Hi,
On Aug 3, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. o...@ocosa.com wrote:
Anyone charging end users for IPv6 space yet? :p
Just wondering, with so many IPv6 resources in a single allocation it
would seem difficult to charge anything at all.
1. How are you making up loss of revenue on
Hi!
On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. o...@ocosa.com wrote:
By end user I mean hosting clients (cloud, collocation, shared, dedicated,
VPS, etc.) of any sort. For example you have clients that would needsay
/24 for their dedicated server. If you charge a $1.00/IP which is
On Jun 28, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Eric Germann egerm...@limanews.com wrote:
All,
I'm trying to understand why a Vyatta 6.4 collection of routers is carping
about the following as martian routes:
113.107.174.14
27.73.1.159
94.248.215.60
95.26.105.161
They don't look like they fall in
Hi,
On Jun 28, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Eric Germann egerm...@limanews.com wrote:
Well, I did when I checked them shortly after I saw the log messages.
Wondering now if the routes for those bounced and in the middle of the
bounce, they're considered martian.
Yes, that sounds reasonable.
Hi,
On 3/8/2012 5:40 PM, Matthew Huff wrote:
Just got an email today to our account associated with our legacy ARIN address space. A firm
Precision Management of Texas is interested in subleasing some of our IP space for
on-demand solutions for brand marketers and website promotion chiefly
hi,
On Feb 8, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Nicolai wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:20:07PM -0500, Ryan Rawdon wrote:
Assuming it is not a futile/wasted effort, where is the current best
place/resource to report an active botnet CC to?
I don't know if there's a single best option, but there are
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:47:03 -0400
Chris cal...@gmail.com wrote:
For folks who do not understand, I'm trying to McColo XSServer so
their lack of response in regards to abuse is gone rather than the
suggestions of scripting (guess you didn't read the full text of the
email) or you pushing a
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:22:53 -0400
Chris cal...@gmail.com wrote:
McColo and Atrivo were disconnected for much larger sins than
spamming someone's wordpress blog.
Many of you do not understand the scope of just spamming a Wordpress
blog.
I do understand the scope of shady SEO companies.
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:50:38 +0100 (BST)
Tim Franklin t...@pelican.org wrote:
Thankfully, the current test has been a success.
Including stopping non-members from posting to the list, and other
anti-spam?
I've got a sudden influx this morning of spam addressed to
nanog@nanog.org :(
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:12:57 -0400
Thomas York strate...@fuhell.com wrote:
At my current place of business, we have several manufacturing plants
in China as well as the United States. All of the plants have an OVPN
tunnel to a datacenter here in Indianapolis which connect all of the
plants.
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:22:03 -0400
Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Scott Brim scott.b...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:42, Leigh Porter
leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com wrote:
So are they basing this on you downloading it or on
On Mon, 9 May 2011 17:14:06 -0400
Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Monday, May 09, 2011 04:45:36 PM Kevin Oberman wrote:
Depends on what he is doing. BSDs tend to be far more mature than
any Linux. They are poor systems for desktops or anything like
that. They are heavily used as
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:02:36 -0700
Dan Dill d...@harsch.com wrote:
http://www.pcbgov.com/city_directory.htm
Seems like it wouldn't be hard to track down that information...
Can you identify where on that page it lists a contact for the IT
department of the Panama City government?
I can't,
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:18:30 -0700
Wil Schultz wschu...@bsdboy.com wrote:
I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of
testing ipv6 out.
A couple of concerns that come to mind are:
1) www.domain.com and ipv6.domain.com are serving the exact same
content. Typical SEO
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
goe...@anime.net wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Alexander Maassen wrote:
Why o why are isp's and hosters so ignorant in dealing with such
issues and act like they do not care?
they don't act like they do not care. they really *don't* care. no
acting.
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:03:18 -0500
Leon Kaiser litera...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the man who poisoned DroneBL. He is a bad man. Keep your
children safe.
http://raged.tittybang.org/
How, exactly, has kunwon1 poisoned DroneBL when he has had no RPC key
for over a year?
William
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:34:11 +0100
Alfa Telecom r...@alfatelecom.cz wrote:
On 03/03/2011 03:25 PM, Brandon Ross wrote:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Alfa Telecom wrote:
Both ranges are from RIPE region and couldn't be announced from
ARIN ASN at all.
Your premise is incorrect. Any block from
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:25:23 + (GMT)
Tim Franklin t...@pelican.org wrote:
I do not live over there, I have never seen a Vonage or Magic jack
or any other VoIP service ad on TV in the UK, ever.
Vonage *are* advertising on UK TV. Hardly the carpet-bombing the OP
suggests is the
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:41:57 -0800
Kate Gerry k...@quadranet.com wrote:
We've been advised by a client that they're incorrectly listing
a /15. The listing is:
(E-431420) 96.44.0.0/15
According to their FAQ they only take delistings via newsgroups and
Google News isn't co-operating
Hi,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:12:40 -0600
Aaron Wendel aa...@wholesaleinternet.net wrote:
How can someone steal something from you that you don’t own?
Legacy space. The best example I can think of was Choopa's hijacking
of Erie Forge and Steel's legacy space. In this case, it was theft as
it
Hi,
Could an nLayer network engineer contact me offlist regarding a service
or core router at I'm guessing One Wilshire that is having serious
problems?
Thanks.
William
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:37:55 +1300 (FJST)
Franck Martin fra...@genius.com wrote:
Any relation?
http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/11/02/04/0043234/Verizon-To-Throttle-High-Bandwidth-Users
No, that has to do with wireless users, not DSL. Wireless is an
entirely different part of the Verizon
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:09:07 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
That's fine, but the listings don't even make sense. There is no
evidence in the listing and i'm still trying to figure out a) why they
think that these new listings have anything to do with the ones we
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:35:22 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
William,
I'm not certain that any Black Lotus IP's are even connected to EFnet.
Maybe not presently, but your company has a history in the IRC
community. And it's not a history I would define as good.
A
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:54:37 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
William,
Our company is primarily focused on the filtering of DDoS traffic. A
significant amount of our IP space is routed elsewhere via proxy or
GRE. If a customer pollutes, they pollute and thats their
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:11:37 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
William,
You're quite right, we don't. We presume that our customers are
honorable until proven otherwise. We're a legitimate U.S. based
corporation and we make ourselves available to the pertinent RBL's
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:13:16 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
Bill,
I'm getting 72.215.225.9 for that host.
The nameservers just changed to ns2/ns4.codiz.net.
ns2 is a bogon, the real deal is ns4 hosted at corbina.ru, which has an
abuse@ that goes to /dev/null so
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:21:19 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
William,
It depends, we have criteria. You can't just e-mail
ab...@blacklotus.net and expect any given web site to be immediately
shut down. There is due process and we need to make a decision on the
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:42:22 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
I fat fingered the netmask, try now.
$ wget -S www.vertrouwdeapotheek.nl
--2011-01-17 19:07:59-- http://www.vertrouwdeapotheek.nl/
Resolving www.vertrouwdeapotheek.nl... 208.64.120.197
Connecting to
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:46:55 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
Raymond,
I do not take you for a fool, the assignment is legitimately null
routed. My traceroutes are dropping at my home ISP.
I call bollocks. It's alive and kicking via BGP here.
edge1.lax01# show ip
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:23:17 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:21 PM, William Pitcock
neno...@systeminplace.net wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:46:55 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
Raymond,
I do not take you
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:28:55 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
Rhetorical question. Probably PCCW isn't accepting the null routes.
Why not blacklist them for having messed up communities?
Why not actually nullroute the IPs instead of depending on BGP tagging?
Again: ip
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:38:54 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
It's a problem with PCCW not accepting the tags, we've had this issue
with them occasionally and will need to address it with them directly.
The machine itself has also been shut down so there should not be any
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:34:49 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
We were offering a privacy protected domain registration service at
one point which we have since discontinued for obvious reasons.
Ah yes! That *was* you guys.
Did you know that you're still being recommended
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:45:40 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
All,
I would like to extend a special thanks to one of the Spamhaus team
members for reaching out to me and offering dialogue on this matter.
He was quite polite and understanding of the situation and we
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:49:15 -0500
Richard Barnes richard.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
What IPv6 prefix lengths are people accepting in BGP from
peers/customers? My employer just got a /48 allocation from ARIN, and
we're trying to figure out how to support multiple end sites out of
Hi,
I am wondering why it seems that many ISPs still do not do packet
source verification in 2010? Just last night I had to deal with a DoS
attack that would have been impossible if more ISPs did packet source
verification.
I mean, it's 2010. We can do IP-level ACLs in hardware on most of the
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 18:34 +1100, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 9/12/10 8:04 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Philip Dorr tagn...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that they were also slashdotted. The logs would also have a
large number of unrelated.
pro-tip: the
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:58 -0500, Jay Nakamura wrote:
I really want to move all newly installed internal and customer racks
over to all 208v power instead of 120v. As far as I can remember, I
can't remember any server/switch/router or any other equipment that
didn't run on 208v AC.
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 20:02 -0500, Bret Clark wrote:
On 11/29/2010 07:55 PM, Ren Provo wrote:
http://blog.comcast.com/2010/11/comcast-comments-on-level-3.html
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Dave CROCKERd...@dcrocker.net wrote:
Okay's let's say L3 gives in to Comcast and pays
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:43 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
I'm surprised it took this long for the DDoS train to pull into the station.
Wikileaks gets DDoSed all the time. My understanding is that PRQ
nullrouted the IP because the DDoS is much larger this time.
William
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 17:07 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
I wouldn't have thought that PRQ would have any significant protection in
place.
They used to host thepiratebay. I would figure that site probably got a
lot of ddos attacks...
William
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:06 +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 14:14, Scott Morris s...@emanon.com wrote:
If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful.
When does it become a meal and, more importantly, do you want to
supper (sic) size?
The supersize option
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 15:39 -0500, Srikanth Sundaresan wrote:
Can anyone explain why ATT's UVerse adds significant delay to packets
compared to their ADSL service?
U-Verse is actually the name of two entirely different services - VDSL
and FTTP. This is a typical symptom of stupidity on behalf
Hi,
Have you checked the IronPort reputation scores for your mailserver IPs?
Google uses this data as part of it's spam detection method.
William
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 16:15 -0400, Erik L wrote:
I realize that this is somewhat OT, but I'm sure that others on the list
encounter the same
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 16:29 -0700, J.D. Falk wrote:
On Sep 2, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Brad Fleming wrote:
Any Road Runner abuse reps on the list?
http://postmaster.rr.com/ is a good place to start.
Quoting that website:
| The Postmaster team is part of the Road Runner Mail Operations
| team,
Vyatta's commercial products (the bundles with OS+Hardware) come with adequate
support in my experience.
William
(Sorry for topposting. The android email experience is depressingly lacking.)
Andrew Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote:
On 8/23/2010 1:17 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
What it really
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 18:49 +, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
Isn't this a little bit like an SSL daemon?
no.
One which refuses to process a revocation list on the basis of the
function of the certificate is useless.
no, it's not. ssl as a form of identity assurance itself is what is
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:29 +, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
hmm funny, it had the piratebay on it,
if you think that is a good sales point... do you actually have any
legitimate customers?
william
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 14:42 -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
But I do take your point about .co/.com, and in all fairness, it is a
decade delayed favor returned by NeuStar to Verisign for the .bz/.biz
collaborative marketing ploy of 2001.
Or eNom's .cc/.com ploy from 1999-present. Don't
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 15:50 -0400, Steven King wrote:
I am very curious to see how this would play with networks that
wouldn't support such a technology. How would you ensure communication
between a network that supported 33-Bit addressing and one that doesn't?
33-bit is a fucking retarded
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 19:16 +, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 16 Jan 2010, at 05:30, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote:
Mark Schouten ma...@bit.nl wrote:
http://virbl.bit.nl/index.php#ipv6
Comments on the listing method are appreciated.
wow bind? thats gonna get slower and slower and slower. I hope
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:32 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
Hi everyone,
We're going to anycast a /24 for some DNS servers (and possibly another UDP
based service)[1].
I see that ARIN are listing on https://www.arin.net/knowledge/ip_blocks.html
the smallest allocations from each prefix.
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:42 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jun 21, 2010, at 23:34, William Pitcock wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:32 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
Hi everyone,
We're going to anycast a /24 for some DNS servers (and possibly another
UDP based service)[1].
I
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:57 -0400, Steven Fischer wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with the Dell PowerConnect 8024F 10-gig
switch that they'd be willing to share? How does it perform? How reliable
is it? My experiences with the Dell switches have been less than favorable
to this
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 11:07 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 6/17/2010 11:01, Sandone, Nick wrote:
I would also add Brocade/Foundry to the mix as well. We've been deploying
these switches with great results. Since the IOS is very similar to
Cisco's, the transition has been quite easy.
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 23:40 -0700, jacob miller wrote:
Hi,
Am getting the following error from my SCO UNIX box.
They mean use an operating system not made by crackheads. There's a
reason why SCO switched from UNIX sales to Intellectual Property
trolling after all.
William
Hi,
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:27 -0400, Brad Beck wrote:
All,
I've been working diligently to improve performance of interactive
applications (Citrix, terminal) that are run by users in our office
located in Anchorage, and are served by a managed Internet connection
provided by GCI. Our
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 14:12 -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote:
Like many people, I can't justify the expense of commercial IP
connectivity for my residence. As a result, I deal with dynamic IP
addresses; dns issues; and limitations on the services that I can host
at my residence. It just struck me
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 15:11 -0500, Olsen, Jason wrote:
I'm a bit surprised that after the furor here on NANOG when the story
first broke (in 2008) that there's been no discussion about the recent
outcome of his trial (convicted, one count of felony network tampering).
Surely even at DeVry they
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:48 -0400, David Krider wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:47 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
Surely even at DeVry they teach that if you refuse to hand over
passwords for property that is not legally yours, that you are
committing a crime. I mean, think about it, it's
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:23 -0500, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/29/2010 21:05, William Pitcock wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:48 -0400, David Krider wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:47 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
Surely even at DeVry they teach that if you refuse to hand over
passwords
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 14:54 -0700, David Conrad wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part of
the v6 internet
Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber?
DHCPv6 solves
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 15:07 -0500, Dennis Burgess wrote:
I have a customer that has an IP of 12.43.95.126. Currently, I can not
get any reverse on this IP.
What is the best way to find out the responciable servers for this?
Thanx in advance.
neno...@petrie:~$ dig -x 12.43.95.126
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 07:09 -0700, todd glassey wrote:
On 4/12/2010 2:49 AM, Alex Kamiru wrote:
I am in the process of sourcing for a carrier class email security
solution that will replace our current edge spam gateways based on open
source solutions. Some solutions that am currently
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 22:10 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Would someone from Google kindly confirm/deny this claim? I'm as patient
as any other, but I'm beginning to feel for those who have yet (but are
ready to) to trigger the filters...
Thankfully, my 'reasonable' regex knowledge has me
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 15:31 -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
On Apr 7, 2010, at 9:22 AM, William Herrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:09 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct)
nan...@adns.net wrote:
Was looking at the ARIN IP6 policy and cannot find any reference to those
who have
IP4 legacy
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 20:30 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, William Pitcock wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
trusted communities without leaks.
Have you ever considered that public
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 22:12 +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
On 3/20/10 8:37 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
That is not what I mean and you know it.
What do you mean than? Hank made a good point on the type of traffic
normally going through these groups.
My point hasn't much to do with the NSP-SEC
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
trusted communities without leaks.
Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
thing? This seems to be the plight of many security people, that they
have to be
Hello,
Few people actually care about nsp-sec so what exactly are you getting at?
Guillaume FORTAINE gforta...@live.com wrote:
Misses, Misters,
I would want to inform you that the security of the Internet, that is
discussed in the NSP-SEC mailing-list [0] by a selected group of vendors
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 23:52 -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 18, 2010, at 11:46 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
Few people actually care about nsp-sec so what exactly are you getting at?
I might argue the few comment, but I think it's better not to reply to
Guillaume so people who
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 07:53 +, gordon b slater wrote:
Hmm, the hey! it's open source! factor doesn't hold much sway in the
network world, no-one will be amazed at that. Many observers are
surprised at the amount of free software employed by ISPs and the
like, but it's certainly no news to
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 22:52 -0800, Nathan wrote:
Hello,
I'm hoping to alleviate the what's going on!? type messages here this time.
:)
stupid question
Any IPs we can ping and get a response back from to verify everything is
ok? 1.2.3.4 isn't pingable, for example. :(
/stupid question
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:29 -0700, Brielle Bruns wrote:
Isn't the timestamps inserted by syslog rather then the reporting
program itself?
The syslog message sent to the local unix socket (/dev/log
or /dev/syslog) may contain a timestamp, in which case, that timestamp
may be used instead of the
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 19:30 +, gordon b slater wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 13:17 -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
The syslog message sent to the local unix socket (/dev/log
or /dev/syslog) may contain a timestamp, in which case, that timestamp
may be used instead of the local time
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 16:21 +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
Last week Czech researchers released information on a new worm which
exploits CPE devices (broadband routers) by means such as default
passwords, constructing a large DDoS botnet. Today this story hit
international news.
What makes
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 17:12 -0700, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack Linux (or BSD) router distro?
Currently using IPCop but it lacks ipv6 support. I've used SmoothWall
Express but not in some time and not sure how well it works with IPv6. Not
looking
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 13:05 -0500, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
Lots of people roll FreeBSD with Quagga/pf/ipfw for dual stack. See
the freebsd-isp list.
FreeBSD's network stack chokes up in DDoS attacks due to interrupt
flooding. We used to use FreeBSD for firewalling and basic routing, but
when
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 09:56 -0800, Gerald Wluka wrote:
I am new to this mailing list - this should be a response to an already
started thread that I cannot see:
Welcome to NANOG!
IntelliguardIT has a new class of network appliance that installs inline
(layer 2 appliance). It
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 22:16 -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Bruce Williams wrote:
The problem with IE is the same problem as Windows, the basic design
is fundementally insecure and timely updates can't fix that.
You do realize, of course, that IE is recording
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 01:47 -0600, James Hess wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Jan 6, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
DDoS attacks are attacks against capacity and/or state. Start reducing
DDoS, by its very nature is a type
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 16:24 -0500, Robert Brockway wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
In the most basic terms, a stateful firewall performs bidirectional
classification of communications between nodes, and makes a pass/fail
determination on each packet based on a) whether
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:12 -0800, Paul Ferguson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
Without a warrant, there is an absolute right to privacy.
It continues to exist right up until either (a) one
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 23:25 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:13 PM, William Pitcock
neno...@systeminplace.net wrote:
It worked against Indymedia UK: http://www.indymedia.org/fbi/
indymedia is in texas, no mlat required.
It was an MLAT initiated by the Dutch
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 16:55 +, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
thing is that it's illegal to maintain a database with personal details
which ip addresses according to various german courts are (don't ask..
mmk? ;) ofcourse we all know ip addresses identify nodes on a network, not
persons,
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 11:32 +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Read the last paragraph again.. will be submitted for delisting .. not
has been delisted and it will take 3-5 hours to propagate... I have to
process all removals manually after the robot because the robot does get
it wrong, and
Hi,
Does anyone know of a webservice that converts a given IP into the
public CIDR range that belongs to? I am developing a tool where IP to
CIDR conversion based on RIR whois data would be useful for implementing
filtersets.
William
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 21:10 -0800, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Current RIR whois actually does that.
ie: search for 199.4.29
it will show you 199.4.28/22
Yes, but it has to be parsed, and RIRs have varying whois formats. ARIN
vs RIPE whois output, for example.
William
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 21:12 -0800, Paul Ferguson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:57 PM, William Pitcock
neno...@systeminplace.net wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know of a webservice that converts a given IP into the
public CIDR range that belongs to? I am developing a tool where IP
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 18:02 +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
You should still be able to submit a ticket to SORBS, no? I was
always under the impression that it was open a ticket and wait or
you are moved to the back of the line with
Hi,
ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole
Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20 being
involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
So it'd be cool if I could you know, talk to someone who has involvement
with that, because frankly, I do
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 09:55 -0800, Alex Lanstein wrote:
Also, the fact that Atrivo is *dead* and this
stuff is still listed means that anyone who gets
those blocks from ARIN next are basically screwed
Why would you say Atrivo is dead?
r...@localhost --- {~} nslookup
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 17:25 -0800, Alex Lanstein wrote:
William Pitcock wrote:
Cernal and Atrivo are two different entities, Atrivo used to host
Cernal, but now they have different hosting arrangements.
I now understand the original point you were trying to make about Atrivo. I
disagree
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +, John Levine wrote:
ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole
Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20 being
involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses
information about this? I got hit by the ATS failure last
month, so I guess it's possible that that equipment may have flaked again.
-t
--
William Pitcock
SystemInPlace - Simple Hosting Solutions
1-866-519-6149
not legally be free
speech). Courts determine what is free speech. ISPs just try to stay the
hell out of the way.
Jack
--
William Pitcock
SystemInPlace - Simple Hosting Solutions
1-866-519-6149
the way IP issues get handled.
(again, not the opinions of my employer.)
William
--
William Pitcock
SystemInPlace - Simple Hosting Solutions
1-866-519-6149
-Original Message-
From: Brian Johnson bjohn...@drtel.com
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:03:29
To: North American Network Operators Groupna
the former for a few thousand aliases with no degredation
in performance. The hacks available for freebsd-4.x for the Web Polygraph
software did something similar.
2c,
Adrian
--
William Pitcock
SystemInPlace - Simple Hosting Solutions
1-866-519-6149
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 10:47 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
sure would be nice if there was a diagnosis before the lynching
If this happened in v4, would customers care 'why' it happened?
Obviously not.
I
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
