From: Clay Kossmeyer
To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: Clay Seaman-Kossmeyer (ckossmey)
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software SSL VPN Denial of
Service Vulnerability
Hi All -
The Cisco PSIRT has been sending IOS Security Advisories to the
On 04/01/2014 11:44 AM, Clay Kossmeyer wrote:
Hi All -
The Cisco PSIRT has been sending IOS Security Advisories to the NANOG mailing
list for well over a decade. We started this process a long time ago at the
request of the list’s then-membership and haven’t been asked to change since.
Admit
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
The Cisco PSIRT has been sending IOS Security Advisories to
the NANOG mailing list for well over a decade
Thank you, much appreciated
Given that there are a number of forums that more directly
address either Cisco-specific issues or are specific
> The Cisco PSIRT has been sending IOS Security Advisories to
> the NANOG mailing list for well over a decade
Thank you, much appreciated
> Given that there are a number of forums that more directly
> address either Cisco-specific issues or are specific to
> vulnerability announcements, were hap
--- ckoss...@cisco.com wrote:
From: Clay Kossmeyer
[...] we’re happy to discontinue sending to the NANOG list directly.
--
Instead of discontinuing them how about one email that contains
all the details, rather than one email per detail. Simi
On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:24:32 -0400, "Chuck Church" said:
> Given that probably 80+% (a guess, but I'd be really surprised at a lower
> figure) of all internet traffic crosses at least one Cisco device somewhere,
> I think it would be a huge disservice to discontinue sending these emails.
Actually,
Cisco IOS Software SSL VPN Denial of
Service Vulnerability
Hi All -
The Cisco PSIRT has been sending IOS Security Advisories to the NANOG
mailing list for well over a decade. We started this process a long time
ago at the request of the list's then-membership and haven't been asked to
chang
Hi All -
The Cisco PSIRT has been sending IOS Security Advisories to the NANOG mailing
list for well over a decade. We started this process a long time ago at the
request of the list’s then-membership and haven’t been asked to change since.
Admittedly, vulnerability disclosure/discussion/repo
On Friday, March 28, 2014 05:48:29 AM Shrdlu wrote:
> Why? Personally, I think it's fine. It only happens (at
> most) every six months (and sometimes more like a year).
I think it's fine too.
As I'm sure you know, if you're a Cisco customer, you can
subscribe to their internal notification serv
On 3/28/2014 12:57 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
Alexander Neilson wrote:
I wonder if they should be invited to only post a single message with
the titles and links to the alerts so that people can follow it up.
i would prefer that the header be in blue, the titles in green, and the
urls in magenta, i
On 3/27/2014 11:57 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Alexander Neilson wrote:
I wonder if they should be invited to only post a single message with
the titles and links to the alerts so that people can follow it up.
i would prefer that the header be in blue, the titles in green, and the
urls in magenta,
Alexander Neilson wrote:
> I wonder if they should be invited to only post a single message with
> the titles and links to the alerts so that people can follow it up.
i would prefer that the header be in blue, the titles in green, and the
urls in magenta, in comic sans, of course
randy
On 3/27/2014 7:44 PM, Alexander Neilson wrote:
I wonder if they should be invited to only post a single message with
the titles and links to the alerts so that people can follow it up.
Why? Personally, I think it's fine. It only happens (at most) every six
months (and sometimes more like a year
I wonder if they should be invited to only post a single message with the
titles and links to the alerts so that people can follow it up.
They should also include a link to their own list that they send the full
alerts to.
That way there could be some headline alerting to people that there is
On 3/27/2014 4:07 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:52:42AM -0600, kendrick eastes wrote:
The Full-disclosure mailing list was recently... retired, I guess cisco
thought NANOG was the next best place.
Nope, they've been sending these things here for as long as I can remember.
I
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:52:42AM -0600, kendrick eastes wrote:
> The Full-disclosure mailing list was recently... retired, I guess cisco
> thought NANOG was the next best place.
Nope, they've been sending these things here for as long as I can remember.
I have NFI why -- probably hubris, thinki
For anyone who was subscribed to the old full-disclosure list ... Fydor of nmap
has brought it back to life.
Infolink @ http://insecure.org/news/fulldisclosure/
Subscribe @ http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
On Mar 26, 2014, at 10:52 AM, kendrick eastes wrote:
> The Full-disclos
The Full-disclosure mailing list was recently... retired, I guess cisco
thought NANOG was the next best place.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:45 AM, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
>
> Is this normal for the list to diretly get Cisco security advisories or
> something new. First time I have seen these.
>
These also get posted to other mailing lists, such as cisco-nsp.
jms
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
Thanks everyone for the replies. I guess since they are done so infrequently,
I was not a list member the last go around.
Robert
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:58:44 -0400
Andrew L
Thanks everyone for the replies. I guess since they are done so
infrequently, I was not a list member the last go around.
Robert
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:58:44 -0400
Andrew Latham wrote:
Robert
Perfectly normal, almost an announce list for issues like this.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:45 PM
Robert
Perfectly normal, almost an announce list for issues like this.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:45 PM, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
>
> Is this normal for the list to diretly get Cisco security advisories or
> something new. First time I have seen these.
>
> Robert
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:10
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
Is this normal for the list to diretly get Cisco security advisories or
something new. First time I have seen these.
They do this twice a year, all their advisories were sent here about half
a year ago as well.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: s
They don't come out often but it happens. Looks like there were 5 or 6 of them.
James
-Original Message-
From: "rw...@ropeguru.com"
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:45:18
To: ;
Reply-To: Robert Webb
Subject: Re: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software SSL VPN Den
Is this normal for the list to diretly get Cisco security advisories
or something new. First time I have seen these.
Robert
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:10:00 -0400
Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco IOS Software SSL
24 matches
Mail list logo
