On 1/29/2013 4:39 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Francois Mezei jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca
It is in fact important for a government (municipal, state/privince or
federal) to stay at a last mile layer 2 service with no retail
offering. Wholesale only.
Not
On 9/25/2012 4:11 PM, Bryan Seitz wrote:
All,
Recently began seeing things like this to the default GW from
inside and outside the FIOS network. Called tech support but all they
could do was put a ticket in for the NetEng team.
http://pastie.org/4800421
On 9/16/2012 9:55 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I came across these threads today; the blind ignorance towards IPv6 from
some of the posters is kind of shocking. It's also pretty disappointing
if these are the people providing internet access to end users. We focus
our worries on the big guys like
On 9/12/2012 5:18 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Hi Folks,
I expect folks on NANOG would know: Are there any domain registrars who
provide APIs for managing domains and/or DNS records? It's kind of a
pain managing large numbers of domains via klunky web interfaces. It
sure would be nice to tie
On 8/20/2012 12:09 PM, Eric Wieling wrote:
For a while we have had a customer with some lines which go down every time it
rains. We put in the trouble ticket, a couple of days later Verizon says the
issue is resolved...until the next time it rains.
The customer sent us some pictures today
A merchant can offer a cash discount.
--John
On 6/10/2012 11:16 AM, Barry Shein wrote:
I was under the impression (I should dig out my contract) that
merchant contracts also forbid charging more for a charge than for
cash or conversely discount for cash! but I see so many violations
of that
In my experience Cogent is fine when used in a BGP mix. When we used
them, our service was quite reliable. Routing was funky at times, but we
never had packet loss.
--John
On 5/14/2012 3:03 PM, Jason Baugher wrote:
The emails on the Outages list reminded me to ask this question...
I've done
In that case, just keep adding disks to you capture system, or use a NAS
to do it.
--John
On 4/12/2012 2:16 PM, Maverick wrote:
Thank you very much for your suggestions.
1) My goal is to store the traffic may be fore ever, and analyze it in
the future for security related incidents detected
On 4/12/2012 2:34 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:18:30 -0700, John T. Yocum said:
In that case, just keep adding disks to you capture system, or use a NAS
to do it.
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:43:49 -0700, Joel jaeggli said:
1TB is 2.276 hours at 1Gb/s
If he's got
On 3/28/2012 12:13 PM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
I'm not convinced. What you mention is real, but the code they need is
little more than a regular expression that can be found on Google and a
20-line script for testing lames. And a couple of weeks of testing, and
I think I'm
On 3/22/2012 3:49 PM, Greg Shepherd wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:11 PM,valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:40:27 -0700, Owen DeLong said:
Yes, I find it quite amusing that I am paying additional fees on all
of my telecommunications services to subsidize high speed PON
On 3/21/2012 8:44 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
Hey All,
I have a site in Alabama that could really use some additional
diversity, but apparently ATT fiber is the only game in town.
If anybody has any options, such as fixed wireless in the 10-50mbs,
please reply to me, off-list.
Best,
Joe
On 3/21/2012 12:16 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 03/21/2012 11:58 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Eric Wielingewiel...@nyigc.com
Verizon, the copper wireline company, is removing service from
locations EVERY TIME VZ fiber is installed in a building. This
prevents
On 3/21/2012 1:56 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William Herrinbill@her
The hinky part is that the FCC decided that copper pairs are an
unbundled element but PONS wavelengths and Coaxial cable frequency
channels are not. So, Verizon doesn't have to share access
When I asked ATT about the sudden latency jump I see in traceroutes,
they told me it was due to how their MPLS network is setup.
--John
Frank Bulk wrote:
Our upstream provider has a connection to ATT (12.88.71.13) where I
relatively consistently measure with a RTT of 15 msec, but the next hop
that occur on any other network.
Perhaps someone from ATT would like to chime in.
--John
Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote:
Did that satisfy you? I guess with MPLS they could tag the traffic and send
it around the country twice and I wouldn't see it at L3.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: John T
16 matches
Mail list logo
