Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread James Downs
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:52:01PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote: > Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any > sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even > vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) would have a >

Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread Brandon Butterworth
On Mon Mar 13, 2017 at 04:52:01PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote: > Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of > any sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of > content (even vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with > vendor consent) would have a

Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Mar 13, 2017, at 6:06 PM, Steve Feldman wrote: > On Mar 13, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >> Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any >> sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content

Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread Bob Evans
I have referred to online sessions from the past several times. NANOG is great at preserving information, compared to other conferences. In addition, if you attend a conference, say you have to missed a session due to business distractions, you can usually watch it that evening in your room. If

Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread Mike Hammett
Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) would have a catastrophic effect on conference attendance. NANOG doesn't seem to

Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread Steve Feldman
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any > sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even > vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) would