It appears that Eric Kuhnke said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>I've seen a US based ISP do its internal management network reverse DNS
>using '.us' as a suffix, where the hierarchy is like POP name, then
>city/airport code, then state (eg: CA, NJ, FL), then .us for geographical
>location of equipment in USA.
I've seen a US based ISP do its internal management network reverse DNS
using '.us' as a suffix, where the hierarchy is like POP name, then
city/airport code, then state (eg: CA, NJ, FL), then .us for geographical
location of equipment in USA.
The .us domain in question was owned by the same
- Original Message -
> From: "Seth Mattinen via NANOG"
> On 11/2/23 1:30 PM, goemon--- via NANOG wrote:
>> Are there any legitimate services running solely on .us domain names?
>
> Yes.
Though not -- by several orders of magnitude -- nearly as many as there should
be... but let's not
On 11/2/23 1:30 PM, goemon--- via NANOG wrote:
Are there any legitimate services running solely on .us domain names?
Yes.
K-12 education is typically in *.us
-Eric
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 1:32 PM goemon--- via NANOG wrote:
>
> https://krebsonsecurity.com/2023/10/us-harbors-prolific-malicious-link-shortening-service/
>
> "The NTIA recently published a proposal that would allow registrars to
> redact all registrant
On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 8:54 AM wrote:
> Yeah. I wonder why this cannot be reversed really?
> First domain registration should cost more.. 50 USD maybe? Dunno.
> And then, when you want to extend the domain, price should be
> around 5 times lower?
Maybe go the other way: you have to pay the same
list
Subject: Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 20:39:17 -0700
Not specific to .US really
Pretty much every new gTLD that can be registered on "promotional" first
year prices below .com/.net/.org harbors a large than usual proportion of
phishi
message --
From: Eric Kuhnke
To: goe...@sasami.anime.net
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 20:39:17 -0700
Not specific to .US really
Pretty much every new gTLD that can be registered on "promotional" first
y
Not specific to .US really
Pretty much every new gTLD that can be registered on "promotional" first
year prices below .com/.net/.org harbors a large than usual proportion of
phishing domains and suspicious things, because one of the sole operational
criteria for phishers registering disposable
On November 2, 2023 at 22:09 al...@allan.vin (Allan Liska) wrote:
> I think it is a matter of proportionality.
>
> According to Spamhaus malicious domains account for only 1.5% of all .com
> domains, but 4.8% of all .us domains
> (https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/tlds/) - compare
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 3:10 PM Allan Liska wrote:
> According to Spamhaus malicious domains account for only 1.5% of all .com
> domains, but 4.8% of all .us domains
> (https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/tlds/) - compare that to .tk where 6.7%
> of all domains are malicious.
Hi Allan,
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 5:46 PM William Herrin wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 1:30 PM goemon--- via NANOG wrote:
> > https://krebsonsecurity.com/2023/10/us-harbors-prolific-malicious-link-shortening-service/
> >
> > What hope is there when registrars are actively aiding and abeting criminal
>
I think it is a matter of proportionality.
According to Spamhaus malicious domains account for only 1.5% of all .com
domains, but 4.8% of all .us domains
(https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/tlds/) - compare that to .tk where 6.7% of
all domains are malicious.
allan
--- Original
There are LOTS of small business that have .us domains. I've got several
that just use these domains as well as locality specific things such as
schools or towns that use them rather than the longer ones supplied to
municipal entities.
/rh
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 1:34 PM goemon--- via NANOG
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 1:30 PM goemon--- via NANOG wrote:
> https://krebsonsecurity.com/2023/10/us-harbors-prolific-malicious-link-shortening-service/
>
> What hope is there when registrars are actively aiding and abeting criminal
> enterprises?
I'm confused. Does .com/.net/.org have a
I personally own a .us domain name -- while it's a personal domain and doesn't
do a lot of traffic, it's still a legitimate domain.
-Original Message-
From: "goemon--- via NANOG"
Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 4:30pm
To: "NANOG list"
Subject: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link
16 matches
Mail list logo
