on this is that viagenie responds well to mail and will fix
things, but the software has not been widely tested and is not production
quality right now.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
. In that service they
If I give them a /56 then it's zero administration for me for the
forseeable future. Why on earth would I want to handle customer
administration when I don't need to?
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
and ignorant and just simply
misunderstanding the issue, but I still find it hard to believe that a
router would blindly trust an outside address to know about an inside
address that is not already in the router's neighbor table.
That's how it's always worked, both for v4 and v6.
--
Mikael
.
In the DHCP case this is easy, yes.
I perfer to have only LL on the link towards the customer operated CPE,
thus I don't really need to keep lots of ND state per customer.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
literals in the forseeable future, just like
we needed trumped winsock in the 90ties, we're going to need full v4
connectivity for Windows XP (applications + dns transport) over v6only
access.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
and
directed their customers to the cloning functionality to solve the
problem.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Rolling a totally new thing out to 100% of the user base on the same day
will rarely end well.
If this is LTE only the it's a totally new thing anyway and I doubt some
extra IPv6 troubles will hurt that much more :P
--
Mikael Abrahamsson
you need indications of error rate constantly. It's cheaper than the
40G card, but most likely more expensive than a 4 port 10GE card with ZR
optics.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
).
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
would see 0 buffering instead of 30ms).
Surely buffers that can store seconds worth of data are simply too big?
FIFO with seconds worth of data is just silly, yes.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
near that, but on the other side a
few ms of buffering+tail drop has much less impact on interactive
applications compared to seconds of buffering.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
.
It's one of those in the black box things that should just work, but
there is little upside in having it because it's hard to charge for.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
approach 1:1 ratio more and
more...
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
(no AQM) in most devices.
Personally I have MQC configured on my interface which has assured bw for
small packets and ssh packets, and I also run fair-queue to make tcp
sessions get a fair share. I don't know any non-cisco devices that does
this.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
deployment of this in 2011 seems highly doubtful?
It's one of those features I doubt would ever be implemented in 12.0S for
GSR, but perhaps enough large ISPs have stopped using IOS GSRs at their
edge so this is not a problem anymore.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
. Aggregate at nodes with several thousand households
and let ISPs colocate at these nodes to reach end users.
Think COs but instead of copper, use fiber, and the entitity who owns this
doesn't do anything but L1.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
situation.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
Considering there are mobile roaming partners that charge USD10-15 per
megabyte, unfortunately that proposition is really hard to do in todays
global market.
but really
that much, and it's going to involve a lot of work
to make it happen, so if we're going to do that work, do it properly.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
/arguments.html#crc seems to disagree?
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
QoS-configuration in place. It really solves a
lot of the problems people are seeing with FIFO and mixed traffic.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
to reserve resources everywhere, so it might be that a lot
of transport network devices could potentially be included as well.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
that is seriously
hindering performance on the Internet as it is today or in the next few
tens of years.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
care of the path in between has a
larger MTU.
But in a transition some end systems will have 9000 MTU and some parts of
the network will have smaller, so then you get problems.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
reality).
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
, and then the packets start flowing.
I don't have a good idea how to emulate this, the tools I've seen so far
usually just emulate jitter, delay and packet loss, and not really the
above behaviours.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
that.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
? Thanks.
The default is that M and O bits are off, ie hosts should do SLAAC and
there is no DHCPv6 info to be had.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
for
it.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
for
misunderstandings.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
. The MiRICi-155 is part of RAD’s “System on an SFP” product
line.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
the service you want, why is that
a kooky reason to take your business elsewhere?
Just leave.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
you please share your
configuration you're using on the tunnel interfaces? I thought 6to4
traffic was only supposed to be 1280MTU?
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
will support a single device behind it doing Proto
41, so saying 6to4 has no NAT traversal and thus won't work beind NAT
isn't true in all cases.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
providing their own
relays, someone else is and the performance might be good or bad.
Same logic applies to Teredo as to 6to4 and why if you're an ISP who
cares, you should run your own. Your customers are using both, whether
they know it or not.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
it is making
things worse for your customers. Yes, 6to4 is generally bad but it's out
there. Everybody needs to think about it.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
database
go out of sync and miss information for things it actually should have
understood.
This was *silent* error/corruption. I'm not sure I prefer to have silent
problems instead of tearing down the session which is definitely
noticable.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
in those networks.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
against current standards, but for
me these are more in tune with todays reality in networking as I see them.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
systems have problems, I'd imagine
the best security is when they work together.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
specify requirement of allowing configuration
change of a default?
I'd say by definition it's meaningless of talking about a default that
can't be changed.
As I stated in the 6man discussion, I prefer routers to by default not
send redirects. We do that in our configuration template.
--
Mikael
is sometimes they will pay to have it trashed instead of
the option of a recycler/reseller coming around and picking it up at no
cost.
As you said, it's just one of those things.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
break some TCP sessions? How would someone get
around this? This is also what OpenDNS does from what I understand.
Usually network do not loadshare per-packet on BGP, so a TCP session will
always go to the same dns server, at least for the short duration this
TCP session lives.
--
Mikael
to be anonymous, there is always TOR or other anonymising services.
Personally I prefer static for both IPv4 and IPv6 and have chosen
providers accordingly historically. I also recommend this to others.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
).
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Woow this is fantactic news. Oh wait. Didnt Akamai invent this years
ago?
I helped install my first Akamai cluster before year 2000 if I remember
correctly. So it's at least a decade ago :P
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
+forums etc) actively suggests
disabling IPv6 for a lot of slowness problems.
We have a long road ahead of us...
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
IPv6 as
far as I could see, I had to use the power kernel referenced in the url
earlier in the thread to get IPv6 at all.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
does they support mapping of STS3c only?, STS12c only?,
Or both?
I'm no ATM expert, but I've never seen ATM be anything else than
concatenated, so I'd say vc-4-4c (STM4) and plain vc4 (STM1).
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
...@swm.pp.se; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:10:41 +0200 (CEST)
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
guess it depends on
more factors than just running Debian. IPv6 seems to be on by default,
yes.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
the packet dropping that a rate limiter
does.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, Alan Bryant wrote:
Does anyone know of a solution to connect a POS OC-3 to a router running
Mikrotik's RouterOS? I have searched google extensively with varying
phrases and nothing helpful comes out of it.
I don't know much about Mikrotik, but there are OC-3 interfaces
-UNITS=ktsRANGE-STYLE=bestRANGE-COLOR=navyMAP-STYLE=
Of course fiber very seldom goes direct path, so 124ms sounds plausable
and could most likely be improved by a little bit by choosing another
provider, but would that really substantially improve your interactivity
problem?
--
Mikael Abrahamsson
this is impossible to answer.
If you aim at mobile broadband users, then you'll get the peak in the
evening just like your current peak, because it'll be similar users. If
you aim at other groups of people, then you'll get different traffic
patterns.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Rens wrote:
Does anyone have any configuration examples for this or tutorials,
everything on the net seems way to complex for my needs.
Multicast Quick-Start Configuration Guide
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk828/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094821.shtml
--
Mikael
under the impression that it wasn't by IP but that they
could block specific youtube videos etc.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
snr target/no interleaving
for low bw/low BER/low latency applications, low snr target/interleaving
for file transfers.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
interleaving and then the added coding delay.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
are there to protect the king, it's a sensitive subject.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
.
Exactly.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
, but if you go to the ubuntu support
channels and forums (and mac I guess) you'll see that this is no longer
true.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
the real PD prefix, so end
user dns etc works so it's easy to do administration of the device.
We can't expect end-users to do the above procedure.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
to a cpe router with an easy to type
address.
Yeah, and when I try that on my linux box it won,t install the software
for some reason. we need solutions that are cross platform and open, let's
not help microsoft any further, thank you.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
nice to be able to have a very
simple L3 device in the CO and do routing there, avoids all the need for
secure metro ethernet and long L2 transport. very clean.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
-NATed node.
These kind of applications work best if there is at least one non-NATed
party involved, especially for video etc.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
and according
to what I see in the IETF, this is going to be the recommendation for an
IPv6 enabled home gateway.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
to be of that calibre (probably because of price
point).
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
there.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
...
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
On 04/16/2010 08:35 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, William Jobs wrote:
Has anyone else undertaken a similar setup? What were the difficulties
you
encountered especially in terms of reduced throughput, packet loss
etc. Any
or something. Sounds likeyuou'll get by
just fine using an L3 switch.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
, avoid.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Joe Johnson wrote:
Maybe encourage people like Apple, Xerox, HP or Ford to migrate their
operations completely to IPv6 and return their /8?
Perhaps 45.0.0.0/8 can start, that shouldn't be too hard to migrate out
of? :P
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
get this as some tracking tools doesn't seem to
support it and it's thus harder to find the responsible network.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Seth Mattinen wrote:
That's an exact opposite of silly from the OP's request; my corporate
account works just fine.
Well, your corporate account seems to involve less silly (exchange/lotus
notes) than most.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
in these mailing lists
regardless of my employer, thus I never understood why someone would want
to post from their corporate accounts.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Simon Leinen wrote:
Check out M-Lab - http://www.measurementlab.net/
Offline suggestions I have received also includes
http://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/ which seems to have some of the test
suggestions as well.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
MSA size, so apparently the parts needed for
multiple OC-768 ports can't be physically fitted in one PLIM.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Matthew Petach wrote:
/me sits back patiently and waits for CRS-5, then...[1]
CRS-3 is ~3 times as fast as CRS-1, so I guess the next iteration will be
CRS-12 and then CRS-36, CRS-108 (perhaps CRS-100 just to make it easy).
:P
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm
entries it'll allow?
Probably around there, yes, 10M RIB, 2-3M FIB.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
98% of Teredo users getting the v6only content (using DNS) was using
WinXP, so it does seem it does lookups.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
content.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
, for
instance, is hardly mentioned).
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
happen in normal operation.
Put another way: If you think you can do better, then let's see your video.
I'm very happy someone is willing to do these kinds of videos, and if you
don't want peoples feedback, then just say so.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
be used by end users. Creating a new MIME type
precludes most end users from ever using it because their MUA won't
support it.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
/paste this into an email and send. Question is how an end
user should handle the reply they get, it'll be pretty much unreadable to
the untrained eye.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Mathias Seiler wrote:
So what do you think? Good? Bad? Ugly? /127 ? ;)
This thread:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/20788
had a long discussion regarding this topic.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
list-link you can click. Might not be perfectly intuitive,
but it's full functionality and quite easy.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
out the testing
kit.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
years.
There was quite a buzz regarding doctor checklists a few years back, I
read several articles about it, but now I can't find the one I want to
find, but http://www.healthbeatblog.org/2007/12/pilots-use-chec.html
talks a bit about the topic.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Hello there..
I am looking to sell and buy some used hardware, where is the best place for
this, other than ebay ?
Mostly juniper stuff
network-res...@network-resell.com
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
this.
Last I checked, this was the conclusion of multiple IPv6 related
IETF working groups, check out homegate and v6ops WGs for instance.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
to deal with.
Creating a standard on what to put in WHOIS/DNS for
dynamic/static/infrastructure would make a lot of sense, seems nobody is
doing it though.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
/10 is
5-10 USD/month cheaper.
I've been trying to run the text thru google translate, but the web magic
seems to prohibit this from working.
If someone can figure it out better than me, the URL is here (in swedish):
http://www.sollentunaenergi.se/bredband/ansl_villor.asp
--
Mikael
network. You can choose from several different ISPs, some of
which also offer VoIP. When your supplier has informed us about your
order, switched services normally within 10 working days. Information on
service providers and prices can be found under the Internet link.
--
Mikael
for some small and mid-sized players.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
available in the market.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
401 - 500 of 604 matches
Mail list logo
