We use the ADC D1M-1A0019, happily:
http://www.launch3telecom.com/adc/dsxpanels/D1M-1A0019.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: sjk [mailto:s...@sleepycatz.com]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 2:56 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: DSX cross-connect solution
I am trying to find hardware for a
On Mon, 04 May 2009 16:05:30 -0400, Wallace Keith
kwall...@pcconnection.com wrote:
I would stick with wire wrap, 66 blocks make an inferior connection.
True, but a 66 block will work. Usually. And is easily re-punched.
If someone cannot deal with wire wrapping, they are not living in a
Alternatively, one could use a digital cross-connect.
Terry
-Original Message-
From: Ricky Beam [mailto:jfb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:23 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: DSX cross-connect solution
On Mon, 04 May 2009 16:05:30 -0400, Wallace Keith
kwall
2:37 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: DSX cross-connect solution
Alternatively, one could use a digital cross-connect.
Terry
-Original Message-
From: Ricky Beam [mailto:jfb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:23 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: DSX cross-connect
You would get better density from a 110 patch than a 66, and telco frames
for 19 and 23 are readily available.
Robert D. Scott rob...@ufl.edu
Senior Network Engineer 352-273-0113 Phone
CNS - Network Services 352-392-2061 CNS Phone Tree
University of Florida
I would stick with wire wrap, 66 blocks make an inferior connection. If
someone cannot deal with wire wrapping, they are not living in a telecom
world. Find a contractor who can do this properly. Both Telect and ADC
have good DSX panels in varying densities.
-Keith
-Original Message-
6 matches
Mail list logo
