On 06/08/2015 06:22 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:10:25 -0700, Jeroen van Aart said:
You sort of nailed it though. I think ready knowledge
about the internals of utilities such as traceroute
or ping is nice to have, however if you don't know
On 06/05/2015 06:38 PM, Mike Hale wrote:
We need a pool on what percentage of readers just googled traceroute.
You sort of nailed it though. I think ready knowledge about the
internals of utilities such as traceroute or ping is nice to have,
however if you don't know it it is not something
Why am I not surprised?
Whose fault would it be if your comcast installed public wifi would be
abused to download illegal material or launch a botnet, to name some
random fun one could have on your behalf. :-/
(apologies if this was posted already, couldn't find an email about it
on the
On 09/24/2014 07:53 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Get Your Hands Off My Laptop: Physical Side-Channel Key-Extraction Attacks On
PCs
http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/626
http://www.tau.ac.il/~tromer/handsoff/
gets your gpg private key damned quickly
Only 4 pages into reading the pdf, but it's an excellent
Scott Weeks wrote:
-Original Message-
Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
Regards,
-AS666 NOC
--
ASN 666 is the US army. I was curious a long time
ago and looked it up... ;-)
scott
OP is a troll, best to ignore and block:
On 08/18/2014 12:57 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
Le 18/08/2014 20:38, Jeroen van Aart a écrit :
OP is a troll,
Sure? :-)
I drew that conclusion considering normally the emails coming from that
address have a different origin (thus coming from a different person),
i.e. coming from psg.com
On 09/19/2013 12:06 PM, Ryan Harden wrote:
As a side note, how are some of you not aware of this? This has happened with
every single Apple OS update since the iPhone was released in 2007.
The difference is there are now a couple more million devices out
there than there were in 2007. And in
On 05/01/2013 10:05 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
I'm more impressed with MicroCenter than Frys (at least the Frys south if
SF).
Too bad the Micro Center in Santa Clara along hwy 101 closed shop a year
or so ago. According to them the owner of the building raised the lease
price too much. The
On 03/05/2013 05:41 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I think it's also important to cover the following topics somewhere in the
process:
1. This will affect the entire organization, not just the IT department and
will definitely impact all of apps, sysadmin, devops, operations, and
On 02/09/2013 07:55 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
When you are staying at a 3* hotel, should you have no expectations
that you'll be getting at least a 3Mbps pipe and at least an under
100ms average latency, and won't be getting a balancer that would be
breaking up your ssh sessions?
On 01/08/2013 08:36 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
- Forwarded message from Lauren Weinsteinlau...@vortex.com -
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:35:59 -0800
From: Lauren Weinsteinlau...@vortex.com
To: nnsq...@nnsquad.org
Subject: [ NNSquad ] Mark Crispin - MRC - Inventor of IMAP and a friend for
Not exactly a nanog subject but I would like to know if there is a
(ideally) locally owned ISP in LA that's knowledgeable, for DSL service.
Something like cruzio in Santa Cruz. Trying to avoid the big ones such
as ATT and comcast.
Thanks,
Jeroen
--
Earthquake Magnitude: 4.0
Date: Tuesday,
On 12/20/2012 10:41 AM, Wayne E Bouchard wrote:
How many people here have gotten good enough that they can cut a
cable and pop connectors on each end in under 3 minutes? How many have
gotten good enough that the failure rate for *hand made* cables is sub
1:1000? Show me another connector type
On 12/20/2012 01:13 PM, George Herbert wrote:
For some users, even more positive than RJ45 is warranted. I at times
work in and have a number of friends working in various aerospace and
rocketry areas, and RJ45's have been widely known to come loose under
acceleration.
I found that a spliced
On 11/30/2012 02:02 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
OK, there must be a lot more paranoid people out there than I thought
for awhile? I am sure he will let you out to go to the bank, get your
stuff, and leave town. I think you have seen way to many movies.
So if the cops show up at his door
On 11/27/2012 07:14 PM, Cody Rose wrote:
I have had great success with the Shrew Soft vpn client and if you are
using Fedora it is only a 'yum install ike' away and works without root
and properly utilizes the tap interface while installing the proper
routes needed to get traffic going.
On 11/27/2012 07:27 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Do you want one for IPSEC or for the SSL VPN Appliance that Juniper is pushing
nowadays?
I just checked, the script i am looking at calls the ncscv tool which I
believe is made by juniper? It needs amongst other things an ssl
certificate. So I
On 11/28/2012 02:03 PM, Edward Dore wrote:
openssl x509 -inform DER -infile -outform PEM -outfile
Thanks, that did the trick.
--
Earthquake Magnitude: 4.6
Date: Thursday, November 29, 2012 02:23:59 UTC
Location: Jan Mayen Island region
Latitude: 71.0240; Longitude: -6.5291
Depth: 13.50 km
Hello,
Does anyone know a practical and somewhat user friendly way of
connecting to juniper vpn using linux?
I have happily used http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/ a allow
linux users to connect cisco vpn boxes where a crappy cisco vpn client
would be needed otherwise, and it works
On 10/31/2012 12:24 PM, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
I had to summarize this recently for a news article I was interviewed for, so I
figured I forward:
Of our three datacenters, this is what we saw:
Parsippany 1 (OCT) - The worst we saw here was several sub-second power hits.
UPS's held without
On 10/03/2012 09:52 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
Op 3-10-2012 18:33, Kevin Broderick schreef:
I'll add that in the mid-90's, in a University Of Washington lecture
hall, Vint Cerf expressed some regret over going with 32 bits. Chuckle
worthy and at the time, and a fond memory
- K
Pick a number between
(..) they always have criminal links and protection from
corrupts officials (often co-owners) and security/law enforcement services
From: Jeroen van Aart
there is
nothing but crap coming from 91.201.64.0/24. Amongst other things
attempts to spam (through) wordpress sites.
inetnum
Owen DeLong wrote:
ATT should just be glad there was a /12 for them to get.
That isn't going to be true for much longer.
If you are counting on an IPv4 free pool to run your business next year, you
are making a bad bet.
The 16777214 IP addresses (give or take) in their 12/8 assignment
joel jaeggli wrote:
On 8/23/12 2:11 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
it's probably used internally and renumbering
to 10/8 would be too big a hurdle to take. ;-)
show route 12.0.0.0/8
...
That was mostly tongue in cheek. I was remembering the reasons people on
here brought up why /8 legacy
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
I am curious, since I have pretty much confirmed the problem is on my
side, why would a move of an IPv6 tunnel from one server to another
A helpful person pointed me in the right direction. Multiple times I
checked the /etc/network/interfaces file and didn't spot
Recently I migrated the server that's running an HE IPv6 tunnel to one
of the Fremont endpoints and now the tunnel is going down for a few
minutes every couple of hours or so. I haven't been able yet to find a
reason for this. I made sure the old server is not running any IPv6
related things
Rob Mosher wrote:
Perhaps you should try contacting HE support. I hear they're responsive.
I understand however I was pretty sure it wasn't the tunnel that was the
problem. So I didn't feel emailing HE was appropriate.
I am curious, since I have pretty much confirmed the problem is on my
Joe Greco wrote:
No, really, how bad an idea can it be to have a central database and
a system that's allowed to remotely log in, configure, and update
thousands of Internet-connected CPE? I mean, talk about making an
attractive target.
No argument against the lack of wisdom regarding this
William Herrin wrote:
This is, incidentally, is a detail I'd love for one of the candidates
to offer in response to that question. Bonus points if you discuss MSS
clamping and RFC 4821.
The less precise answer, path MTU discovery breaks, is just fine.
I would say that the ability to quickly
JC Dill wrote:
I'm really surprised to see this Windows is more popular, that's why
it's exploited more often misinformation being spewed on a technical
list like NANOG. I thought people here had more clue.
I don't think a individual opinion is representative for the whole
1+ (?) member
Rob McEwen wrote:
Personally, I prefer paying a little extra for my own dedicated and/or
co-located servers... where I'm in total control of ALL aspects of
hardware/software.
You are resisting the lure back to the mainframe paradime [sic], let go
of your resistance and let yourself be gently
Ameen Pishdadi wrote:
A Kia and Ferrari can both get me from point a to point b, but the Ferrari is capable of getting me there way quicker, and yes I'm going to pay a premium for it but if I'm going from NYC to San Fran I'd definitely feel safer in the Ferrari reliability wise and get there a
Brandt, Ralph wrote:
I am not sure who uses DSL here. I have two people I know who use it,
both are dissatisfied and if they had an alternative it woud not be.
It is slow, unreliable compared to cable.
That's a rather bold statement which I find hard to believe. Do you have
any data to
David Miller wrote:
I think you are referring to this thread -
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/149903
Utilisation doesn't become 100%, instead measured utilisation will
either be 100% or 0% at each interval.
Thanks, and yes that was what I was trying to say. :-)
--
Anurag Bhatia wrote:
I have been using Zenoss quite a bit. It does not shows exact real time
stat of interface but close to real time + it has ton more options for
I remember someone here saying that real time monitoring gives you
useless results, because if you make the time of measurement
Livingood, Jason wrote:
you may just have nuked their 911 capability.
Depending on your internet connection to be able to dial 911 is a bit
foolhardy, to put it nicely. It pays off to have a phone that's only
powered through the phone line itself, for emergencies (and your
everyday home
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Actually, I said that, not Jason. Jason just used mail software that *can't get
quoting right* to reply to my message, so your quote of his message got the
attribution wrong.
Sorry, I don't keep track of who is unable to quote properly. But I do
always try to
Christopher Morrow wrote:
wow, 1990 much? are you actually just trolling today perhaps?
No, what is wrong with using a land line, a rotary phone and enjoying a
reliable service? Plus a superior audio quality as opposed to the
compressed to hell quality of mobile phones.
Not withstanding
Sean Harlow wrote:
Then you'll be happy to know that most VoIP phones default to and good VoIP providers
gladly support G.711, the exact same codec used in all digital trunks in the POTS
network. Also, an on-the-ball VoIP carrier will be pushing G.722 HD Voice
devices which offer about
Jared Mauch wrote:
Regarding landline service, this can fail for many of the common reasons it
does are the same reasons that IP service may fail. The failure modes can
depend on a variety of circumstances from the physical layer (e.g.: audible
static on the line) that cause your ear to
Sean Harlow wrote:
Originally, you said VoIP and cellular used bad codecs.
Yeah, I overlooked that important detail, sorry.
The cellular world works with less bandwidth and more loss than the VoIP world usually deals with, so while us VoIP guys sometimes use their codecs (GSM for example)
O'Reirdan, Michael wrote:
Please look at www.dcwg.org
Thanks all for the information.
It looks like the practical upshot is that computers that have been
infected and not yet fixed may loose the ability to resolve names into
IP addresses starting sometime after July 9, which is when the
Excuse the horrible subject :-)
Anyone have anything insightful to say about it? Is it just lots of fuss
about nothing or is it an actual substantial problem?
http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/november/malware_110911
Update on March 12, 2012: To assist victims affected by the DNSChanger
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
Do you have reference to recent papers with experimental data about non
ECC memory errors? It should be fairly easy to do
Maybe this provides some information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECC_memory#Problem_background
Work published between 2007 and 2009 showed widely
Jimmy Hess wrote:
Consider that the probability 16GB of SDRAM experiences at least one
single bit error at sea level,
in a given 6 hour period exceeds 66% = 1 - (1 - 1.3e-12 * 6)^(16 *
2^30 * 8).In any given 24 hour period, the probability of at least
one single bit error exceeds 98%.
Leo Bicknell wrote:
But what's really missing is storage management. RAID5 (and similar)
require all drives to be online all the time. I'd love an intelligent
file system that could spin down drives when not in use, and even for
many workloads spin up only a portion of the drives. It's easy
PC wrote:
It exists. Google for unRAID It uses something like Raid4 for Parity
data, but stores entire files on single spindles. It's designed for home
media server type environments. This way, when you watch a video, only the
There may be a performance penalty using raid4, because it uses
Brielle Bruns wrote:
Unfortunately, the apathy of providers, backbones, and network operators
in general have created an environment that the almighty buck rules
everything.
I totally agree with pretty much everything in this email.
I also agree that blocking whole /24 or bigger when spam
Landon Stewart wrote:
I think we should all just NULL ROUTE all of their IP space on our borders
to get their attention.
Yeah you're free to do that, as well as complain about it and SORBS in
turn is free to put whatever the hell they feel like on their block
lists and not remove it at all,
C. A. Fillekes wrote:
I do not think that the closing of a service that's undergone multiple
acquisitions by actual competitors is at all surprising. Did the
closing of Alta Vista a couple years ago after its acquisition by
Yahoo! spell the death of internet search? No.
Well, it's a bit hard
Michael Sinatra wrote:
active class newsgroups. As you can see from examples such as CS 61a (
https://groups.google.com/group/ucb.class.cs61a/about?pli=1),
Can someone help out mrshare?
https://groups.google.com/group/ucb.class.cs61a/browse_frm/month/2010-08
The above link and this one are a
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
The massive drop in latency is expected to supercharge algorithmic stock
market trading, where a difference of a few milliseconds can gain (or lose)
millions of dollars.
But it should be illegal to run a stock market that volatile. This can't end
well.
The
Joel Maslak wrote:
is not. But there is value in not passing utter garbage to another
program (it has a tendency to clog mail queues, if for no other
reason) - just make sure you do it right.
I fail to see why you wouldn't be able to throttle any abuse of your
webform so it wouldn't clog a
Does anyone know if these crappy dell powerconnect switches (in my case
a 3448p) have a convenient or at least working way of exporting/backing
up the configuration to a different place? The only thing I can find is
using a tftp server but it's not working...
Thanks,
Jeroen
--
Earthquake
Steve Bertrand wrote:
imo, this discussion of outbound SMTP has been sounding akin to me
saying I should let my upstream ensure that all of my BGP announcements
are good, instead of filtering my own outbound.
know whether the address is to RFC or not. Less bugs and changes, I feel
it is
Bill Weiss wrote:
I'm using RANCID against a few 54xx PowerConnect switches, and it's
working well enough. I'm pretty sure my dlogin and drancid came from
http://web.rickyninja.net:81/rancid/drancid and
http://web.rickyninja.net:81/rancid/dlogin .
A number of people suggested that, thanks.
Ryan Malayter wrote:
not designed or coded by a native English speaker. You have to use the
upload link to export config, and put in the address of your TFTP server,
since you are uploading from the switch to the tftp server.
Yes I tried that. However the switch complains with an error about
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Ryan Malayter wrote:
not designed or coded by a native English speaker. You have to use the
upload link to export config, and put in the address of your TFTP
server, since you are uploading from the switch to the tftp server.
Yes I tried that. However the switch
Joe Greco wrote:
The ideal world contains a mix of techniques.
Yes and copying parts of relevant code of an MTA could be one.
You cannot just blindly leave it to the MTA to decide what's valid.
Along that path lies madness. How do you pass the address to the MTA?
Don't do it as a system()
Owen DeLong wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_address#Valid_email_addresses
You may have noticed my particular test wouldn't accept foo!bar!ucbvax!user
format addresses, either.
It works well enough for my purposes. I did not claim it was perfect.
Why not leave it to the MTA to
Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
7 - compressed air can to clean dust
dust?!?!? sounds like time to find a whole new colo and move everything
out of there haha.
i've -never- encountered one with dust in it.
that stuff usually gets sucked out before it gets the idea to land on
anything should it
Randy Carpenter wrote:
Does anyone have any recommendation for a reliable cloud host?
Basic requirements:
1. Full redundancy with instant failover to other hypervisor hosts upon
hardware failure (I thought this was a given!)
Assuming a simple set up as you suggest. If what you want to do
Mike Hale wrote:
If you're located in a major city, I'm sure you can find a community
college that has a networking certificate program you can send your
developer to, along with an in-house training program.
Oh come on!!!1
Investing in your employee by sending them out to courses, for crying
John Mitchell wrote:
rant
I would wholeheartedly agree with this, but I believe its worse than
teaching process is one of learning to program like a monkey, monkey
see monkey do. People are no longer taught to think for themselves, but
instead taught to program in a specific language (PHP,
Jamie Bowden wrote:
Hey now...the time from zero to TS/SCI has gone from over half a decade to a
mere quarter decade. You can totally pay these guys to sit around doing drudge
work while their skills atrophy in the interim. Of course, if you need a poly
on top, add some more time and stir
After reading a number of threads where people list their huge and
wasteful, but undoubtedly fun (and sometimes necessary?), home setups
complete with dedicated rooms and aircos I felt inclined to ask who has
attempted to make a really energy efficient setup?
This may be an interesting read,
Leigh Porter wrote:
You dudes need to get with the times and put all this stuff in the cloud.
Ok so I joke a little..
The cloud seems to be a more modern implementation of the mainframe
paradigm (and now I feel soiled having used 2 such words in one
sentence). It has its uses, though it's
Marcel Plug wrote:
I've run a SheevaPlug at home for a few years now. I don't do
anything fancy with it, but it does what I need it to do. Mostly that
I wonder how reliable the storage is in these things. Is it comparable
to modern SSDs?
Oh and I also have native IPv6 on my DSL. I like
Marcel Plug wrote:
No issues so far. As I said though, I don't push it too hard. I
don't have any specs or stats off hand, so I can't get any more
detailed.
What's the speed like?
I'm pretty happy with them, I just wish my DLink would stop requiring reboots...
I assume you connected it
Michael Sinatra wrote:
The words Internet and Web can be used interchangeably
I prefer the term intergophers myself.
--
Earthquake Magnitude: 4.9
Date: Friday, February 17, 2012 14:28:20 UTC
Location: Komandorskiye Ostrova, Russia region
Latitude: 54.5969; Longitude: 168.8863
Depth: 34.70 km
Steven Bellovin wrote:
Note this from the NY Times article:
The Megaupload case is unusual, said Orin S. Kerr, a law professor
at George Washington University, in that federal prosecutors obtained
the private e-mails of Megaupload�s operators in an effort to show they
were operating in
randal k wrote:
This is a huge point. We've had a LOT of trouble finding good network
engineers who have all of the previously mentioned soft attributes -
anything, can't setup a syslog server, doesn't understand AD much less
LDAP, etc. Imagine, an employee who can help themselves 90% of the
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Does your Mom call you up every time she gets a dialog box complaining
about an invalid certificate ?
If she has been conditioned just to click OK when that happens, then
she probably can't.
Everyone I have observed clicks ok or confirm exception (if I
remember the
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 04:00:44 PM Douglas Otis wrote:
products are able to provide good returns. In this view, the analogy
holds when price alone is not considered.
And, like Edison, Mr. Jobs fiercely championed his own technologies over all others; just one
Fyodor wrote:
switched their Nmap downloads back to our real installer. At least
for now. But that isn't enough--they are still infecting the
installers for thousands of other packages!
I am sorry about these problems, it is unacceptable.
Sourceforge, at least a year or 2 ago, did
Fyodor wrote:
switched their Nmap downloads back to our real installer. At least
for now. But that isn't enough--they are still infecting the
installers for thousands of other packages!
I am sorry about these problems, it is unacceptable.
Sourceforge, at least a year or 2 ago, did
Fyodor wrote:
switched their Nmap downloads back to our real installer. At least
for now. But that isn't enough--they are still infecting the
installers for thousands of other packages!
I am sorry about these problems, it is unacceptable.
Sourceforge, at least a year or 2 ago, did
William Herrin wrote:
If your machine is addressed with a globally routable IP, a trivial
failure of your security apparatus leaves your machine addressable
from any other host in the entire world which wishes to send it
Isn't that the case with IPv6? That the IP is addressable from any host
Owen DeLong wrote:
It's both unacceptable in my opinion and common. There are even those
misguided souls that will tell you it is best practice, though general
agreement,
even among them seems to be that only 25/tcp should be blocked and that
465 and 587 should not be blocked.
From my
Lynda wrote:
Dennis was one of the good ones. A kind and generous person, who changed
all our worlds.
Indeed.
I consider the KR C book as the pinnacle of how a book like that should
be written. Every page, every sentence contains a multitude of
information and there is no redundancy.
The C
Joe Greco wrote:
toddlers around and drive to and from work. An SUV in almost all cases
is added luxury.
My SUV carries seven passengers and allows me to haul gear including
conduit, lumber, ladders, etc. It's actively dangerous to do some of
these things in a sedan.
Hence I said in almost
I am sure it has come up a number of times, but with IPv6 you can make
up fancy addresses that are (almost) complete words or phrases. Making
it almost as easy to remember as the resolved name.
It'd be nice in a weird geek sort of way (but totally impractical) to be
able to request IPv6
William Herrin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote:
able to request IPv6 blocks that have some sort of fancy name of your
choice.
4-character or shorter hex words, for your reference:
aced
ace5
ac1d
:-D
Thanks.
I wonder about 2001:db8
Joe Greco wrote:
that things are changing. The number of TV's in a household are going
up. Some can now stream directly to the TV. I have numerous devices
How can it go up even more? I thought every bedroom and living room has
one by now, in the average family house. In my experience
Steven Bellovin wrote:
When I was in grad school, the director of the computer center (remember
those) felt that there was no need for 1200 bps modems -- 300 bps was
fine, since no one could read the scrolling output any faster than that
anyway.
Right now, I'm running an rsync job to back up my
Owen DeLong wrote:
If you don't believe that consumer content acquisition is shifting away from
traditional methods towards internet-oriented mechanisms rapidly, you haven't
been paying attention to the bandwidth growth at Netflix as just one example.
Hulu, Youtube, and even the various
Paul Graydon wrote:
I've seen the stuff about adding a few extra TLDs, like XXX. I haven't
seen any references until now of them considering doing it on a
commercial basis. I don't mind new TLDs, but company ones are crazy
and going to lead to a confusing and messy internet.
I don't know
Octavio Alvarez wrote:
In fact. Although a website of mine worked flawlessly in a dual-stack
but it did NOT in an IPv6-only environment. Unfortunately, the problem
has to be fixed in the DNS provider, which though supporting
records was enough to support IPv6.
Why not run your own
Seth Mattinen wrote:
listen-on-v6 { any; };
Yeah that's what I did. But I keep reading about how these big name
companies messed it up in some subtle or not so subtle way and I keep
thinking I must have missed something. Because surely those big
companies can't find it that difficult, can
Leo Bicknell wrote:
but it all doesn't matter because the network team hadn't actually
made IPv6 work yet as there was no business case.
Ahhh, ok, well at least I know I did it right the first time.
No, I'm not cynical. :)
It probably reflects daily practice for many big organisations,
Ricardo Ferreira wrote:
Funny, how in the title refers to the Internet globally when the article is
specific about the USA.
I live in europe and we have at home 100Mbps . Mid sized city of 500k
people. Some ISPs even spread WiFi across town so that subscribers can have
internet access outside
Randy Bush wrote:
some of us try to get work done from home. and anyone who has worked
and/or lived in a first world country thinks american 'broadband' speeds
are a joke, even for a home network.
I understand, but I was referring to the average home internet
connection. But even for work
Don Gould wrote:
100/40 isn't about 6 channels of TV and even less about torrents.
It's about BIR not CIR.
It's about dropping my HD video recorder, with 2 hours of random video
recorded at todays 'family birthday party', on its 'hot shoe' and it
All these new gadgets will drive the need
Eugen Leitl wrote:
It definitely reduces need for moving human bodies in metal boxes
back and forth, and reduces road wear and carbon dioxide emissions.
I think a world of telecommuting employees is a utopia that will not be
reached in my lifetime. Most companies have proven to be unwilling
Jay Ashworth wrote:
Even Cracked realizes this:
http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-reasons-internet-access-in-america-disaster
That can't be good.
ignorant?
up to 10 percent of the country can't even get basic broadband
I think I saw much larger numbers a few years ago when I read some hype
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
So the *actual* numbers are much worse than the FCC numbers.
Be that as it may, when I moved to the States I had to give up DSL back
in the Netherlands. But since I got flat rate dialup in return in the
USA it wasn't such a big deal, for me the internet worked
Owen DeLong wrote:
FIrst I've heard of such a thing. The original organizers of W6D have zero
motivation to try such a thing and I can't imagine why they would even
consider it for more than a picosecond.
It'd be a great way to get a point across. ;-)
--
Steve Clark wrote:
This is all very confusing to me. How are meaningful names going to
assigned automatically?
Right now I see something like ool-6038bdcc.static.optonline.net for one
of our servers, how does this
mean anything to anyone else?
Does http://وزارة-الأتصالات.مصر/ mean more to
Paul Vixie wrote:
time in Nicaragua he said that he has a lot of days like this and he'd
like more work to be possible when only local connectivity was available.
Compelling stuff. Pity there's no global market for localized services
or we'd already have it. Nevertheless this must and will
Joe Abley wrote:
Or perhaps even some kind of new technology that is independent of the
Internet! Imagine such futuristic ideas as solar-powered spacecraft in orbit
around the planet bouncing content back across massive areas so that everybody
can pick them up at once.
Crazy stuff.
You
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
