Just a quick note. I do have multicast enabled on the server gre1
interface. A tshark capture shows the igmp group queries from the router
and the igmp join reply from the server.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Brian Christopher Raaen
mailing-li...@brianraaen.com wrote:
I am trying to set
John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
*.4.4.3.0.5.a.0.0.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. PTR a.node.on.vlan344.namn.se.
...will work just fine, for instance.
Since there is no record for a.node.on.vlan344.namn.se., this
won't work fine in any rDNS check I'm aware of.
I believe it's relatively
Can one of you guys contact me of list. (Sorry for the noise
list... Best place for me to definitively the right person)
--
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
J. Oquendo
SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP, CPT, RWSP, GREM
Where ignorance is our master, there is no
Not sure how widespread their leakage may be, but Dreamhost just
hijacked one of my prefixes...
Possible Prefix Hijack (Code: 10)
Your prefix:
Jeff,
We are not announcing the prefix in question nor do we peer with AS42861.
--
Best Regards,
Kenneth McRae
*Director, Network Operations*
kenneth.mc...@dreamhost.com
Ph: 818-447-2589
www.dreamhost.com
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
Not sure how
Robtex would beg to differ... you show peered with AS42861, perhaps
someone (else) is looping their advertisements?
_R_egistered
_O_ther side
_B_GP visible Peer
OB AS174 COGENT /PSI
B AS4323 TWTC Autonomous system for tw telecom .
B AS4826 VOCUS-BACKBONE-AS Vocus Connect
Sounds like someone in Russia is having some fun with as-path prepending
and prefix hijacking.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Kenneth McRae wrote:
Jeff,
We are not announcing the prefix in question nor do we peer with AS42861.
--
Best Regards,
Kenneth McRae
*Director, Network Operations*
Just checked all BGP speakers again and I show no peering with AS42861.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
Robtex would beg to differ... you show peered with AS42861, perhaps
someone (else) is looping their advertisements?
*R*egistered
*O*ther side
*B*GP
That would be my guess. We have had some issues with this in the past with
operators from China and Russia.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org wrote:
Sounds like someone in Russia is having some fun with as-path prepending
and prefix hijacking.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013,
Here at/as AS5580 I no longer see it announced as a /20, only your own /18:
#sh ip bgp routes 150.182.192.0 255.255.192.0 longer-prefixes
Number of BGP Routes matching display condition : 4
Searching for matching routes, use ^C to quit...
Status A:AGGREGATE B:BEST b:NOT-INSTALLED-BEST
Hi,
Here's a quick summary of what we saw at BGPMon.net.
At 2013-01-11 14:14:13 we saw announcements (seemingly) originated by
26347, for prefixes normally announced by other ASn's (origin change /
hijack).
This seems to have affected 112 prefixes for 110 ASn's [1], including
Rogers, Tata,
Also getting POTS line in your pop sometimes get tricky. 2G/3G modems
with cheap plans cost like 10$/month (dunno about US though), thats
almost same as POTS line.
On 10/01/13 20:18, William Herrin wrote:
Dial up with PPP and then cross the ethernet? Drop off a cellular
modem with IP service
Jeff:
150.182.208.0/20 is not visible from AS702 in Germany.
150.182.192.0/18 path is 702 701 209 26827 14209
Tony
On 11 January 2013 15:23, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
Not sure how widespread their leakage may be, but Dreamhost just
hijacked one of my prefixes...
Thanks for that info Andree. The only valid peer I see on the list would
be HE. We do not peer with any of the others listed.
Kenneth
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andree Toonk andree+na...@toonk.nl wrote:
Hi,
Here's a quick summary of what we saw at BGPMon.net.
At 2013-01-11 14:14:13
communication prohibited by filter is just an ICMP response code,
sadly Windows does not under it..
Type 3 (Destination unreachable)
Code 13 (Communication Administratively Prohibited - generated if a
router cannot forward a packet due to administrative filtering;)
ICMP echo request for this
- Original Message -
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Randy Whitney
randy.whit...@verizon.com wrote:
Nothing beats POTS in a broad power outage scenario. Numerous power
outages
have taken down mobile service completely while the POTS lines
Hi Kenneth,
.-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at 2013-01-11 8:54 AM
Kenneth McRae wrote:
Thanks for that info Andree. The only valid peer I see on the list
would be HE. We do not peer with any of the others listed.
Could it be these ASns receive your routes via an IX route-server?
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
Hi all,
Atrato / 5580 here.
We don't have direct peering with AS26347, although we learn the AS26347
prefixes through the 206.223.143.253 (AS 19996) routeserver in LAX.
So in a sense we are peering :-)
Kind regards,
Job
On Jan 11, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Andree Toonk andree+na...@toonk.nl
Yes, now that is possible (just no direct peering). So that takes me back
to my original statement about not announcing the 150.182.208.0/20 prefix
to begin with.
Kenneth
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Andree Toonk andree+na...@toonk.nlwrote:
Hi Kenneth,
.-- My secret spy satellite
.-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at 2013-01-11 10:44 AM
Kenneth McRae wrote:
Yes, now that is possible (just no direct peering). So that takes me
back to my original statement about not announcing the 150.182.208.0/20
http://150.182.208.0/20 prefix to begin with.
Here's some more
--- andree+na...@toonk.nl wrote:
From: Andree Toonk andree+na...@toonk.nl
Here's some more data showing an announcement for
150.182.208.0/20 originated by 26347
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Oh, I dunno, Bill. Sure there are lots more RSUs than there used to be,
but at least it's not all *that* hard to tell if you're connected to one.
Much easier than, say, finding out if both sides of your loop have been
- Original Message -
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Oh, I dunno, Bill. Sure there are lots more RSUs than there used to be,
but at least it's not all *that* hard to tell if you're connected to one.
Much
This report has been generated at Fri Jan 11 21:13:09 2013 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 03-Jan-13 -to- 10-Jan-13 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS982975137 4.5% 45.2 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet
Backbone
2 - AS7552
TCP 80 is working fine now; wasn't last night, though. In the past, my
recollection is that ICMP ping to actual Microsoft IP space (not simply Akamai)
would have simply been blackholed/dropped with no response, so seeing packet
filtered come back + no response on any TCP ports made it seem
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
You are suggesting that it is *at all* difficult for a technically competent
end-user to determine whether a given new POTS line will go to a CO or to an
RSU?
Well, let me treat this as an opportunity to learn. How does one
On 1/11/13 02:44 , Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Also getting POTS line in your pop sometimes get tricky. 2G/3G modems
with cheap plans cost like 10$/month (dunno about US though), thats
almost same as POTS line.
They don't generally have public IPs (that can be arranged). verizon 4G
cards have ipv6
I work for a rural Telecom in northwest US.
Typically when I hear statements like that, it's that the tech built (strung
aerially, trenched through ground, or through buried conduit) from a pedestal
or other copper splice point to the customer premise.
I would only expect this to go to the
The issue wasn't diversity, it was is my POTS on Central Battery; sorry for
the comparative red herring.
- jra
Walter Keen walter.k...@rainierconnect.net wrote:
I work for a rural Telecom in northwest US.
Typically when I hear statements like that, it's that the tech built
(strung aerially,
In the US, any incumbent phone carrier (ILEC), is required to have POTS lines
on a power infrastructure capable of sustaining at least an 8 hour interruption
in commercial power, whether it's in a remote or central office. Most companies
use batteries at remotes (and put portable generators out
A POTS circuit necessarily terminates on a piece of gear with a specific CLLI,
generally discernable at order time.
What that gear will be, and if it's in a CO with a real battery plant is also
known in advance.
And, to tie it back on topic, the odds of a core router being in a place where
Sure. I assume it on real wire centers, I don't on RSUs or carrier. Luckily
it's easy to tell which is which, in most cases.
Walter Keen walter.k...@rainierconnect.net wrote:
In the US, any incumbent phone carrier (ILEC), is required to have POTS
lines on a power infrastructure capable of
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
The issue wasn't diversity, it was is my POTS on Central Battery; sorry
for the comparative red herring.
The issue was: is my POTS going to survive an extended regional power
outage that my cellular/DSL/cable modem doesn't,
In the old days of DOCSIS, I was able, during failures of DHCP (for
various reasons) to self assign a nearby IP address in the same subnet
and this worked fine as long as that IP wasn't being used by someone
else at the time.
While this was done to cope with some failures or bad policy at the
On 13-01-11 19:59, Karl Brumund wrote:
JF,
Long ago been fixed. Look at Cisco CMTS config documentation, particularly
cable-source-verify.
Many thanks. In particular, you need cable-source-verify dhcp to
prevent self assigned IPs that are unused by neighbours.
Is this something that is now
Colleagues:
I write to share a few NANOG
57http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/index.html,
February 4-5, 2013, meeting updates with you.
The NANOG Program Committee, once again, delivered a NANOG program full of
great content. The NANOG 57
On 12.01.2013 3:44, Joel jaeggli wrote:
On 1/11/13 02:44 , Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Also getting POTS line in your pop sometimes get tricky. 2G/3G modems
with cheap plans cost like 10$/month (dunno about US though), thats
almost same as POTS line.
They don't generally have public IPs (that can
39 matches
Mail list logo
