On 4/3/13 2:52 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
We host one of the gazillion speed test sites and for networks that are
close to us we find it reasonably accurate .. a good benchmark at least ..
The speedtest.net that's hosted on one of my directly connected transits
is consistently wrong, which is
On 4/3/13 6:25 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
I'm shocked Ookla hasn't been eaten by some major ISP. Speed tests are
the root of most complaints. Your link is congested (oversubed) and you
then attempt to completely saturate your bandwidth to tell your provider
what a suck job they are doing. I
On 4/2/13 2:24 PM, Carlos Alcantar wrote:
You might want to consider putting up a speedtest server internal to your
network. I know there is a fee but well worth it I believe. You will
still need to take the results with a grain a salt but you will have the
best results as well.
The
On 3/27/13 2:46 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
Wasn't there a ton of drama with the SpamHaus guys a year or so ago
regarding RBL's on NANOG?
There's always someone who publicly flips out over being listed by a
major DNSBL at least once a year.
~Seth
On 3/4/13 2:16 PM, Bill Weiss wrote:
For what it's worth, I've contacted Yelp about this issue a number of
times, and they're wholly uninterested in traffic from Linode. They're
also unwilling to discuss the issue with someone coming from Linode. So,
good luck on that front!
With all
On 1/31/13 10:13 AM, matt kelly wrote:
Can anyone recommended ddos mitigation companies with US east coast
presence that provide the services via bgp? We are not interested in an
appliance but rather offloading the traffic.
Prolexic.
On 12/6/12 12:49 PM, William Herrin wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm looking at several brands of rackmount 3kva double-conversion
UPSes, such as Tripp Lite and Eaton Powerware. I'm specifically
looking for something that will work as a line-interactive UPS until
the power starts to misbehave and will
I apologize for mentioning it; thanks for taking the time to point out such
data could not possibly be useful.
~Seth
Sent from my iPad, please excuse my brevity.
On Dec 6, 2012, at 16:19, Alex Rubenstein a...@corp.nac.net wrote:
I have a 700VA 9130 rackmount that I recently bought to give it
On 11/19/12 6:08 PM, Wallace Keith wrote:
Just got paged with a pbx alarm that had 1970 as the year. By the time I
logged in , it was showing 2012. Using GPS for time and date.
I use GPS for my NTP server and didn't notice anything, but it's PPS
disciplined after initial sync so it
On 11/19/12 9:16 AM, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Actually, this is kind of an interesting aside. Last time I checked, Canada
counts as North America and large parts of Quebec are inhabited by folks who
don't speak much, if any, English. Having said that, I can't recall having
seen any Quebecois
On 11/20/12 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 50abc681.5040...@rollernet.us, Seth Mattinen writes:
On 11/19/12 9:16 AM, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Actually, this is kind of an interesting aside. Last time I checked, Canad
a counts as North America and large parts of Quebec are inhabited
Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
they've worked out for you.
I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but
On 11/13/12 1:20 PM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
As a side note, how do you call a UPS online if it stays on bypass most
of the time, and throws out of bypass to go to battery?
It's a selectable feature. I was probably going to set it to true online
mode, but play with the other mode for curiosity's
On 11/13/12 6:49 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
On 11/13/2012 6:42 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
recommend
On 10/31/12 11:25 AM, andy lam wrote:
Anyone knows if there's a way to find out how involved NSA monitors 151 front
street at Toronto? NSA allegedly monitors data centres in the US, but does
it have the same influence at a building sitting in its neighbor's soil?
There's something on the
On 10/10/12 10:10 AM, William Herrin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:18 PM, jamie rishaw j...@arpa.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Aaron Toponce
Instead, purchase a cellular USB modem with a standard plan. All 4 major
carriers provide APIs to interact with the modems, and you get
On 9/28/12 11:08 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
Just got told by a Lightpath person that in order to do BGP on a
customer gig circuit to them they would need a visio diagram (of what I
dont know).
Has anybody else seen this brain damage?
Hand draw two squares, label them our AS and your AS with a
On 9/27/12 8:52 AM, Jason Fesler wrote:
Safari on the iPad seems to be preferring A over if a hostname has
both, though. I can browse to a bracketed IPv6 address so it is working.
I think perhaps it is time to update test-ipv6.com a bit, and have it
penalize the first number when IPv4
So I'm back at the office this morning and the iPad is *not* getting an
IPv6 address but is showing LTE service. It did do IPv6 over LTE at home
so it's not a device problem. So I suppose the closest tower to my
office is not IPv6 enabled.
Is this an expected behavior in some areas or something
Does Verizon have IPv6 on their LTE network everywhere or is it limited
to specific regions? I ask because I have a Verizon LTE iPad just
upgraded to iOS6 (which supposedly added this capability), but it's not
getting an IPv6 address on the LTE interface. Or does Verizon now need
to authorize
On 9/20/12 5:39 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
Your problem is likely with Apple, they have not yet supported ipv6 on
the cellular interface afaik.
Well, that's true under iOS 5, but iOS 6 released yesterday (and
assuming you have a third gen iPad with LTE) was supposed to correct
that. It runs
Huh, so I come home and now I'm getting IPv6 from Verizon LTE. But I
definitely wasn't at the office. I verified with an app called IT
Tools that shows the interfaces and routing table, plus it does
traceroute/ping. Maybe the nearest tower over there doesn't support
IPv6? Odd.
Running
On 9/20/12 6:33 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Huh, so I come home and now I'm getting IPv6 from Verizon LTE. But I
definitely wasn't at the office. I verified with an app called IT
Tools that shows the interfaces and routing table, plus it does
traceroute/ping. Maybe the nearest tower over
On 9/20/12 6:47 PM, TJ wrote:
Did Apple use their version of Happy Eyeballs on the iPads?
ISTR they cache certain timeouts, so if IPv6 was failing before it may take
awhile for it to become preferred again.
Well, I can try creating a new DNS record that never existed before and see.
~Seth
On 9/20/12 6:47 PM, TJ wrote:
Did Apple use their version of Happy Eyeballs on the iPads?
ISTR they cache certain timeouts, so if IPv6 was failing before it may take
awhile for it to become preferred again.
It seems you may be correct.
~Seth
I came across these threads today; the blind ignorance towards IPv6 from
some of the posters is kind of shocking. It's also pretty disappointing
if these are the people providing internet access to end users. We focus
our worries on the big guys like ATT going IPv6 (which I'm sure but
they're
On 9/16/12 10:06 AM, John T. Yocum wrote:
On 9/16/2012 9:55 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I came across these threads today; the blind ignorance towards IPv6 from
some of the posters is kind of shocking. It's also pretty disappointing
if these are the people providing internet access to end
On 9/16/12 9:55 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I came across these threads today; the blind ignorance towards IPv6 from
some of the posters is kind of shocking. It's also pretty disappointing
if these are the people providing internet access to end users. We focus
our worries on the big guys like
On 9/4/12 9:05 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Peach john-na...@johnpeach.com
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:57:38 -0400 (EDT)
Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
SMTP Auth to *arbitrary remote domains' MX servers*? Am I missing
something,
or are you?
I run an
What's the state of MPLS on Linux these days?
~Seth
On 8/23/12 7:18 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Aug 23, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Blake Hudson bl...@ispn.net wrote:
How does one suddenly justify needing 1,000,000 more IP addresses (explosive
expected growth in the next couple months?)
I can easily see people moving through those IPs in short
On 8/21/12 6:10 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Hey everyone,
Many moons ago I worked in a place where we had a Brady LS2000 wire
labeler. So long as the supplies were fresh it was great.
In the storage unit I have a Brady TLS2200. Supplies are expensive,
but it works reasonably well.
On 8/16/12 2:35 PM, John Osmon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:10:42PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
[...]
+1 for ubiquity. I've had excellent results with their products though
I have not used the Air Fiber product specifically and haven't
tested any of the long-haul 1Gbps products.
I've
On 8/10/12 9:14 AM, fc lists wrote:
Hi ...
This is my last resort. Apologies if this have been discussed before or if
is totally OT ... but i figured i could find some useful help here.
I need to find a good VPS provider in India where to setup a small set of
machines in a Virtual
On 8/6/12 4:15 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
That's simply not true at all...
Let's look at what it takes to configure BGP as I suggested...
1. The ASN number of the two providers
2. The ASN to be used for the local side
3.
On 8/3/12 8:56 AM, William Herrin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Alain Hebert aheb...@pubnix.net wrote:
Yes the easier way to do it is have your subnet routed to someone that
is willing to colo your router, or provide your with something like NHRP,
and use a 87x on your brand new
On 8/3/12 12:22 PM, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. wrote:
Anyone charging end users for IPv6 space yet? :p
Nope, and no plans to.
~Seth
On 8/3/12 3:42 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
Hi,
On Aug 3, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. o...@ocosa.com wrote:
Anyone charging end users for IPv6 space yet? :p
Just wondering, with so many IPv6 resources in a single allocation it
would seem difficult to charge anything at all.
1.
On 7/13/12 7:38 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
OK. I'm pretty sure I'm gonna get some flak for this but I'll share this
question and it's background anyway. Please be gentle.
In the past, with IPv4, we have used reserved or non-routable space
Internally in production for segments that won't be seen
On 7/17/12 3:34 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2012-07-18 00:21, Seth Mattinen wrote:
[..]
Don't, because there's already a /10 defined for such things. It's
called ULA (unique local address) aka RFC 4193. ULAs are not globally
routable.
Here's a calculator that will generate a random one
On 7/17/12 3:57 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
I am wondering what you meaning with 'squat', note that what I reference
above is real full RFC4193 calculated ULA.
By squat I meant take a random chunk of IPv6 space and use it as
private address space. He said:
On 7/13/12 7:38 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
On 7/10/12 9:16 AM, John Peach wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:05:36 -0400
shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
can some op filter this asshole?
Please stop forwarding the whole message; I'd already dropped him in my
procmail rules.
I don't think the archives need to be archiving it,
On 7/6/12 10:44 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 13:20:55 -0400, Andrew Fried said:
The dns-ok.us site is getting crushed from all the sudden media
interest.
One wonders why it's so hard to get the media interested when it
would be *helpful*. DNS Changer gets traction
On 6/29/12 8:22 PM, Joe Blanchard wrote:
Seems that they are unreachable at the moment. Called and theres a recorded
message stating they are aware of an issue, no details.
I didn't see anyone post this yet, so here's Amazon's summary of events:
http://aws.amazon.com/message/67457/
On 6/30/12 4:50 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012, jamie rishaw wrote:
you know what's happening even more?
..Amazon not learning their lesson.
I was not giving anyone a free pass or attempting to shrug off the
outage. I was just stating that there are many reasons why
On 6/30/12 9:25 AM, Todd Underwood wrote:
On Jun 30, 2012 11:23 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
mailto:se...@rollernet.us wrote:
But haven't they all been cascading failures?
No. They have not. That's not what that term means.
'Cascading failure' has a fairly specific meaning
On 6/30/12 12:04 PM, Todd Underwood wrote:
This was not a cascading failure. It was a simple power outage
Cascading failures involve interdependencies among components.
I guess I'm assuming there were UPS and generator systems involved (and
failing) with powering the critical load, but I
On 6/29/12 8:47 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
Whatever happened to UPSs and generators?
You don't need them with The Cloud!
But seriously, this is something like the third or fourth time AWS fell
over flat in recent memory.
~Seth
On 6/29/12 8:22 PM, Joe Blanchard wrote:
Seems that they are unreachable at the moment. Called and theres a recorded
message stating they are aware of an issue, no details.
Streaming services and web; just tried my Roku and it failed to connect.
~Seth
On 6/26/12 2:34 PM, Dave Hart wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Majdi S. Abbas m...@latt.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:33:35PM -0400, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Word around the campfire is that the 18x is jittery compared to the 18.
The 18x is much worse than the 18LVC.
On 6/13/12 9:10 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Jun 13, 2012 8:29 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a Hurricane Electric v6 tunnel setup on an AWS (amazon web
services)
instance so that i can have ipv6 connectivity. I can ping and traceroute
out of the tunnel fine,
On 6/1/12 7:04 AM, Brzozowski, John wrote:
Jimmy,
Trust me, I work for Comcast and run the IPv6 program. This has been the
case for nearly 7 years. We can take some of the items below off list.
We have launched IPv6 for residential broadband at this time. Commercial
DOCSIS support is
On 5/28/12 6:31 AM, Evgeniy Aikashev wrote:
Dear all,
We are AS21219 - PJSC Datagroup and owner of 5.1.0.0/19 block. Our customers
have no access to some part of Internet if they use these IPs.
Could you please update your bogon filters to permit this range.
Do you have a test IP address
On 5/25/12 8:54 AM, Jarek Kasjaniuk wrote:
W dniu 25.05.2012 17:02, Andy Smith pisze:
www.nanpa.com (North American Number Plan Association). This is
the official site for area code/exchange information in North
America. www.localcallingguide.com also has information, but I'm
not sure how
On 5/25/12 3:08 PM, Adam wrote:
You also have to implement additional filters to protect yourself from what
your client can advertise. I'm lucky enough to work for a major ISP with
pretty sophisticated filters built off the public route registry, but not
all ISPs have this functionality.
On 5/19/12 3:48 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote:
Was wondering if there's anyone from Server Beach/Peer1 here. We have a
dedicated server with them which we primarily use for DNS. I am adding
support for anycasting on that
On 4/24/12 9:37 AM, Bret Palsson wrote:
Where is this outages list?
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
~Seth
On 4/10/12 5:38 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
Yes, you can ask them to change the 'profile', which can make things
more stable.
Or you can dump you switch your DSL out for Uverse (Internet Only)...
Which is sold online (only) without any bundle.
In most cases you can end up with more bandwidth
On 4/3/12 1:27 AM, jamie rishaw wrote:
1) Tech says Charter (according to internal talk) has no v6 deploy plans
until 2013. Someone stop me from pulling out my hair on this -- Does 3q
'13 align with others' plans for v6 deployment ?
All of mine already provide me with native IPv6.
On 3/10/12 2:47 PM, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
well... we actually intend to just announce /64's and smaller as well.
i don't see the problem with that.
just get routers with enough memory...
i'm rather for a specification of a minimum supported route-size
(let's say something along the
On 3/10/12 6:34 PM, chris wrote:
Looks like no dice on uverse, says its not available. i thought uverse was
fios though atleast that was my understanding. now im even more confused,
how can att/bellsouth be the ILEC and have zero internet options at all but
be offering pots? Only logical thing
On 2/20/12 12:05 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Here's one example; cheapest I've seen:
http://www.kvm-switches-online.com/0su51068.html
There are others. This one appears to be web/java based rather than VNC,
though that probably isn't a killer for most people.
I thought I'd seen a little
On 2/16/12 1:25 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:
If you're building a datacenter probably not. Other than giving the remote
hands some identifier and making them label the servers themselves. If
you're at a conference you could get away with using masking tape and a
sharpie. If you think it was
On 2/12/12 10:48 PM, ali baba wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Hope someone can help me out.. I have some IP Transit links with one of the
Tier1s and I need to know the sourcedestination of traffic passing
though.. My provider gives me a straight NO, we can provide this and I am
wondering if anyone
On 2/1/12 9:05 PM, Erik Amundson wrote:
I apologize for this being off-topic in the NANOG list, but I'm hoping some
of you have experience with the particulars of what I'm looking for...
I am looking for a server cabinet which has an electric latching mechanism on
it. I want to use my
On 2/1/12 10:16 AM, George Bonser wrote:
Let's say I had a business in space in a building I was leasing at 100 Main
Street, Podunk, USA. Now let's say you didn't renew the lease so I moved to
a building up the block but put the 100 Main Street address on my new
location and continued to
On 2/1/12 1:13 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 20120201201012.ge10...@hiwaay.net, Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, George Bonser gbon...@seven.com said:
Let's say I had a business in space in a building I was leasing at 100 Main
Street, Podunk, USA. Now let's say you didn't renew the
On 1/27/12 7:52 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
This is already very normal (tens of millions of people doing this).
World of Warcraft, RIFT, and Star Wars: The Old Republic, etc. are all
around 20G of downloads. Sure they have boxed versions, but after you
install them they need another 10G of
On 1/27/12 11:26 AM, Brian Stengel wrote:
We have a potential customer that is asking for us to enable MD5
authentication on a TCP connection between two BGP peers? Is this still
common practice today? Any potential problems or gotchas to keep in mind?
Sprint requires it to enable remote
On 1/23/12 11:23 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
Is there someone who can talk about how to get IPv6 on ATT residential:?
Thanks,
- Jared
-- snip --
ISPs participating in World IPv6 Launch will enable IPv6 for enough users so
that at least 1% of their wireline residential subscribers who visit
On 1/17/12 5:02 PM, Derek Ivey wrote:
Just saw this new site: http://www.worldipv6launch.org/
Many large companies and ISPs are planning to finally go live with IPv6
by June 6, 2012.
I don't see Verizon (my ISP) on the list though :(. I'm glad to see
companies moving forward with IPv6!
On 12/20/11 9:14 AM, Christian de Larrinaga wrote:
You tell that to
http://www.charset.org/punycode.php?encoded=xn--m_omaaamk.comdecode=Punycode+to+normal+text
Normal text
FMQQSQQT.com
to Punycode
xn--m_omaaamk.com
?
Dash - is a different character than underscore _
~Seth
On 12/20/11 9:23 AM, Christian de Larrinaga wrote:
indeed.. now have your Mom read this again
C
Uh, what?
~Seth
On 12/19/11 6:10 PM, Richard Laager wrote:
I'm trying to sign up for Microsoft's Junk Mail Reporting Program.
Multiple representatives keep sending me more-or-less form
responses saying they can't add my dynamic customer IP ranges
because they're included in...[a] third party block list. The
On 11/17/11 4:58 AM, A. Chase Turner wrote:
I am seeking a $100 turnkey micro hardware appliance to plug into a LAN hub
(behind a consumer-level cable modem) whose only purpose in life is to send
heartbeat (and simple quality of service metrics) to a pre-configured central
aggregation
On 11/6/11 10:14 PM, David Hubbard wrote:
Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher
speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for
out of band management during emergencies. I was
wondering if anyone had experiences with such devices
they could share?
Devices I've
On 10/3/11 4:38 PM, Brandon Kim wrote:
Since we're on the topic of DoS. What best practice actions can be taken
AFTER such an attack?
Wait to hear from Roland. ;)
~Seth
On 9/30/11 3:41 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
Steven G. Huter wrote:
this August 2011 article in the Economist outlines some relevant info
about the prineville, oregon FB datacenter.
http://www.economist.com/node/21525237
steve
Informative article...It's the climate, stupid.
Got a laugh
On 9/26/11 10:33 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
On 9/26/11 8:36 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Has anyone been able to pull any magic off that allows PPTP connectivity
over sprint's 3G/4G wireless network?
I assume they're just
On 9/23/11 11:29 AM, Eric Germann wrote:
Long time on-again-off-again lurker.
Looking to multihome in the most efficient mode.
Our two upstreams are AS11530 (Embarq) and AS10796 (Time Warner). Diverse
routed fiber from each at 10Mbps.
Our traffic profile is highly asymmetric as a
On 9/20/11 12:24 PM, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
On Sep 20, 2011 3:21 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
If you open the door to that sort of interpretation, then every org with
a T1 and a backup dial-up connection can claim to be multihomed.
You say that like it's a bad thing.
In either of
On 9/18/11 1:08 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
On Sep 18, 2011, at 15:51, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
I'm told of others that have bought legacy IPv4 prefixes with no
intention of updating whois at this time - no desire to enter into a
relationship with ARIN and be subjected to existing
On 9/3/11 2:02 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Wayne E Bouchard w...@typo.org
and will largely accept the problems for the durration or b) (and far
more likely) the links apple is using will become flooded or the
systems overloaded in some way or another in which
On 8/27/11 5:30 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 13:56:35 EDT, Patrick W. Gilmore said:
And the customers still don't care. They just care _that_ it
affected them - at least during the problem. Although one can
hope they care enough to change their behavior afterward.
On 8/24/11 6:44 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:55 AM, JC Dill wrote:
On 23/08/11 3:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
A. Our structures aren't built to seismic zone standards. Our
construction workers aren't familiar with*how* to build to seismic
zone standards. We don't
On 7/26/11 7:58 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Hi all,
I will like to know, from those deploying IPv6 services to residential
customers, if you are planning to provide static or dynamic IPv6 prefixes.
Static everywhere for me, including residential customers.
~Seth
On 7/8/11 9:04 AM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
Hello Everyone
We are going to be moving the NANOG mailing list over to our new service
provider beginning this week. There are several changes that will occur over
time that will, hopefully, reduce the service impact to users. One key
On 6/25/2011 15:12, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I have never seen a generator that syncs to the utility for live, no
break transfer. I'm sure such a thing exists, but that sounds crazy
dangerous to me. Generators sync to each other, not the utility.
Most of these come in open, delayed, or closed
On 6/25/2011 16:43, Paul Graydon wrote:
On 6/25/2011 12:32 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
For open and closed transitions you'll most certainly want to sync to
utility to transition between the two. For the delayed transition model
it'll stop at the intermediate open point for a configurable amount
On 6/22/11 3:07 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
Your average person cares a whole lot less about what's crossing their
Internet connection than they care about whether or not this works
than I do.
I continue to be amazed at the quality of Netflix video coming across
the wire. Our local cable company
On 6/22/2011 14:33, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
I agree, the whole use of the terms 'need' and 'want' in this conversation
are
ridiculous. It's the Internet. The entire thing isn't a 'need'. It's not
like life
support or something that will cause loss of life if it isn't there. The
only
On 6/20/11 5:44 AM, Steve Richardson wrote:
They have inquired about IPv6 already, but it's only gone so far as
that. I would gladly give them a /64 and be done with it, but my
concern is that they are going to want several /64 subnets for the
same reason and I don't really *think* it's a
On 6/15/2011 12:14, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Octavio Alvarez wrote:
In fact. Although a website of mine worked flawlessly in a dual-stack
but it did NOT in an IPv6-only environment. Unfortunately, the problem
has to be fixed in the DNS provider, which though supporting
records was enough
On 6/15/2011 12:32, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
listen-on-v6 { any; };
Yeah that's what I did. But I keep reading about how these big name
companies messed it up in some subtle or not so subtle way and I keep
thinking I must have missed something. Because surely those big
On 6/12/11 2:22 AM, Don Gould wrote:
100mbit is not luxury, it's something my business needs all it's
customers to have to drive more uptake of my services.
My customers already have 10/1 today. Now I need them to have 100/40 so
they have a reason to buy other CPE that in turn drives my
On 6/8/11 1:29 AM, Neil Long wrote:
On 8 Jun 2011, at 02:13, TJ wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:04, Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljit...@muada.comwrote:
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:31, TJ wrote:
... and Gmail, too ...
imap.gmail.com only has IPv4, though.
Good catch, applies to pop smtp as
On 6/8/2011 12:43, Dennis Burgess wrote:
Just noted that cogent does not have a IPv6 route to any subnet in HE,
and HE does not have any routes to Cogent!
Looks like we have different Global IPv6 tables? Or does Cogent just
NOT peer IPv6 peer with anyone else!
Cogent and HE don't
On 6/7/2011 17:04, fredrik danerklint wrote:
This is from Sweden.
$ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
; DiG 9.7.3 any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61742
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1,
On 6/7/2011 17:16, Scott Howard wrote:
That's because you're asking the wrong nameservers. The response you're
getting is pointing you to the correct nameservers (glb1/glb2.facebook.com)
which are defintely returning records for me :
$ dig +short www.facebook.com
On 5/25/11 9:09 AM, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
Mac Mail (and others) have a feature that allows my customers to generate a
fake NDR message and send it back through my server. I get about a customer
every few months that discovers this 'solution' to spam emails, and when it
happens they cause
201 - 300 of 605 matches
Mail list logo
