On 4/12/13 9:29 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
Whatever criticisms you can lay at the feet of ICANN,
especially in recent years, greed for new TLDs is not one of them.
Hmmm. Many people would disagree with that, based on episodes like this:
The Internet already have a problem with one of everything where a single
provider is much more popular than the other ones. Amazon, Google, Reddit,
Wikipedia...The 2th cooperative encyclopedia editing website is much
less popular than Wikipedia.
This is not a good thing, is a bad thing
- Original Message -
From: . oscar.vi...@gmail.com
What is the problem that people is trying to solve here? is this the
correct place to solve it?
Wow; really?
The problem is Google isn't *quite* a monopoly, yet, and we'd like to be,
even though that's evil.
And the answer is no,
I believe that unstoppable force is called the want of money.
However, the pressure from the community was overwhelming to open up the
process again, and continued unabated from a time even before the 2000
round was closed. Whatever criticisms you
On 4/11/2013 3:56 PM, Oliver Garraux wrote:
The whole custom TLD thing is just a truly awful, awful idea.
Oliver
-
Oliver Garraux
Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux
AOL 'go' words were cool the firs
On 4/11/13, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote:
Agreed; but it would seem that unstoppable forces have been set into
motion by ICANN, to cause it to happen, regardless of whether it is
beneficial to the community, and regardless of any objections from the
public...
Yes... let a single
On 4/11/13, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote:
The whole custom TLD thing is just a truly awful, awful idea.
--
- mysi...@gmail.com wrote: ---
From: Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com
Agreed; but it would seem that
On 4/12/13 3:41 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On 4/11/13, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote:
Agreed; but it would seem that unstoppable forces have been set into
motion by ICANN, to cause it to happen, regardless of whether it is
beneficial to the community, and regardless of any objections
- Original Message -
From: Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net
Subject: Re: Google Wants to Create a Dotless Domain Called Search..?
The whole custom TLD thing is just a truly awful, awful idea.
Whether gTLD expansion is a good or bad idea (protip: good) is orthogonal
to whether
On 04/12/2013 04:10 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
On 4/11/13, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote:
The whole custom TLD thing is just a truly awful, awful idea.
--
- mysi...@gmail.com wrote: ---
From: Jimmy Hess
or Al Gore
http://internets), and how would that be handled by most modern(ish) browsers
and devices?
http://m.gizmodo.com/5994354/google-wants-to-create-a-dotless-domain-called-search
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
(cisco = http://routers or
Al Gore http://internets), and how would that be handled by most modern(ish)
browsers and devices?
http://m.gizmodo.com/5994354/google-wants-to-create-a-dotless-domain-called-search
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
= http://routersor
Al Gore
http://internets), and how would that be handled by most modern(ish)
browsers and devices?
http://m.gizmodo.com/5994354/google-wants-to-create-a-dotless-domain-called-search
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
13 matches
Mail list logo
