>>> Owen DeLong wrote :
>>> How would you have made it possible for a host that only understands 32-bit
>>> addresses to exchange traffic with a host that only has a 128-bit address?
>> Michel Py wrote :
>> With some kind of NAT mechanism, naturally.
>> Which is not possible with the current
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 04:36:50PM -0400, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>
> On October 4, 2019 at 15:26 o...@delong.com (Owen DeLong) wrote:
> >
> > OK… Let’s talk about how?
> >
> > How would you have made it possible for a host that only understands
> 32-bit addresses to exchange traffic with
On October 4, 2019 at 15:26 o...@delong.com (Owen DeLong) wrote:
>
> OK… Let’s talk about how?
>
> How would you have made it possible for a host that only understands 32-bit
> addresses to exchange traffic with a host that only has a 128-bit address?
A bit in the header or similar
Looking for someone on the abuse team at Tucows. Major scam in progress via
a domain registered through them.
-James
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Satchell"
> On 10/3/19 10:13 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
>> There is one thing in 1122/1123 and 1812 that is not in those kinds
>> of documents that I miss; that is essentially "why". Going through
>> 1122/1123 and 1812, you'll ind several sections that
5 matches
Mail list logo
