--On 16 april 2012 17.38.07 -0400 Brandon Penglase
bpenglase-na...@spaceservices.net wrote:
direction of our security analyst) turn up a DA test server.
snip
Needless to say, everything was horribly slow, and some things even
flat out broke.
To be expected when DNS is given the rôle
IMO it's much easier to disable one rogue than to disable IPv6 on the
whole network. That is if you can find it, but with some proper
tcpdumping and/or CLI commands (depending on the switches that you have)
it should be relatively easy.
Not to mention that, as pointed by others, this provides a
I don't understand why a problem with a tunnel 'leaves a bad taste with
IPv6'. Since when a badly configured DNS zone left people with a 'bad
taste for DNS', or a badly configured switch left people with 'a bad
taste for spanning tree' or 'a bad taste for vlan trunking' ?
It seems to me that what
Op 17-4-2012 10:33, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo schreef:
IMO it's much easier to disable one rogue than to disable IPv6 on the
whole network. That is if you can find it, but with some proper
tcpdumping and/or CLI commands (depending on the switches that you have)
it should be relatively easy.
You have a rogue IPv6 router on your network. It's not a host problem.
It's along the lines of having a rogue DHCP server on your network but
faster propagation.
It needs to be tracked down and disabled.
You can use tcpdump (as root) to capture IPv6 RA and see who's doing it,
and what's being
tcpdump -e will show source and dest mac address.
On Apr 17, 2012, at 6:54 AM, Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu wrote:
tcpdump -ni eth0 'ip6 dst ff02::1'
06:48:48.044409 IP6 fe80::2d0:1ff:fedf:8400 ff02::1: ICMP6, router
advertisement, length 64
RA guard is useful if your tcam capacity and or switching platform allows -
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-01
An older yet still a good read from Cisco on some IPv6 first hop security:
Hello, all!
I have Paradyne Bitstorm 2600 DSLAM, but no password. Is it possible to
reset this device to factory configuration? Manuals don't say much, only
specified way to restore factory settings assume logged in
administrator.
Thanks!
Thanks. I have already tried interrupting boot process. Booting up with
parameter 0x00020 (disable login security) don't seem affect outcome,
both serial and management ethernet still asks login.
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 09:09 -0500, Chris Boyd wrote:
Try pressing enter several times after
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/04/going-with-the-flow-google/all/1
Going With The Flow: Google’s Secret Switch To The Next Wave Of Networking
By Steven Levy April 17, 2012 | 11:45 am |
Categories: Data Centers, Networking
In early 1999, an associate computer science professor
I wonder if this will be contributed to the DC (DataCenter) work
currently gearing up in the IETF.
Regards
Marshall
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/04/going-with-the-flow-google/all/1
Going With The Flow: Google’s
On 4/17/12 13:46 AM, Joseph Mays wrote:
The interface on the remote end (t1 WIC port in a 2600 shows a lot more
errors, including a lot of frame errors, for the same time period.
[snip]
Are these T1 frame errors, or a higher level? If you believe this to
be a T1 concern, you should be
You might want to put a t1 test set on the line and check and see if the
clock frequency is moving.
Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
101 Haskins Way, So. San Francisco, CA. 94080
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com
-Original Message-
Dear NANOGers,
EFF is looking for sign-ons to a letter expressing concern about some of the
proposed cybersecurity legislation currently being debated in the US
Congress. This legislation has a number of alarming provisions, including
incentives for recording massive amounts of network traffic
Jimmy Hess wrote:
Consider that the probability 16GB of SDRAM experiences at least one
single bit error at sea level,
in a given 6 hour period exceeds 66% = 1 - (1 - 1.3e-12 * 6)^(16 *
2^30 * 8).In any given 24 hour period, the probability of at least
one single bit error exceeds 98%.
Thanks for useful reply everyone!
As I mentioned - I applied quick temporary fix by stop broadcast from
router and clearing of routing table on servers. Will apply disabling of
autoconfig now.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Mick O'Rourke mkorourke+na...@gmail.comwrote:
RA guard is useful if
16 matches
Mail list logo
