Op 27-4-2011 0:38, Andrew Kirch schreef:
On 4/26/2011 12:11 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
I've run a volunteer/free hosting service since 1997 or so - it never
ceases to amaze me how people will complain about free things, but
when you ask them to pony up a little monthly support its like you
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:
I'm not complaining, but I would point out that if these free brokers
are the public face of IPv6 for many hobbyists (and much of the various
software run on/over the internet is written by volunteers, and/or given
away for free), we aren't going to
On 27 Apr 2011, at 00:21, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Kevin Day toa...@dragondata.com wrote:
...
To get ahead of the issue, we've put an IPv6 option into the World of
Warcraft interface with patch 4.1. So as IPv6 starts to become more
widely available the game will already be prepared to handle
On 27 Apr 2011, at 08:19, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:
I'm not complaining, but I would point out that if these free brokers are
the public face of IPv6 for many hobbyists (and much of the various software
run on/over the internet is written by
Hi There,
We just released a new version of the IPv6 CPE survey. After lots of feedback
on the previous editions, we are now doing a proper survey. Based on the
responses we receive in this survey we will be able to compile a new edition of
our matrix and provide some more statistical
On Apr 27, 2011, at 4:11 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
On 27 Apr 2011, at 00:21, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Kevin Day toa...@dragondata.com wrote:
...
To get ahead of the issue, we've put an IPv6 option into the World of
Warcraft interface with patch 4.1. So as IPv6 starts to become more
widely
- Original Message -
From: Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:
I'm not complaining, but I would point out that if these free brokers
are the public face of IPv6 for many hobbyists (and much of the various
software run on/over the internet
On Apr 27, 2011 5:49 AM, Marco Hogewoning mch-na...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi There,
We just released a new version of the IPv6 CPE survey. After lots of
feedback on the previous editions, we are now doing a proper survey. Based
on the responses we receive in this survey we will be able to compile a
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:56:55PM +0300, Rogelio wrote:
On Apr 26, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
Would it turn out to be less expensive to just start a new subscription as
if you never had one before?
Usually places like this do it by serial number, in which case they don't
Greetings,
Does anyone know who I could contact at Verizon Wireless
regarding mis-routing one of my NXX blocks?
Off list responses are fine.
Thanks,
--
Tom Pipes
Essex Telcom Inc
- Original Message -
From: Tom Pipes tom.pi...@t6mail.com
Does anyone know who I could contact at Verizon Wireless
regarding mis-routing one of my NXX blocks?
Amazingly, customer service might be useful. I once called Sprint/Nextel
to tell them that my Nextel phone couldn't call the
On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
Can we get mobile devices added to this? Mobile consumes a large amount of
address space and is especially well suited for ipv6-only operations.
Unfortunately, the results would be painfully narrow. Now that Nokia no
longer supports
Can we get mobile devices added to this? Mobile consumes a large amount of
address space and is especially well suited for ipv6-only operations.
I would rather make it a separate study. Integrating this with CPE might become
messy and it would make the survey really long and complicated. Of
Anyone out there have experience with Riverbed Steelhead products?
Do they improve TCP performance over WAN links? is it worth the price?
mike
---
James and Eric have done outstanding contributing here. I just wanted to add a
tad bit of information leaving out the name
Mobile v6 folks,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Kevin Day toa...@dragondata.com wrote:
T-Mobile: Nokia N900 works great thanks to you(admittedly a dead-end from
Nokia, but it works with the same level of shell script and kernel hacking
that all N900 users expect)
Add the Nokia N97 to
I ended up calling 611 on my Verizon phone and they were extremely nice and
tried to help, but were unable to take it any further due the the fact that
the call appears to route properly. The problem is that the call does
route, but to the wrong switch in the wrong LATA and then routes over
- Original Message -
From: Tom Pipes tom.pi...@t6mail.com
I ended up calling 611 on my Verizon phone and they were extremely nice and
tried to help, but were unable to take it any further due the the fact that
the call appears to route properly. The problem is that the call does
Have you tried looking for a Verizon routing or translations contact in the
LERG? This is the official way.
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: Tom Pipes [mailto:tom.pi...@t6mail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 4:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Carrier Contact
I ended
18 matches
Mail list logo
