Re: Merit radb https interface, TLS1.0 only?

2018-02-02 Thread Andy Brezinsky
It's not just you: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=radb.net&s=207.75.117.71 On 02/02/2018 08:15 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: Is the radb login page supposed to be TLS1.0 only? This is with the latest version of Firefox. Screenshot: https://imgur.com/nnlFmLZ I also noticed that the

RE: Merit radb https interface, TLS1.0 only?

2018-02-02 Thread Edwin Pers
I'd hope that it's not supposed to be that way, but I'm seeing the same thing with chrome on win10 and firefox on debian 9, so it's not just you. -Ed -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 9:16 PM To: nanog@

Merit radb https interface, TLS1.0 only?

2018-02-02 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Is the radb login page supposed to be TLS1.0 only? This is with the latest version of Firefox. Screenshot: https://imgur.com/nnlFmLZ I also noticed that the registration page is plain http/non TLS. for reference: https://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=tls+1.0+deprecated&ie=utf

Re: listserv hosed? [Was: Fwd: nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder]

2018-02-02 Thread Måns Nilsson
Subject: Re: listserv hosed? [Was: Fwd: nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder] Date: Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 04:04:54PM -0500 Quoting valdis.kletni...@vt.edu (valdis.kletni...@vt.edu): > And you have reason to think that it *still* does things that way, 17 years > later? I honestly do not k

Re: listserv hosed? [Was: Fwd: nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder]

2018-02-02 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 19:13:04 +0100, Måns Nilsson said: > A VM/370 app that still does all internal processing in EBCDIC, even on > POSIX OSes[0], with almost-ascii config files, and that ran very well > on VMS? What is there not to love? > [0] Eric Thomas, mr LISTSERV himself, told me this when w

Re: listserv hosed? [Was: Fwd: nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder]

2018-02-02 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 06:30:20 -0500, Rich Kulawiec said: > > 1. It's not a listserv. It's a mailing list. ListServ is obsolete, > expensive, closed-source garbage software used exclusively by people > who don't know any better and like to waste their money. Well Rich, your bias is obvious. Have

Re: listserv hosed? [Was: Fwd: nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder]

2018-02-02 Thread Måns Nilsson
Subject: Re: listserv hosed? [Was: Fwd: nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder] Date: Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 06:30:20AM -0500 Quoting Rich Kulawiec (r...@gsp.org): > > 1. It's not a listserv. It's a mailing list. ListServ is obsolete, > expensive, closed-source garbage software used exclusi

Weekly Routing Table Report

2018-02-02 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, CaribNOG TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG, IRNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sen

Re: listserv hosed? [Was: Fwd: nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder]

2018-02-02 Thread Valerie Wittkop
Last night there was an update to the OS of our production environment, and a restart of the system. We are currently working to confirm all is functioning properly. Apologies for the extra noise in the mail list. Cheers, Valerie Valerie Wittkop NANOG Program Director Tel: +1 866 902 133

Re: listserv hosed? [Was: Fwd: nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder]

2018-02-02 Thread Lyle Giese
Groundhog day AGAIN! Lyle On 2/1/2018 10:07 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote: On 2018-02-01 22:59, Paul Ferguson wrote: Started getting a series of these just now from the past. :-) Same here. The 821 headers show Received: to be "now", while the RFC 822 headers have a Date of first of where

Re: listserv hosed? [Was: Fwd: nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder]

2018-02-02 Thread Rich Kulawiec
1. It's not a listserv. It's a mailing list. ListServ is obsolete, expensive, closed-source garbage software used exclusively by people who don't know any better and like to waste their money. 2. This problem was possibly, but not certainly, caused by a misfiring cron job. (I've seen it before