Re: Spectrum technical contact

well, my comment about ddos rtbh using /32 BGP community is with regard to my provider spectrum which was previously time warner cable/charter AS 11427 is who I peer with Aaron > On Dec 21, 2018, at 5:40 PM, n...@imap.cc wrote: > > Is this the right Spectrum? There's one that's aka Wave and ar

Re: Spectrum technical contact

Is this the right Spectrum? There's one that's aka Wave and are pretty good and incredibly responsive to abuse reports, and then there's Spectrum Cable/Charter, which is on par with residential Comcast service. On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, at 2:01 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote: > http://as11404.net/communi

Re: Spectrum technical contact

http://as11404.net/communities.html 11404:666 is probably what you want. On 12/21/18 3:55 PM, Aaron1 wrote: If you BGP neighbor with them you can send-community /32 advertisement to them, and the will remotely black hole it Aaron On Dec 21, 2018, at 3:51 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: We have h

Re: Spectrum technical contact

If you BGP neighbor with them you can send-community /32 advertisement to them, and the will remotely black hole it Aaron > On Dec 21, 2018, at 3:51 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > We have had a DOS attack for over 12 hours. I simply want them to null route > or black hole an address. The traf

Spectrum technical contact

We have had a DOS attack for over 12 hours. I simply want them to null route or black hole an address. The traffic is filling one of our circus with them. The farthest I got was them telling me they can't do route changes because we're not public safety. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct

Re: Stupid Question maybe?

* Baldur Norddahl: > Why do we still have network equipment, where half the configuration > requires netmask notation, the other half requires CIDR and to throw you > off, they also included inverse netmasks. Some also drop the prefix length in diagnostic output if it matches that of the address

Re: Network instability 12956 <=> 18881

> On Dec 21, 2018, at 3:34 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > > > They are both Telefónica operations; 12956 is TIWS/Telxius, 18881 is a CLEC > they bought a few years ago, previously known as GVT. > Could be a cable cut in SAM-1, the submarine fiber system operated by Telxius > (the cable is also k

Re: Network instability 12956 <=> 18881

They are both Telefónica operations; 12956 is TIWS/Telxius, 18881 is a CLEC they bought a few years ago, previously known as GVT. Could be a cable cut in SAM-1, the submarine fiber system operated by Telxius (the cable is also known as Emergia). Rubens On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 6:24 PM Jared Mau

Network instability 12956 <=> 18881

Does anyone know what’s going on here? There’s a lot of BGP churn coming from this network edge. - Jared

contact from 7029

Any contact from asn 7029 in the list? It seems there is incorrect announcement being originated in that ASN. If anyone from that ASN in the list, fell free to contact me privately. thanks

RE: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

The biggest difference we see is that the “non commercial” IX’s are now building metro fabrics across multiple different datacenter providers. When you look at the costs, you need to look at the colo as part of that cost also. Allowing datacenters to compete for space and power drives down the c

Re: Real-time BGP hijacking detection: ARTEMIS-1.0.0 just released

Exactly for this case, besides what Jared mentioned, there is the possibility of using a third party mitigation service. This service can be provided by e.g., a DDoS protection provider since it requires announcing the exact /24 (or other prefix) from another AS which can attract and tunnel the tra

Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers

Hi Dominic, On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 19:15 +0100, Dominic Schallert wrote: > Dear Job, Michael, Ross, > thank you very much for sharing your opinion, the detailed info and > references. That’s pretty much what I excpected. > Just wondered because I couldn’t find any IXP Conection Agreement > stating

Re: Real-time BGP hijacking detection: ARTEMIS-1.0.0 just released

Hello, it is quite easy to install on a VM, you will not need special infrastructure, but only two pieces of software to be able to run lightweight containers (docker-ce and docker-compose). In fact, this is how we test it ourselves :). We will consider publishing a standalone VM is this he

RE: routeviews.org pending delete

Hey folks, Thanks for the heads-up, we've already been working through this with Network Solutions. The project has switched stewards recently and the renewal notification got lost in the transition. The NS records should point back to the correct routeviews.org address now. We're also worki

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

There is a fundamental product limitation. CoS on Cascade port for MX is not officially supported as well QFX acting as AD. I agree with those who perceive all these approaches as proprietary lock-in (disguised as cheap). From: NANOG On Behalf Of Vincentz Petzholtz Sent: Wednesday, December

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@li

Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

MICE is technically a cooperative not a non-profit. The fees cover the costs and just the costs and the members are owners. Also MICE does not provide any transport. All transport to remote locations is provided by the network hosting the remote switch. Jay On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, 9:16 AM Mike Ham

Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

I think anyone not Equinix, DRT, CoreSite, etc. is building into multiple datacenter providers in their markets, some just more aggressively than others. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From:

Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

Someone's typically paying the difference in a non-profit IX. Someone's donating piles of cash, free dark fiber, free colo, etc. You're either paying your own way, or you have a port subsidized by someone else. There's not necessarily anything wrong with that, but you have to make sure you count

Re: Real-time BGP hijacking detection: ARTEMIS-1.0.0 just released

Folks have studied announcing a /25 etc.. and it can help because many providers will accept them.. it won’t get everyone, but longer than /24 prefixes do help. - Jared > On Dec 21, 2018, at 10:07 AM, Kody Vicknair wrote: > > I'm curious, If the highjacked prefix is a /24 (subset of your much

RE: Real-time BGP hijacking detection: ARTEMIS-1.0.0 just released

I'm curious, If the highjacked prefix is a /24 (subset of your much larger /22) and you can only tie the highjacked prefix, at that point how effective is the mitigation outside of a default bgp route selection process? -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org]

Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

http://micemn.net/services.html MICE in Minneapolis is a great IX that we are on and their port fees are very reasonable. They used to be completely free up until this year. Even so, their fees are virtually nothing which encourages more operators to connect to it versus For-Profit IX's where some

Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

Not all transit is cheap and not all transit is good quality, regardless of what it costs. ;-) At our IX, we regularly see clients whose total network usage goes up once they're on the IX. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP

Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

New rates for 2019 just posted yesterday! Get yer ports while they’re hot! > On Dec 21, 2018, at 9:14 AM, Clayton Zekelman wrote: > > > TorIX is a great example of a not for profit IX that is very successful. > > https://www.torix.ca/ > > A very dedicated team of peo

Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

Torix and Six are great examples. If you want to be for profit, make sure to publish port pricing and keep it fair. Transit is cheap and good quality On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 08:14 Clayton Zekelman wrote: > > TorIX is a great example of a not for profit IX that is very successful. > > https://ww

Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

TorIX is a great example of a not for profit IX that is very successful. https://www.torix.ca/ A very dedicated team of people provide an incredible level of service. Thave a very transparent process. Their pricing is listed up front on their website: https://www.torix.ca/peering/#pricing

Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

As far as neutral, I meant separate from the datacenters in which they're housed. People in NA seem to think there are only two kinds of IXes, Equinix, DRT, Coresite types and NWAX, SIX, MICE types. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothe

Re: Pinging a Device Every Second

Depending on your requirements and scale - but I read you want history - it's probably less a demand on CPU or network resources, but more on IOPS. If you cache all results before writing to disk, then it's not much of a problem, but by just going "let's use RRD/MRTG for this" your IOPS could beco