On Sat, 5 Jan 2019, Mitchell Lewis wrote:
How common is it for Verizon to deliver "Internet Dedicated Ethernet"
over sonet? Ran into a situation where the canoga-perkins nte was
uplinked to a Flashwave 4100es in the basement (uplinked by an OC-48).
There is in a Verizon ILEC area.
If the
On Tue, 1 Jan 2019, Mitchell Lewis wrote:
I am working on project that may involve building points of presence in
Cleveland & Cincinnati. Any suggestions as to which colocation facility
in each city to build in? The prime factor of consideration for this
project is access to waves to places
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018, Joe wrote:
Apologizes in advance for a simple question. I am finding conflicting
definitions of Class networks. I was always under the impression that a
class "A" network was a /8 a class "B" network was a /16 and a class "C"
network was a /24. Recently, I was made aware
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018, David Cornejo wrote:
not sure he was complaining about the request, just that it provided
no context or reason why they should link. a personal pet peeve of
mine.
Agreed, and I do get unsolicited Linkedin requests quite often.
Sometimes, this is clearly the result of
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) via NANOG wrote:
* If there is any data which can provide what % of traffic is
multicast traffic. And if multicast is removed, how much unicast traffic
it would add up?
* Since this forum has people from deployment area, I would love to
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018, John Kristoff wrote:
Second best might be the Internet2 community where a number of
institutions that have always had it might still have it turned on.
Though there has been only one post in all of 2018 on their list if
that tells you anything.
At my previous job (large
All:
Let's kindly kill off the portions of this thread that have absolutely
nothing to do with running a network. Political rants, plate tectonics,
Math 101, and debating whether or not climate change is a thing really
have no place on this list / in this context.
Thank you
jms
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Kurt Kraut wrote:
Network Information:
a. [Network Number] 59.106.12.0-59.106.27.255
b. [Network Name] SAKURA-NET
g. [Organization] SAKURA Internet Inc.
m. [Administrative Contact] KT749JP
n. [Technical Contact] KW419JP
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, James Bensley wrote:
In my opinion the circuit ID should be an abitrary (but unique) value
and nothing more. As Nick suggested start at 1 and go up. If your
company is called ABC Ltd then maybe have your first circuit ID as
ABC0001 and count up from there, it's as
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, William Herrin wrote:
Heck, I’m gonna do whatever it takes to NOT subnet on bits with my v6
deployment. Hopefully with v6, gone are the days of binary subnetting math.
I hedged my bets when I laid out our v6 space at my previous $dayjob. We
used /126s for
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Ca By wrote:
Just a reminder, that 10% is a global number.
The number in the USA is 25% today in general, is 37% for mobile devices.
Furthermore, forecasting is a dark art that frequently simply extends the
past onto the future. It does not account for purposeful
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Rob McEwen wrote:
it then seems like dividing lines can get really blurred here and this
statement might betray your premise. A site needing more than 1 address...
subtly implies different usage case scenarios... for different parts or
different addresses on that block...
-10-02 16:52 GMT+02:00 Justin M. Streiner <strei...@cluebyfour.org>:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Marco Paesani wrote:
Hi,
probably this route is wrong, see RFC 6598, as you can see:
show route 100.64.0.0/10
inet.0: 563509 destinations, 1528595 routes (561239 active, 0 holddown,
3898 hidden)
+ =
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Marco Paesani wrote:
Hi,
probably this route is wrong, see RFC 6598, as you can see:
show route 100.64.0.0/10
inet.0: 563509 destinations, 1528595 routes (561239 active, 0 holddown,
3898 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
100.100.1.0/24 *[BGP/170] 2d
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Niels Bakker wrote:
* t...@ninjabadger.net (Tom Hill) [Fri 02 Oct 2015, 18:34 CEST]:
Any RIR - or LIR - that considers allocating space in sizes smaller than a
/24 (for the purpose of announcing to the DFZ) would do well to read this
report from RIPE Labs:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Sean Donelan wrote:
It could be summarized as "Circuit route diversity sucks." The only thing
worse than circuit route diversity were the processes to assure diverse
circuit orders stayed diverse.
No small feat when carriers re-groom circuits and don't bother to tell
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Dovid Bender wrote:
I am trying to understand why the legal babble bothers anyone. Does it
give you a nervous twitch? Remind you why you hate legal? It's just text
at the bottom of your email.
I can see both sides of this:
1. People who post to this list from a work email
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, James Bensley wrote:
Perhaps that depends on were are you in the world and your traffic types.
I have worked with two UK ISPs that have Cogent as one of their
transit providers, neither have had any problems in the 5+ years
they've both had the Cogent transit, it has
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Martin T wrote:
there are various tools out there which show the prefix distribution
among the peers/uplinks for given ASN. For example
https://radar.qrator.net/as/graph#96311 or
http://bgp.he.net/AS#_asinfo. As far as I know, those tools build
the graphs mainly
, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
You're certainly free to block whatever traffic you wish, but your
customers might not appreciate a heavy-handed approach to stopping bad
traffic at the gates.
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:
blocking to mitigate risk is a better trade off gaining better
percentage legit traffic against a indventant minor valid good network
range.
There are bound to be an awful lot of babies in that bathwater you're
planning to throw out.
You're
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Paul B. Henson wrote:
Seems to be a lot less noise on this iteration of the shake fist at
Verizon's lack of IPv6 thread, I guess everybody is pretty much burned out
and given up 8-/. Verizon should just update their IPv6 status page with a
link to hurricane electric's
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, Paul B. Henson wrote:
I think it's been about a year and a half since I last looked (and
cried) at the status of FIOS IPv6. As far as I can tell, there's been no
new official news since 2013. We're deploying IPv6 at the university I
work at, so IPv6 at home is moving from
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Matsuzaki Yoshinobu wrote:
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote
A friend in AS58587 confirmed that this was caused by a configuration
error - it seems like related to redistribution, and they already
fixed that.
7007 all over again. do not redistribute bgp into igp. do not
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Ricky Beam wrote:
The death of Novell NetWare (and their transitioned to IP) killed it the
enterprise. Games adopting IP for network play killed it in the home.
Ultimately, it sucks as a WAN protocol, so the internet was built using this
new fangled IP thing.
There are
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Sandra Murphy wrote:
On Jun 30, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org
wrote:
At a minimum, AS-PATH filtering of outgoing routes to just your ASN(s)
and your downstream customer ASNs. Whether this is done manually,
built using AS-SETs from your
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, chris wrote:
I cant say much about other incumbents but i have been in alot of vz co's
in nj/nyc and Its very rare to see any humans in a CO anymore even in ones
in really dense metro areas
The majority of ILEC COs I've seen are unstaffed these days, save for the
rare
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Mark Tinka wrote:
For peering and customers, we set a default prefix limit value for IPv4
and IPv6. We only change this if the peer/customer informs us that they
will announce a lot more than what we've configured. We add some % to
cover for sudden growth, but not too much
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Yardiel D. Fuentes wrote:
This discussion is always reminisced of questions such as: Why would I
want to learn Algebra or Calculus in college ? or why would I want to go
to college at all ? .. the student argues that calculus or college is
hardly ever used, if at all, in a
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
On 06/05/2015 06:38 PM, Mike Hale wrote:
We need a pool on what percentage of readers just googled traceroute.
Don't learn by heart that which you can look up. In this day and age where
knowledge about every subject imaginable is a 5 second (to a
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015, Joshua Riesenweber wrote:
As someone studying their first CCIE (RS), I sometimes find these kind
of discussions disheartening. They come up every now and again, and the
opinions seem vary anywhere between 'a good interview tool' and 'less
than worthless'.
[snip]
Does a
On Thu, 28 May 2015, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
I think this (Bill's) is a very good practice. It's not that difficult
to enumerate the name of every pro sports team in the US, the 100 most
popular dog names, the 200 most common street names, etc. This attack
can be mitigated by limiting
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Stephen Frost wrote:
I'm still wondering when they're going to teach the Verizon FIOS people
about the IPv6 goodness...
I've been barking up that three for nearly the past three years. No
definite answers thus far, other than the ONTs deployed in many customer
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Ca By wrote:
Having your upstream apply a permanent udp bw policer, say 5 or 10x busy
hour baseline, works well for this.
Many upstreams will not do that, particularly on a permanent basis. They
might do something temporarily to deal with an incident, but many of the
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Methsri Wickramarathna wrote:
My company has 3 upstream providers and we are serving more than 400
customers ..In that case we have to manage our upstream capacity... When
considering capacity managing normally we just transfer a /24 from
congested Up stream provider to
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 02:45:46PM -0600, Rafael Possamai wrote:
I am a huge fan of FreeBSD, but for a medium/large business I'd definitely
use a fairly well tested security appliance like Cisco's ASA.
Closed-source software is faith-based security.
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
I was looking for feedback on the following question:-
When connecting two MM SFP/SFP+/XFP 's together...(short range).
What should be the best practice receive power range ?
SX (1G) / SR (10G) / SR10 (100G) gear generally has a receive threshold
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Brandon Ewing wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 12:51:04PM -0600, David Bass wrote:
The n2k ToR is not a great design for user or storage interfaces if most of
your traffic is east/west. It is great as a low cost ilo/drac/choose your oob
port, or if most of your traffic is
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Tore Anderson wrote:
For many folks, that's easier said than done.
Think about it: If everyone could just dual-stack their networks, they
might as well single-stack them on IPv4 instead; there would be no
point whatsoever in transitioning to IPv6 for anyone.
I re-read
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Eric Louie wrote:
If you assign a customer IPv6 space only, a translation mechanism is
needed to allow that customer to reach Internet destinations that only
speak IPv4 today. There's no way around that.
What IPv6 to IPv4 translation mechanisms are available for networks
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Eric Louie wrote:
It also sounds like the Internet (aka the upstream/Tier 1 carriers) don't
want me to advertise anything longer than my /32 into BGPv6. Is that true?
(I'm getting that from the spamming comments made by others) Am I
supposed to be asking ARIN for a /32
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
Zhone reversed their stance on this and put everything on finding a fix.
Now we have a working firmware that moves data at line speed with no need
to put limits on downloads. Everyone are happy now. The 2301 with new
firmware is performing as expected
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Yucong Sun wrote:
It is not the same thing though. In my case, they just say we want you to
buy our IP, if you don't and want use you own Arin allocated IP blocks
through bgp, then we got to charge you anyway!
Are they charging per /24 (assuming IPv4 here...), or per
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Miles Fidelman wrote:
If it doesn't deliver to spec, that certainly seems like a warranty claim,
followed by a lawsuit (yes - talk to a lawyer).
Also, define large shipment and total dollars involved. You might be able
to take them to small claims court (much simpler
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
What are other arguments against vendor lock-in ? Is there any argument
FOR such locks (please spare me the support issues, if you can't read
specs and SNMP, you shouldn't even try networking) ?
Did you ever experience a shift in a vendor's position
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
Is it unrealistic to hope for enough salesmen pressure on the corporate
ladder to make such moronic attitude be reversed in the short term ?
No salesperson is likely to do that for you. They know only to well that
eliminating vendor lock-in means
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:34:50 -0500, Justin M. Streiner said:
No salesperson is likely to do that for you. They know only to well that
eliminating vendor lock-in means they will lose sales on artificially
costly optics from $vendor
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Sholes, Joshua wrote:
I concur. I was recently an admin/ITSO for a defense contractor, and
from a network logging standpoint it is VERY difficult to tell the
difference between what you posted and a really subtle
social-engineering-enabled attack--and EVERY attacker these
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:36:17 -0500, Christopher Morrow said:
also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel
for that...
Indeed. I've
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Max Clark wrote:
DB9 ports seem to be a nearly extinct feature on laptops. Any suggestions on
a cheap laptop for use in field support (with an onboard DB9)?
You might be able to pick up something like an old Dell Latitute D800
series pretty cheaply. Built-in RS232
On Sun, 9 Nov 2014, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
A job opportunity just came my way to work with 26 miles of dark fiber
in and around a city in Texas.
How is the outside plant being built and supported? Who fixes fiber cuts?
Who manages the fiber-cut-fixers? Who monitors the network and handles
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Blake Hudson wrote:
Owen, should providers be able to over subscribe their networks? If so, at
what tier level (tier 1, 2, 3, residential ISP)? Is it acceptable for a
provider to permit frequent congestion if they choose to? Or should they be
forced to take action that may
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014, Mark Price wrote:
Similar to another thread on the list today, I'm troubleshooting a problem
for a customer on Comcast business fiber.
Downloading a file from one of our web servers is very slow (~15KByte/sec).
mtr looks clean in both directions. I added an IP address on
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:24:46 -0700, keith tokash said:
Is there an industry standard regarding how much bandwidth an inter-carrier
circuit should guarantee?
And where your PoPs are (and how many) matters as well - if you have a peering
Do you see any other indications of performance problems?
jms
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Javier J wrote:
Anyone else notice this?
Or is this an AWS issue in APAC that hasn't been reported yet?
AU-NY(aws)
18. xe-1.level3.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.n 72.0%
BR(aws)-AU(aws)
11.
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Eric Sieg wrote:
Could someone from Global Crossing reach out to me please? Just need to
confirm you see a route and haven't had any luck accessing your looking
glass in the last 24 hours.
Have you tried reaching out to anyone at Level3? Level3 acquired GX 3 years
ago.
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Anthony Junk wrote:
I already have IPv6 on my router at home. They rolled out an update a few
months back that added the capability for the latest 802.1N model. I'm not
at home to look at it but I'll update with the model this evening.
Like many others, I would be
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, David Hubbard wrote:
Got you beat by nine weeks with a Foundry 9604. :-)
I might have a Cat5505 or two on our out-of-band management network with
uptimes that approach this.
jms
#sh ver
SW: Version 03.3.01aTc1 Copyright (c) 1996-2004 Foundry Networks, Inc.
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Jim Devane wrote:
They make great fish tanks in their second lives, although uptime stats are more
general recollection for me now.
http://postimg.org/image/xdyp4o6p7/
Reminds me of a kegerator I saw many moons ago, made out of a hollowed-out
Wellfleet BCN ;)
jms
Works here (large .edu in Western PA). I would expect there to be rioting
in the streets if FB was down.
jms
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Charles Mills wrote:
W. PA. too. Looks pretty widespread.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:46 PM, aUser au...@mind.net wrote:
Appears to be in Oregon, Southern
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Corey Touchet wrote:
14 years at Verizon Wireless and I despised the crop of multicast products
that seemed to pop up from time to time. Even in a fully controlled
network multicast remains at best black magic. There are ways to make it
more reliable and prevent people
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Ryan Shea wrote:
Just one man's experience, but my YouTube performance over my Hurricane
Electric tunnel has been strikingly poor lately - so much so that I was
thinking of squashing v6 in my house entirely. Looking for your
experiences/thoughts on whether cutting over to
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Just send your request to the all-gods well-known multicast group.
224.6.6.6?
jms
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 05:20:48PM +, Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote:
Which one?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
No, I expect it to be part and parcel of the basic fees, as IPv4
is, which I'm happy to hear it is in this case.
Based on a response I saw in this thread earlier today, it sounds like
IPv6 support is no longer a separate charge from Akamai. Perhaps
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
Or they did get the memo, but realised that no sale == no commission.
If they got the memo and chose to ignore it, then that gives me all the
ammunition I need to hit them with the biggest cluebat I have, and squeeze
them for a discount for the
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, John York wrote:
Hoping to not start a war...
We (a multi-homed end-user site) are finally getting IPv6-enabled Internet
connectivity from one of our ISPs. In conversations regarding our BGP
config, the ISP has balked at allowing us to advertise our ARIN-assigned
/44,
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Ian Bowers wrote:
Thank you for sharing! Would LOVE to see something like this from Verizon
about FioS.
Agreed. I'd love to see some movement from Verizon, but I'm not hopeful.
I'm not above using this announcement to needle them a bit (more than
normal) the next time
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, C. A. Fillekes wrote:
Furthermore, since the internet is everywhere, I pointed out (or did you
stop reading after I mentioned that we don't actually know the gender of
the scammer?) Markus has the option of pursuing this in a jurisdiction
where the penalties for criminal
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014, Markus wrote:
nothing operational here, but there are many smart minds on this list and
people working for telcos, ISPs and law enforcement agencies, so maybe you
are willing to give me some advice in the following case:
That individual is hiding his real identity really
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, stovetop 202 wrote:
What do you mean by if anyone can see it?
The lines are now closed off from the public's view.. but the textbooks
still teach you that you should be able to have access freely. Is it
the data on the hard line that you're worried people can see?
It
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Brian Hartsfield wrote:
I am going to be real interested to see how the media handles the situation
when ARIN runs out of IPv4 addresses. I could really see some big doom
and gloom stories hit some of the mainstream media when that occurs. While
it isn't the end of the
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Christopher Morrow wrote:
2. The network Admins at the above mentioned companies need to learn IPV6,
most will want there company to pay the bill for this.
for a large majority of the use cases it's just configure that other
family on the interface and done.
In the
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Ricky Beam wrote:
Can we stop with the lame every person, and their dog! numbering plans. The
same MISTAKE has been repeated so many times in recent history you'd think
people would know better. It's the exact same wrong-think that was applied to
the 32bit IPv4 addressing
On Wed, 14 May 2014, Gus Crichton wrote:
Hope you networking experts can shed some light on a concern I have
please. I am multihoming using 2 ISPs to the internet, due to reasons
outside my control, my primary preferred link keeps dropping a number of
times a day forcing traffic to my backup
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Bob Evans wrote:
Ahh, Yep, same thing port and/or protocol for an address range. I haven't
seen that accomplished via BGP. I know ATT will do it - they want about 2K
more per month for that ability. All your traffic is redirected (extra
hops ) through a firewall. So, it's
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Rick Astley wrote:
Double-billing Rick. It's just that simple. Paid peering means you're
deliberately
billing two customers for the same byte
Where your statement is short sighted I already explained partly in saying
its too difficult to decide who gets a free ride and
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
Comcast is the destination network for the traffic; they're not providing
transit services to Netflix. Comcast needs to accept the Netflix traffic
that Comcast's customers are requesting *somehow*; I don't see why they get
to charge Netflix for a
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Rick Astley wrote:
That amount of data is massive scale. I don't see it as double dipping
because each party is buying the pipe they are using. I am buying a 15Mbps
pipe to my home but just because we are communicating over the Internet
doesn't mean the money I am paying
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Bryan Socha wrote:
Whats the big deal If your just arin, dont panic. Akamai and
digitalocean has been the only people aquire fair priced v4 putside
arin.So arin is ending. It doesnt stop anything. be smart 3 usd
per ip is fair if dirty. F the
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, John Jackson wrote:
I have a customer who previously didn't have any IPv4 address space. They
recently acquired a competitor that has a /24.
Are there any special ARIN rules for this type of transfer?
Any pointers, or 'gotchas'?
I'm pretty sure ARIN has the transfer
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
They're just leaking every route right?
Is it possible to poison the AS paths you announce with their own AS to get
them to let go of your prefixes until it's fixed?
Would that work, or some other trick that can be done without their cooperation?
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Adrian Minta wrote:
Already too late :(
*Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:*
indriana.triyunianingt...@indosat.com
mailto:indriana.triyunianingt...@indosat.com
The recipient's mailbox is full and can't accept messages now. Please try
resending this
These also get posted to other mailing lists, such as cisco-nsp.
jms
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
Thanks everyone for the replies. I guess since they are done so infrequently,
I was not a list member the last go around.
Robert
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:58:44 -0400
Andrew
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:19:14 -0400, rw...@ropeguru.com said:
Again comparing something like factual numbers of IPv6 addresses the
the very fuzzy math of guessing how many atoms there are is very silly
indeed.
A bit of thought will show
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Bryan Socha wrote:
Oh btw, how many ipv4s are you hording with zero justification to keep
them? I was unpopular during apricot for not liking the idea of no
liability leasing of v4. I don't like this artificial v4 situation
every eyeball network created.Why is
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Cb B wrote:
You can pay $3 per ipv4, that is your business. But, it may be worth noting
that ATT, Verizon, Comcast, T-Mobile, TWT, Google Fiber all have have
double digit ipv6 penetration today.
To be fair:
Verizon Wireless, if you're referring to 4G LTE? Agreed.
I don't
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, William Herrin wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Justin M. Streiner
strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote:
All of these 'Hail Mary' options for 'saving' IPv4 really are pointless.
IPv4 is like the U.S. Penny. It'll be useless long before it goes
away. And right now it's
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, William Herrin wrote:
That's what I hear. Interesting thing though: it hasn't happened yet.
IANA ran out of /8's and it didn't happen. The RIRs dropped to
high-conservation mode on their final allocations and it didn't
happen. How could that be?
I never said that things
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Nick Hilliard wrote:
FB, T-mobile and you are all using ipv6-ipv4 protocol translators because
ipv6-only services are not a viable alternative at the moment.
Using IPv6 internally is different from being able to use IPv6 end-to-end.
6-4 translators will be needed to
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 22/03/2014 19:35, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
CGN also comes with lots of downside that customers are likely to find
unpleasant. For some operators, customer (dis)satisfaction might be the
driver that ultimately forces them to deploy IPv6.
don't
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Randy wrote:
I have a situation where a 208v/20A PDU (L6-20P) is supposedly hooked to a
208v/30A circuit (L6-30R). Before I order the correct PDU's and whip
cords...sanity check...are connectors 'similar' enough that this is possible
(with force) or am I going to find
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Eric A Louie wrote:
Are there any other solutions, short of using BGP multihoming and
having them try to get their own ASN and IPv4 /24 block?
For what it sounds like the customer wants to do, this really is the right
solution. Most everything else has some level of
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Eric A Louie wrote:
Honestly? Because the end-customers are not technically competent
enough to run dual-homed BGP, and we don't want to be their managed
service providers on the IT side. And announcing the ATT space is fine
until something goes wrong, and I have to
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Bryan Seitz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 09:18:08PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
I echo the 'good luck' and ditto on the experience.
There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to
be precious little movement over there.
I've been fighting this
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Tristan Lear wrote:
We have a business-class FIOS connection where I work and a static
IP as well. At least three people who work here have FIOS at home.
I've read rumors about business class customers who really work their
phone sex getting native ipv6, and I also heard
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
Or you could just accept that there needs to be more routing slots
as the number of businesses on the net increases. I can see some
interesting anti-cartel law suits happening if ISP's refuse to
accept /28's from this block.
In the worst case, this
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Tore Anderson wrote:
I wouldn't worry if I were you. I'll wager you $100 that pretty much all
of the people requesting a block from ARIN under this policy (or any
other) is going to go for a /24 (or larger). There is some precedent;
RIPE policy has not mandated a minimum
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
In Australia I would sue Telstra, Optus, ... if their customers
couldn't reach me due to routes being filtered. I would take this
to the ACCC (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission) as a
restraint of trade issue.
And if the provider doing the
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 29/01/2014 17:35, Philip Lavine wrote:
Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip
(or for that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a
statically configured address or use EUI-64 auto config?
how are you
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
I had a customer ask if we could provide him with BGP such that he could be
multihomed. He already has 128 IP addresses from another ISP. Obviously a
/25 is a non go for multihoming as everyone are going to ignore his route.
Not necessarily
1 - 100 of 383 matches
Mail list logo
