Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

I've, generally, always been wary about these "satellite" systems since Cisco introduced them with the ASR9000v back in 2012. My whole thing is it being a closed system that requires the same vendor hardware from start to finish. Back then, wiring things up redundantly where all ports are in

Re: Stupid Question maybe?

Class A,B,C represent the position of the first 0 bit in the address and a corresponding natural netmask. A=1st bit (/8), B=2nd bit (10xx, /16), and C=3rd bit (110x, /24). The confusion you seem to be experiencing related to the number of A,B, and C networks defined in RFC-1918

Re: Stupid Question maybe?

You may find this helpful in your search for knowledge: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing "Classful" networking is rarely useful other than for understanding How We Got Here. There's a handy table in the linked article which expresses each IPv4 mask length in relation

Stupid Question maybe?

Apologizes in advance for a simple question. I am finding conflicting definitions of Class networks. I was always under the impression that a class "A" network was a /8 a class "B" network was a /16 and a class "C" network was a /24. Recently, I was made aware that a class "A" was indeed a /8 and

Re: How to choose a transport(terrestrial/subsea)

On 12/17/18 3:51 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote: One question, how much people care about vendor diversity? I do and did care. I don’t want to put all my eggs in one basket. Do you care? Thank you There are advantages and disadvantages to vendor diversity. As advantages, you won't be subject to

Re: How to choose a transport(terrestrial/subsea)

As long as you understand that vendor diversity doesn't imply route diversity. Diversity within a given vendor is still subject to the same chassis, the same automation platform, the same billing department, etc. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet

Re: How to choose a transport(terrestrial/subsea)

Back to main discussion How do we choose the best transport? One question, how much people care about vendor diversity? I do and did care. I don’t want to put all my eggs in one basket. Do you care? Thank you Mehmet On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:30 Mike Hammett wrote: > I haven't. > > Sure,

Re: historical Bogon lists

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear team, > Have you tried reaching out to Team Cymru? They provide bogon > feeds in a number of different formats. I would be surprised if > they don't have the ability to provide historical versions of the > bogon list. - It's probably worth

Re: Twitter (AS13414) Peering Contact

i will make an intro offlist On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:09 AM Ryan Gard wrote: > Afternoon, > > If there's anybody on the list from Twitter AS13414, if they could contact > me off list? Further, if you have contact info outside of the standard > peering email, that would be fantastic. > > We've

Twitter (AS13414) Peering Contact

Afternoon, If there's anybody on the list from Twitter AS13414, if they could contact me off list? Further, if you have contact info outside of the standard peering email, that would be fantastic. We've made a few attempts over the last year give or take to reach out, and unfortunately we've

Re: Auto-reply from Yahoo...

On 12/17/2018 10:21 AM, Tom Beecher wrote: We got something in to fix the behavior of the auto-responder to not reply to things with a Precedence header present. I'm told something was already in the pipe on the auto-submitted header as well. Cool. Thank you for the update. -- Grant. .

Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

Fusion has made a lot more sense since Juniper changed the licensing model from every switch AND the MX to just the MX. We've deployed it in some of our sites. It is very cool from a forwarding plane perspective, but from a control plane standpoint it's very...meh. For example, you can't get SNMP

JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

Hey there Any ISP using Juniper Fusion Provider Edge? https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/information-products/pathway-pages/junos-fusion/junos-fusion.html I am trying to chat with an engineer besides Juniper engineers to understand how buggy (or not) this is to go on production

Re: Auto-reply from Yahoo...

We got something in to fix the behavior of the auto-responder to not reply to things with a Precedence header present. I'm told something was already in the pipe on the auto-submitted header as well. On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:50 AM Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: > On 12/17/2018 09:17 AM, Tom

Re: Auto-reply from Yahoo...

On 12/17/2018 09:17 AM, Tom Beecher wrote: I can try and chase someone internally to see if I can get the auto-responder replied stopped to the list. Can I request that the (any) auto-responder be enhanced to: 1) Not respond to emails with Precedence: List 2) Retain a list of source

Hostwinds LLC. (AS54290) Contact

Good Morning, If anyone from Hostwinds LLC, AS54290 is on the list, can you please contact me at ccummi...@coeur.com? Also, if anyone would like to send me contact info if you have it, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Chris Cummings

Re: Auto-reply from Yahoo...

That email addy is from an employee that just left the company. For any of the administrators it should be safe to remove the subscription for that address. ( I can confirm directly from my company email account if that's required for confirmation. ) I can try and chase someone internally to see