rved for IANA IPv4 Special Purpose Address Registry
>> [RFC5736]. Complete registration details for 192.0.0.0/24 are found in
>> [IANA registry iana-ipv4-special-registry].
>>
>> Was RFC5736 obsoleted? I think not, so I would treat it as bogon.
>>
>> Its a nice tiny subn
--
From: Tom Beecher
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)"
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 13:24:47 -0400
>
> That means that some IP addresses in the block 192.0.0.0/24 may be
> routable.
>
>
details for 192.0.0.0/24 are found in
> [IANA registry iana-ipv4-special-registry].
>
> Was RFC5736 obsoleted? I think not, so I would treat it as bogon.
>
> Its a nice tiny subnet for special purposes. I personaly use it
> as my Internal VM Net on my desktop for example.
>
>
&
To: NANOG
Subject: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 16:18:47 -0500
As one to never let a good academic question go unasked... what is it
about 192.0.0.0/24 that is or isn't a bogon. This doesn't seem so
straightforward an answer to me, at least in theory. Although in
practice
message --
From: John Kristoff
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 07:29:54 -0500
On Tue, 14 May 2024 12:00:15 +0200 (CEST)
b...@uu3.net wrote:
> Was RFC5736 obsoleted?
No.
> Its a nice tiny subnet for special purposes. I persona
purposes. I personaly use it
as my Internal VM Net on my desktop for example.
-- Original message --
From: John Kristoff
To: NANOG
Subject: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 16:18:47 -0500
As one to never let a good academic question go unasked... what
As one to never let a good academic question go unasked... what is it
about 192.0.0.0/24 that is or isn't a bogon. This doesn't seem so
straightforward an answer to me, at least in theory. Although in
practice it may already be decided whether one likes the answer or not.
192.0.0.0/24 was
7 matches
Mail list logo
