Asr1002-f may have problem as it limited to 512k iirc
On 08 мая 2014 г., at 2:45, Shawn L sha...@up.net wrote:
Do the ASR1k routers have this issue as well? I searched around but
couldn't find any information.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Irwin, Kevin
* Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com [2014-05-08 03:19]:
Except for that whole mac address thing, that crashes networks...
this lie doesn't get any more true by repeating them over and over.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, AG Hamburg HRB 128289,
* Robert Drake rdr...@direcpath.com [2014-05-08 06:02]:
On 5/7/2014 9:47 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
Now, the bar for an informational RFC is pretty low. Especially for people
who have written them before. Those people seem to think one is needed in
this case so they might want to get started
* Owen DeLong o...@delong.com [2014-05-08 07:16]:
If they take their ball and go home, that's fine. The problem is that they
seem to occasionally have their ball brought (by systems administrators) to
networks where the network engineers are already running VRRP on routers (for
example) and
* Owen DeLong o...@delong.com [2014-05-08 04:36]:
I don’t believe for one second that the IESG refused to deal with ‘em.
you're free to believe whatever you want and ignore facts.
I do believe the IESG did not hand them everything they wanted on a
silver platter in contravention of the
* Gary Buhrmaster gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com [2014-05-08 00:43]:
But (presuming no adjustments) the patent is now expired,
and the OpenBSD team could now release CARPv2 (or
whatever they decide to call it) which would implement the
standard, should they wish to work and play well with the
If OBSD can't afford MAC addresses but does not object to them in principle, I
can give forever IRU for 256 MAC addresses to OBSD for 0USD one-time fee.
--
++ytti
* Eygene Ryabinkin r...@grid.kiae.ru [2014-05-08 11:12]:
Henning,
Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:35:00AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com [2014-05-08 03:19]:
Except for that whole mac address thing, that crashes networks...
this lie doesn't get any more true by
* Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi [2014-05-08 12:14]:
If OBSD can't afford MAC addresses but does not object to them in principle, I
can give forever IRU for 256 MAC addresses to OBSD for 0USD one-time fee.
congratulations, that is far ahead of just whining.
when/if we change the mac addrs, the new
On 08/05/2014 11:25, Henning Brauer wrote:
you shouldn't see issues but log spam.
maybe you misunderstand the problem. If you have vrrp and carp on the same
vlan, using the same vrrp group ID as VHID, then each virtual IP will arp
for the same mac address on that vlan.
This messes up the
* Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org [2014-05-08 13:03]:
On 08/05/2014 11:25, Henning Brauer wrote:
you shouldn't see issues but log spam.
maybe you misunderstand the problem. If you have vrrp and carp on the same
vlan, using the same vrrp group ID as VHID, then each virtual IP will arp
for the
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:31:23PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi [2014-05-08 12:14]:
If OBSD can't afford MAC addresses but does not object to them in
principle, I
can give forever IRU for 256 MAC addresses to OBSD for 0USD one-time fee.
when/if we change the mac
On 08/05/2014 12:09, Henning Brauer wrote:
my switches seem to deal with that, wether they have special handling
for that mac addr range or not i dunno.
I've seen this problem cause downtime on production networks.
fyi, it will probably work fine on hubs, but not on switches.
again, stress
And that's why C. should use a more appropriate example to defend
his position.
By this thread, I suspect, that whoever dealt with those different
organization for OpenBSD CARP, lacked the skills to accomplish the
task and got shut down for being an ass.
PS:
Being of the
On 8/05/2014, at 11:09 pm, Henning Brauer hb-na...@bsws.de wrote:
* Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org [2014-05-08 13:03]:
On 08/05/2014 11:25, Henning Brauer wrote:
you shouldn't see issues but log spam.
maybe you misunderstand the problem. If you have vrrp and carp on the same
vlan, using
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:48:26AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
awaiting your diff.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=139955603603070w=2
Kind regards,
Job
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 07:28:46 PM Peter Rubenstein
wrote:
Operationally speaking, AS1 should not be leaking routes
from one upstream to the other. Bad route policy.
ideally it'd be nice to be valley-free... so to
It depends, you can put in a table-map to stop the routes from being
installed into the FIB/RIB on an ASR-1K with 2GB of RAM you can then have
up to 2 million IPv4 routes. Alternatively, if you are not using your
ASR-1k to forward traffic, I think you could also just turn off CEF and
have the same
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 04:41:21 PM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
if only there were some technology that could be used to
thwart such things.
It's gotten to a point where a repeat offender has me wound
up enough to prepend his AS into some of my paths.
I wish there was a simpler way to turn
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 04:45:09 PM Irwin, Kevin wrote:
It depends, you can put in a table-map to stop the routes
from being installed into the FIB/RIB on an ASR-1K with
2GB of RAM you can then have up to 2 million IPv4
routes.
Helpful only if you don't want to forward traffic through
the
Hello,
as we are running out of ipv4 addresses we started to think of dual stack
deployment in our network and that means we will soon need to have some NAT
in place (NAT44).However I am curios to find how do you manage NAT logs?
Considering the fact that we will need to use overload for pools I
I know most people have problems with 2 bgp feeds and 4GB RAM on
ASR1002-F (as it max installable memory). So I doubt about 2M routes
with 2GB RAM.
On 08.05.2014 18:45, Irwin, Kevin wrote:
on an ASR-1K with 2GB of RAM you can then have
up to 2 million IPv4 routes
In the past, when we had a Cisco 7200 doing NATing, we had a script someone
wrote that would telnet into the router and do a sh ip nat trans. The file
would be saved out and we could parse through it at a later time, we had the
script run even 10 minutes or so I believe. If that is what you
We’ve had two of the ER3s in production. One of which has had no problems to
date, the other one had several issues just staying online. It would randomly
drop out from time to time (no ICMP, didn't pass traffic; basically a flashing
brick). These were both single homed stub networks on older
On May 8, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Nolan Rollo nro...@kw-corp.com wrote:
TL;DR: Ubiquiti has good, inexpensive equipment but it might not always be
ready for production networks or very patient customers. For what you’re
looking for though no one else can match that price point.
+1
If you have
I would love to see the EdgeRouter Lite, or something similar with 2 SFP ports
and 2 1000bT ports (Which would fit with the OP's question). Q-in-Q tunneling
and basic routing required, but not much else for me. Bonus points points for
something like that with redundant power supplies for $1k
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 04:41:21 PM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
if only there were some technology that could be used to
thwart such things.
It's gotten to a point where a repeat offender has me wound
up enough to
I still get email updates on the thread I created in mid 2013. In my experience
their forum is a good excuse for not EVER answering the phone. And when I say
ever.. I mean.. They don't even take sales calls.
(the issue is still there.. By the way.)
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
With all the talk lately about the growth in routes, I got to thinking
about upgrading the memory in a couple of my routers.
Does anyone have experience using third-party guaranteed compatible
memory.
With Cisco's discount it looks like I can upgrade for $5k vs $700 with
third party memory. I'm
http://blog.level3.com/global-connectivity/observations-internet-middleman/
See also...
Level 3 accuses five unnamed US ISPs of abusing their market power in peering
http://gigaom.com/2014/05/05/level-3-accuses-five-unnamed-us-isps-of-abusing-their-market-power-in-peering/
...
I’d love to see
Observations of an Internet Middleman (Level3)
http://blog.level3.com/global-connectivity/observations-internet-middleman/
See also...
Level 3 accuses five unnamed US ISPs of abusing their market power in peering
..for inadvertent double-post. mea culpa.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Henning Brauer hb-na...@bsws.de wrote:
* Owen DeLong o...@delong.com [2014-05-08 04:36]:
I don’t believe for one second that the IESG refused to deal with ‘em.
you're free to believe whatever you want and ignore facts.
I do believe the IESG did not hand
* Bill Fenner fen...@gmail.com [2014-05-08 20:41]:
I was the IESG member responsible for the VRRP working group when the
OpenBSD developer (I'm sorry, Henning, I forget if it was you or someone
else)
wasn't me, as stated repeatedly I wasn't the one talking to the
standard bodies.
came to a
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 05:29:08 PM Nikolay Shopik wrote:
I know most people have problems with 2 bgp feeds and 4GB
RAM on ASR1002-F (as it max installable memory). So I
doubt about 2M routes with 2GB RAM.
I've never ran the ASR1002-F, but I know some other ASR1000
platforms consume half
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 06:34:14 PM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
:( that's bad news... config hackery is brittle.
(but fun)
Don't I know :-)... *sigh*
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:39:13PM +, Drew Weaver wrote:
I am wondering if maybe we should make some kind of concerted effort to
remind folks about the IPv4 routing table inching closer and closer to the
512K route mark.
Closer to? Internap announces 507K prefixes to me today.
On 08/05/14 17:46, Shawn L wrote:
Does anyone have experience using third-party guaranteed compatible
memory.
With Cisco's discount it looks like I can upgrade for $5k vs $700 with
third party memory. I'm just wondering if others have used it, and how it's
performed, or if it isn't worth the
I could never get an definitive answer out of TAC or my account team, but I
believe the ASR1002 w/ESP5 is also affected.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote:
Asr1002-f may have problem as it limited to 512k iirc
On 08 мая 2014 г., at 2:45, Shawn L
On 05/08/2014 01:46 PM, Shawn L wrote:
With all the talk lately about the growth in routes, I got to thinking
about upgrading the memory in a couple of my routers.
Does anyone have experience using third-party guaranteed compatible
memory.
With Cisco's discount it looks like I can upgrade for
A few years back, we had to do memory upgrades on our ASAs in order to move to
8.3 code. All was done with 3rd party memory kits. There have been no
performance issues we've noticed with them. The one issue we had was that one
of the memory sticks in the kit was bad. The vendor immediately sent
On 05/06/2014 05:39 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
I am wondering if maybe we should make some kind of concerted effort to remind
folks about the IPv4 routing table inching closer and closer to the 512K route
mark.
Thanks for this e-mail with clear subject ;)
Did anyone yet calculated roughly when
Running 6500's and 7200's with 3rd party memory... No issues.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Gary Dunaway gary.duna...@teamhgs.com wrote:
A few years back, we had to do memory upgrades on our ASAs in order to move
to 8.3 code. All was done with 3rd party memory kits. There have been no
This is what your looking for :
http://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-PC2700U-512MB-DDR-CL2-5-333Mhz-ECC-Memory-38L52
31-/331191705115?pt=US_Memory_RAM_hash=item4d1c905e1b
512MB DDR CL2.5 Unbuffered/Unregistered CL2.5 - buy 10 and have a huge
stack of spares :)
--
Geraint Jones
Director of Systems
I think we have told what happened in enough detail in the 3.5
^your version of
commentary already posted to this thread.
randy, yet another of the hordes of vrrp users
I used some old laptop simms from ebay in my 2801.. Worked like a charm :)
On 5/8/14, 10:08 PM, Geraint Jones gera...@koding.com wrote:
This is what your looking for :
http://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-PC2700U-512MB-DDR-CL2-5-333Mhz-ECC-Memory-38L5
2
46 matches
Mail list logo
