Re: ISP billing - data collection, correlation, and billing

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 4:48 AM Lee Howard wrote: > > Depending on the capability of the exporter, you don't need to export full flow information. With Cisco's Flexible Netflow you can define the aggregation in the flow cache you are monitoring. You are not required to use a

RE: ISP billing - data collection, correlation, and billing

@nanog.org Subject: Re: ISP billing - data collection, correlation, and billing On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 4:48 AM Lee Howard <l...@asgard.org <mailto:l...@asgard.org> > wrote: Depending on the capability of the exporter, you don't need to export full flow information. With Ci

Re: ISP billing - data collection, correlation, and billing

Hi, we use the same approach as you. When provisioning services they’re identified by a label in the interface description so data is collected and delivered to our billing systems. Gerardo El 14/07/17 13:43, "NANOG en nombre de Sean Pedersen"

Re: ISP billing - data collection, correlation, and billing

To be honest we don't do usage billing so I've never used it. I'd like to think it is since it uses a verification between the collector and source. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 15, 2017, at 3:47 AM, Lee Howard > wrote: On 7/14/17, 2:47 PM, "NANOG on

Re: ISP billing - data collection, correlation, and billing

On 7/14/17, 2:47 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Luke Guillory" wrote: >On the HFC / CMTS side of things we have IPDR which I believe has some >open source collectors out there. I'm not sure that IPDR is used much >outside of the HFC

RE: ISP billing - data collection, correlation, and billing

transmission. . -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Sean Pedersen Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 1:41 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: ISP billing - data collection, correlation, and billing I went back a few years in the archives and found a few odd references

ISP billing - data collection, correlation, and billing

I went back a few years in the archives and found a few odd references, but not much discussion. I'm curious what some other approaches are to usage-based billing, both the practice of generating/correlating data and the billing itself. We bill based on use/95th percentile and our system is