Re: Free(opensource) Ticketing solutions

OSTicket is decent, not the prettiest, but works well. Sent from my iPhone > On May 27, 2024, at 1:30 PM, Pascal Masha wrote: > >  > Hello, > > Which free and good ticketing systems do you folks(for those who do) use? > > Regards, > Paschal Masha

Re: Mailing list SPF Failure

On 5/16/24 7:36 PM, John R. Levine wrote: I think a lot of us have nanog whitelisted or otherwise special cased. I don't and gmail is my backend. That's trivial falsification that lack of an SPF records alone will cause gmail rejects. Mike Also, it's been pumping out list mail for

Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities

On 5/16/24 6:55 PM, John Levine wrote: It appears that Brandon Martin said: I think the issue with their lack of effectiveness on spam calls is due to the comparatively small number of players in the PSTN (speaking of both classic TDM and modern IP voice-carrying and signaling networks)

Re: Mailing list SPF Failure

they're broken...there's a few guys on the list here. On Thursday, 16/05/2024 at 19:17 Michael Thomas wrote: On 5/16/24 3:54 PM, William Herrin wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:03 PM John Levine mailto:jo...@iecc.com>> wrote: >> It appears that Michael Thomas mailt

Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities

On 5/16/24 4:17 PM, Brandon Martin wrote: I think the issue with their lack of effectiveness on spam calls is due to the comparatively small number of players in the PSTN (speaking of both classic TDM and modern IP voice-carrying and signaling networks) world allowing lots of regulatory

Re: Mailing list SPF Failure

On 5/16/24 3:54 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:03 PM John Levine wrote: It appears that Michael Thomas said: Since probably 99% of the mail from NANOG is through this list, it hardly matters since SPF will always fail. Sorry, but no. A mailing list puts its own

Re: Mailing list SPF Failure

On 5/16/24 8:59 AM, Scott Q. wrote: Uhm, not really. An SPF failure is really bad even though DKIM works. It might depend what they do with DMARC but even so, there's no reason they can't just add that IP to their SPF record. SPF has from day one been known to be broken with mailing lists.

Re: Mailing list SPF Failure

On 5/16/24 8:11 AM, Peter Potvin via NANOG wrote: Appears there’s no SPF record at all now for nanog.org , which is not ideal… Since probably 99% of the mail from NANOG is through this list, it hardly matters since SPF will always fail. What is more important is that they

Re: Microsoft missing public DNS TXT entry for DKIM records (msn.com)

On 4/4/24 12:43 AM, Jay Acuna wrote: On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 1:23 AM Adam Brenner via NANOG wrote: .. It seems to me that if msn.com is going to include DKIM headers in their outgoing email, they should also publish their DKIM public key. If they are not going to publish their DKIM public

Re: Best TAC Services from Equipment Vendors

I miss the sarcasm? michael brooks On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 8:55 AM Tom Beecher wrote: > It may be a pain in the butt to get Cisco equipment, but their TAC is >> sublime. If something is critical enough, and you push hard enough, Cisco >> will move heaven and earth to solve your

Re: Best TAC Services from Equipment Vendors

You are missing the point, we opened the case 3 months ago michael brooks On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 8:24 AM wrote: > To be honest, if your DR environment has been offline for 3 months and you > are just now opening a case, I would not consider that critical. > > Shane > &g

Re: Best TAC Services from Equipment Vendors

phone asked this? Admittedly, we are going through a rough patch in terms of support, but it is not out of line with the past decade's experiences. michael brooks On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 12:47 PM Joel Esler wrote: > It may be a pain in the butt to get Cisco equipment, but their TAC is > su

Re: Best TAC Services from Equipment Vendors

are speaking in trajectories michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five Star Schools michael.bro...@adams12.org "flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss" On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 11:25

Re: Meta outage

On Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:06:11 -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote: >It's making the general press this hour so of course you already know about it >but my question is this: who peers with meta and have you seen BGP sessions >drop or the like? Do you operate meta CDN nodes in your network? Are they

Re: Leap Day

Here's a link to the full article for anyone that's not a sub to NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/29/science/leap-day-easter.html?unlocked_article_code=1.ZU0.5Thd.N-PiRNtpSr2c=url-share On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:39 AM Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > Late, just saw the posting on BlueSky: > > In

Re: Leap Day

Good article, enjoyable read. Most interesting tidbit: that UTC and Atomic time disagree by 34 seconds. michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five Star Schools michael.bro...@adams12.org "flying is learning how to

Re: IPv6 uptake

On 2/18/24 1:10 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: Michael Thomas wrote on 18/02/2024 20:56: That's really great to hear. Of course there is still the problem with CPE that doesn't speak v6, but that's not their fault and gives some reason to use their CPE. Already solved: cable modem ipv6 support

Re: IPv6 uptake

On 2/18/24 12:50 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: Michael Thomas wrote on 18/02/2024 20:28: I do know that Cablelabs pretty early on -- around the time I mentioned above -- has been pushing for v6. Maybe Jason Livingood can clue us in. Getting cable operators onboard too would certainly be a good

Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4)

On 2/18/24 8:47 AM, Greg Skinner via NANOG wrote: On Feb 17, 2024, at 11:27 AM, William Herrin wrote: On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 10:34?AM Michael Thomas wrote: Funny, I don't recall Bellovin and Cheswick's Firewall book discussing NAT. And mine too, since I hadn't heard of "Fire

Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4)

On 2/17/24 11:27 AM, William Herrin wrote: On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 10:34 AM Michael Thomas wrote: I didn't hear about NAT until the late 90's, iirc. I've definitely not heard of Gauntlet. Then there are gaps in your knowledge. Funny, I don't recall Bellovin and Cheswick's Firewall book

Re: IPv6 mail The Reg does 240/4

On 2/17/24 2:21 PM, John Levine wrote: But what happens under the hood at major mailbox providers is maddeningly opaque so who really knows? It would be nice if MAAWG published a best practices or something like that to outline what is actually happening in live deployments. Unfortunately,

Re: The Reg does 240/4

On 2/17/24 10:19 AM, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: Mike, it’s true that Google used to be a lot less strict on IPv4 email than IPv6, but they want SPF and /or DKIM on everything now, so it’s mostly the same. There is less reputation data available for IPv6 and server reputation is a harder

Re: IPv6 uptake

On 2/17/24 10:26 AM, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: On Feb 16, 2024, at 14:20, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: - Original Message - From: "Justin Streiner" 4. Getting people to unlearn the "NAT=Security" mindset that we were forced to accept in the v4 world. NAT doesn't "equal" security.

Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4)

On 2/16/24 6:33 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 6:10 PM Ryan Hamel wrote: Depending on where that rule is placed within your ACL, yes that can happen with *ANY* address family. Hi Ryan, Correct. The examples illustrated a difference between a firewall implementing

Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4)

On 2/16/24 5:37 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 5:33 PM Michael Thomas wrote: So you're not going to address that this is a management plain problem. Hi Mike, What is there to address? I already said that NAT's security enhancement comes into play when a -mistake- is made

Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4)

On 2/16/24 5:30 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 5:22 PM Michael Thomas wrote: On 2/16/24 5:05 PM, William Herrin wrote: Now, I make a mistake on my firewall. I insert a rule intended to allow packets outbound from 2602:815:6001::4 but I fat-finger it and so it allows them

Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4)

On 2/16/24 5:05 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 3:13 PM Michael Thomas wrote: If you know which subnets need to be NAT'd don't you also know which ones shouldn't exposed to incoming connections (or conversely, which should be permitted)? It seems to me that all you're doing

Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4)

On 2/16/24 3:01 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 2:19 PM Jay R. Ashworth wrote: From: "Justin Streiner" 4. Getting people to unlearn the "NAT=Security" mindset that we were forced to accept in the v4 world. NAT doesn't "equal" security. But it is certainly a *component*

Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

On 1/15/24 11:02 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 21:08, Michael Thomas wrote: An ipv4 free network would be nice, but is hardly needed. There will always be a long tail of ipv4 and so what? You deal with it at your I mean Internet free DFZ, so that everyone is not forced

Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

On 1/15/24 12:26 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 10:05, jordi.palet--- via NANOG wrote: In actual customer deployments I see the same levels, even up to 85% of IPv6 traffic. It basically depends on the usage of the caches and the % of residential vs corporate customers. You

Re: IPv6 Traffic Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

On 1/15/24 12:56 AM, jordi.palet--- via NANOG wrote: No, I’m not saying that. I’m saying "in actual deployments", which doesn’t mean that everyone is deploying, we are missing many ISPs, we are missing many enterprises. I don't think what's going on internally with enterprise needs to

Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

On 1/12/24 11:54 AM, Darrel Lewis wrote: On Jan 12, 2024, at 11:47 AM, Seth David Schoen wrote: Michael Thomas writes: I wonder if the right thing to do is to create a standards track RFC that makes the experimental space officially an add on to rfc 1918. If it works for you, great

Re: IPv6? Re: Where to Use 240/4 Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

On 1/12/24 8:45 AM, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: Frankly, I care less. No matter how you use whatever IPv4 space you attempt to cajole into whatever new form of degraded service, the simple fact remains. IPv4 is a degraded technology that only continues to get worse over time. NAT was bad.

Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block

a whole bunch of software out there that makes certain assumptions about allowable ranges. That is, they've been compiled with a header that defines .. #define IN_BADCLASS(i) (((in_addr_t)(i) & 0xf000) == 0xf000) Michael

RE: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

comment about DNSSEC that I hadn't considered. -Michael From: Damian Menscher Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 12:21 PM To: Michael Hare Cc: John R. Levine ; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server? Google Public DNS (8.8.8.8) attempts to identify and filter

RE: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

enterprise. So what are most folks doing to survive crap like this? Nothing/waiting it out? Oursourcing DNS? Scrubbing appliance? Poormans stuff like I mention above? -Michael > -Original Message- > From: NANOG On > Behalf Of John R. Levine > Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023

Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds

As one beholden to USAC/FCC I have to agree with Shane... michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five Star Schools michael.bro...@adams12.org "flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss" O

Re: Zayo woes

week. Then the construction crew showed up the next day michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five Star Schools michael.bro...@adams12.org "flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss" O

Re: Appropriate venue to find out about the state of art of spear phishing defense?

On 11/13/23 12:29 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: We use KnowBe4.com's user training. That's really the only way you can fight this, since its a human problem, not a technical one. These guys provide fully automated, AI based (well, who knows what that means) simulated phishing attacks, largely to

Appropriate venue to find out about the state of art of spear phishing defense?

I know this is only tangentially relevant to nanog, but I'm curious if anybody knows where I can ask what orgs do to combat spear phishing? Spear phishing doesn't require that you deploy DMARC since you can know your own policy even if you aren't comfortable publishing it to the world.

Re: [EXTERNAL] DNS filtering in practice, Re: Charter DNS servers returning malware filtered IP addresses

On 10/28/23 3:13 AM, John Levine wrote: It appears that Michael Thomas said: If you're one of the small minority of retail users that knows enough about the technology to pick your own resolver, go ahead. But it's a reasonable default to keep malware out of Grandma's iPad. How does

Re: OSP Management

We used to have an FTE for ArcGIS. We got by pretty well until we needed to document circuits down to the NIC level, and then we lost that FTE altogether. PatchManager was chosen from an RFP for its granularity and (seeming) user-friendliness. michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five

Cisco 15454 Multishelf

to accomplish this by pointing and clicking (in the multishelf configuration tab). Any hints (probably off-list since I doubt that this is a platform still of interest to many) would be welcome. Thanks, Michael

OSP Management

On that note, what do you all use for managing OSP? We have been attempting to stand up PatchManager for quite some time, and find it a good product, but the billions of options can be overwhelming michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five Star Schools michael.bro...@adams12.org

Re: emily postnews

You sure :-)^oo mh 28 octobre 2023 19:32 "Jay R. Ashworth" a écrit: > - Original Message - > >> From: "Randy Bush" >> >> another old dog doing a search wrote to tell me they really appreciated >> that i still had some antique advice up. i had long forgotten this one. >> but found it

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Charter DNS servers returning malware filtered IP addresses

On 10/27/23 2:20 PM, John Levine wrote: It appears that Bryan Fields said: -=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=- On 10/27/23 7:49 AM, John Levine wrote: But for obvious good reasons, the vast majority of their customers don't I'd argue that as a service provider deliberately messing with DNS is an

Re: transit and peering costs projections

On 10/15/23 8:33 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:  I think we often forget just how much of a massive inversion the communications industry has undergone; back in the 80s, when I started working in networking, everything was DS0 voice channels, and data was just a strange side business that nobody

Re: xfinity not working

On 10/11/23 11:34 AM, William Herrin wrote: On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:12 AM Delong.com wrote: There are still some knobs… e.g. bridge mode or not (usually) I'm guessing that's only if there's a built-in wifi router. My grand experience with cable modems counts to exactly two brands and

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

and good to work with (we have had them build custom-length cables). michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five Star Schools michael.bro...@adams12.org "flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss&quo

Re: what is acceptible jitter for voip and videoconferencing?

On 9/22/23 1:54 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: Telnet sessions where often initiated from half duplex terminals. Pushing that flow control across the network helped those users. I'm still confused. Did it require the telnet users to actually take action? Like they'd manually need to enter the GA

Re: what is acceptible jitter for voip and videoconferencing?

On 9/22/23 9:42 AM, Jay Hennigan wrote: On 9/21/23 17:04, Michael Thomas wrote: When I wrote my first implementation of telnet ages ago, i was both amused and annoyed about the go-ahead option. Obviously patterned after audio meat-space protocols, but I was never convinced it wasn't

Re: what is acceptible jitter for voip and videoconferencing?

On 9/21/23 3:31 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 6:28 AM Tom Beecher wrote: My understanding has always been that 30ms was set based on human perceptibility. 30ms was the average point at which the average person could start to detect artifacts in the audio. Hi Tom,

Re: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk interfering in Ukraine?

On 9/14/23 6:34 AM, Dave Taht wrote: This is one of those threads where I do think folk would benefit from hearing from the horses' mouths. In a recent bio of musk published this past week, the author claimed that starlink withdrew service over crimea based on the knowledge it was going to be

Re: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk interfering in Ukraine?

On 9/14/23 9:26 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: *nods* likely plenty of similar examples by less polarizing people. Then lets hear them? It certainly seems like an  operational issue if this starts to become common. How is it dealt with if at all beyond diversity which is hard to come by with LEO

So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk interfering in Ukraine?

Doesn't this bump up against common carrier protections? I sure don't want my utilities weaponizing their monopoly status to the whims of any random narcissist billionaire. Mike

Re: Destination Preference Attribute for BGP

ears. A bit more info: we are also looking at an internal solution which passes IGP metric into MED to influence pathing. To avoid TL;DR I will stop there in the hopes this is an intriguing enough problem to generate discussion. michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five Sta

Re: Hawaiian ILEC infrastructure and fire

On 8/17/23 11:26 AM, scott via NANOG wrote: I don't want to overwhelm the list, but since there's interest here's something interesting I just now got from the electric company.  400 poles and 300 transformers.  Wow! Those of us from California and the west have watched this in abject

Destination Preference Attribute for BGP

/) and RFC6938 (which implies DPA was in use, but then was deprecated). michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five Star Schools 720.972.4110 michael.bro...@adams12.org "flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and

Re: Copper wire thefts increase 139% in one California county

On 7/1/23 9:46 AM, Sean Donelan wrote: Copper wire thefts of all kinds appear to be increasing in 2023. Not just telecommunications copper cables, but also electric and transit cables. San Joaquin County reported a 139% increase in copper wire thefts over four months, and one theft in

Re: Northern Virginia has had enough with data centers

On 6/26/23 6:06 PM, Ron Yokubaitis wrote: Dalles: government subsidized Hydroelectric Power, that’s why. Well that maybe, but electric rates are hella cheap in Oregon regardless. Mike Sent from the iPad of Ron Yokubaitis On Jun 26, 2023, at 7:37 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:  On 6/24

Re: Northern Virginia has had enough with data centers

On 6/24/23 5:28 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: On Jun 23, 2023, at 18:04, Michael Thomas wrote:  On 6/23/23 4:01 PM, Delong.com via NANOG wrote: The electric grid complaints are about the demand on the grid making the entire region less stable and proposed construction of new high-voltage tower

Re: Northern Virginia has had enough with data centers

On 6/23/23 4:01 PM, Delong.com via NANOG wrote: The electric grid complaints are about the demand on the grid making the entire region less stable and proposed construction of new high-voltage tower corridors for data centers. Yeah, I can kind of understand those, but as long as the grid is

Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps

On 6/17/23 4:14 PM, Tom Beecher wrote: Also: they plan to use Starship when it's available which has 10x more capacity. If it really is fully reusable as advertised, that is going to really drive down the launch cost. Starship is years away from being flight ready. The most

Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps

. As does math. On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 4:38 PM Michael Thomas wrote: On 6/17/23 1:25 PM, Tom Beecher wrote: Won't Starlink and other LEO configurations be that backstop sooner rather than later? Unlikely. They will remain niche. The economics don't make sense

Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps

expensive than, say, satellite tv dishes? I can see marginally more because of the LEO aspect, but isn't that mainly just software? It wouldn't surprise me that the main cost is the truck roll. Mike On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 4:17 PM Michael Thomas wrote: On 6/16/23 1:09 PM, Mark Tinka

Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps

On 6/16/23 3:18 PM, Keith Stokes wrote: Cox also has a 1.2 TB cap. If I can believe my graphs, the metered Cox connection (video streaming primarily for wife) is about 90 GB the month of April and the unmetered ATT fiber WFH for me is about 370 GB. Total LAN is about 450 GB. Napkin math but

Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps

how they are numbering them though. Are the they using the same scheme that the mobile providers are using with ipv6? hmm. Mike On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 4:22 PM Mark Tinka wrote: On 6/16/23 22:16, Michael Thomas wrote: > Won't Starlink and other LEO configurations be that backstop sooner &g

Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps

On 6/16/23 1:22 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: On 6/16/23 22:16, Michael Thomas wrote: Won't Starlink and other LEO configurations be that backstop sooner rather than later? I don't know if they have caps as well, but even if they do they could compete with their caps. Maybe. I really haven't

Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps

On 6/16/23 1:09 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: On 6/16/23 21:19, Josh Luthman wrote: Mark, In my world I constantly see people with 0 fixed internet options.  Many of these locations do not even have mobile coverage.  Competition is fine in town, but for millions of people in the US (and I'm

Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps

On 6/15/23 10:41 PM, Crist Clark wrote: Comcast still has data caps. My service is 1.2 TB per month. If we get close, we get a warning email. If we were to go over (hasn’t happened yet), we get billed per additional 500 MB. However, I just looked at my account usage for the first time for a

Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps

On 6/15/23 3:19 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: While a lot of ISPs gave up on data caps, the language is still lurking in many Terms Of Service. https://www.fcc.gov/document/chair-rosenworcel-proposes-investigate-impact-data-caps proposed Notice of Inquiry to learn more about how broadband

Re: 365 Datacenters Tampa AC Failure

Issue started a little after 2am, I was hard down till about 11:30am (servers did a high temp shutdown)On Jun 12, 2023 8:01 PM, Michael Spears wrote:Yep there's issues over there. They had some compressors go down. Should be getting back to normal now... Hasn't been a good month for them

Re: 365 Datacenters Tampa AC Failure

Yep there's issues over there. They had some compressors go down. Should be getting back to normal now... Hasn't been a good month for them in regards to cooling..On Jun 12, 2023 7:15 PM, George Herbert wrote:Oof.  Get ready to replace all spinning media you may have there.  -George Sent

Re: New addresses for b.root-servers.net

On 6/7/23 15:13, Izaac wrote: On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:30:36AM -0700, William Herrin wrote: Data embedded in the binary is hard-coded. That's what hard-coded means. If it makes you happier I'll qualify it as a "hard-coded default," to differentiate it from settings the operator can't override

Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

On 6/3/23 4:24 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 4:09 PM Michael Thomas wrote: How can the RIAA even know? I mean, are they putting up honey pots or something? IIRC, they went after folks sharing the files via bit torrent rather than folks who only downloaded them. Oh yeah

Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

On 6/3/23 4:01 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:51 PM Mel Beckman wrote: It’s like blaming water companies for people stealing boats :) It's been a while and the article is light on the facts of the case, but IIRC what happened was: RIAA made some DMCA complaints to Cox.

Are we back to the 2000's again?

Apparently the RIAA is back suing ISP's (Cox in this case) for users pirating music. It was pretty bogus back then, but with the uptake of TLS for almost everything and DoH to conceal DNS requests what exactly is an ISP supposed to do these days? Throw in a VPN and the pirates completely

Re: Do ISP's collect and analyze traffic of users?

On 5/19/23 6:09 AM, Justin Streiner wrote: Hank: No doubt there is a massive amount of information that can be gathered from in-box telemetry.  This thread appears to be more focused on providers gathering data from traffic in flight across their infrastructure. Yeah, my curiosity was

Re: Do ISP's collect and analyze traffic of users?

On 5/16/23 7:55 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: Of course there are other monetisation opportunities via other mechanism than data-in-the-wire, like DNS And with DoH, that doesn't sound like a very long term opportunity. Mike

Re: Do ISP's collect and analyze traffic of users?

On 5/16/23 7:35 AM, Livingood, Jason via NANOG wrote: +1 to what Josh writes below. I would also differentiate between mobile networks (service provisioned to individual devices & often carrier s/w on the device) and wireline networks (home devices behind a router/gateway/NAT). I just

Re: Do ISP's collect and analyze traffic of users?

On 5/15/23 9:46 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 6:42 PM Dave Phelps wrote: I think it's safe to assume they are selling such data. https://www.techdirt.com/2021/08/25/isps-give-netflow-data-to-third-parties-who-sell-it-without-user-awareness-consent/

Re: Do ISP's collect and analyze traffic of users?

resents us. michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five Star Schools "flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss" On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 7:42 AM Josh Luthman wrote: > Our ISP does not coll

Do ISP's collect and analyze traffic of users?

And maybe try to monetize it? I'm pretty sure that they can be compelled to do that, but do they do it for their own reasons too? Or is this way too much overhead to be doing en mass? (I vaguely recall that netflow, for example, can make routers unhappy if there is too much "flow").

Re: Best Linux (or BSD) hosted BGP?

I run BIRD on Ubuntu and it works well. Feel free to reach out off list Bryan if you want some examples of a basic configThank you,Michael SpearsOn May 1, 2023 12:01 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:I know best subjective, but I'm looking at a project to announce some IP space that's between uses now

Re: Namecheap's outbound email flow compromised: valid rdns, spf, dkim and dmarc on phishes

: Namecheap has updated their status page item to include "We have stopped all the emails (that includes Auth codes delivery, Trusted Devices’ verification, and Password Reset emails, etc.)" Yikes. On Sun, Feb 12, 2023, 3:54 PM Michael Thomas wrote: I think that it might be appropria

Re: Namecheap's outbound email flow compromised: valid rdns, spf, dkim and dmarc on phishes

registrars are not supposed to make such a rookie mistake. On Sun, Feb 12, 2023, 3:46 PM Michael Thomas wrote: On 2/12/23 3:40 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > https://www.namepros.com/threads/concerning-e-mail-from-namecheap.1294946/page-2#post-8839257 > >

Re: Namecheap's outbound email flow compromised: valid rdns, spf, dkim and dmarc on phishes

On 2/12/23 3:40 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: https://www.namepros.com/threads/concerning-e-mail-from-namecheap.1294946/page-2#post-8839257 https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/184391/namecheap-hacked It looks like a third party service they gave their keys to has been compromised. I got several

Re: About emails impersonating Path Network

On 2/7/23 11:33 AM, Jay Hennigan wrote: On 2/7/23 11:18, Michael Thomas wrote: FWIW, lookalike domains can and do happen with http too. Nothing unique about that to email. Then the bad guys throw in the occasional Cyrillic, etc. character that looks like a Roman one and things get even

Re: About emails impersonating Path Network

On 2/7/23 6:09 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:41:43PM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote: This seems like a perfect object lesson on why you should use DKIM and SPF and make sure the sending domain can set up a p=reject policy for DMARC. But it's not. DKIM and SPF are mostly

Re: About emails impersonating Path Network

This seems like a perfect object lesson on why you should use DKIM and SPF and make sure the sending domain can set up a p=reject policy for DMARC. Mike On 2/6/23 10:25 AM, Konrad Zemek wrote: Hi Nanog, It looks like someone with an axe to grind against our company has decided to email

RE: Smaller than a /24 for BGP?

I’m late to the conversation, but I would have to agree with most. Below a /24 route advertisement shouldn’t happen. I have a /24 that I would love to advertise as 2 /25’s, but the affects on everyone else is just too much. I take full routes from 4 providers, and I certainly don’t want to add

Re: Starlink routing

On 1/23/23 3:14 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: The original and traditional high-cost way of how this is done for MEO/LEO is exemplified by an o3b terminal, which has two active motorized tracking antennas. The antenna presently in use for the satellite that is overhead follows it until it's

Re: Starlink routing

On 1/22/23 3:05 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 2:45 PM Michael Thomas wrote: I read in the Economist that the gen of starlink satellites will have the ability to route messages between each satellite. Would conventional routing protocols be up

Starlink routing

I read in the Economist that the gen of starlink satellites will have the ability to route messages between each satellite. Would conventional routing protocols be up to such a challenge? Or would it have to be custom made for that problem? And since a lot of companies and countries are

Re: Nov 16th (Overnight Traffic Pattern)

sounds likely, I think the new Warzone tips the scales at 180GB for PC. -- M Zarglis J Crowe wrote on 2022-12-06 2:48 PM: That was most likely due to Call of Duty Warzone 2.0 going live that day. On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 2:34 PM Nicholas Warren mailto:nwar...@barryelectric.com>> wrote: I

Fred Brooks has died

His Mythical Man Month is a must read for anybody even remotely adjacent to coding, and frankly it should be read out of that context too. RIP Fred and thank you, that was one of the most important books I've ever read. Mike

Re: juniper.net down?

Site loading from AS30136 On Tue, Oct 18, 2022, 12:13 PM wrote: > juniper.net down? > > > > > > > > Aaron > > aar...@gvtc.com > > > --

Re: jon postel

Fixed: Where Wizards Stay Up Late should be required reading for anyone wanting to learn about the history / development of the ARPAnet and the Internet. michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five Star Schools 720.972.4110 michael.bro...@adams12.org

Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls)

On 10/7/22 12:45 AM, Brian Turnbow via NANOG wrote: The federal law in 47 USC 227(e) says: (1)In general It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States, in connection with any voice

Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls)

On 10/4/22 5:23 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: On Tue, 4 Oct 2022, Michael Thomas wrote: Exactly. And that doesn't require an elaborate PKI. Who is allowed to use what telephone numbers is an administrative issue for the ingress provider to police. It's the equivalent to gmail not allowing me

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >