You might want to consider 655 or 825 from Dlink and the Apple Airport
Extreme and Time Capsule. We have had a pretty
good experience with these models thus far.
John
=
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Cable
e) mailto:john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com
o)
* Jay Ashworth (j...@baylink.com) wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Matt Ryanczak ryanc...@gmail.com
Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6 enabled but the user-agent on my phone
denies me an IPv6 experience.
I thought I'd heard that LTE transport was *IPv6 only*...
LTE supports both IPv4
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message
AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE763A3AC06@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet
.us, John van Oppen writes:
I was wondering the same thing... we have v6 enabled to about 700 users i=
n our native Ethernet to the home deployment here in
On 8 Jun 2011, at 02:13, TJ wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:04, Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljit...@muada.comwrote:
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:31, TJ wrote:
... and Gmail, too ...
imap.gmail.com only has IPv4, though.
Good catch, applies to pop smtp as well. Baby steps, I guess?
/TJ
Sadly,
On 8 Jun 2011, at 04:46, Jared Mauch wrote:
We have seen a traffic increase but nothing like what I was expecting, nay
hoping to see. (i.e.: gigs and gigs of traffic - it does look like ~2x to me
in an unscientific eye-look at a chart).
Some of it may be down to client behaviour.
That is one of the issues that I believe RIPE is capturing -- how many
dual-stacked sites have all their objects dual-stacked.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: David Hill [mailto:dh...@mindcry.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 12:10 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun
On Jun 8, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
On 8 Jun 2011, at 04:46, Jared Mauch wrote:
We have seen a traffic increase but nothing like what I was expecting, nay
hoping to see. (i.e.: gigs and gigs of traffic - it does look like ~2x to
me in an unscientific eye-look at a chart).
Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:15 PM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6
On 2011-Jun-08 13:40, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
stack at home (well, mostly, like most folks, VZ gives me a single
address and I live behind that with NATv4, but otherwise, I loves me
some FiOS) and yesterday went by for me without
potentially allowing the world to access that port.
Cheers,
Harry
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Bowden [mailto:ja...@photon.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:40 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: RE: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
Massar [mailto:jer...@unfix.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:52 AM
To: Jamie Bowden
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On 2011-Jun-08 13:40, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
stack at home (well, mostly, like most folks
Message-
From: Harry Hoffman [mailto:hhoff...@ip-solutions.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 8:00 AM
To: Jamie Bowden; 'NANOG list'
Subject: RE: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
I have the same setup as you, except a Linux box that does the
firewalling.
The actiontec is pretty bad-ass, hardware-wise
TJ trej...@gmail.com wrote:
... and Gmail, too ...
Except they are not relaying mail over v6.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at http://dotat.at/
South Utsire: Variable 3 or 4, but in far southeast, easterly 5 at first and
becoming westerly 5 to 7 later. Slight or moderate. Rain then
In message b7872a58-de28-4cc2-8929-931fd3ce0...@delong.com, Owen DeLong write
s:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
=20
In message =
AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE763A3AC06@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet
.us, John van Oppen writes:
I was wondering the same thing... we
On Jun 8, 2011, at 4:52 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2011-Jun-08 13:40, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
stack at home (well, mostly, like most folks, VZ gives me a single
address and I live behind that with NATv4, but otherwise, I loves
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message b7872a58-de28-4cc2-8929-931fd3ce0...@delong.com, Owen DeLong
write
s:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
=20
In message =
AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE763A3AC06@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet
.us, John van Oppen
Just FWIW:
US, Amazon, Dlink, DIR615, $35.45 ...
/TJ
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 08:46, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message b7872a58-de28-4cc2-8929-931fd3ce0...@delong.com, Owen DeLong
write
s:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
=20
In message =
In message e9d05f4b-081c-4f5d-9c6f-05f4ff8f0...@delong.com, Owen DeLong
writes:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
=20
In message b7872a58-de28-4cc2-8929-931fd3ce0...@delong.com, Owen =
DeLong write
s:
=20
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
=20
=3D20
-Original Message-
From: Tim Chown [mailto:t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:32 AM
I had to flush my MacOS X DNS cache before I'd get the
new record.
World IPv6 Day will be tomorrow.
Marcus Williams
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Mark Andrews wrote:
The AUD prices include all taxes. That being said one can still buy
retail in the states including taxes, add shipping and come out in front
for a identical product. 3x markup is a rip-off.
Swedish prices are approximately equivalent of 110USD for
On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Williams, Marcus (Contractor) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Chown [mailto:t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:32 AM
I had to flush my MacOS X DNS cache before I'd get the
new record.
World IPv6 Day will be tomorrow.
The AUD prices include all taxes. That being said one can still
buy retail in the states including taxes, add shipping and come out
in front for a identical product. 3x markup is a rip-off.
No argument here, but, as I'm in the states...
The worst tax rate I know in the US is California
On 2011-Jun-08 16:09, Owen DeLong wrote:
[..]
World IPv6 day is today. It started at UTC June 8 and goes to
just before UTC June 9. As I write this, there are approximately
10 hours remaining in world IPv6 day.
I think it is quite obvious that nothing serious broke anywhere ;)
(read:
: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10:09 AM
To: Williams, Marcus (Contractor)
Cc: Tim Chown; NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Williams, Marcus (Contractor) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Chown [mailto:t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday
I have a similar setting as Jamie, VZ Fios plus HE tunnel, except I am
running a FreeBSD VM to terminate tunnel and to run rtadvd. everything
works nicely, so I thought I could do some tests on IPv6 connectivity
and speed to China. There is a single-stack IPv6 website
(bt.neu6.edu.cn) hosted by a
On 6/8/11 1:29 AM, Neil Long wrote:
On 8 Jun 2011, at 02:13, TJ wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:04, Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljit...@muada.comwrote:
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:31, TJ wrote:
... and Gmail, too ...
imap.gmail.com only has IPv4, though.
Good catch, applies to pop smtp as
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does
for others though
If you go to www.v6.facebook.com it works, but it seems they have some
problem on their main site. I am seeing
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:22 58PM, john.herb...@usc-bt.com
john.herb...@usc-bt.com wrote:
No issues connecting to FB for me on IPv6 (both to www.v6.facebook.com and to
the returned by www.facebook.com now).
Interesting (perhaps) side note - www.facebook.com has a , but
facebook.com
van Beijnum
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does
for others though
If you go to www.v6.facebook.com it works, but it seems they have some
problem
What seems evident, looking at
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/06/monitoring-world-ipv6-day/ is that a
lot of folks switched it on - and then switched it off again pretty damn
quick!
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com wrote:
What seems evident, looking at
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/06/monitoring-world-ipv6-day/ is that a
lot of folks switched it on - and then switched it off again pretty damn
quick!
Or ... folks switched it on and then
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:48:52PM -0400, Joly MacFie wrote:
What seems evident, looking at
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/06/monitoring-world-ipv6-day/ is that a
lot of folks switched it on - and then switched it off again pretty damn
quick!
I'd attribute that spike to people actively
On Jun 7, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Matt Ryanczak ryanc...@gmail.com
Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6 enabled but the user-agent on my phone
denies me an IPv6 experience.
I thought I'd heard that LTE transport was *IPv6 only*...
you may have but
Leslie Daigle and Vint Cerf are on the News Hour tonight about World IPv6
Day. Watch it if you get a chance. They did a great job!
CJ
Sent from my iPad
On 2011-06-08, at 5:09 AM, Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Matt Ryanczak ryanc...@gmail.com
Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6 enabled but the user-agent on my phone
denies me an IPv6
: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:15 PM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does
for others though
If you go to www.v6.facebook.com
On 08/06/2011 22:58, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:48:52PM -0400, Joly MacFie wrote:
What seems evident, looking at
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/06/monitoring-world-ipv6-day/ is that a
lot of folks switched it on - and then switched it off again pretty damn
quick!
I'd
www.juniper.net is on IPv6
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does for others
though
www.level3.com works fine over v4 but shows a 404 over IPv6
www.simobil.si is temporarily unavailable over IPv6 but works fine over IPv4
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does for
others though
If you go to www.v6.facebook.com it works, but it seems they have some problem
on their main site. I am seeing some issues reaching them over IPv6.
On 6/7/2011 6:15 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does for others
though
If you go to www.v6.facebook.com it works, but it seems they have some problem
on their main site. I am
Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:15 PM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:19 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 6/7/2011 6:15 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does for
others though
If you go to www.v6.facebook.com it works, but it seems
- Original Message -
From: John Herbert john.herb...@usc-bt.com
No issues connecting to FB for me on IPv6 (both to www.v6.facebook.com
and to the returned by www.facebook.com now).
Interesting (perhaps) side note - www.facebook.com has a , but
facebook.com does not.
And
yahoo is already serving up the as well.
Thanks Igor!
Looking forward to seeing the traffic spike today :)
- Jared
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.juniper.net is on IPv6
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does for
others
records are up and running nicely also.
J.
-Original Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:15 PM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote
On 06/07/2011 07:56 PM, Pete Carah wrote:
On 06/07/2011 07:22 PM, john.herb...@usc-bt.com wrote:
No issues connecting to FB for me on IPv6 (both to www.v6.facebook.com and
to the returned by www.facebook.com now).
Interesting (perhaps) side note - www.facebook.com has a , but
This is from Sweden.
$ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
; DiG 9.7.3 any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61742
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
;; WARNING:
I'll be watching this page probably.
http://www.worldipv6day.org/participants/
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:02, Pete Carah wrote:
www.facebook.com (but not facebook.com) just turned on here too (after
google). another hex-speak spelling...
I'm using my iPhone as the IPv6-only canary. www.facebook.com now seems to
work, but it redirects to m.facebook.com which doesn't have IPv6.
On 6/7/2011 17:04, fredrik danerklint wrote:
This is from Sweden.
$ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
; DiG 9.7.3 any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61742
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1,
I'm getting v6 for facebook now.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
- Original Message -
This is from Sweden.
$ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
; DiG 9.7.3
On Jun 7, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:02, Pete Carah wrote:
www.facebook.com (but not facebook.com) just turned on here too (after
google). another hex-speak spelling...
I'm using my iPhone as the IPv6-only canary. www.facebook.com now seems to
That's because you're asking the wrong nameservers. The response you're
getting is pointing you to the correct nameservers (glb1/glb2.facebook.com)
which are defintely returning records for me :
$ dig +short www.facebook.com @glb1.facebook.com
2620:0:1c08:4000:face:b00c:0:3
Scott.
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:02, Pete Carah wrote:
www.facebook.com (but not facebook.com) just turned on here too (after
google). another hex-speak spelling...
I'm using my iPhone as the IPv6-only canary. www.facebook.com now seems to
work, but it redirects to m.facebook.com which doesn't have
On 06/07/2011 08:08 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I'm using my iPhone as the IPv6-only canary. www.facebook.com now seems to
work, but it redirects to m.facebook.com which doesn't have IPv6. This seems to
be a trend, yahoo and cnn do the same thing. Annoying.
Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6
On 6/7/2011 7:13 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 6/7/2011 17:04, fredrik danerklint wrote:
This is from Sweden.
$ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
; DiG 9.7.3 any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.juniper.net is on IPv6
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does for others
though
Working great for me. Getting to it via HE.
www.level3.com works fine over v4 but shows a 404 over IPv6
Yes, I am seeing
On 06/08/2011 02:13 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
I'm getting v6 for facebook now.
www.facebook.com is v6 here, but I see no for the fbcdn.net subdomains.
--
Rémy Sanchez
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 20:14, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
Props to google for doing it right, e.g.:
maps.googleapis.com
gg.google.com
safebrowsing.clients.google.com
Thank you google!
- Jared
... and Gmail, too ...
/TJ
Sorry about this.
When asked for the right thing it does resolv!
$ dig www.facebook.com
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.facebook.com. IN
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.facebook.com. 30 IN 2620:0:1c08:4000:face:b00c:0:3
That's because you're asking
On 6/7/2011 17:16, Scott Howard wrote:
That's because you're asking the wrong nameservers. The response you're
getting is pointing you to the correct nameservers (glb1/glb2.facebook.com)
which are defintely returning records for me :
$ dig +short www.facebook.com
- Original Message -
From: Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net
Props to google for doing it right, e.g.:
maps.googleapis.com
gg.google.com
safebrowsing.clients.google.com
Thank you google!
Funny you bring up getting all the subsidiary sties right.
I tried to
- Original Message -
From: Matt Ryanczak ryanc...@gmail.com
Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6 enabled but the user-agent on my phone
denies me an IPv6 experience.
I thought I'd heard that LTE transport was *IPv6 only*...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
That is expected, the CDN is not IPv6 enabled (yet)
On 6/7/11 5:24 PM, Rémy Sanchez remy.sanc...@hyperthese.net wrote:
On 06/08/2011 02:13 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
I'm getting v6 for facebook now.
www.facebook.com is v6 here, but I see no for the fbcdn.net
subdomains.
--
Rémy
Anyone with native v6 want to help me test my content? I don't have any v6
access from anything except a few dedicated servers yet. Off list response is
fine :)
-Original Message-
From: TJ [mailto:trej...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 6:32 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: IPv6 day
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:31, TJ wrote:
... and Gmail, too ...
imap.gmail.com only has IPv4, though.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:04, Iljitsch van Beijnum iljit...@muada.comwrote:
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:31, TJ wrote:
... and Gmail, too ...
imap.gmail.com only has IPv4, though.
Good catch, applies to pop smtp as well. Baby steps, I guess?
/TJ
Anybody keeping any realtime stats ?
-J
I'm observing our netflow of the ipv6 address-family from nodes where we're
capable. It's not that interesting actually. I've seen larger spikes than
what we're seeing [so far].
Akamai has a realtime IPv6 stats page as well here:
http://www.akamai.com/ipv6
You can check out the hits/second
Thanks for the link Jared.
I wonder how many eye-balls are really enabled to reach the IPv6
sites. Akamai's site doesn't show very impressive numbers, trying to
figure why 300ms latency and 4% packet loss ?
-J
On Jun 7, 2011, at 11:31 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
Thanks for the link Jared.
I wonder how many eye-balls are really enabled to reach the IPv6
sites. Akamai's site doesn't show very impressive numbers, trying to
figure why 300ms latency and 4% packet loss ?
My guess is it's over the entire
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
Thanks for the link Jared.
I wonder how many eye-balls are really enabled to reach the IPv6
sites. Akamai's site doesn't show very impressive numbers, trying to
figure why 300ms latency and 4% packet loss ?
-J
In message AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE763A3AC06@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet
.us, John van Oppen writes:
I was wondering the same thing... we have v6 enabled to about 700 users i=
n our native Ethernet to the home deployment here in Seattle.Unfortunat=
ely, user routers don't seem to
Some sites still require ipv4 to load properly (stylesheets, statics,
etc)
disable ipv4 on your machine and go to:
http://www.facebook.com
http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/
http://www.yahoo.com/
I guess it is a start though.
74 matches
Mail list logo
