In article <1c6ee78f6c1e400289fa7797f3ba6...@pur-vm-exch13n1.ox.com> you write:
>Given the size and that the data is stored in encrypted RAR files, I wonder if
>they
>just busted a Usenet service provider rather than a P2P / file sharing site.
Unlikely. There aren't that many large usenet provid
On Mar 2, 2015, at 10:03 AM, Mike A wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 05:53:33PM +, Naslund, Steve wrote:
>> Don't know who this is but the legalities are pretty clear I think. The DC
>> is not required to know what data is stored but if the cops can prove that
>> someone DID know what was s
Here is what is going to hurt or help the cops case.
"The volume of information is so expansive that in order to store and analyze
the data safely and securely, police had to purchase storage hardware similar
to what was used by Canadian military forces in Afghanistan. To access the
files, many
Canadian and US laws are similar. But I'll leave it up to the lawyers to
figure it all out, happily I'm no where near this, but it being a small
industry here, I suspect I have friends that are dealing with some crap
right now
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Mike A wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 201
Part of it depends on if the DC was doing managed services as well. If they
are just a space tenant then their exposure can be limited. But if it was
their servers that will be a little different. Not saying it would make the
difference, but opens another avenue to be argued.
To me it’s like
: 914-460-4039
aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+mhuff=ox@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Naslund,
Steve
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 12:54 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Large Ontario DC busted for hosting petabytes of child
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 05:53:33PM +, Naslund, Steve wrote:
> Don't know who this is but the legalities are pretty clear I think. The DC
> is not required to know what data is stored but if the cops can prove that
> someone DID know what was stored, that person can be criminally charged.
> IANA
Don't know who this is but the legalities are pretty clear I think. The DC is
not required to know what data is stored but if the cops can prove that someone
DID know what was stored, that person can be criminally charged. IANAL but I
have worked with LE on a similar case and that is how it wa
18 million dollars revenue in three months so certainly pretty large sized.
Any idea which DC this is?
http://motherboard.vice.com/en_ca/read/police-could-charge-a-data-center-in-the-largest-child-porn-bust-ever
9 matches
Mail list logo