On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:00:35 -0400, "Mike." said:
> Oddly, prehaps, those punchcards on the stagecoaches probably will
> outlast any magnetic media we have at our disposal today
Here's a picture of an estimated 4.3G of data on punch cards:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IBM_card_storage.N
On 4/2/13 2:24 PM, Carlos Alcantar wrote:
> You might want to consider putting up a speedtest server internal to your
> network. I know there is a fee but well worth it I believe. You will
> still need to take the results with a grain a salt but you will have the
> best results as well.
>
The s
thanks all this is a good start.
regards,
-Beavis
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Yang Yu wrote:
> I am using Plixer Scrutinizer Flow Analyzer with RouterOS. It does
> have cool looking web panel. But some interfaces (instance 0, instance
> 1 etc.) reported doesn't exactly match up with interfa
I am using Plixer Scrutinizer Flow Analyzer with RouterOS. It does
have cool looking web panel. But some interfaces (instance 0, instance
1 etc.) reported doesn't exactly match up with interfaces in RouterOS.
I haven't figured out what exactly those are.
Yang
- Original Message -
> From: "Steven Bellovin"
> DLT? I first heard it as a station wagon full of (9-track, 1600 bpi,
> that having been the state of the art) mag tapes on the Taconic Parkway,
> circa 1970. I suspect, though, that Herman Hollerith expressed the idea
> about a stage coach
Things get upgraded over time.
Owen
On Apr 2, 2013, at 15:44 , Steven Bellovin wrote:
> DLT? I first heard it as a station wagon full of (9-track, 1600 bpi,
> that having been the state of the art) mag tapes on the Taconic Parkway,
> circa 1970. I suspect, though, that Herman Hollerith expres
The speedtest.net site has a free mini edition
(http://www.speedtest.net/mini.php) you can download and extract to
some http available path (asp, php, jsp all supported). It's a flash
applet, easy to wrap into your own page. Transfers one of ten large
JPG files of random noise (largest is 31MB). II
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 18:41:17 -0400
Joe Abley wrote:
> 26/1000 is more than zero but still quite small. Subsequent samples
> with bigger sizes give 332/10, 3017/100.
>
> No science here, but 2% - 3% is what it looks like, which is big
> enough to be a noticeable support cost for a medium-s
Is anyone aware of a reputable supplier of 80 km BiDi XFPs? My regular
supplier of generics doesn't have an option for us, but I would really like
to avoid leasing additional fibers.
Frank
On 4/2/2013 at 6:44 PM Steven Bellovin wrote:
|DLT? I first heard it as a station wagon full of (9-track, 1600 bpi,
|that having been the state of the art) mag tapes on the Taconic
Parkway,
|circa 1970. I suspect, though, that Herman Hollerith expressed the
idea
|about a stage coach full of pun
DLT? I first heard it as a station wagon full of (9-track, 1600 bpi,
that having been the state of the art) mag tapes on the Taconic Parkway,
circa 1970. I suspect, though, that Herman Hollerith expressed the idea
about a stage coach full of punchcards, back in the 1880s.
On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:
On 2013-04-02, at 18:18, John Kristoff wrote:
> I would expect from stubs this will be close enough to zero to be
> effectively zero. At least I would hope so.
This (below) is one of four resolvers, together providing service for two
recursive DNS servers used by residential DSL and cable int
On 4/2/2013 at 5:19 PM Jay Ashworth wrote:
|- Original Message -
|> From: "Owen DeLong"
|
|> "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 full of DLT cartridges."
|
|Aww you remembered.
|
| http://baylink.pitas.com/20110516.html#747F
=
Staying more in the realm of what
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 19:40:03 +0100
Tony Finch wrote:
> You should be able to get a reasonable sample of IPv6 resolvers from
> the query logs of a popular authoritative server.
When I tried this in the past for IPv4, I missed the majority of
potential open resolvers / open forwarders on the net co
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:33:36 +0200 (CEST)
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> > You're sending queries, not replies. That's why DPI is needed to
> > do the blocking, rather than just by port.
>
> What queries are sourced from port 53 nowadays?
I would expect from stubs this will be close enough to zero
You might want to consider putting up a speedtest server internal to your
network. I know there is a fee but well worth it I believe. You will
I would consider NDT as well: www.internet2.edu/performance/ndt
Last I checked, about 3 years ago,
Hello All,
I would like to ask if there are any folks out there that use any
specific tool (OpenSource/Closed) that is used for mikrotik routers. I
need packet visibility (ala netflow) or anything similar to that
effect.
any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
cheers,
-Beavis
--
() ascii r
You might want to consider putting up a speedtest server internal to your
network. I know there is a fee but well worth it I believe. You will
still need to take the results with a grain a salt but you will have the
best results as well.
Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
132
- Original Message -
> From: "TJ"
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 full of DLT cartridges."
>
> XKCD is all over this: http://what-if.xkcd.com/31/
> :)
I have always wondered what kind of station wagon Andy had in m
- Original Message -
> From: "Owen DeLong"
> "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 full of DLT cartridges."
Aww you remembered.
http://baylink.pitas.com/20110516.html#747F
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Des
Thanks for the many helpful suggestions I received offline.
One thing that I was able to deduce was that one of the radios along the
path had Ethernet auto negotiate turned on. I turned it off and the TCP
speeds went way up. It seems that UDP was not affected by this setting
while TCP was.
Than
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 full of DLT cartridges."
>
> Owen
XKCD is all over this: http://what-if.xkcd.com/31/
:)
/TJ
"Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 full of DLT cartridges."
Owen
On Apr 2, 2013, at 11:31 , "Scott Berkman" wrote:
> Hey careful, Pigeons have won this fight before:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8248056.stm
>
> -Original Message-
> From: George Herbert [mailto:george.herb..
Hey careful, Pigeons have won this fight before:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8248056.stm
-Original Message-
From: George Herbert [mailto:george.herb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 10:37 PM
To: Jeff Kell
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: RFC 1149
Packets, shmackets. I'm just upset that
Owen,
Was this actually posted anywhere. I'm pretty sure it's a joke, but I would
like to send it to a vendor who keeps asking when we will need IPv6 support :)
Thanks.
Brian Johnson
Converged Network Engineer
CCNP, CCNP Security & MEF-CECP Certified
> -Original Message-
> From: Owen D
- Original Message -
> From: "Jimmy Hess"
> On 4/1/13, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> >> It would just be way too much luck and convenience for that to
> >> happen
> >> by coincidence.
> >
> > Once in a while, you win.
>
> The trouble with winning by coincidence or winning as a side-effect...
>
On Apr 1, 2013, at 10:37 PM, George Herbert wrote:
> Packets, shmackets. I'm just upset that my BGP over Semaphore Towers
> routing protocol extension hasn't been experimentally validated yet.
>
> Whoever you are who keeps flying pigeons between my test towers, you can't
> deliver packets with
> From: Dobbins, Roland [mailto:rdobb...@arbor.net]
> On Apr 2, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Such lines are tantamount to extortion especially if the ISP supplies
> commercial grade lines.
> Patrick's talking about consumer broadband access. Such AUP stipulations
> are quite comm
Subject: Re: Open Resolver Problems Date: Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:25:53AM +0200
Quoting Mikael Abrahamsson (swm...@swm.pp.se):
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Måns Nilsson wrote:
>
> >What percentage of the SOHO NAT boxes actually are full-service
> >resolvers? I was under the impression that most were mer
On 4/1/13, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>> It would just be way too much luck and convenience for that to happen
>> by coincidence.
>
> Once in a while, you win.
The trouble with winning by coincidence or winning as a side-effect...
Do you keep winning?
What happens with IPv6 CPE devices, when there is
30 matches
Mail list logo
