s are AT, Nordunet, DE-CIX, YYCIX,
> XS4ALL, MSK-IX, INEX, France-IX, Seacomm, Workonline, KPN International,
> and hundreds of others.
>
>
>
>> On Jul 4, 2019, at 5:56 AM, i3D.net - Martijn Schmidt via NANOG
>> wrote:
>>
>> So that means it's time for everyone t
So that means it's time for everyone to migrate their ARIN resources to a sane
RIR that does allow normal access to and redistribution of its RPKI TAL? ;-)
The RPKI TAL problem + an industry-standard IRRDB instead of WHOIS-RWS were
both major reasons for us to bring our ARIN IPv4 address space
Hi Adam,
Depends on how big of a router you need for your "small PE".
Taking Juniper as an example, the MX204 is pretty unbeatable cost wise if you
can make do with its 4*QSFP28 & 8*SFP+ interfaces. There's a very big gap
between the MX204 and the first chassis based router in the MX lineup,
It kinda depends on the application that's being used. For example, videogaming
has a ratio somewhere around 1:2.5 since you're only transmitting metadata
about the players environment across the wire. The actual video is typically
rendered at the end user's side. So it's not very bandwidth
Is this the right time to ask whether everyone who operates DNSSEC
validating resolvers was required to click somewhere on the ARIN website
that they agree to be bound by the Relying Party Agreement before their
resolver can make DNSSEC lookups against the ARIN nameservers?
Or does that logic
Dear Ronald,
Thanks for the investigative work, we will look into your report and
take the appropriate action.
Kind regards,
Martijn Schmidt
i3D.net / AS49544
PS: if anyone suspects that any of our customers are misbehaving, we
would very much appreciate hearing about it directly via
Hi Ramy,
Having worked with NTT & GTT, but not Telia, I can heartily recommend
NTT. Every one of these providers has its peering challenges so you'll
need diversity regardless of the one you pick, but the operations team
over at NTT has been absolutely stellar in terms of technical know-how
and
TISparkle/Seabone also has an IP transit PoP in Accra, plus they have a
partnership with Dolphin Telecom.
On 06/01/2017 05:30 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> All of the licensed mobile phone network operators in Ghana are also ISPs
> and can reach enterprise customers. Within Accra or a few other major
Hi Graham,
I haven't personally tried this but do have plenty of hands-on
experience with the MLXe platform. As far as I understood from previous
conversations with my Brocade SE, if your firmware is recent enough and
the card doesn't have any ports used in a certain VRF the selective FIB
Hi Jason,
The following reply which I sent to the IDR mailing list might also be
helpful for you to understand the way most of these designs currently
work - as well as some of the problems we encounter with the existing
RFC1997 communities:
; ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
>
> Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
> Telefax: +43-5-0556-500
>
> E-Mail: jjarit...@anexia-it.com
> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com
>
> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichle
"We also had problems where transit customers said don't want to be
exported to a certain IX point of presence while he wanted to be
exported at a different location."
That's a fairly normal request. I think nearly every major IP transit
provider has built out a BGP action community system to
Hello,
Brandon Martinlists.na...@monmotha.net , 31/3/2015 10:07 PM:
I'm not sure where the VDX line ends up in this. It's apparently
somewhat the result of actually merging the two technology lines,
and it
runs somewhat different software as a result.
The VDX was AFAIK already
13 matches
Mail list logo
