On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:27 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
On 23/03/2010, at 3:43 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
With the smaller routing table afforded by IPv6, this will be less
expensive. As a result, I suspect there will be more IPv6 small multihomers.
That's generally a good thing.
Puzzled: How
Conclusion : if you can't reply to these fundamental questions, hire a
CISO and build a CSIRT.
sigh I *so* hate making an argument from authority (other than I think smb
published a paper on that already), but in your case I'll make an exception.
Go read
Hi
I don't see on google a list of MPLS Provider at New York City.
Anyone know a small mpls provider in this city ?
Bye
Stephane
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:27 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
On 23/03/2010, at 3:43 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
With the smaller routing table afforded by IPv6, this will be less
expensive. As a result, I suspect there will be more IPv6 small
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:13:48 BST, Guillaume FORTAINE said:
I have read with interest this document.
(lots of irrelevant commentary elided - the vast majority of which merely
confirms the point that a lot of people have been doing further research on
issues that we identified a decade and more
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:17 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:27 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
On 23/03/2010, at 3:43 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
With the smaller routing table afforded by IPv6, this will be
On 23/03/2010 12:59, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
And now, you're still acting like you've got new unique insights and going out
of your way to irritate the very same more experienced people that you
probably
should be trying to learn from, when you haven't bothered to find out that
you're
Hello,
Does anyone have any hands on experience with Cisco's Unified Computing System?
Knowing some of the issues it purports to address the solution seems
compelling but the devil is in the details. I generally lean towards the best
of breed approach and am wary of any solution that claims
inetnum: 59.52.0.0 - 59.55.255.255
netname: CHINANET-JX
descr:CHINANET Jiangxi province network
descr:China Telecom
Anyone from China Telecom , can you please contact me off-list?
Thanks
Mehmet
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
I think that the additive nature of the IPv6/IPv4 routing tables will be the
driving factor for deprecation of IPv4 pretty quickly once IPv6 starts to
reach critical mass. The problem is that we are so early on the IPv6
On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
I think that the additive nature of the IPv6/IPv4 routing tables will be the
driving factor for deprecation of IPv4 pretty quickly once IPv6 starts to
reach
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
[ (Non-cross)posted to NANOG, PPML, RIPE IPv6 wg, Dutch IPv6 TF. Web version
for the monospace font impaired and with some links:
http://www.bgpexpert.com/addrspace2009.php ]
2009 IPv4 Address Use Report
As of January first, 2010, the number of unused IPv4
Christopher Morrow wrote:
it's not clear that 1.1.1.0/24 is actually assigned to anyone,
RIPE/APNIC were just using for some experiments. Did you actually mean
1.0.0.0/8?
Uhm, yes of course. Thanks :-)
Does anyone have any experiences good/bad/indifferent with this company and
their products? They claim 2x the performance at ½ the cost and am a bit leery
as you can imagine.
We are looking to replace our aging F5 BigIP LTM's and will be evaluating these
along with the Netscaler and new
On 24/03/2010, at 4:10 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
it seems to me that we'll have widespread ipv4 for +10 years at least,
How many 10 year old pieces of kit do you have on your network?
Ten years ago we were routing appletalk and IPX. Still doing that
now?
Ten years ago companies were
tell me Mark,
when will you turn off -all- IPv4 in your network?
no snmp/aaa, no syslog, no radius, no licensed s/w keyed to a v4
address,
no need to keep logs for leos' (whats the data retention law in your
jurisdiction?)
etc...
simple switching of
On 24/03/2010, at 1:46 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
tell me Mark,
when will you turn off -all- IPv4 in your network?
I don't imagine there'll be a date as such; We'll just enable
IPv6 versions of the services you've mentioned on equipment which
supports it, and note
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:24:45PM +1030, Mark Newton wrote:
On 24/03/2010, at 1:46 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
tell me Mark,
when will you turn off -all- IPv4 in your network?
I don't imagine there'll be a date as such; We'll just enable
IPv6 versions of the
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Mark Newton new...@internode.com.au wrote:
On 24/03/2010, at 4:10 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
it seems to me that we'll have widespread ipv4 for +10 years at least,
How many 10 year old pieces of kit do you have on your network?
it's not my network anymore
19 matches
Mail list logo
