Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
While I hesitate to argue DNS with Mark, I feel this needs a response. On Aug 19, 2012, at 17:37 , Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message ddf607b5-415b-41e8-9222-eb549d3db...@semihuman.com, Chris Woodfield writes: What Patrick said. For large sites that offer services in multiple data

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Aug 20, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: But I do not think returning multiple A records for multiple datacenters is as useful as lowering the TTL. Some folks do this via various GSLB mechanisms which selectively respond with different records based on the assumed relative

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Aug 20, 2012, at 06:49 , Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote: On Aug 20, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: But I do not think returning multiple A records for multiple datacenters is as useful as lowering the TTL. Some folks do this via various GSLB mechanisms which

Re: Finding Name Servers (not NS records) of domain name

2012-08-20 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Matthew Palmer wrote: I religiously use http://squish.net/dnscheck/ the moment I suspect *any* sort of DNS hinkiness. Verbose, but *damn* if it doesn't hand me the answer practically every time. http://dnscheck.iis.se It's not as verbose and provides more direct

Re: DNS caches that support partitioning ?

2012-08-20 Thread Tony Finch
Raymond Dijkxhoorn raym...@prolocation.net wrote: When you use forwarding it doesnt cache the entry. ('forward only' option in bind for example). That's incorrect. Try configuring a forwarded zone and observe the TTLs you get in responses. The forward only option disables recursion but not

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net said: * How many applications are even aware multiple addresses were returned? Most anything that supports IPv6 should handle this correctly, since getaddrinfo() will return a list of addresses to try. * How do you guarantee sub-second

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Aug 20, 2012, at 08:25 , Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote: Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: On Aug 19, 2012, at 17:37 , Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: Which is why the DNS supports multiple address records. Clients don't have to wait a minutes to fallover to a second

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Aug 20, 2012, at 08:47 , Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: Once upon a time, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net said: * How many applications are even aware multiple addresses were returned? Most anything that supports IPv6 should handle this correctly, since getaddrinfo() will

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Aug 20, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: My question above is asking Mark how you guarantee the user/application selects the A record closest to them and only use the other A record when the closer one is unavailable. I understand - my point was that folks using a GSLB-type

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Tony Finch
Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: On Aug 20, 2012, at 08:47 , Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: Most anything that supports IPv6 should handle this correctly, since getaddrinfo() will return a list of addresses to try. Ah, the amazing new call which destroys any possibility

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Shumon Huque
On 8/20/12 10:11 AM, Tony Finch wrote: Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: On Aug 20, 2012, at 08:47 , Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: Most anything that supports IPv6 should handle this correctly, since getaddrinfo() will return a list of addresses to try. Ah, the amazing new

HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame

2012-08-20 Thread -Hammer-
A while back I brought up a discussion about IPv6 and I mentioned having some HSRP issues. Not end of the world, just adjusting to IPv6. Several folks went offline to tell me that I should dump legacy HSRP and go to VRRP. While I never did find anyone who could explain how HSRP is a sunset

Re: HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame

2012-08-20 Thread -Hammer-
And two seconds after I hit send I find an updated article http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp_fhrp/configuration/xe-3s/fhp-vrrp.html facepalm If you have more information I still welcome it. I'm going to go sit in the corner now... -Hammer- I was a normal American nerd

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 20/08/2012 14:18, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: On Aug 20, 2012, at 08:47 , Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: Most anything that supports IPv6 should handle this correctly, since getaddrinfo() will return a list of addresses to try. Ah, the amazing new call which destroys any possibility

Re: HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame

2012-08-20 Thread -Hammer-
Correction. Still looking for something IPv6 specific. -Hammer- I was a normal American nerd -Jack Herer On 8/20/2012 9:39 AM, -Hammer- wrote: And two seconds after I hit send I find an updated article

Re: HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame

2012-08-20 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 20/08/2012 15:41, -Hammer- wrote: Correction. Still looking for something IPv6 specific. Last time I looked, the support looked like this: XR: v4: HSRPv1, VRRP v6: VRRP IOS: v4: HSRPv1, HSRPv2, VRRP, GLBP v6: HSRPv2, GLBP You'll notice a certain lack of joined-up

Re: DNS caches that support partitioning ?

2012-08-20 Thread Aaron Hopkins
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: IMHO, if Google losses a datacenter and all users are stuck waiting for a long TTL to run out, that is Very Bad. In fact, I would call even 2.5 minutes (average of 5 min TTL) Very Bad. I'm impressed they are comfortable with a 300 second TTL.

Re: HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame

2012-08-20 Thread -Hammer-
Yeah I see the disconnect. I'm assuming that what I see is what I get. Which means I'm going to stick with HSRP. If our AS team gives me any good feedback that I can share I will do so. Thanks Nick. XE: v4: HSRPv1, HSRPv2, VRRPv6: HSRPv2 Reflections of a madman... Why is

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Tony Finch
Shumon Huque shu...@upenn.edu wrote: On 8/20/12 10:11 AM, Tony Finch wrote: The problem is RFC 3484 address selection; getaddrinfo is just the usual place this is implemented. I had believed that there was work in progress to fix this problem with the specs but it seems to have stalled.

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Tim Chown
On 20 Aug 2012, at 16:39, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote: Shumon Huque shu...@upenn.edu wrote: On 8/20/12 10:11 AM, Tony Finch wrote: The problem is RFC 3484 address selection; getaddrinfo is just the usual place this is implemented. I had believed that there was work in progress to fix

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:07 , Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote: On Aug 20, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: My question above is asking Mark how you guarantee the user/application selects the A record closest to them and only use the other A record when the closer one is

Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Eric Wieling
For a while we have had a customer with some lines which go down every time it rains. We put in the trouble ticket, a couple of days later Verizon says the issue is resolved...until the next time it rains. The customer sent us some pictures today of the pole outside their office. The

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread glen wiley
Our neighborhood lost phone service when the pedestal at the end of the road was annihilated by a flail mowera WEEK AGO. The repair - orange plastic bag over the entrails of the pedestal. Yay Verizon - I finally understand why I send them so much money - stylish orange bags! On Mon, Aug 20,

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Eric Wieling wrote: For a while we have had a customer with some lines which go down every time it rains. We put in the trouble ticket, a couple of days later Verizon says the issue is resolved...until the next time it rains. The customer sent us some pictures today of

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Jon Lewis
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Eric Wieling wrote: For a while we have had a customer with some lines which go down every time it rains. We put in the trouble ticket, a couple of days later Verizon says the issue is resolved...until the next time it rains. The customer sent us some pictures today of

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Harry Hoffman
What? That's totally legit. Look! There's even bubble wrap there for cushioning! ;-) On 08/20/2012 03:09 PM, Eric Wieling wrote: For a while we have had a customer with some lines which go down every time it rains. We put in the trouble ticket, a couple of days later Verizon says the issue

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Miles Fidelman
Justin M. Streiner wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Eric Wieling wrote: For a while we have had a customer with some lines which go down every time it rains. We put in the trouble ticket, a couple of days later Verizon says the issue is resolved...until the next time it rains. The customer

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Joel Esler
Can we all just agree that the whole pole needs to be restrung? That's horrible! On Aug 20, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Harry Hoffman hhoff...@ip-solutions.net wrote: What? That's totally legit. Look! There's even bubble wrap there for cushioning! ;-) On 08/20/2012 03:09 PM, Eric Wieling wrote: For

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Joel Esler wrote: Can we all just agree that the whole pole needs to be restrung? That's horrible! Agreed, but Verizon and whoever happens to be on that pole are pretty unlikely to do that unless pushed. The NY Public Service Commission might find the state of what's

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread David Scott
You misunderstand the engineering that went into this project. 1. The black garbage bag was the original install. It has served past the self life and has become outmoded. You can clearly see the wind whipped ends that are to give it a nice cosmetic appeal. The plastic is breaking

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Joe Greco
Can we all just agree that the whole pole needs to be restrung? Maybe it just needs a heavier garbage bag. That's horrible! We had a pedestal around here that was covered, I want to say for years, though it might have been just a year or two, with a work tent. If you have never seen one:

RE: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Otis L. Surratt, Jr.
+1 for agreeing needs to be restrung. This made me laugh! Nice humor for the day. But you know someone should call the utility company that owns the pole and report it. Also file a complaint with your ROW division and corporation commission. -Original Message- From: Joel Esler

RE: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Eric Wieling
Unfortunately, the lines are being resold by a CLEC. My understanding is the PUC/PSC doesn't take complaints from CLECs and, since the customer is customer of the CLEC, any complaints which are filed go against the CLEC, not Verizon. -Original Message- From: Justin M. Streiner

RE: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Mike Walter
Maybe you can hope for a wind storm to take down the pole or someone to crash into it, then they'll surely have to fix it. -Mike -Original Message- From: Eric Wieling [mailto:ewiel...@nyigc.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:57 PM To: Justin M. Streiner; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE:

Re: HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame

2012-08-20 Thread sthaug
Yeah I see the disconnect. I'm assuming that what I see is what I get. Which means I'm going to stick with HSRP. If our AS team gives me any good feedback that I can share I will do so. Thanks Nick. XE: v4: HSRPv1, HSRPv2, VRRPv6: HSRPv2 Not particularly relevant to the

Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies

2012-08-20 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
Given the recent VZ thread, I thought I'd show why my new house has crap Internet. The story: A piece of underground cable went bad. The techs didn't pull new underground cable. They decided it was better to do it arial (if you can call 2 feet arial). They took apart the two pedestals on

RE: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
Quality Union work! -Original Message- From: Miles Fidelman [mailto:mfidel...@meetinghouse.net] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:29 PM Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags Justin M. Streiner wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Eric Wieling wrote:

RE: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies

2012-08-20 Thread Otis L. Surratt, Jr.
I'm baffled. This is horrible! What about standards? -Original Message- From: Patrick W. Gilmore [mailto:patr...@ianai.net] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:12 PM To: NANOG list Subject: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies Given the recent VZ thread, I thought I'd show why my

Re: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies

2012-08-20 Thread Leo Bicknell
In a message written on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:12:22PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: The story: A piece of underground cable went bad. The techs didn't pull new underground cable. They decided it was better to do it arial (if you can call 2 feet arial). They took apart the two

Re: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies

2012-08-20 Thread Peter Kristolaitis
On 12-08-20 04:25 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote: In a message written on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:12:22PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: The story: A piece of underground cable went bad. The techs didn't pull new underground cable. They decided it was better to do it arial (if you can call 2 feet

Re: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies

2012-08-20 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Aug 20, 2012, at 16:25 , Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote: In a message written on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:12:22PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: The story: A piece of underground cable went bad. The techs didn't pull new underground cable. They decided it was better to do it

Re: HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame

2012-08-20 Thread Owen DeLong
VRRP is to HSRP what 802.1q is to ISL... I highly recommend using VRRP instead of HSRP because: 1. It is a more robust protocol 2. It is vendor agnostic 3. Being vendor agnostic it is more likely to have a continuing future. Does anyone still use ISL? Owen On Aug 20, 2012, at

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread John T. Yocum
On 8/20/2012 12:09 PM, Eric Wieling wrote: For a while we have had a customer with some lines which go down every time it rains. We put in the trouble ticket, a couple of days later Verizon says the issue is resolved...until the next time it rains. The customer sent us some pictures today

Re: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies

2012-08-20 Thread Ren Provo
Hi Patrick, Yikes. We can work together on getting this sorted. Will give you details directly. Cheers, -ren On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: Given the recent VZ thread, I thought I'd show why my new house has crap Internet. The story: A piece

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Aled Morris
On 20 August 2012 20:41, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote: We had a pedestal around here that was covered, I want to say for years, though it might have been just a year or two, with a work tent. If you have never seen one:

Comcast 1, Verizon 0 [was: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies]

2012-08-20 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
Comcast has already contacted me to fix this up. -- TTFN, patrick On Aug 20, 2012, at 16:12 , Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: Given the recent VZ thread, I thought I'd show why my new house has crap Internet. The story: A piece of underground cable went bad. The techs

Re: HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame

2012-08-20 Thread -Hammer-
It's a good argument Owen. Unfortunately it looks like VRRP is not an available feature on the ASR for IPv6 FHRP. I'm still trying to confirm it but it is definitely not configurable in my version of code and if it's just coming out in a new release there is no way I'm jumping in with both

Re: Comcast 1, Verizon 0 [was: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies]

2012-08-20 Thread Christoph Blecker
Always good to know that *somebody* is listening! Cheers, Christoph On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: Comcast has already contacted me to fix this up. -- TTFN, patrick On Aug 20, 2012, at 16:12 , Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:

Re: HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame

2012-08-20 Thread -Hammer-
That's good to know. Seriously. I can point that out to the Cisco guys... :) -Hammer- I was a normal American nerd -Jack Herer On 8/20/2012 3:10 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: Yeah I see the disconnect. I'm assuming that what I see is what I get. Which means I'm going to stick with HSRP. If

Re: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies

2012-08-20 Thread Joe Greco
The story: A piece of underground cable went bad. The techs didn't pull = new underground cable. They decided it was better to do it arial (if = you can call 2 feet arial). They took apart the two pedestals on = either side of the break and ran a new strand of RG6 (yes, the same = stuff

RE: Comcast 1, Verizon 0 [was: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies]

2012-08-20 Thread Beeman, Davis
Whatever you do, no one let on that people can get issues like this fixed by posting to NANOG... this list will be flooded in a matter of hours... Davis Beeman -Original Message- From: Christoph Blecker [mailto:cblec...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 14:27 To: Patrick W.

Re: HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame

2012-08-20 Thread Randy
--- On Mon, 8/20/12, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com Subject: Re: HSRP vs VRRP for IPv6 on IOS-XE - rekindling an old flame To: sth...@nethelp.no Cc: nanog@nanog.org Date: Monday, August 20, 2012, 1:31 PM VRRP is to HSRP what 802.1q is to ISL... I

Re: Comcast 1, Verizon 0 [was: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies]

2012-08-20 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
Perhaps this time they can afford to run you some real, honest-to-god Helvetica cable rather than Arial cable as you noted below. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arial#Criticism You're definitely a bigger geek than I am though for griping about the font they used for the writing on your drop

Re: Comcast 1, Verizon 0 [was: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies]

2012-08-20 Thread Robert M. Enger
Lucky that any form of publicity works! This lady http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/11/AR2005081102101.html got her OSP cable issue printed in the Washington Post. And, as I recall the follow-up article, even that did not result in a prompt repair of her

Re: Verizon's New Repair Method: Plastic Garbage Bags

2012-08-20 Thread Wayne E Bouchard
To be fair, this sort of thing does happen from time to time in perfectly legitimate situations. In some cases, parts need to be acquired or maintenance schedules need to be arranged in order to do a propper repair. So just because you see these, don't immediately think it is bad techs rather than

Re: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies

2012-08-20 Thread Randy Bush
on bainbridge, i replaced centurystink dsl (756k/256k for $65/mo) with comcast (20m/4m for $50/mo). the installer was a knarly old dog, and damned competent. he cleaned up old cable on the pole and where it went underground to the house. he cleaned up the box and replaced in-house junctions.

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 0d919d57-bda0-4fda-873d-3dc0cd574...@ianai.net, Patrick W. Gilmore writes: On Aug 20, 2012, at 06:49 , Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net = wrote: On Aug 20, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: =20 But I do not think returning multiple A records for multiple =

Re: Return two locations or low TTL [was: DNS caches that support partitioning ?]

2012-08-20 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 20120820124734.ga14...@hiwaay.net, Chris Adams writes: Once upon a time, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net said: * How many applications are even aware multiple addresses were returned? Most anything that supports IPv6 should handle this correctly, since getaddrinfo() will

Re: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies

2012-08-20 Thread Greg Shepherd
Oh to have choices... I'm still hanging on the end of a dedicated T1 and paying through the nose. I'm nearly convinced that the monthly income from my circuit has prevented Qwest, and now Century Link from building out DSL. Greg On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:

[NANOG-announce] Call for Board Member Nominations for 2012 Elections - August 20 to October 1, 2012

2012-08-20 Thread Sylvie LaPerriere
*Dear NANOGers, Hope you are enjoying this great Summer. Following our August 4 posting ‘‘Announcing the October 2012 NANOG Elections’ which provided a preview into our election process, we are now pleased to open the Call for Board Member Nominations for the three vacant positions on the Board