Re: Implementing 464XLAT at a small WISP

2017-12-27 Thread Mark Andrews
> On 28 Dec 2017, at 11:45 am, Brock Tice wrote: > > We recently deployed our first half-dozen IPv6-only customers after 6+ months > of testing, using 464XLAT. > > It took me ages to sort all this out, so I hope someone finds this helpful. > Feedback very much welcome. > >

Implementing 464XLAT at a small WISP

2017-12-27 Thread Brock Tice
We recently deployed our first half-dozen IPv6-only customers after 6+ months of testing, using 464XLAT. It took me ages to sort all this out, so I hope someone finds this helpful. Feedback very much welcome.

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread Brock Tice
On 12/27/2017 04:11 PM, Jima wrote: > On 2017-12-27 15:50, William Herrin wrote: >> Net 196/8 is part of the swamp. Just speculating, but perhaps the >> original registration of 196.53.96.0/22 >> pre-dated the reassignment of 196/8 to AfriNIC? > > Maybe? This snippet from

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread Brett A Mansfield
I had some of that subnet from logicweb. Once I realized it was Afrinic I switched. Now I have the same issue with another subnet from ARIN. 104.153.151.0/24 is all blocked still and I cannot get anyone from any of the companies to respond or unblock them. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield > On

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread Jima
On 2017-12-27 15:50, William Herrin wrote: Net 196/8 is part of the swamp. Just speculating, but perhaps the original registration of 196.53.96.0/22 pre-dated the reassignment of 196/8 to AfriNIC? Maybe? This snippet from WHOIS kind of nags at me, though: inetnum:

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread Mark Andrews
> On 28 Dec 2017, at 9:38 am, Jima wrote: > > On 2017-12-27 14:10, Jared Mauch wrote: >> On Dec 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: >>> Doesn't Hulu (et al) have an obligation to provide service to their paying >>> customers? >>> >>> Does this

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread Laszlo Hanyecz
On 2017-12-27 22:38, Jima wrote: On 2017-12-27 14:10, Jared Mauch wrote: On Dec 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: Doesn't Hulu (et al) have an obligation to provide service to their paying customers? Does this obligation extend to providing service

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread William Herrin
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Jima wrote: > On 2017-12-27 14:10, Jared Mauch wrote: > >> On Dec 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG >> wrote: >> >>> Doesn't Hulu (et al) have an obligation to provide service to their >>> paying customers? >>> >>> Does

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread Jima
On 2017-12-27 14:10, Jared Mauch wrote: On Dec 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: Doesn't Hulu (et al) have an obligation to provide service to their paying customers? Does this obligation extend to providing service independent of the carrier that paying

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread William Herrin
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Michael Crapse wrote: > I would like to know, Is there any legal recourse we can take against such > a company consistently ignoring whitelist requests? > Hi Michael, There is not, however that does not mean a letter from your lawyer to

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread Jared Mauch
> On Dec 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: > > set Devil's advocate mode = on Polluted IP space concern = ON > On 12/26/2017 04:24 PM, John Levine wrote: >> Is there some reason you believe that Hulu has a legal duty to provide old >> TV shows to your

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread Grant Taylor via NANOG
set Devil's advocate mode = on On 12/26/2017 04:24 PM, John Levine wrote: Is there some reason you believe that Hulu has a legal duty to provide old TV shows to your users? Doesn't Hulu (et al) have an obligation to provide service to their paying customers? Does this obligation extend to

RE: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread Keith Medcalf
Title II is not particularly relevant. It merely permits a claim of the form "Carriage must be provided without discrimination to everyone who pays the fee for carriage. I have paid the fee for carriage, but I am suffering discrimination in the provision of carriage as prohibited by Title II

Re: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and others

2017-12-27 Thread Mike Hammett
"Net Neutrality" - where only one party in the flow of bits could *possibly* be negligent, malicious, etc. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Michael Crapse"