Re: [[Infowarrior] - NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for Years]

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/14/2014 05:50 PM, John Levine wrote: > >> In article <534c68f4@cox.net> you write: >> >>> On 4/14/2014 9:38 AM, Matthew Black wrote: >>> Shouldn't a decent OS scrub RAM and disk sectors before allocating them to processes,

Re: DMARC -> CERT?

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: > By their statement it's obvious that yahoo doesn't care about what they > broke. It's unfortunate that email has become so centralized that one > entity can cause so much 'trouble'. Maybe it's a good opportunity to > encourage the affecte

Re: [[Infowarrior] - NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for Years]

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:27 AM, TGLASSEY wrote: > Vladis is %100 on the money here. Lets take this a step farther and ask is > there a criminal liability for the person who checked that code in - Oh you > bet there is... > > Todd Thank you--I needed some humour in my morning, I was starting to

Re: responding to DMARC breakage

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > >> On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:12:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman said: >> >> It occurs to me that Yahoo's deployment of DMARC p=reject, and the >>> choice of several big mail operators to honor that, has created a >>

Re: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition

On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:40 PM, John R. Levine wrote: > The numbers you list in your argument against a micropayment >> system being able to function are a fraction of the number of >> transactions Facebook deals with in updating newsfeeds for >> the billion+ users on their system.[0] >> > > ..

Re: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:59 AM, John Levine wrote: > >That way? Make e-mail cost; have e-postage. > > Gee, I wondered how long it would take for this famous bad idea to > reappear. > > I wrote a white paper ten years ago explaining why e-postage is a > bad idea, and there is no way to make it w

Re: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on Technica

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote: > [...] > The economic reality is that if I build out an expensive infrastructure I > have to pile on as many high priced services as possible to order to > maximize the revenue from it. A customer who does not balk at a $200 a > month TV/vo

Re: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on ISPs' refusal to upgrade networks | Ars Technica

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Niels Bakker wrote: > * mpet...@netflight.com (Matthew Petach) [Sun 23 Mar 2014, 20:06 CET]: > > Doesn't sound too outlandish. Mind you, I'm sure >> it would raise costs, as that testing and validation >> wouldn't be free.

Re: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on ISPs' refusal to upgrade networks | Ars Technica

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Blake Hudson wrote: > This is exactly my point. If a subscriber can use the service for 30 > consecutive days and never achieve the "8Mbps" because the network is > incapable by design, or by virtue of its over subscription is statistically > impossible of deliver

Re: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on Technica

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:18 AM, TGLASSEY wrote: > I want to ask you folks something... > > How do you as the people operating the network think two exabytes of data > gets pushed across your networks to each of the PRISM Collection Sites > (daily) with no one noticing... Know what I mean>? > > T

Re: anyone ever get an HWIC-CABLE-D-2 card to work?

On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Warren Bailey < wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote: > Some cable providers do weird provisioning stuff with different flavors of > DOCSIS. Do you know if your HWIC supports the version of DOCSIS your > provider runs? It looks like those cards are good for

Re: anyone ever get an HWIC-CABLE-D-2 card to work?

On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 1:21 PM, chris wrote: > Did you have comcast register this card on your account? When you try to > browse web do you get redirected like a modem in walled garden state? > Yes, I read the HFC MAC address off to the comcast account activation people, and they repeated it bac

anyone ever get an HWIC-CABLE-D-2 card to work?

I'm grasping at straws here, and reaching out to a wider community to find out if there's anyone out there that's been able to get an HWIC-CABLE-D-2 card to work. I figured it was worth giving one more shot before I call and cancel my Comcast account, as it seems silly to pay for a service I can't

Re: valley free routing?

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:23 PM, William Herrin wrote: > Hi folks, > > Can anyone tell me about a situation in which a route which was not > valley free was not a result of a misconfiguration or a bad actor? For > those who don't recall the terminology, a network path is valley free > if it cross

NANOG60 notes

I've been pinged by a few people who had to travel midway through NANOG due to weather if I would be posting notes up; yes, though it looks like cluepon.net isn't writeable, so for now I'm putting them up on my home box, but when cluepon.net is writeable again, I'll copy them over there. For now:

2014.02.10 NANOG60 day 1 notes...ish

I was going to put my notes from today's talk up at http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/Past_Events but discovered the site seems to have gone read-only, and my login doesn't work anymore. If people know what happened to the logins for that site, I'd be happy to add notes for today's talks to the p

Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Cb B wrote: > On Feb 2, 2014 8:35 AM, "Jonathan Towne" wrote: > > > > The provider has kindly acknowledged that there is an issue, and are > > working on a resolution. Heads up, it may be more than just my region. > > > > And not just your provider, everyone is d

Re: turning on comcast v6

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Lee Howard wrote: > > > On 12/20/13 8:07 AM, "Jamie Bowden" wrote: > > > > > > >> "Parity" isn't enough information; what features are missing? RA is > >>part > >> of IPv6, but you don't have to use SLAAC. > >> I'd say it's the DHC people who need to hear it, no

Re: Europe-to-US congestion and packet loss on he.net network, and their NOC@ won't even respond

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > Dear NANOG@, > ... > From hetzner.de through he.net: > > > Cns# date ; mtr --report{,-wide,-cycles=600} --interval 0.1 --order "SRL > BGAWV" -4 c.indiana.edu ; date > Using a 1/10th of a second interval is rather a

Re: NAT64 and matching identities

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote: > Yo Lee! > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:14:47 -0500 > Lee Howard wrote: > > > >There is obviously a long tail of ip4 destinations, but nearly all > > >of 500 of the Alexa global 500 have ip6 listeners, > > > > Do you have a data source for that

Re: How anti-NSA backlash could fracture the Internet along national borders - The Washington Post

On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Levine wrote: > > In article you > write: > >>The balkanizing of the Net? > >> > >> > http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/01/how-anti-nsa-backlash-could-fracture-the-internet-along

Re: latest Snowden docs show NSA intercepts all Google and Yahoo DC-to-DC traffic

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Mike Lyon wrote: > So even if Goog or Yahoo encrypt their data between DCs, what stops > the NSA from decrypting that data? Or would it be done simply to make > their lives a bit more of a PiTA to get the data they want? > > -Mike > I'm just gonna toss this URL o

Re: latest Snowden docs show NSA intercepts all Google and Yahoo DC-to-DC traffic

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Ray Soucy wrote: >> > Was the unplanned L3 DF maintenance that took place on Tuesday a frantic >> > removal of taps?

Re: latest Snowden docs show NSA intercepts all Google and Yahoo DC-to-DC traffic

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Ray Soucy wrote: > Was the unplanned L3 DF maintenance that took place on Tuesday a frantic > removal of taps? :-) > No need for intrusive techniques such as direct taps: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?reload=true&arnumber=1494884 "Of all the

Re: Fundamental questions of backbone design

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:46 PM, wrote: > On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 23:33:16 +0530, Anurag Bhatia said: > > >localpref to customer routes then peering and finally transit. Does > this > >works well or you see issues with people who have 10+ prepends on some > >peering routes calling you to

Re: clear forwarding route

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:32 AM, John Smith wrote: > This is a hack that most vendors provide, just in case their code doesnt > work as expected. > > Nobody in his sane mind will clear the FIB on a live router. This creates > all sorts of problems. The router starts sending out ICMP errors > (unr

2013.10.09 NANOG59 notes posted

Sorry, ARIN's been keeping me busy since the NANOG wrap-up, but finally took some time after the social tonight to finish posting all the rest of my notes, minus the IP Reputation notes, to http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/NANOG59 Another awesome NANOG, one of the best ones in a while; thanks aga

2013.10.07 NANOG59 notes posted

sorry, my calendar's been a bit full today; notes from the morning, afternoon, community meeting, and datacenter BoF track have been posted to http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/NANOG59 I'll try to get them up a bit faster tomorrow, sorry about the delay, it's been a really busy day today. Matt

Re: rr.com contact please

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote: > > On Sep 16, 2013, at 19:07, "Matthew Petach" > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:25 AM, wrote: > >> > >>

Re: rr.com contact please

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:25 AM, wrote: > Can someone from rr.com please contact me. Your abuse desk seems to > believe this netblock does not belong to you: > > network:Class-Name:network > network:ID:NETBLK-ISRC-24.39.**128.0-17 > network:Auth-Area:24.39.128.0/**17 > ne

Re: The US government has betrayed the Internet. We need to take it back

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Sam Moats wrote: > ... > Below is a sample banner (IS is information System) > > By using this IS (which includes any device attached to this IS), you > consent to the following conditions: > > -The USG routinely intercepts and monitors communications on this IS fo

Re: FW: Yahoo Maintenance Notification for CoreSite - Any2 Denver

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eric Louie wrote: > For any Yahoo peers at Coresite, FYI - I'm expecting to lose my BGP peer > for > a portion of their maintenance. > Should be all back up and happy on the new blade now. ^_^ Thanks! Matt > > > -Original Message- > > From: CoreSite O

Re: Akamai Edgekey issues ?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote: > Here is another bit of data... www.apple.com not reachable from a machine > using Google's NS, reachable from an iPad using TWC NS > > IP addresses returned by each are different ... could be load balancing, or > creative (broken) traffic engi

Re: Any from O1 alive today?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Robert Glover wrote: > Dear O1, > > Your managed modem service appears to not be authenticating users at > this time. We have some grumpy dial-up users this morning. Our RADIUS > is functioning normally (other services are able to authenticate against > it succes

Re: looking for hostname geographic hint validation

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Bradley Huffaker wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:45:09PM -0700, Matthew Petach wrote: > > Hitting 93% accuracy is actually pretty mindblowing > > from my perspective, given how random some of > > the naming choices are. ^_^; > > Thi

Re: looking for hostname geographic hint validation

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:35 PM, tabris wrote: > On 08/27/2013 12:33 PM, Bradley Huffaker wrote: > > We are currently working on an algorithm that automatically detects > > geographic hints inside of hostnames. At this point we are seeking > > operators who can validate some of our inferences. Pl

Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:06 AM, joel jaeggli wrote: > On 8/21/13 6:56 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > > > but how do you represent seattle colonolizing bc? > "keep your potatoes out of my pig." > Ugh. Suddenly your talk of potatoes in pigs makes "colon-olizing" seem almost meaningful (methinks Rand

Re: Trivium

I'm curious; do people really think that the difference in material indexed between Google, Yahoo/Bing, and others is really that big? I don't mean the heuristics and algorithms used to return the results in a particularly useful order; I mean the sheer raw set of indexed pages. I don't debate th

Re: Trivium

It's pretty well known that the "hottest searches" pages put up by the major search engines filter out the extremely high levels of background noise. Compare http://www.google.com/trends/ with http://www.google.com/trends/explore#cmpt=q while it's more engaging to show the hottest searches as be

Re: Spoofing ASNs (Re: SNMP DDoS: the vulnerability you might not know you have)

On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2013, at 2:31 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > > > On (2013-07-31 17:07 -0700), bottiger wrote: > > > >> But realistically those 2 problems are not going to be solved any time > >> in the next decade. I have tested 7 large hosting networks

Re: 204.17.16.0/20 Unreachable via Comcast ASN 7992; Looking for Help or Contacts

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Phil Fagan wrote: > BGP Noob question here; but wouldn't Time Warner not recieve a prefix if it > wasn't reachable? Is this an artifact? > In a perfect world, people wouldn't advertise prefixes unless they knew they had reachability for those prefixes. Unfortuna

Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads

On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote: > On 7/27/13, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:18:52 -0500, Jimmy Hess said: > > I have to admit that this is the biggest can-o-worms suggestion > I've > seen all week. > > (Hint: our org chart says I work in our Networ

Re: Office 365..? how Microsoft handed the NSA access to encrypted messages

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Aaron Wendel wrote: > On 7/14/2013 3:37 PM, Richard Golodner wrote: > >> On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 09:36 -1000, Randy Bush wrote: >> >>> in >>> fact, they were all likely in the same rotten boat. >>> >> >> Why I love open source. Look at my mail, track my web s

Re: gTLDs opened up

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Alex Buie > wrote: > > Am I missing something, or is that purporting to be an IPv4 address > > beginning with 478? > > > > > http://www.open-root.eu/about-open-root/how-to-install-an-open-root-website-6

Re: www.att.net ipv6 traceroute

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:34 AM, David Hill wrote: > Anyone else noticing odd ipv6 traceroutes to www.att.net > (2001:1890:1c01:2::40)? > > For example, the first traceroute originating in Chicago, and if the > hostnames are anything to go by: > > Chicago -> Dallas -> Atlanta -> Miama -> NYC -> Am

Re: Yahoo Postmaster

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Andy B. wrote: > If there is a YAHOO! Postmaster contact available, can you please > contact me off list? > > I need to investigate a customer's "TS03" listing of a very large > netblock (/16) and I'm afraid regular Yahoo! forms are leading me > nowhere but frustr

Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue

On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Neil Harris wrote: > On 22/06/13 16:34, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> That's easily solved by padding the ACK to 1500 bytes as well. Matt Or indeed by the media player sending large amounts of traffic back to >>> the CDN via auxiliary HTTP POST requ

Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:29 PM, wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:39:56 +0200, Niels Bakker said: > > > You're mistaken if you think that CDNs have equal number of packets > > going in and out. > > And even if the number of packets match, there's the whole "1500 bytes > of data, 64 bytes of ACK" t

Re: Prism continued

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Jon Lewis wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 goe...@anime.net wrote: > > cellphones with cameras are probably better for the purposes of covert >> mass surveillance, especially ones with front facing cameras. far more of >> them out there, and wireless to boot. >> >> s

Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > > however, providers a/b at site1 do not send us the two /24s from > > site b.. > > This is probably incorrect. > > The providers are almost certainly sending you the prefixes, but your > router is dropping them due to loop detection.

Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Joe Abley wrote: > > On 2013-06-10, at 18:36, "Dennis Burgess" wrote: > > > I have a network that has three peers, two are at one site and the third > > is geographically diverse, and there is NO connection between the two > > separate networks. > > > > Currently

Re: PGP/SSL/TLS really as secure as one thinks?

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Joe Abley wrote: > > On 2013-06-07, at 11:14, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > > On 2013-06-07 06:50, Dan White wrote: > > [..] > > > > A nice 'it is Friday' kind of thought > > > >> OpenPGP and other end-to-end protocols protect against all nefarious > >> actors, inc

Re: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project

On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote: > On 6/7/13, Måns Nilsson wrote: > > Subject: Re: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project Date: Fri, Jun > 07, > > 2013 at 12:25:35AM -0500 Quoting jamie rishaw (j...@arpa.com): > >> > >> Just wait until we find out dark and lit private fibe

Re: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > >> Has fingers directly in servers of top Internet content companies, >> dates to 2007. Happily, none of the companies listed are transport &g

Re: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > Has fingers directly in servers of top Internet content companies, > dates to 2007. Happily, none of the companies listed are transport > networks: > > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/us-intelligence-mining-data-from-nine-us-in

Re: nokiamail spam

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:11 AM, John Levine wrote: > >> 2. I have yet to see any evidence this century that Yahoo cares in > >> the slightest about the unceasing flood of spam/phish/abuse flowing > >> outbound from its operation. After all, if they did, we would not > >> be having this conversat

2013.06.03 NANOG58 notes posted

Sorry about the delay in sending these out; didn't realize my nanog subscription had lapsed. Notes are being posted to the NANOG wiki at cluepon: http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/NANOG58 rather than spam the list with each new set of notes, you can check the wiki about 30 minutes after the end

Re: So how big was it *really*?

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Simon Lockhart" > >> And there's a (semi-)public response from one of Cloudfare's >> upstreams: >> >> http://cluepon.net/ras/gizmodo > > Money quote: > > """ > so when 300 Gbps > of NEW traffic suddenly

Re: Open Resolver Problems

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Tom Paseka wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Matthew Petach > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:06 PM, John Levine wrote: >> >>As a white-hat attempting to find problems to address through legitimate >> >> m

Re: Open Resolver Problems

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:06 PM, John Levine wrote: >>As a white-hat attempting to find problems to address through legitimate >>means, how >>do you … > > You make friends with people with busy authoritative servers and see > who's querying them. I'm confused. Don't most authoritative servers h

Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:01 AM, William Herrin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: ... >> Do the engineering heads at the top 10 tier-1/2 carriers carry enough water >> to make that sale to the CEOs? > > To ask the CEOs to authorize cutting off access to a competitor'

Re: NANOG 57 Notes from Matthew

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > I've created a skeleton page at Cluepon for this meeting; Matthew will be > uploading his notes there shortly: > > http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/NANOG57 Oh. that'll teach me to read my inbox first before mailing out. ^_^; Yes, notes a

2013.02.06 NANOG57 day3 afternoon session notes posted

I put the notes from the afternoon session up on my website--but thanks to a great suggestion by Jay, I'm also putting them up on the nanog.cluepon.net site on the wiki, so that as folks spot my typos, they can fix them themselves, rather than wonder why goodle.com doesn't resolve for them, etc. ^

Re: Level3 worldwide emergency upgrade?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Jonathan Towne wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 07:57:06AM -0500, Alex Rubenstein scribbled: > # The question should be more along the lines of, "why aren't you multihomed > in a way that would make a 30 minute outage (which is inevitable) irrelevant > to you? > >

2013.02.06 NANOG57 day3 morning session notes posted

Huge thanks to the program committee for pulling another great set of talks together; this really has been a top-notch bunch of content! Notes are up at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2013.02.06-NANOG57-day3-morning-session.txt As always, if my apache process wedges, let me know and I'll kick it;

2013.02.05 NANOG57 day2 afternoon session

Notes, complete with typos are up at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2013.02.05-NANOG57-day2-afternoon-session.txt definitely awesome content today; bummed i missed out, sounds like tonight should be an absolute blast at seaworld--have fun, and we'll see what tomorrow brings. :) Matt

2013.02.05 NANOG57 day2 morning session notes are up

I posted my notes from this morning's session at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2013.02.05-NANOG57-day2-morning-session.txt Sorry about the gap in the notes about the telegeography talk; my player decided to wig out, and then die, and I lost a chunk while switching to the redundant computer. Awes

Re: 2013.02.04 NANOG57 day 1 afternoon notes

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:09 PM, David Conrad wrote: > Matt, > > Thanks very much (as always) for the great notes! Extremely helpful. > > Regards, > -drc Glad they're useful--wish I could have been there, the social tomorrow night sounds like it will be absolutely stellar, in true Snowhorn fashio

2013.02.04 NANOG57 day 1 afternoon notes

Notes from the afternoon session, including the community meeting, but minus most of the BCOP presentation have been posted: http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2013.02.04-NANOG57-day1-afternoon-session.txt it looks like apache2 serves up about 100 connections, then wedges. :( No time to troubleshoot

Re: Is Google Fiber a model for Municipal Networks?

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Matthew Petach" > >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote: >> > True, but I think it means we've bound the problem. It appears to >> &

Re: Is Google Fiber a model for Municipal Networks?

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote: > > True, but I think it means we've bound the problem. It appears to > take $1400-$4500 to deploy fiber to the home in urban and suburban > areas, depending on all the fun local factors that effect costs. *sigh* I'd gladly pay $5000 NRC to ge

2013.02.04 NANOG57 day 1 morning session notes posted

I jotted down some notes from this morning's session in case people are curious; they should be up visible at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2013.02.04-day1-morning-session.txt apache's kinda flakey on the box; if it stops responding, ping me and I'll bounce the server. ^_^; Thanks! Matt

Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs

I'll bet Hitler would have used his real name on the whois entries. There. Now I think we're done. Matt On Jan 16, 2013 7:09 AM, "Todd Underwood" wrote: > > I do not understand why you're so adamant about sending this information > > to an organization primarily distinguished by its incompete

Re: OOB core router connectivity wish list

On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> I want OOB with ethernet, MDIX, 100base-TX or 1000base-TX, with DHCP client >> support. With a cherry. > > and auto configuration that works? :) reliably? with your > switch/rout

Re: Need a Yahoo network contact

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Joe Freeman wrote: > I need a Yahoo contact if anyone is available. > > I'm having issues with customers on 186.65.92.0/22 (ASN52379) out of Costa > Rica being able to reach Yahoo sites (www.yahoo.com/www.flickr.com) with > their web browsers, but they can ping

Re: What is BCP re De-Aggregation: strict filtering /48s out of /32 RIR minimums.

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Ben S. Butler wrote: > Hi, ... > ... > What we need is a way to filter that says throw this prefix away if I can see > it inside of another prefix. Ie discard this /48 if it is part of a /32 (or > bigger) that I also have in my RIB and then insert the /32 into

Re: qwest.net dropping packets... wife would like someone to pick them up please...

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Don Gould wrote: > Hi all, > > Hope you're all getting on top of Sandy. > > Trying to hit kajabi.com, I'm getting up to 60% packet loss off qwest.net - > dca2-edge-02.inet.qwest.net > > A bit of quick googleing and we assumed that they're on the west coast of > US,

Re: Are people still building SONET networks from scratch?

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 10/09/2012 21:43, Matthew Petach wrote: >> If service is critical enough to me that 20 second hiccups make >> a difference, I'll find two providers to provide connectivity > > um, what do you mean, "two p

Re: Are people still building SONET networks from scratch?

This *was* a troll, right...? On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:55 AM, david peahi wrote: > In my neck of the woods, critical locations often exist "in the middle of > nowhere", resulting in underserved facilities, where best effort networks > such as metro Ethernet cannot be trusted to remain available

Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:21 AM, wrote: > I think having a GRE tunnel for the internal routing protocol is > unnecessary. Can you explain the reasoning behind this? I understand > the technical issue whereby GRE will allow multicast for EIGRP, OSPF, > etc, but why not just redistribute into BGP

Re: yahoo admin mail contact (or answer)

It would really help to know what the source IPs or source prefix these connections are coming from. It's entirely possible there's an old bogon filter entry lurking around or some such that's causing headaches. Thanks! Matt On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Georgios Vlachos wrote: > First thi

Re: Bandwidth spikes due to Microsoft release of windows 8 on MSDN

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Blake Pfankuch wrote: > Anyone seeing a significant increase of traffic with this? > Not yet. Maybe everybody's waiting until service pack 2 is released? Matt

Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Geoff Huston wrote: > Perhaps we should have newnog implement a penalty payment system for registrations; tag an extra $25 "excessive leakage" charge onto conference registrations for networks that are in the top 30 list? I worked at a network that made it onto

What is a link-local address?? WAS: Re: JUNOS forwards IPv6 link-local packets

(tl;dr -- IPv6 link-local definition is ambiguous and inconsistent across vendors) I'm curious about what people's perception of valid link-local addresses is; that is, what specifically makes a valid link-local address? The top portion of RFC 4291 lists the link-local prefix as: 2.4. Address T

Re: WW: Colo Vending Machine

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Jon Lewis wrote: > Speaking of that sort of thing, I'd really LOVE if there were a device about > the size of a netbook that could be hooked up to otherwise headless machines > in colos that would give you keyboard, video & mouse.  i.e. a folding > netbook shaped V

2012.02.08 NANOG54 day 3 morning session notes

I've posted my notes from this morning's session at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.08-nanog54-morning-session.txt I wonder if perhaps we don't keep asking for NEBS compliance just because we don't have another easy acronym to put on the RFQs that represents what *our* industry needs, vs th

2012.02.07 NANOG54 day 2 notes, afternoon session

I'm so sorry; I thought I would have time to send these out after the peering track, but I got pulled into some conversations which ended up lasting until 2330 hours, and ran right on through the social event. So, the afternoon session notes ended up having to wait until I got back to my room. Ap

2012.02.07 NANOG54 day 2 morning session notes

I've posted my notes from the morning session at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.07-nanog54-morning-session.txt for those who find them useful. Off to grab lunch now! BTW--wouldn't deploying the telex proxy require ISPs to do away with BCP 38 in their networks? Just curious. Thanks! Ma

Re: 2012.02.06 NANOG54 day1 afternoon session notes

o video archive will be very useful. The archived video streams will generally be posted on the website within a month or so; it just requires a wee bit of patience. ^_^ Thanks! Matt > Thanks. > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Matthew Petach > wrote: >> >> My notes f

2012.02.06 NANOG54 day1 afternoon session notes

My notes from the second half of today's NANOG 54 talks are now up at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.06-nanog54-afternoon-session.txt for those catching up remotely before the videos get posted up. Off to the Beer and Gear now. ^_^ Thanks! Matt

2012.02.06 NANOG54 monday morning session notes are up

I posted my notes from this morning's session at http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.06-nanog54-morning-session.txt in case people find them to be useful. Thanks! Matt

Re: This network is too good...

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: > > Hi all, > > Any thoughts on products that screw up networks in deterministic (and > realistic found-in-the-wild) ways?  I'm thinking of stuff like > PacketStorm, Dummynet, etc.  Dial up jitter, latency, tail drop, RED, > whatever... > >

Re: Tata AS6453 not peering with NTT AS2914 in Japan

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote: > Call it funny or what - so far I have got 4 replies and in total 10emails > in one to one discussion. > > No one replied in mailing list! People are often hesitant to discuss dirty laundry in public; not least because it can sometimes have

Re: community strings for Reliance Globalcom

gt; Stefan Fouant > JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ER, JNCI > Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks > > Follow us on Twitter @JuniperEducate > > Sent from my iPad > > On Jan 12, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Philip Lavine

Re: community strings for Reliance Globalcom

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Philip Lavine wrote: > does anybody have the community strings for Reliance Globalcom > You might check to see if they left the default "public" read-only string in place, but I highly doubt it. Most people are pretty careful to pick at least somewhat hard to gue

Re: local_preference for transit traffic?

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > On Friday, December 16, 2011 05:02:33 AM Joe Malcolm wrote: > >> Once upon a time, UUNET did the opposite by setting >> origin to unknown for peer routes, in an attempt to >> prefer customer routes over peer routes. We moved to >> local prefere

Re: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > > On 2011-12-12, at 4:22 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote: > >> I guess most (i.e. those >> which aren't Akamai) are more concerned with making money than with >> delivering >> a good service to the end user. > > Really?  I always thought that high

Re: Looking for a Tier 1 ISP Mentor for career advice.

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > --- bickn...@ufp.org wrote: > From: Leo Bicknell > > If you have telecommuters _everyone_ in the office should be forced > to work from home at least 2 weeks a year, including the manager. > It's only from that experience you learn to deal wit

Re: Looking for a Tier 1 ISP Mentor for career advice.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Keegan Holley wrote: > 2011/11/21 >> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:40:08 EST, Tyler Haske said: >> >> > I'm looking for a mentor who can help me focus my career so eventually I >> > wind up working at one of the Tier I ISPs as a senior tech. I want to >> > handle the big

2011.10.12 NANOG53 weds morning session notes

Wow. As always, Geoff Huston really knows how to deliver a message in a way that just reaches right out and grabs you; awesome, awesome keynote talk, that's going to be another one for the archives. ^_^ Notes from this morning's session have been posted to http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2011.10.1

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >