On 19/Feb/15 19:03, Phil Bedard wrote:
ASR9K IOS-XR 5.3.0 Release Notes:
IPv6 Support in MPLS LDP: Starting from release 5.3.0, support for native
MPLS LDP over IPv6 is enabled to continue providing existing services
seamlessly while enabling new ones. The attributes and capabilities of
If your time is worth anything, you can't beat the Mac Mini, especially for a
branch office mission-critical application like DNS.
I just picked up a Mini from BestBuy for $480. I plugged it in, applied the
latest updates, purchased the MacOSX Server component from the Apples Store
($19), and
On 2015-02-19 18:26, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:52:42 +, David Reader said:
I'm using several to connect sensors, actuators, and such to a private
network, which it's great for - but I'd think at least twice before
deploying
one as a public-serving host in
older apple tv will work as well :)
Colin
On 19 Feb 2015, at 19:47, Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org wrote:
If your time is worth anything, you can't beat the Mac Mini, especially for a
branch office mission-critical application like DNS.
I just picked up a Mini from BestBuy for $480. I
If you have a lot of locations, as I believe Ray is looking for, all of
this is a manual process you need to do for each instance. That is slow
and inefficient. If you're doing more than a few, you probably want
something you can PXE boot for provisioning and manage with your
preferred DevOps
Keenan,
Red. Herrings.
You can provision macs over the network. That's one of the functions of Mac OSX
Server OS. It's trivial to then promote them to servers themselves. All
remotely.
Also, the Mac is running a full BIND9 implementation, not some cutdown version.
Yes the GUI is minimal, but
here here, apple kits rocks for low end server work, sun kit rocks for high end
server work.
Colin
On 19 Feb 2015, at 20:55, Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org wrote:
Keenan,
Red. Herrings.
You can provision macs over the network. That's one of the functions of Mac
OSX Server OS. It's
Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net writes:
odroid-c1 + eMMC module + RTC battery + case + power adapter.
Should run you about $75 *AND* wouldn't be bad for running NTP as
well.
I haven't looked into the details of the clock, so wouldn't be bad
is probably true, notably good, well, that would be
I now have a few moments to discuss Security Onion, and why it works well
for a many small and mid-sided organization.
Security Onion is a Linux distro for IDS, NSM, and log management. The
whole thing can be run on a single, or separated systems, based on the
needs, network and security
Denys Fedoryshchenko de...@visp.net.lb writes:
Beaglebone has gigabit mac, but due some errata it is not used in
gigabit mode, it is 100M (which is maybe enough for small office). But
it is hardware mac.
The Beaglebone Black rev C BOM calls out the ethernet phy chip as
LAN8710A-EZC-TR which
These are all excellent tools for a dedicated knowledgeable network security
person to use. The most important element being the dedicated knowledgeable
network security person.
--p
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jimmy Hess
Sent:
Beaglebone has gigabit mac, but due some errata it is not used in
gigabit mode, it is 100M (which is maybe enough for small office). But
it is hardware mac.
Another hardware MAC on inexpensive board it is Odroid-C1.
But stability of all this boards in heavy networking use is under
question, i
I believe the ASA was first developed as the PIX on Plan 9. The OS that came
out of that was originally called Finesse OS, but was later renamed as PIX OS.
After Cisco purchased the PIX and renamed it to the ASA, they began using a
Linux kernel around PIX OS V8.
--p
-Original
On 2015-02-19 15:13, Rob Seastrom wrote:
Denys Fedoryshchenko de...@visp.net.lb writes:
Beaglebone has gigabit mac, but due some errata it is not used in
gigabit mode, it is 100M (which is maybe enough for small office). But
it is hardware mac.
The Beaglebone Black rev C BOM calls out the
+10
The original SANS DDOS task force, and many others since, have emphasized this.
Filter your Outbound! Bogons for obvious reasons, BGP3 to keep routing
multipliers, non-internals to keep from being used as an amplifier network, the
list goes on. Be a good network neighbor.
--p
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 06:18:43AM -0500, Rob Seastrom wrote:
Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net writes:
odroid-c1 + eMMC module + RTC battery + case + power adapter.
Should run you about $75 *AND* wouldn't be bad for running NTP as
well.
I haven't looked into the details of the clock,
The PIX was originally developed as a “Network Translation, Inc.” box
(translation.com http://translation.com/). (John Mayes, Brantley Coile,
Johnson Wu)
Cisco continued the PIX name for many years and through some major changes to
the operating system. A later round of major changes had it
I never heard back from anyone, but the two sites came back up 1:59 pm
Central time, so it was down just over a week.
Now it
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 9:39 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Domenick Petrella
domenick.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
The BeagleBone's ethernet is directly connected to the SoC, so you would
get a higher throughput ceiling than the rpi.
sounds super important...
question though, what's the expected average/normal/budgeted
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:16 PM, manning bill bmann...@isi.edu wrote:
and then there are the loons who will locally push /64 or longer, some of
which may leak.
2001:2b8:46:::/64
... a fairly extensive list actually
show route table inet6.0 | grep ^2 | except /4[876543210] | except
Instead, we may find network equipment vendors might ship with
larger/faster TCAM, and faster processing to handle increasing routing
table demands.
We've been hearing the end is nigh! for a decade, and as far as I can
tell, we are no closer to the end than when we started.
Maybe some equipment
If you're already installing a Cisco router, maybe look at an SRE-V module? You
could install a VM/OS on the router.
Cheers,Josh
I notice draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 was posted February 11, 2015.
What is the chance of getting working code this decade? I would quite like
to play with this new fangled IPv6 widget...
(Okay, I'd like to stop using IPv4 for infrastructure. LDP is the last
piece for me.)
--
Tim:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:52:42 +, David Reader said:
I'm using several to connect sensors, actuators, and such to a private
network, which it's great for - but I'd think at least twice before deploying
one as a public-serving host in user-experience-critical role in a remote
location.
I
Subject: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Date: Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:06:40AM
-0500 Quoting Tim Durack (tdur...@gmail.com):
I notice draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 was posted February 11, 2015.
What is the chance of getting working code this decade? I would quite like
to play with this new fangled
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:26:36 +0200
Denys Fedoryshchenko de...@visp.net.lb wrote:
As far as i know, Raspberry PI ethernet over USB might be fine for DNS
too, but before it had issues with
large data transfers (ethernet driver hangs). No idea about now.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:26:36 +0200
Denys
People, processor of this hardware will be killed before the 100M ethernet
be the problem.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
2015-02-19 12:52 GMT-02:00 David Reader david.rea...@zeninternet.co.uk:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:26:36 +0200
Denys Fedoryshchenko de...@visp.net.lb wrote:
As far as i know,
ASR9K IOS-XR 5.3.0 Release Notes:
IPv6 Support in MPLS LDP: Starting from release 5.3.0, support for native
MPLS LDP over IPv6 is enabled to continue providing existing services
seamlessly while enabling new ones. The attributes and capabilities of the
existing MPLS LDP have been extended to
and then there are the loons who will locally push /64 or longer, some of which
may leak.
even if things were sane nothing longer than a /32 were to be in the table,
are we not looking at the functional
equivalent of v4 host routes?
/bill
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102
On 2/19/15, 2:27 PM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
Getting IPv6 support in LDP is one thing.
This is one document that we need to keep track to know what MPLS
applications currently running off of LDPv4 still need to be ported to
run over LDPv6:
That might be a little more valid once we move past 2000::/3 -- at the
moment, more like IPv4 /29s.
Alas, /48 seems to be the generally accepted maximum prefix length, so,
yeah, this could be unfortunate.
Jima
On 2015-02-19 20:16, manning bill wrote:
and then there are the loons who
The BeagleBone's ethernet is directly connected to the SoC, so you would
get a higher throughput ceiling than the rpi.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015, 19:03 Geoff Mulligan nano...@mulligan.org wrote:
I have used the BeagleBone to run a few simple servers. I don't know if
the ethernet port on the Bone
Just a reminder that this deadline is coming up! We can't wait to see
your submissions :)
Leslie
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Benno Overeinder be...@nlnetlabs.nl wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Please find the CFP for RIPE 70 below.
The deadline for submissions is 1 March 2015.
Please also
in a discussion with some fellow researchers, the subject of ipv6
deaggregation arose; will it be less or more than we see in ipv4?
in http://archive.psg.com/jsac-deagg.pdf it was thought that
multi-homing, traffic engineering, and the /24 pollution disease were
the drivers. multi-homing seems
34 matches
Mail list logo
