On Sat, 8 Dec 2012, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
It's being implied everywhere that native IPv6 is somehow important to
seek, since we're running out of IPv4 addresses.
Ok, so I'll give you that tunneling a really short bit, tunneling isn't
too bad, but native is most of the time better.
reliable tunnel
bzzzt! oxymoron alert!!!
What is nifty.com? Is it legitimate? The web page is in Chinese.
I noticed they were trying to do a lot of connects to our mail servers
but were in the block list and seem to have been for years.
So I opened it up because fool that I am I like to believe people mend
their ways.
It instantly
Actually it's in Japanese. Nifty is one of the oldest (and at one time,
largest) access services in Japan. It's owned by owned by Fujitsu.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nifty_Corporation
http://www.nifty.co.jp/english/
From here it looks like it's originated by AS2510, which is also Fujistsu.
So
NANOG Community,
The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold their 57th
meeting in Orlando, FL on February 4th through the 6th. Of special note,
this is the first meeting that will have a fully Monday through Wednesday
agenda. Our host, CyrusOne is eagerly awaiting welcoming
That's a really good point, Patrick.
We've received an interesting analysis from our customers recently where they
reviewed the accounting on all the services they need in order to peer off
approximately 1/3rd of their total traffic.
They took their national wavelength cost, local access,
Actually it's in Japanese. Nifty is one of the oldest (and at one
From here it looks like it's originated by AS2510, which is also
Fujistsu.
So it is legitimate, even if the unwanted traffic your receiving is
not.
Owning and using a domain name with 1 character difference from Nifty,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
The vast majority of AS-AS boundaries on the Internet are settlement free
peering. I guess that makes the Internet a scam.
As for the costs involved, free is a relative term. Most people think of
peering as free
Hi,
Ok, so I'll give you that tunneling a really short bit, tunneling isn't too
bad, but native is most of the time better.
So sad that some companies mess up in such a way that their customers rather
tunnel than use their native infra... :-(
- Sander
On Dec 9, 2012, at 2:58 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
reliable tunnel
bzzzt! oxymoron alert!!!
Intellectually I want to agree with you, but after some reflection...
We use lots of tunnels at my org - the IPsec variety. A quick non-scientific
query of our monitoring logs reveals
reliable tunnel
bzzzt! oxymoron alert!!!
We use lots of tunnels at my org - the IPsec variety.
as does iij, very heavily. and it has some issues.
A quick non-scientific query of our monitoring logs reveals that our
tunnels are exactly as reliable as the circuits and routers which
On Sun, 9 Dec 2012, Ryan Malayter wrote:
But where are all these horrifically unreliable tunnels?
6to4 is one example.
I'd say since PMTUD is too often broken on IPv4 (if the tunneling routers
even react properly to PMTUD need-to-frag messages for their tunnel
packets) in combination with
Ok, so I'll give you that tunneling a really short bit, tunneling
isn't too bad, but native is most of the time better.
So sad that some companies mess up in such a way that their
customers rather tunnel than use their native infra... :-(
The ISPs are unfortunately behind what the tunnel
13 matches
Mail list logo
