On 6/5/2012 9:29 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Looking more closely... Is this still work in progress?
;; ANSWER SECTION:
comcast.net.358 IN MX 5 mx3.comcast.net.
comcast.net.358 IN MX 10 mx1.comcast.net.
comcast.net.358 IN
On 6/17/12 1:18 PM, "Jason Roysdon"
wrote:
>Jason,
>
>Will all MX get RRs, or at least all of your MX priority levels
>have at least one RR? Without a failure of mx2 & mx3, Sendmail and
>well-behaving mail servers are never going to try mx1.
Yes, in the relatively near future.
- Jaso
On 6/5/2012 7:42 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
Op 5-6-2012 16:10, Livingood, Jason schreef:
In preparation for the World IPv6 Launch, inbound (SMTP) email to the
comcast.net domain was IPv6-enabled today, June 5, 2012, at 9:34 UTC.
Roughly one minute later, at 9:35:30 UTC we received our first
inbound e
On Tuesday, June 5, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Seth Mos wrote:
> Op 5-6-2012 16:10, Livingood, Jason schreef:
>
> I enabled v6 for my email before my website since the impact if it
> didn't work on the 1st try was almost nil.
>
> Still waiting for the 1st Country to top Romania' 6% deployment. I'm
> sure
On 6/5/12 10:33 AM, "Jeroen Massar" wrote:
>Though it can work, it used to be a really bad idea as there where a
>couple of SMTP systems (Communigate Pro being one of them I recall)
>which just failed when not seeing an "A" on an MX, this as they did not
>understand IPv6...
>
>There is bound to
Hi! Seth,
In the past several hours we have of course seen other messages from a
range of hosts, many of which were legitimate email so it wasn't just
spam! ;-)
Since the Internet is of course more than just the web, we encourage
others to start making non-HTTP services available via IPv6 as
On 6/5/12 10:22 AM, "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" wrote:
>You specificly tell 'inbound' ... by that you mean the MX record was
>added. But just to be sure. Comcast is also sending out over IPv6 now
>right? And if so, what protocol is preferred by default? Outgoing mail
>over IPv4 or over IPv6?
Outbound S
Op 5-6-2012 16:10, Livingood, Jason schreef:
In preparation for the World IPv6 Launch, inbound (SMTP) email to the
comcast.net domain was IPv6-enabled today, June 5, 2012, at 9:34 UTC.
Roughly one minute later, at 9:35:30 UTC we received our first
inbound email over IPv6 from 2001:4ba0:fff4:1c:
On 2012-06-05 07:29, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
[..]
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> comcast.net.358 IN MX 5 mx3.comcast.net.
> comcast.net.358 IN MX 10 mx1.comcast.net.
> comcast.net.358 IN MX 5 mx2.comcast.net.
>
> ;; ADDITIONAL
Hi!
In preparation for the World IPv6 Launch, inbound (SMTP) email to the
comcast.net domain was IPv6-enabled today, June 5, 2012, at 9:34 UTC.
Roughly one minute later, at 9:35:30 UTC we received our first
inbound email over IPv6 from 2001:4ba0:fff4:1c::2. That first bit of mail
was spam, and w
Jason,
In preparation for the World IPv6 Launch, inbound (SMTP) email to the
comcast.net domain was IPv6-enabled today, June 5, 2012, at 9:34 UTC.
Roughly one minute later, at 9:35:30 UTC we received our first
inbound email over IPv6 from 2001:4ba0:fff4:1c::2. That first bit of mail
was spam, an
In preparation for the World IPv6 Launch, inbound (SMTP) email to the
comcast.net domain was IPv6-enabled today, June 5, 2012, at 9:34 UTC.
Roughly one minute later, at 9:35:30 UTC we received our first
inbound email over IPv6 from 2001:4ba0:fff4:1c::2. That first bit of mail
was spam, and was cau
12 matches
Mail list logo