there weren't enough
Guys,
The whole purpose of this is that they do NOT need to be global.
Security thru obscurity. It actually has a place in some worlds. Does that
make sense? Or are such V4-centric approaches a bad thing in v6?
On 7/13/12 8:41 PM, Brandon Ross br...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Owen
bashes head against wall
Thank you all. It's not the protocol that hurts. It's rethinking the
culture/philosophy around it.
-Hammer-
On 7/14/12 3:20 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
They're a bad thing in IPv6.
The only place for security through obscurity IMHO is a small round
this than in an IPv4 scenario. I know, not apples to
apples but for this question they are close enough. Unless there is
something IPv6 specific that is influencing this
--
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
Leo/Jeroen,
Thank you both. That is the simple answer that I wasn't thinking
of. I'm not as IPv6 savvy as I need to be (yet) so I haven't put all the
pieces together when trying to look at the bigger picture. Thanks again.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 7/13/2012
I think they would. I'm just a bit too new to this. Thanks.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 7/13/2012 10:05 AM, TJ wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:38 AM, -Hammer- bhmc...@gmail.com
mailto:bhmc...@gmail.com wrote:
OK. I'm pretty sure I'm gonna get some flak
for Internal services. I'm finally getting to the point where
I'm looking past the vastness of the numbers and just focusing on
subnets and masks and subnetting and whatnot.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 7/13/2012 11:11 AM, Tom Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:05 AM
I gotta agree with Aaron here. What would be my motivation to trust an
open and public infrastructure? With my business or personal keys?
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 6/7/2012 2:37 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Owen DeLongo
Thank you for educating without insulting. Always professional Owen.
It's appreciated.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 6/7/2012 3:18 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
A proper CA does not have your business or personal keys, they merely
sign them and attest to the fact
You should be discussing this with inside counsel. Not NANOG.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 5/24/2012 7:50 AM, not common wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for some guidance on full packet inspection at the ISP level.
Is there any regulations that prohibit or provide
by technology my advice would be to direct them
to legal.
You should be picking up a pattern here
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 5/24/2012 8:13 AM, not common wrote:
Thanks guys, I am looking for stuff to bring to my legal team (which
is one guy, that can't spell IP
And if your legal can't figure it out that is exactly what outside
counsel is for.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 5/24/2012 8:22 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
The problem is that it is strictly a jurisdictional question. I'm not
trying to throw it back at you. But I can't
Very nice Patrick
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 5/24/2012 8:19 AM, Patrick Darden wrote:
0. General Reference
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_packet_inspection#DPI_at_network.2FInternet_service_providers
e.g. Lawful Intercept
1. network neutrality -- lots
and whatnot so I could share more detailed
information with them.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 4/25/2012 10:34 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
There is not a new policy added on to prevent hoarding. What is required is what
has been required for several years. Utilization
purchase/lease/rent/titlepawn/etc. We paid for and got a block of IPs.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 4/25/2012 11:13 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:54:39 -0500, -Hammer- said:
I can say that I recently completed the purchase of a large IPv6
Sorry everyone. Bad choice of words. I simply meant they have their
money and we have our allocation.
Stand down. Move along. Nothing to see here.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 4/25/2012 11:55 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
No, you didn't. You may have completed
Killing me softly Owen
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 4/25/2012 1:15 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Nope... You paid for and received registration services for a block of IP
Addresses.
Anyone can use those integers for many purposes, but, only you are registered
to use
Joe,
We have a wide variety of both Internet and MPLS (WAN) circuits in
Alabama from ATT and ITC/Deltacom (Now Earthlink Business). They both
have a significant footprint in Alabama. Check with Earthlink Business.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 3/21/2012 10:44 AM
Can you be a little more specific? Otherwise I think your answer would
be The Internet
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 3/12/2012 3:05 PM, Maverick wrote:
Is there a whitelist that applications have to talk to in order to
update themselves?
Shouldn't eh be Canada and not Western Sahara?
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 3/12/2012 3:10 PM, Marco Davids (Prive) wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Marco Davids (Prive) wrote:
Some nice info here, too: http://bgp.he.net/report/dns
.cw seems to be missing.
Oops
Wile E Coyote knows all about him.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 3/5/2012 3:26 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote:
Anyone have a clueful road runner contact?
-Dan
I'm sure that virtualizing the sup would be possible. But having to come
up with all the line cards would be a nightmare. I'd love for someone
Internal to tell me I'm wrong but until we can get a 3560 or a 3750X on
Dynamips I wouldn't push for a 6500 or a Nexus.
-Hammer-
I was a normal
NO.
There is no method. Go to Ebay and buy one. Sorry. Or if you are a big
enough customer you can ask Cisco to mock up your solution in one of
their labs.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/22/2012 9:48 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Carlos Asensio
Can someone give me a link or part number on the Raritan site? I see LCD
consoles but they are the generic slide out versions. Looking for the
netbook concept referenced below
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/21/2012 3:51 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
+1 for Raritan
This list is awesome. Is anyone consolidating it? I'm still catching up
on the thread
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/17/2012 1:05 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 07:50, Paul Graydon wrote:
what OSI means
Yet another common misconception popping
Let me simplify that. If you are over 35 you know how to troubleshoot.
Yes, I'm going to get flamed. Yes, there are exceptions in both directions.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/17/2012 8:29 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 08:50
Well said. An American tragedy.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/17/2012 9:01 AM, Brandt, Ralph wrote:
Hammer, you are at least 75% right. You will get flamed and in most
cases, the 35 year age is close to right.
But then in Programming where I spent most of my
. They have a unique understanding of the layers. I had
that understanding in my 20s. The technology is so complicated these
days that many folks miss those fundamentals and go right into VSS on
the 6500s or MPLS over Juniper. In the end, it all comes in time.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American
If you do, please share it. Thank you.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/17/2012 9:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:29 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
This list is awesome. Is anyone consolidating it? I'm still catching up on the
thread
I was thinking
):
telnet 1.2.3.4 1433
What? It answered? So the SQL service is running? Then it ain't the
network dude
So many times people don't pick up on that. But when they do, it's like
a light bulb went off and they see the world differently. Like
subnetting
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
Well put and great example Owen.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/17/2012 12:59 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
This reminds me of what I think is the biggest root misconception of the 20th
and 21st centuries:
Rapid step-by-step training can replace conceptual education
Still buzzing over that cheap auto insurance eh? :) Wait till people
stop carding you.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/17/2012 1:42 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
As someone who was born in 1984 I respectfully disagree. ;-)
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:52 AM, -Hammer-bhmc
I couldn't argue with any of that. Again, there are exceptions on either
side.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/17/2012 2:40 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
Maybe ;-)
I don't think it's an age thing, though.
The number of people who have a real interest in technology, and how
Switching VS Bridging
Collision Domain VS Broadcast Domain
L2 in general is the layer that the new folks often misunderstand.
I once had someone ask me what a hub was. That pretty much told me how
old I was
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/15/2012 2:47 PM, John
operate. They don't
understand header manipulation vs payload.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/15/2012 3:52 PM, Dan White wrote:
Packet loss at hop X in traceroute/mtr does not necessarily point to a
problem at hop X.
hijacked.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/10/2012 11:51 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:37:01 PST, Leo Bicknell said:
We know how to sign and encrypt web sites.
We know how to sign and encrypt e-mail.
We even know how to compare keys
, I'm an end customer. Not a carrier. So my concern is (A)
my Internet facing applications and (B) my users who eventually will
surf IPv6.
Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
I'm doing it.
A lot of kinks to work out this year.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 2/3/2012 2:28 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2012-02-03 21:10 , -Hammer- wrote:
So, we are preparing to add IPv6 to our multi-homed (separate routers
and carriers with IBGP) multi-site
OK. Looking forward to getting the lab up. Since I can handle the volume
I'll take both tables. At least in the lab. Looking forward to doing
some experiments with DNS just to see what all the fuss is about. Looks
like I'll need to order a Mac for the lab. No harm there. :)
-Hammer-
I
Avocent Cyclades ACS. Enterprise class.
http://www.avocent.com/Products/Category/Serial_Appliances.aspx
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 1/30/2012 10:08 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
What are people using for console servers these days? We've
historically used retired routers
Here's your baseline: Sony Vita. They already tossed the UMD out with
the PSP-GO and that failed miserably. Now they are trying again to go to
digital only with the Vita. It's not the scale of PS3 or XBOX360 but it
may be a good way to gauge the potential success of the concept.
-Hammer-
I
Now we are venturing OT but I thought the format was proprietary but you
still had to get the content on the memory via the glorious Internet?
Are you saying I can go to Gamestop and buy a stick with whatever game
I'm looking for? Is that the plan?
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack
On a less serious note, did anyone notice the numbers on the fbi.gov
link? I'm pretty sure they are implying those are IP addresses.
123.456.789 and 987.654.321. Must be the same folks that do the Nexus
documentation for Cisco.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 1/19
Found them all on the same page. Not exactly what I was looking for but
it's worth sharing.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9670/products_implementation_design_guides_list.html
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 1/14/2012 7:10 PM, Charles Spurgeon wrote:
On Fri
Nice link. Thanks Joshua.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 1/18/2012 11:57 AM, joshua sahala wrote:
vpc has a long list of unclear and/or seemingly contradictory caveats
(spread across multiple cisco docs/webpages). when it doesn't work
(as expected), it can
Thanks Charles. It's a start.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 1/14/2012 7:10 PM, Charles Spurgeon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 03:05:45PM -0600, -Hammer- wrote:
The first link references chapter 3. I found chapter 5 as well
but I can't find the full index. Do
). Is
there something fancy here that I'm missing in the docs or am I wrong in
equating the two? Isn't VPC just S/MLT? It's just that Cisco has shown
up 8 years late and is trying to hype it up to compensate?
--
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
. If anyone has some really deep docs on VPC I'd appreciate the
links. Thanks.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 1/13/2012 1:31 PM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
On 1/13/12 11:19 , -Hammer- wrote:
OK, So I'm doing a lot of reading lately on Nexus as we are about to get
into the 7k
Thanks Charles. Good stuff.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 1/13/2012 2:10 PM, Charles Spurgeon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:38:26PM -0600, -Hammer- wrote:
Wow. A fellow greybeard. OK. That's what I needed to know. I'm trying to
understand if VPC has any more
Charles,
The first link references chapter 3. I found chapter 5 as well
but I can't find the full index. Do you have that link by any chance?
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 1/13/2012 2:10 PM, Charles Spurgeon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:38:26PM -0600
Jay,
Do you know if they'll be keeping/maintaining your colo? Or is it
too early for that kind of information?
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 1/10/2012 9:58 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
By Knology.
Should I be scared?
My experiences with Knology have been fairly
. but Dynamips or something similar? If the software is out there I
have the hardware to support it. Based on some cheap googling I'm
thinking the answer will be no. Although I did find Greg Ferros public
outcry for network emulators from last year
--
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
So you want a dynamic real time network discovery / topology mapping?
I think Whatsup gold tried this years ago and it could even export to
Visio. But not sure lately.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 12/20/2011 08:37 AM, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011
Bah. Look like I need more of an education on Nexus in general. Thanks
for the easy pointer.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 12/20/2011 11:02 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 20/12/2011 13:55, -Hammer- wrote:
I know we can't throw NX code on Dynamips but I figured I
way to emulate the [5,7]K anytime soon. Thank you all for
your comments.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 12/20/2011 12:03 PM, Tim Stevenson wrote:
You couldn't use Titanium to judge/discuss the nexus family as a whole
either. Aside from 1KV, all the nexus products use
Doesn't Titanium achieve this for you? I know. It's Internal. But it
simulates the 7k. Or am I getting it backwards?
My point is that if Cisco already simulates it Internally it's only a
matter of time before someone ports something
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
.
I don't see how it can hurt Cisco to have people wanting to run their
stuff for learning/training/validation purposes in a virtual
environment. But that is a whole different thread.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 12/20/2011 12:31 PM, Tim Stevenson wrote:
At 10:18
incorrectly.
And our wonderful federal auditors expect it and call it the same thing.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 12/07/2011 09:43 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Dec 8, 2011, at 1:36 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I don't think you're looking at defense in depth
I personally have not seen it done in large environments. Hardware isn't
there yet. I've seen it done in small business environments. Not a fan
of the idea.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 12/06/2011 03:16 PM, Holmes,David A wrote:
Some firewall vendors are proposing
There was a new BIND vulnerability announced...
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-4313
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/30/2011 10:59 AM, rob.vercoute...@kpn.com wrote:
Hello Leland,
Yes we do see the same behavior!
regards,
Rob Vercouteren
Just offering it up. It's not a 0day or anything but it is recently
published. I am not receiving the DoS so I haven't had a chance to
observe the traffic.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/30/2011 11:40 AM, David Conrad wrote:
On Nov 30, 2011, at 9:13 AM, -Hammer
LOL. I see what you did there.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/21/2011 01:17 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
I wonder if they are using private IP addresses.
-as
On 21 Nov 2011, at 13:32, Jay Ashworth wrote:
On an Illinois water utility:
http
used against bad guys w/o question.
While I agree that this is an extra layer of complexity, the focus is to
make in manageable.
I'm not saying you are flat out wrong Owen. I am saying that it's all a
matter of your viewpoint.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/16/2011
Well argued Owen. I can see both sides.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/16/2011 02:44 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Nov 16, 2011, at 9:13 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
NAT neither provides nor contributes to security.
NAT detracts from security by destroying audit trails
. They filter garbage. You focus your
IDS/IPS on what the FW is allowing. It's more than a screen door. But
yes, it's LESS than a true vault door. It's all about mitigating the
risk. You'll never be 100% full proof.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/15/2011 08:56 AM, William
to much and definitely keeps
us in check from human errors.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/15/2011 09:00 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On the other hand, since a firewall's job is to stop packets you don't want,
if it stops doing it's just as a firewall, it's likely to keep
I see your side Cameron.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/15/2011 09:20 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Nov 15, 2011 7:09 AM, -Hammer- bhmc...@gmail.com
mailto:bhmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
Everyone is complaining about whether a FW serves its purpose
6to6 and 4to6/6to4 options and we may consider it
but given the push in the IPv6 community for native addressing I really
am hesitant to add NAT functionality given that no one really knows what
the IPv6 future holds.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/14/2011 02:55 PM
not
saying it's fair. It's just how the world works. For that reason there
are some areas where open source is smart while there are other areas (a
firewall you depend on to protect you) where open source may put you and
your employer at risk. You have to consider that. Or... Some of us do.
-Hammer-
I
.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/10/2011 09:14 AM, Richard Kulawiec wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:52:22AM -0600, -Hammer- wrote:
The other high cost of free that people sometimes overlook is
liability.
Please point to an instance (case citation, please
it. But it does happen and it is out there. I was just pointing
it out. Take it for what you want but arguing it is pointless. It's out
there for some of us.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/10/2011 10:04 AM, Peter Kristolaitis wrote:
Your hypothetical scenario assumes
WOW. You really are naive
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/10/2011 12:12 PM, Richard Kulawiec wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:39:29AM -0600, -Hammer- wrote:
OK. Right off the bat you know I can't and won't.
Right. I know you can't and won't. I
You guys are hilarious. OK. I give up. It never happens. I'll leave this
thread alone.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/10/2011 12:19 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Richard Kulawiecr...@gsp.org
Right. I know you can't
published.
Again, I'll try and leave this thread alone.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/10/2011 12:24 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:12:21 CST, -Hammer- said:
WOW. You really are naive
I think Rich has been around long enough
in
the future? When millions of dollars are at stake? You don't have to
like it. But you should be a little more objective.
I am not speaking of specific cases I'm involved in. I just googled a
few things and found some results
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/10/2011
of the capabilities
of the product? Fortinet.
And the list goes on and on and on
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/09/2011 08:00 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:32:45PM +0300, Alex Nderitu wrote:
An important feature lacking for now as far as I know
do it well.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/09/2011 08:52 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
I think that firewall/censorship is all semantics. The real question
is the scale of the environment and the culture of your shop and areas
of ownership.
I work in a large enterprise
You've worked with all the big dogs. What are you looking for?
Alternative options?
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/08/2011 05:06 PM, Jones, Barry wrote:
Hello all.
I am potentially looking at firewall products and wanted suggestions as to the
easiest firewalls
applications but it's not clear on the underlying
reason. I'm giving cautious updates to management because even though
it's obvious something is going on I don't have anything official except
random email threads. Looking for more insight before misinforming
management.
-Hammer-
I was a normal
So the file size was 30% higher implies that the number of updates is
larger and therefore there is instability? I see the logic but if you
scroll thru that page (the whole month of November) there are tons of
1M files. Trying to see what is different about today
-Hammer-
I was a normal
month of
November reflects instability where I see transitions from 600k to 1M
between updates. Yet we didn't experience the same negative customer
experience for those. So how do you see the difference with todays
events? Digging into files now.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
Jared,
This is good stuff and I'm understanding how you interpret the
data. So this confirms what we are seeing. How do we take this towards a
root cause? Mash it with the Juniper threads and see where it goes?
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/07/2011 11:01 AM
release vulnerabilities are fixed as per our End of Engineering
and End of Life support policies.
31.
32. Workarounds
33. No known workaround exists for this issue.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 11/07/2011 04:09 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
Any thoughts on just how wide read
Girls,
You are all pretty. End the thread. Seriously.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 10/28/2011 01:59 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Joel jaegglijoe...@bogus.com wrote:
Email as facility is a public good whether it constitutes
not buying it either.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 10/12/2011 09:47 AM, andrew.wallace wrote:
Guys the outage has moved to U.S and Canada, I think we need to look at this
perhaps being sabotage.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20119163-266/blackberry-service-issues
could have tested
better
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 10/12/2011 10:58 AM, Chris Campbell wrote:
I think it raises serious questions about RIM's DR strategy if a DB corruption
or switch failure or whatever can cause this much outage. 'Surely' RIM have an
second
Again. I know those stories are out there. I'm blessed with a lower
profile or higher karma. One of the two.
digging thru cube to fine wood to knock on
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 10/12/2011 11:53 AM, Mike Gatti wrote:
I have and totally get the point
Girls. You're both pretty. Really. Move on.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 10/07/2011 10:40 AM, Paul Graydon wrote:
On 10/7/2011 5:30 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
On 10/7/11 08:26 , Paul Graydon wrote:
On 10/6/2011 8:02 PM, John Levine wrote:
DISCLAIMER:...
Wow. I
CheckPoint Series 80 has 10 ports.
I think there is a Juniper option as well.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd
-Jack Herer
On 09/06/2011 09:36 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
On 6-9-2011 15:49, Positively Optimistic wrote:
Greetings
Does anyone have a suggestion for a single piece of hardware
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
