Found yet another big hijacking operation. Coming out of RIPEland, again.
See below for full details.
I didn't really want to post again to NANOG on this topic (hijacks) quite
this soon, but the bloody European crooks, spammers, and hijackers aren't
really giving me a break, and I can't abide j
I second what's been said about ACME Packet; loved them when we first got
them, phasing them out now in favor of Ribbon due to what a pain Oracle has
been to deal with.
We're all hardware on the Ribbon side, using both the 5k line and some
premise 1k SBC's. They've been fine so far.
On Thu, Aug 9
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Curtis, Bruce
wrote:
>
> Multicast was also required for earlier versions of VXLAN. But later
> versions or VXLAN only require unicast.
>
> For the far future it seems like Named Data Neworking, Content Centric
> Networking, Information Centric Networking, Data C
Any chance someone here has admin/troubleshooting involvement with Yahoo
Groups, or knows someone who does?
Much appreciated.
Andy Ringsmuth
a...@newslink.com
5609 Harding Dr.
Lincoln, NE 68521
(402) 304-0083 cellular
Multicast was also required for earlier versions of VXLAN. But later versions
or VXLAN only require unicast.
For the far future it seems like Named Data Neworking, Content Centric
Networking, Information Centric Networking, Data Centric Networking etc all
list multicast as a requirement or f
In fact, today I also received comments about the preferences with
Juniper, even with its BNG software mounted on a server.
Thank you all for the responses.
El 08/08/18 a las 18:11, Tony Wicks escribió:
Cisco ASR1k can support up to 64K PPPoE depending on the model/cards. Juniper
MX and Noki
For 20,000 sessions two or more Juniper VMX routers can share the BNG / BRAS
licensing and provide high availability.
The BNG licenses for hardware based MX routers are tied to the chassis and
cannot be shared between multiple routers.
Sent from my mobile device
> On Aug 8, 2018, at 4:13 PM, T
On 9 August 2018 at 13:57, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 at 15:27, James Bensley wrote:
>
>> A recent customer uses multicast to have the same packet arrive at
>> multiple destinations at the same time for resilience (their own
>> internal systems, not IPTV or media etc). Having just refr
Thanks I will post there as well
From: Hiers, David
Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 10:11:33 AM
To: James Milko; Ryan Finnesey
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Feedback - SBC Vendors.
You might want to drop this question on the VoiceOps list:
voice...@voice
You might want to drop this question on the VoiceOps list:
voice...@voiceops.org
It runs at a good signal-to-noise ratio, so you'll get some useful responses.
David
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+david.hiers=cdk@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
James Milko
Sent: Thur
I was looking at SBC SWe (Software Edition) I think the same code base as the
- SBC 5400 – appliance.
From: James Milko
Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 10:06 AM
To: Ryan Finnesey
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Feedback - SBC Vendors.
Which Ribbon product are you looking at? There are quit
Which Ribbon product are you looking at? There are quite a few now and
they have different code bases/features.
JM
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> I am going to have to install a series of SBCs for a voice offering
> connected to Microsoft Teams. We are going to pass
Replied offlist
Jared Mauch
> On Aug 8, 2018, at 3:33 PM, Jawaid Bazyar
> wrote:
>
> Hi, having trouble engaging with an Akamai contact in relation to the server
> stack we have here. Feel free to contact me.
>
> --
>
> Jawaid Bazyar
>
> President
>
> ph 303.815.1814
>
> fax 303.815.100
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 at 15:27, James Bensley wrote:
> A recent customer uses multicast to have the same packet arrive at
> multiple destinations at the same time for resilience (their own
> internal systems, not IPTV or media etc). Having just refreshed their
> network for the next 5-10 years it's
On 8 August 2018 at 19:49, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) via NANOG
wrote:
> Hi Every one,
> Recently we had good discussion over multicast uses in public internet. From
> discussion, it was pointed out uses of multicast is more with in enterprise.
> Wanted to understand how much % multicast traff
On 2018-08-08 23:36, na...@jack.fr.eu.org wrote:
> Let me fix that for you.
> Using multicast on IPv6 grant us the ability to do more.
> Today, this is worthless.
> Will it be the same tomorrow ?
Problem is, to handle the Neigbour Discovery design (16M multicast
groups), we need hardware that doe
16 matches
Mail list logo
