It has limitations, but, it's documented pretty well in the excellent Day
One/Day Two Juniper books for IPv6 written by Chris Grundemann.
However, as others have said, I strongly subscribe to the school of "don't do
that, it leads to unnecessary pain and provides little benefit.
Owen
On Feb 1
Hello,
keith tokash wrote:
I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if
any, benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups.
We're running Junipers and things are fairly neat and ordered;
I haven't really looked very hard, since I subscribe to the stated
reason
In a message written on Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:33:17PM +0100, Grzegorz
Janoszka wrote:
> Most policies can be used in two address families, you can also match
> prefixes, but you cannot have v4 and v6 prefixes in one term. So in your
> policies you have to have at least two terms - one for v4 pre
On 2/8/12 08:59 , keith tokash wrote:
>
> Hi,
I've done it either way, I prefer to put the v6 peers in a different
group than the v4 peers so that I can group the policies at the group
rather than neighbor level.
> I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if
> any, benefit th
On 08-02-12 17:59, keith tokash wrote:
> I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if
> any, benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups.
> We're running Junipers and things are fairly neat and ordered; we have
> multiple links to a few providers in many sites,
In a message written on Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:59:23AM -0800, keith tokash
wrote:
> I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if
> any, benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups.
> We're running Junipers and things are fairly neat and ordered; we have
> mul
Hi,
I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if
any, benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups.
We're running Junipers and things are fairly neat and ordered; we have
multiple links to a few providers in many sites, so we group them and
apply the policies
7 matches
Mail list logo
