Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service

2023-11-04 Thread William Herrin
On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 8:54 AM wrote: > Yeah. I wonder why this cannot be reversed really? > First domain registration should cost more.. 50 USD maybe? Dunno. > And then, when you want to extend the domain, price should be > around 5 times lower? Maybe go the other way: you have to pay the same

Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service

2023-11-04 Thread borg
Yeah. I wonder why this cannot be reversed really? First domain registration should cost more.. 50 USD maybe? Dunno. And then, when you want to extend the domain, price should be around 5 times lower? Those who want to use it for legal activity will chew that little CAPEX. -- Original

Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service

2023-11-04 Thread John McCormac
On 04/11/2023 15:54, b...@uu3.net wrote: Yeah. I wonder why this cannot be reversed really? First domain registration should cost more.. 50 USD maybe? Dunno. And then, when you want to extend the domain, price should be around 5 times lower? Most of the new gTLDs that are using this heavy

Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service

2023-11-04 Thread Eric Harrison
K-12 education is typically in *.us -Eric On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 1:32 PM goemon--- via NANOG wrote: > > https://krebsonsecurity.com/2023/10/us-harbors-prolific-malicious-link-shortening-service/ > > "The NTIA recently published a proposal that would allow registrars to > redact all registrant