Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

In related news, Verizon and ATT WILL be charging their data partners: http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/12/verizon-to-test-sponsored-data-let-companies-pay-to-bypass-data-caps/ "Verizon is reportedly set to begin testing a sponsored data program that would let companies pay Verizon to deliver

Re: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!

FWIW the exact same thing (identical initial ransom email) happened to us two weeks ago. The "2 day" message was received on December 3rd. The group claiming responsibility has yet to follow through. The messages came from a various bitmessage.ch addresses. On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Joe

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny wrote: > In related news, Verizon and ATT WILL be charging their data partners: > http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/12/verizon-to-test-sponsored-data-let-companies-pay-to-bypass-data-caps/ > > "Verizon is reportedly set

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny > wrote: > > is that still net neutrality? > > who cares? mobile was excepted from the NN rulings. Any why the desire for extra regulation for

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

You already have the ability to pay for faster service. NN prevents the carrier from then going to the shipper and extorting further money to deliver the same package. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

On Thu 2015-Dec-10 13:32:25 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said: On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny wrote: > is that still net neutrality? who cares? mobile was excepted from

Re: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!

On December 10, 2015 at 08:20 col...@gt86car.org.uk (Colin Johnston) wrote: > fingerprint shows China and Russia related as expected > Why do the abuse teams in China and Russia ignore basic abuse reports, why > peer/setup connections to companies where abuse is ignored. I wonder how much of

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

> On Dec 10, 2015, at 2:32 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > > I could have paid more to get it faster, and some large-scale shippers > have special arrangements that seem to get their packages priority. How > is this different from Internet traffic? For me the better comparison is

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said: >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny >> wrote: >> > is that still net neutrality? >> >> who cares? mobile was

Re: IEEE OUI regauth (search ?) site

On 9 Dec 2015, at 16:32, Brandon Applegate wrote: Anyone have any insight on how one can look up an OUI (yes I know about oui.txt, but I’m asking about a live query site). Just hacked my own site for a lot of reasons: https://icmp.info/tools/oui

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

> > "Verizon is reportedly set to begin testing a sponsored data program that > > would let companies pay Verizon to deliver online services without using up > > customers' data plans. The news comes from aRe/code interview This is usually referred to as "zero-rating" and is related to,

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

For starters much of the internet infrastructure is built on govt mandated/protected monopolies or very small N oligopolies so is already subject to significant regulation. You can start up a business carrying packages for people for a fee, no harder than any other business. Try spinning up a

Re: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!

These are the three e-mail addresses they have contacted me on so far. armada.collect...@bk.ru melvin.webst...@gmail.com luciennemcglyn...@gmail.com -- Thank You, Joe Morgan - Owner Joe's Datacenter, LLC http://joesdatacenter.com 816-726-7615

Re: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!

fingerprint shows China and Russia related as expected Why do the abuse teams in China and Russia ignore basic abuse reports, why peer/setup connections to companies where abuse is ignored. Colin > On 8 Dec 2015, at 07:24, Joe Morgan wrote: > > We received a similar

Re: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!

hi On 12/10/15 at 11:07am, Joe Morgan wrote: > These are the three e-mail addresses they have contacted me on so far. > armada.collect...@bk.ru > melvin.webst...@gmail.com > luciennemcglyn...@gmail.com Ian> messages came from a various bitmessage.ch addresses # i wonder if they all have the

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:26 PM Owen DeLong wrote: > > > On Nov 23, 2015, at 14:58 , Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > > In message >, Owen DeLong write > > s: > >> >

KP, North Korea disappears

https://stat.ripe.net/KP#tabId=routing KP's one asn and four prefixes go off net about 10:35

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

On 2015-12-10 20:58, Owen DeLong wrote: > What if the rate charged is the same? > > Wouldn’t it still be problematic if: > > I pay VZ $15/Gigabyte for all data I use except Netflix which gets billed > automatically to Netflix instead of me? If Netflix gets charged the same retail rate, then I

Traffic Eng - VM's routing

All, I'm working on trying to move VM's from site A to site B, simple enough motion to complete. The issue is the VM's on site A have to stay the same so once the VM's are moved across they still have site A address but are location now on site B, so what happens is return path for the VM

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

On 2015-12-10 13:07, William Kenny wrote: > "Verizon is reportedly set to begin testing a sponsored data program that > would let companies pay Verizon to deliver online services without using up > customers' data plans. In Canada, the Telecom Act 27(2) states: Unjust discrimination (2) No

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

> On Dec 10, 2015, at 17:49 , Jean-Francois Mezei > wrote: > > On 2015-12-10 13:07, William Kenny wrote: > >> "Verizon is reportedly set to begin testing a sponsored data program that >> would let companies pay Verizon to deliver online services without using up

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

On 2015-12-10 21:39, William Herrin wrote: > Personally, I'm not opposed to this. When each packet has one payer, > it doesn't much matter whether the payer is sender or recipient. If the retail customer pays for $70 for 100 gigs of UBB, and uses 50 gigs of Netflix, then the result is that the

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny wrote: > In related news, Verizon and ATT WILL be charging their data partners: > http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/12/verizon-to-test-sponsored-data-let-companies-pay-to-bypass-data-caps/ Howdy, Personally, I'm not

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

> On Dec 10, 2015, at 18:51 , Jean-Francois Mezei > wrote: > > On 2015-12-10 21:39, William Herrin wrote: > >> Personally, I'm not opposed to this. When each packet has one payer, >> it doesn't much matter whether the payer is sender or recipient. > > > If the

Re: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!

Last year when this happened to several large providers, it was a cluster all around the same time, and it turned out that it was the same org hitting all of them. This quickly came to light as we (ISIPP) started coordinating with the targets, because the attacker was using the same gmail

Re: IEEE OUI regauth (search ?) site

What's even better is that if you can get the feedback button on the lower right to do anything, this is the response: HTTP ERROR 404 Problem accessing /standards-ra-web/pub/%5Bappln.feedback.link%5D. Reason: Not Found On 12/9/2015 10:32 AM, Brandon Applegate wrote: They’ve made