Network Operators Unite Against SORBS
Do you, or have you had problems with SORBS?
Tired of being able to do nothing about it?
Sick of opening a trouble ticket, only to get delisted weeks later?
I am calling on all Network Operators to stand up and stop routing
dnsbl.sorbs.net until
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:35:11 -0700
iHate SORBS ihateso...@gmail.com wrote:
I am calling on all Network Operators to stand up and stop routing
dnsbl.sorbs.net until that time they can commit to making real changes.
This doesn't seem like a network issue. You probably want the mailops
list.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:35:11 PDT, iHate SORBS said:
I am calling on all Network Operators to stand up and stop routing
dnsbl.sorbs.net until that time they can commit to making real changes.
You *do* realize your beef isn't with SORBS, it's with the mail operators that
are using that as part
How about...
Network Operators Against Whiny Mail Operators Who Have Nothing Better To Do
With Their Time But Carry Out Personal Vendettas?
NOAWMOWHNBTDWTRBCOPV
--Original Message--
From: iHate SORBS
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Network Operators Unite Against SORBS
Sent: Oct 12
On 10/12/2010 8:35 AM, iHate SORBS wrote:
Network Operators Unite Against SORBS
Do you, or have you had problems with SORBS?
Tired of being able to do nothing about it?
Sick of opening a trouble ticket, only to get delisted weeks later?
I am calling on all Network Operators to stand
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:35 AM, iHate SORBS ihateso...@gmail.com wrote:
I am calling on all Network Operators to stand up and stop routing
dnsbl.sorbs.net until that time they can commit to making real changes.
What sort of changes are you suggesting? Suggesting a block unless they
make
On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:35 AM, iHate SORBS ihateso...@gmail.com wrote:
I am calling on all Network Operators to stand up and stop routing
dnsbl.sorbs.net until that time they can commit to making real changes.
What sort of changes are
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:25:23AM -0700, Scott Howard said:
I'm no fan of SORBS, but at the end of the day (ignoring the issues like
they had last week) they do what they say they do.
Disagree.
I have followed all the quasi RFC's Mich* Sullivan quotes to get my blocks
unlisted,
and after a
On 10/12/2010 12:46 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
I kinda-sortta feel like many others who have posted here. This is a mail
thing, not netops. Grow a pair and post under your own name. Is it even
on-topic for NANOG? Etc.
I even started typing a message to the effect of: even though I
Really the best thing to do is to just leave SORBS alone.
The more idiotic bans they put into place with demands for $50 per IP
per incident, the less trustworthy of an RBL they become.
Most large network operations will end up ignoring them, or if they do
use the data from their RBL, they will
10 matches
Mail list logo