Anonymized because I am forwarding without permission...
Dears,
As per what I know from friends:
1. All Internet is down. Apparently one network is still working but seems to
be serving the stock exchange only and few others.
2. SMS is down.
3. Landlines are down (at least
Just make sure you don't shoot yourself in the foot by telling the best route
to the end of the tunnel is via the tunnel itself...
I use it too: http://www.avonsys.com/blogpost367 but because I have no other
choice.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Johnson fasterfour...@gmail.com
To:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
The IPv6 geo databases actually tend to be about on par with the IPv4
ones from what I have seen so far (which is admittedly limited as I don't
really use geolocation services). However, I still think it is important
for
Dear all,
On 1/28/11 1:07 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
Hey all,
Some NANOG participants are seeing hearing reports of disrupted
communications in Egypt. Are any of you seeing the same thing?
--Richard
Here is the analysis of BGP table regarding what happened to the
Internet in Egypt:
On 29/01/2011 00:16, Bill Stewart wrote:
How much bandwidth do you need? Is a dialup modem fast enough?
Hi,
Not much at all. Just enough for a telnet/ssh session.
A dialup modem would likely do the trick, but that raises other issues about
dialing up from the UK based NOC,
so I think DSL
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:35:01 +, Andy Ashley wrote
if you want the name). Also suggested to me was doing a swap with
another provider in the facility but it seems as if cross connects
may be prohibitively expensive between suites/floors there. Im going
to wait for pricing on this and
On Jan 28, 2011, at 8:41 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:35:43PM -0800, Jacob Broussard wrote:
Static bogons are the bane of my existence... The pain of trying to explain
to someone for MONTHS that they haven't updated their reference, with
traceroutes to back it up, and
are in the RIPE NCC ROA
Repository, here is the latest output in CSV format:
http://lunimon.com/valid-roas-20110129.csv
On 24 Jan 2011, at 21:33, John Curran wrote:
Copy to NANOG for those who aren't on ARIN lists but may be interested in
this info.
FYI.
/John
Begin forwarded message:
From
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:49:34 +1300, Franck Martin said:
Just make sure you don't shoot yourself in the foot by telling the best route
to the end of the tunnel is via the tunnel itself...
Did you mean routing *your* end of the tunnel to the tunnel itself, or
announcing to the entire world that
On Jan 29, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Alex Band wrote:
John,
Thanks for the update. With regards to offering a hosted solution, as you
know that is the only thing the RIPE NCC currently offers. We're developing
support for the up/down protocol as I write this.
Alex - Yes, congrats on rolling out
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
Just make sure you don't shoot yourself in the foot by telling the best route
to the end of the tunnel is via the tunnel itself...
Right, nail up a /32 static route for the remote gre tunnel endpoint on
each side. That /32 is nailed up to the next
Here is the analysis of BGP table regarding what happened to the Internet in
Egypt:
http://stat.ripe.net/egypt/
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/akvadrako/live_eqyptian_internet_incident_analysis
Cidr report (http://www.cidr-report.org) shows this also very well:
Recent Table History
Thanks for the link to the vid. I see Geoff Huston spoke too. I've embedded
both on
http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=1713
FWIW Vint has been using this as an intro to IPv6 for years.. in fact I've
got some video to edit of him speaking in 1999 - I'll look for it..
j
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 2:43 AM,
Hello,
My company is small clec / broadband provider serving rural communities
in northern California, and we are the recipient of a small grant from
the state thru our public utilities commission. We went out to 'middle
of nowhere' and deployed adsl2+ in fact (chalk one up for the good
On 29/01/11 10:00 -0800, Mike wrote:
The rub is, that they want to legislate that web based
'speedtest.com' is the ONLY and MOST AUTHORITATIVE metric that trumps
all other considerations and that the provider is %100 at fault and
responsible for making fraudulent claims if speedtest.com
Mike, nothing is perfect, so let's just start with that. What the FCC has done
to measure this is to partner with Sam Knows and then have friendly DSL subs
for the participating telcos to run modified CPE firmware to test against their
servers. We have been collecting data for this for the past
I think the big deal here is the 100% thing. If Speedtest is one of many
tests, then I don't particularly see the problem.
It shouldn't be any more difficult to convince politicians that any system
(testing or otherwise) can have problems than it is to convince them of any
other hard fact.
We've learned to pick our fights, and this isn't one of them.
--
Dan White
The most effective mechanism I've seen for explaining the problem is latency
and VOIP. Set up an artificially latency-ridden, high bandwidth connection,
then connect to a PBX using a softphone. One call is
On 1/29/2011 10:00 AM, Mike wrote:
Hello,
My company is small clec / broadband provider serving rural
communities in northern California, and we are the recipient of a
small grant from the state thru our public utilities commission. We
went out to 'middle of nowhere' and deployed adsl2+
Mike wrote:
The rub is, that they want to legislate that web based 'speedtest.com'
is the ONLY and MOST AUTHORITATIVE metric that trumps all other
considerations and that the provider is %100 at fault and responsible
for making fraudulent claims if speedtest.com doesn't agree.
speedtest.net?
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:00:36AM -0800, Mike wrote:
issue, how do we go about getting 'the message' across, how do we go
about engineering something that could be considered statistically
relevant, and most importantly, how do we get this to be accepted by
non-technical legislators and
On 29/01/2011 14:56, Randy McAnally wrote:
Have you looked into the cross connect cost for your DSL line? They typically
aren't very cheap either.
~Randy
Im still waiting for the quote to come back from L3.
Figured a copper pair would be cheaper than a fiber, but who knows?
Andy.
--
This
adoption rates will rival those of IPv6 and DNSSEC. Can the Internet
community afford that?
Alex Band
Product Manager, RIPE NCC
P.S. For those interested in which prefixes and ASs are in the RIPE NCC ROA
Repository, here is the latest output in CSV format:
http://lunimon.com/valid-roas-20110129
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Jeff Richmond jeff.richm...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike, nothing is perfect, so let's just start with that. What the FCC has
done to measure this is to partner with Sam Knows and then have friendly DSL
subs for the participating telcos to run modified CPE firmware
Has anyone seen issues with IOS where certain MACs fail?
54:52:00 (kvm) fails out an old 10mbit port on a 7206 running 12.2 SRE.
I've never seen anything like this. DHCP worked, ARP worked, and arp
debugging showed responses for arp to the MAC, however, tcpdump on the
host system showed no
From: Alex Band al...@ripe.net
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:26:55 +0100
... So the question is, if the RIPE NCC would have required everyone
to run their own certification setup using the open source tool-sets
Randy mentions, would there be this much certified address space now?
i don't agree
You should do a rap song...
IPv6, IPv4, it is all my fault!
Internet was just an experiment
- Original Message -
From: Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com
To: Ben McGinnes b...@adversary.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 30 January, 2011 6:36:21 AM
Subject: Re: Found: Who is responsible
Morning Mike,
The *New Zealand Government* don't use speedtest.net as a benchmark.
Our Government uses a consulting company to provide a range of tests
that address the issues you're talking about and benchmarks are
published each year. http://www.comcom.govt.nz/broadband-reports
The user
Configure your DNS server so that speedtest.net and every variation to point
to the Speedtest that you host...
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 12:01 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: help needed - state of california
community afford that?
Alex Band
Product Manager, RIPE NCC
P.S. For those interested in which prefixes and ASs are in the RIPE NCC ROA
Repository, here is the latest output in CSV format:
http://lunimon.com/valid-roas-20110129.csv
On 24 Jan 2011, at 21:33, John Curran wrote:
Copy
On 1/29/2011 4:24 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
Has anyone seen issues with IOS where certain MACs fail?
54:52:00 (kvm) fails out an old 10mbit port on a 7206 running 12.2 SRE.
I've never seen anything like this. DHCP worked, ARP worked, and arp
debugging showed responses for arp to the MAC, however,
On 1/29/2011 8:47 PM, ML wrote:
I just ran into something like this yesterday. A Belkin router with a
MAC of 9444.52dc. was properly learned at the IDF switch but the
upstream agg switch/router wouldn't learn it. I even tried to static
the MAC into the CAM..router refused.
That's what
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:00 PM, John Curran jcur...@arin.net wrote:
Based on the ARIN's IRR authentication thread a couple of weeks ago, there
were suggestions placed into ARIN's ACSP process for changes to ARIN's IRR
system. ARIN has looked at the integration issues involved and has
All this out of band management talk is making me think it is an
opportunity for a supper low cost DSL offering. Maybe a good way to get
read of some capacity we have.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Andy Ashley [mailto:li...@nexus6.co.za]
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 3:42 PM
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Don Gould wrote:
Ok, that's enough for now. I hope this helps and let me know if you
need any more assistance.
In Sweden, Bredbandskollen.se (translates to Broadband check) rules
supreme. It uses two parallell TCP sessions to measure speed, and the
whole industry has
I am hoping for some recommendations from the group. We will shortly
be building out a new network for offering DSL/ access. We are going
to interface with the Covad network within:
111 8th Avenue,New York (5th Floor)
11 Great Oaks Blvd,San Francisco
427 S La Salle, Chicago
We are going to
On 1/29/11 9:30 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
All this out of band management talk is making me think it is an
opportunity for a supper low cost DSL offering. Maybe a good way to get
read of some capacity we have.
The key of course is that it not be coupled to the physical plant that
the other
37 matches
Mail list logo
